17: Interpersonal relationships 2: Attachment and romantic relationships Flashcards

1
Q

There are three key processes whereby personality affects social interactions. Which?

A
  • The first process is through SELECTION, in which people may choose specific social environments according to their personalities.
  • the second process is EVOCATION. We examine how people evoke distress, as well as positive feelings, in others.
  • the third process whereby personality affects social interactions is through MANIPULATIONS for influencing others. What are the strategies that people use to get what they want from others?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is situational selection?

A

When people choose to enter some situations and avoid other situations

○ Social selections are decision points that direct us to choose one path and avoid another. These decisions, which determine the nature of our social environments and social worlds, are often based on the personality characteristics of the selector.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

personality characteristics play a central role in the selection of a mate, which characteristics do people prefer/desire in a partner?

A

dependable character, emotional stability and pleasing disposition.

Dependability is close to Conscientiousness; emotional stability is identical to the fourth factor on the five-factor model; and pleasing disposition is quite close to Agreeableness, the second factor in the model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A study showed the top 5 most desirable traits in a partner, what are these traits?

A

intelligence, humour, honesty, kindness and good looks.

In relation to the five factor model: Openness (intelligence), Extraversion (humour), Conscientiousness (honesty) and Agreeableness (kindness).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Over the past century, 2 fundamentally competing scientific theories have been advanced for who is attracted to whom.

What are the 2 theories?

A
  1. Complementary needs theory
    - postulates that people are attracted to those who have different personality dispositions to their own
    □ People who are dominant, for example, might have a need to be in a relationship with someone whom they can control and dominate.
  2. attraction similarity theory
    - postulates that people are attracted to those who have similar personality characteristics.
    □ People who are dominant might be attracted to those who are also dominant, because they like someone who ‘pushes back’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

which of the 2 theories for who is attracted to whom seems to be the most supported?

A

Meta-analysis:
□ overwhelming support for the attraction similarity theory
□ no support for the complementary needs theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is assortative mating?

A

The phenomenon whereby people marry people similar to themselves. In addition to personality, people also show assortative mating on a number of physical characteristics, such as height and weight.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does couples change, as time goes by?

A

couples who have been together the longest appear most similar in personality. This may be the result of couples growing more similar in personality over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Do People Get the Mates They Want?

A

NO! desirable mates are always in short supply, compared with the numbers of people who seek them.
Therefore, many people end up mated with individuals who fall short of their ideals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the partners personality affect relationship satisfaction?

A

People are especially happy with their relationships if they have partners who are high on the personality characteristics of Agreeableness, Emotional Stability and Openness. (from Larsen)

People are happy with their relationships if they have partners who are high on especially conscientiousness and agreeableness + emotional stability (low on neurotisism) (fra forelæsning - metaanalyse - lidt andre tal end i bogen)

Having a partner who is AGREEABLE is an especially strong predictor of being happy with one’s relationship for both men and women.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

There are 2 ways in which personality plays a role in the mate selection process. Which?

A
  1. there appear to be universal selection preferences – personality characteristics that everyone desires in a potential mate, such as dependability and emotional stability.
  2. beyond the desires shared by everyone, people prefer partners who are similar to themselves in personality – dominant people prefer other dominant people, conscientious people prefer other conscientious people, and so on. (men iflg. stevens forelæsning har personlighed ikke den store betydning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is central in the violation of desire theory?

A

According to the theory, break-ups should occur more when one’s desires are violated than when they are fulfilled

Following the violation of desire theory we would predict that people cohabiting with or married to others who lack desired characteristics, such as dependability and emotional stability, will more frequently dissolve the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which personality trait has been the best predictor of relational instability and divorce?

A

emotional instability has been the most consistent personality predictor of relational instability and divorce, emerging as a significant predictor in nearly every study that has included a measure of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is Shyness defined?

A

Shyness is defined as a tendency to feel tense, worried or anxious during social interactions or even when anticipating a social interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In which ways does shyness affect the selection of situations?

A
  • During high school and early adulthood, shy individuals tend to avoid social situations, resulting in a form of isolation
    • Shy people also need more time to form new relationships and form fewer of them compared to people who are not shy
    • shy women are less likely to bring up the awkward issue of contraception with their partners before sexual intercourse, and so put themselves in potentially dangerous sexual situations
      □ they are also more likely to avoid going to the doctor for gynaecological examinations, and hence they put themselves at greater health risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is affective forecasting and how does it affect the selection of situations?

A

Affective forecasting refers to the accuracy with which we anticipate our emotional reactions to a certain future event.

E.g. if you anticipate intense and long-lasting joy when skydiving, you are more likely to engage in skydiving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How is evocation defined?

A

Evocation may be defined as the ways in which features of personality elicit reactions from others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is hostile attributional bias?

A

when aggressive people chronically interpret ambiguous behaviour from others, such as being bumped into, as intentionally hostile

the tendency to infer hostile intent on the part of others in the face of uncertain or unclear behaviour from them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

There are at least 2 ways in which personality can play a role in evoking conflict in close relationships after the initial selection of a partner has taken place. Which?

A
  1. People’s personality characteristics can upset others either directly by influencing how they act toward others or indirectly by eliciting actions from others that are upsetting
    □ An example of how a person can perform actions that cause an emotional response in a partner is a dominant person who acts in a condescending manner, habitually evoking upset in the partner.
  2. when a person elicits actions from another that, in turn, upset the original elicitor
    □ An aggressive man, for example, might elicit the silent treatment from his mate, which in turn upsets him because she will not speak to him.
    □ A condescending wife might undermine the self-esteem of her husband and then become angry because he lacks self-confidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the strongest predictor of being upset?

A

low agreeableness and emotional instability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is Expectancy confirmation?

A

a phenomenon whereby people’s beliefs about the personality characteristics of others cause them to evoke in others actions that are consistent with the initial beliefs.

The phenomenon of expectancy confirmation has also been called self-fulfilling prophecy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the Rosenthal effect or the Pygmalion effect?

A

a specific form of expectancy confirmation.

That is, if someone tells you he is convinced you will succeed in dealing with a difficult problem, this may increase the likelihood that you will, indeed, succeed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

It is sometimes said that, in order to change your personality, you must move to a place where people do not already know you.

Why?

A

Because through the process of expectancy confirmation, people who already know you may unwittingly evoke in you behaviour that confirms their beliefs, thereby constraining your ability to change.

24
Q

What is Manipulation?

A

Manipulation, or social influence, includes all the ways in which people intentionally try to change the behaviour of others. (the term manipulation is used here descriptively, with no negative connotation.)

25
Q

How does the evolutionary perspective look at manipulation?

A

From an evolutionary perspective, natural selection favours people who successfully manipulate objects in their environment.

- Some manipulable objects are inanimate, such as the raw materials used to build shelters, tools, clothing and weapons. 
- Other manipulable objects are alive, including predators and prey of different species as well as mates, parents, children, rivals and allies of the same species.
26
Q

What is a taxonomy?

A

A taxonomy is simply a classification scheme – the identification and naming of groups within a particular subject field.

27
Q

via factor analysis, a taxonomy of 11 tactics of manipulation was developed, what are the 11 tactics?

A
  • charm
  • coercion (e.g. yelling)
  • silent treatment (e.g. ignoring)
  • reason (e.g. explaining)
  • regression (e.g. whining)
  • self-abasement (e.g. acting submissive)
  • responsibility invocation (e.g. making someone committed)
  • hardball (e.g. hitting)
  • pleasure induction (e.g. showing the pleasure)
  • social comparison
  • monetary reward
28
Q

Do men and women differ in their usage of tactics of manipulation?

A

This question is still not answered as several studies that investigated this found inconsistent results.

women more than the men reported more frequent use of the regression tactic, including crying, whining, pouting and sulking to get their way. The difference, however, was quite small.

women generally tend to use more manipulation tactics than men, with the exception of the use of humouring. (Humouring, which closely resembles the charm tactic)

29
Q

Are people with certain personality traits are more likely to use certain tactics of manipulation?

A

people HIGH IN DOMINANCE (extraversion) tended to use coercion, such as demanding, threatening, cursing and criticizing.

HIGH AGREEABLE people use pleasure induction and reason.

CONSCIENTIOUSNESS is associated with only one tactic of social influence: reason

EMOTIONALLY UNSTABLE individuals use a wide variety of tactics to manipulate others – hardball, coercion, reason and monetary reward. The tactic most commonly used by emotionally unstable people, however, is regression.

people HIGH ON INTELLECT-OPENNESS tend to use reason above all other tactics. They also use pleasure induction and responsibility invocation

30
Q

what is Machiavellianism?

A

A manipulative strategy of social interaction referring to the tendency to use other people as tools for personal gain.

‘High Mach’ persons tend to tell people what they want to hear, use flattery to get what they want, and rely heavily on lying and deception to achieve their own ends.

31
Q

What is Self-concealment (SC)?

A

Self-concealment (SC) is a personality dimension characterized by the stable tendency to conceal personal information from others, independent of environmental pressures

self-concealers are characterized by the tendency to keep personal information secret (thoughts, feelings etc.), and select and manipulate their (social) environments to be able to do so. Unfortunately, their secrecy also evokes predominantly negative reactions from others, leaving them feeling isolated and with limited social support.

32
Q

How is the generalizeability of research on attachment styles?

A
LOW!
there are different parenting practices across cultures and the research are only made in middle-class western nations (WIERD people)
33
Q

What are the 5 steps in the strange situation?

A
  1. parent and infant enters the room
  2. Parent sits while infant explores the room
  3. stranger enters the room, talks to the parent, approaches the child (no interaction with it)
  4. Parent quietly leaves the room
  5. Parent returns and comforts child
34
Q

Which response will a secure attached child have to the strange situation?

A
  • explores the environment while parent is present
  • shows distress when parent leaves
  • distress can be partially ameliorated by assistance from the stranger
  • delighted by the parents return
35
Q

What characterize parents of a secure attached child?

A
  • they play more with the child

- they react to the childs needs more quickly, more frequently and more consistently

36
Q

Which response will an insecure attached child (anxious/ambivalent) have to the strange situation?

A
  • cling to parent while present
  • cry when parent leaves
  • react with anger or indifference (not being calmed down) when parent returns
37
Q

what characterize parents of an anxious/ambivalent attached child?

A

parenting that is inconsistent - sometimes caring other times neglectful

38
Q

Which response will an insecure attached child (avoidant) have to the strange situation?

A
  • ignore parent while present
  • interact in similar ways with the stranger and the caregiver
  • show no outward distress when parent leaves
  • ignore parent’s return
39
Q

what characterize parents of an avoidant attached child?

A
  • they do not respond to the childs distress
  • discourage crying
  • encourage independence
40
Q

Is it the behavior of the caregiver or genes, that leads to the childs attachment style?

A

genetic effects on attachment style are minimal (0.1)

41
Q

What are the developmental consequences of attachment?

A

Behaviors exhibited by child with caregiver is consistent with behavior with other figures later in life = personality consistency

42
Q

what are the developmental consequences of secure attachment?

A
  • will remain confident that current attachment figures will be responsive and available to meet their needs
  • focus on constructive problem solving rather than recruiting personal aid
43
Q

what are the developmental consequences of anxious attachment?

A
  • uncertainty that attachment figures will remain available.
  • will remain focused on preventing interpersonal loss, including hyper-vigilance and catastrophizing rather than problem solving
44
Q

what are the developmental consequences of avoidant attachment?

A
  • physiological experience of distress and anxiety, which may not be consciously aknowledged
  • focus on emotional control and inhibition
  • trying to avoid problem solving
45
Q

What are the correlation of attachment style and ranking on childhood peer relationship?

A

.29

so secure attachment is positively correlated with great childhood peer relationship

46
Q

what are the correlation of attachment style and ranking on adolescent peer relationships?

A

.37

so secure attachment is positively correlated with great adolescence peer relationship

47
Q

what are the correlation of attachment style and adult romantic relationships?

A

correlations indicate positive, supportive relationships if securely attached

48
Q

what will people rated as insecurely attached show in romantic conflict resolution?

A
  • less caring
  • less trust
  • less emotional closeness
  • less sensitivity to partners needs
  • more hostility
  • less balance between couple functioning and individual interests or needs
  • poorer overall relationship outcomes
49
Q

which personality traits does people with avoidance and anxiety attachment styles commonly have?

A

avoidance:
- low extraversion
- low openness
- low agreeableness

anxiety

  • high neuroticism
  • low agreeableness
50
Q

what is personality consistency in relation to attachment?

A

that interpersonal relationships will look similar across time and specific dynamics

The idea has some support - but it is less true for relationships seperated by more time

51
Q

is there any difference between which characteristics are preferred in different cultures, and why?

A

YES! but there are also similarities.

e. g. developmental and/or egalitarian sex roles are linked to:
- men increasing importance ratings of attractiveness and female financial prospect, decreasing emphasis on housekeeping and chastity
- woman increasing importance on household tasks and personality characteristics

52
Q

Are women pickier than men when choosing the right partner?

A

YES!

women are looking for more “improvement” (higher score than themselves) across more traits

from an evolutionary perspective this could be because it is more costly for a woman to choose a man, and therefore they have to be more picky.

53
Q

Do more gender egalitarian countries show greater/lesser gender differences in some partner preferences?

A

greater

54
Q

Do people find matches of personality?

A

No - there is a little effect here.

BUT partners still find matches - but instead they does it on factors such as age, values, education/IQ etc.

55
Q

For what traits do we see lots of assortative mating?

A

High correlation for education, age, sociopolitical attitudes, religiousness.

56
Q

For what traits do we see less assortative mating?

A

Low correlation for personality.

We can get similarity in a trait even when we are not seeking it. We meet people with similar education i.e. (in our close environment).