Stakeholder Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

Name at least three reasons for involving stakeholders in environmental management.

A

Engaging stakeholders can help to get more/ unique insight into the environmental problem at hand. It can also help to get stakeholders more involved in the project during the implementation step. Additionally, it can help to review the project from a different perspective and, thus, ensure the quality of the project.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Involving stakeholders may be more important in some projects than in others. Give an example of a project where you would advise to consult stakeholders (and why), and an example of a project where you think stakeholder involvement is not necessary.

A

I would advise consulting a stakeholder in a project where the problem is completely unstructured. And consulting a stakeholder is maybe not needed that much if the problem is fully structured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between stakeholder analysis and stakeholder engagement?

A

Analysis is identifying and prioritising stakeholders; investigating their interests, relationships and power. Stakeholder engagement is talking and involving stakeholders in the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which role can stakeholders play in the different steps of the Flex step approach? How are stakeholder analysis and stakeholder engagement related to the flex step approach?

A

All 3 steps of the Flex step method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

During the lecture two videos with examples of stakeholder engagement are shown, (i) Mapping air pollution in Mukuru, Nairobi; and (ii) Stakeholder engagement in IPBES. What are the differences and what are the similarities between the involvement of stakeholders in these two projects?

A

Differences:
In Kenia they involved a lot of non-experts, whereas in IPBES there were mostly experts.
In Kenia the idea was to empower lay people
Similarities:
In both cases it was co-creation of the knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are stakeholders?

A
  • Persons or groups that have, or claim, ownership, rights, or interests in a ( decision making process) and its activities, past, present, or future.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a stakeholder analysis?

A
  • A process that:
    • defines aspects of a social and natural phenomenon affected by a decision or action
    • identifies individuals, groups, and organisations who are affected by or can affect those parts of the phenomenon
    • prioritises these individuals and groups for involvement in the decision-making process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the steps in stakeholder analysis?

A
  • Identifying stakeholders
  • Differentiating between and categorising stakeholders
  • Investigating relationships between stakeholders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is stakeholder analysis relevant?

A
  • Normative analysis:
    • Assumption that people have the right to be involved in decision making
    • To legitimise decisions made, through the involvement of key stakeholders
  • Instrumental analysis:
    • Pragmatic understanding of how decision makers can explain and manage stakeholders
    • To overcome problems of adoption of new technologies/ decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the methods in identifying stakeholders and their stakes (Step 1)?

A
  • Expert opinions, focus groups, semi-structured interviews, snow-ball sampling, checklist of likely stakeholder categories
  • Iterative process!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the difficulties in identifying stakeholders and their stakes?

A
  • Challenging to include all relevant stakeholders. A well-founded criteria should be used depending on the focus of the analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the ways of differentiating & categorising (Step 2)?

A
  • Top-down analytical approaches:
    • Done by the analyst and based on theoretical perspective of how system functions
    • using e.g. interest-influence matrices
    • identifying “key players”, “context setters”, “subjects”, “crowd”
  • Bottom-up stakeholder-led categorisation:
    • Based on empirical analysis of stakeholder perceptions ( i.e. doing interviews)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the ways to investigate stakeholder relationships?

A
  • Actor-linkage matrices: creating grid indicating relationships among stakeholders with key-words such as conflict, complementary, cooperation
  • Social network analysis: provides more in-depth insights into patterns of communication and relationships
  • Knowledge mapping: analysing the content of information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why stakeholder engagement?

A
  • Access to different types of knowledge among stakeholders
  • Account for different perspectives and values
  • Get better insight in the nature and structure of the problem
  • Ensure quality of the project, reviewed from different perspectives
  • Have access to creative problem-solving capacity of group
  • Ensure results are useful to users
  • Get user commitment to results
  • Democratisation: enable participants to be involved/ create options
  • Reach consensus - define one option or decision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What do sustainable solutions for unstructured problems require?

A
  • Systems knowledge: understanding of social ecological systems
  • Normative (target) knowledge: judgements of how a system ought to be; desired state
  • Transformative knowledge: needed to develop strategies towards societal strategies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the different levels of stakeholder engagement in research? ( In descending order of level of participation)

A
  • Co-production: stakeholders and scientists co-produce the integrated insights using values and criteria from both communities. It requires the involvement of researchers and stakeholders during the entire research process.
  • Consulted: stakeholders are consulted for knowledge and policy preferences
  • Informed: stakeholders are informed
  • No participation
17
Q

What to consider when involving stakeholders in research?

A
  • Decide:
    • Why stakeholder engagement?
    • Engagement about what?
    • What level of engagement?
    • Who to involve? The stakeholder selection.
    • In what form? Methods for engagement
  • Tips:
    • Make sure all team members understand why stakeholder engagement is used
    • Hire a facilitator
18
Q

What are the methods for identifying key stakeholders?

A
  • Brainstorm
  • Consult colleagues
  • Develop a mind map
  • Use government statistics and data
  • Initiate self-selection by encouraging individuals to step forward
  • Snowball sampling techniques?
  • Use existing lists
  • Consult with forums used by governments and other organisations
19
Q

What questions to ask when creating a (preliminary) list of stakeholders?

A
  • what do they want or expect from the project?
  • what are the likely benefits for them?
  • what interests do they have that may conflict with the project?
  • how does the stakeholder regard others, and is regarded by others on the list?
20
Q

What are the important points to consider when identifying stakeholders?

A
  • Who is responsible?
  • Who is likely to be affected?
  • Who has a negative view?
  • Who is critical for the final delivery?
21
Q

What are the ways of categorising stakeholders?

A
  • Degree of impact/interest/dependence
  • Level of influence/power
  • Spatial distribution: e.g. macro, meso, micro levels.
22
Q

What are the challenges of stakeholder engagement?

A
  • Stakeholder fatigue, e.g. when past engagement did not deliver
  • Biased representation of stakeholders/ stakeholders missing
  • Power imbalances within stakeholder engagement activities
  • Short-term engagement, e.g. because funding is limited
  • Unrealistic high expectation, i.e. cannot be met by the research project