India-unit 2.1 Flashcards

1
Q

What was India like until 1914?- give a brief history

A

-3000-2000BC- The Indus Valley Civilisation
-250BC- Mauryan Empire
-400s-Gupta Empire
-1500s-1700s- The Mughals (Moguls) ruled India
-1600-The East India Company is set up by Elizabeth I
-1858- The British are granted control of India by Queen Victoria. The British Raj is established
1914-The First World War starts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the population and geography like in India?

A
  • The population of India in 1914 was about 350 million, speaking some 200 languages. Around 150,000 of those 350 million were British
  • Th land was equal to the size of Europe. The country we now know as Pakistan did not exist. Uniting and controlling such a vast country was challenging
  • The most significant area (high geographically and politically) was probably the Punjab-this has been the base of most of the rulers of India in history (where a lot of the king and princes lived)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the 4 main religious groups?

A

1) Hindus
2) Muslims
3) Sikhs
4) Christians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How much of the population was Hindus? What system was in place?

A
  • Hindus made up about 80% of the population.
  • Hindus followed the caste system. The assumptions underlying the caste system were those of purity and pollution. Every Hindu was born into a specific caste and lived out their life within that caste. All social relationships were pre-determined by the caste system ( no social mobility)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where were the Muslims? Who were they in conflict with?

A

-Muslims lived mostly in the north-west and north-east. Many Indians had converted to Islam to avoid their low status in Hindu caste society as Islam places great emphasis on equality. Under the Mughals, there was regular conflict between Hindus and Muslims (this mainly had to do with conflict about Gods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Sikhism?

A

-In the 1500s, religious leaders in the Punjab created a fusion of Hinduism and Islam, known as Sikhism. By 1914, the majority of people living in this area were Sikhs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the East India Company?

A

-English contact with India began in the reign of Elizabeth I, who created the East India Company in 1600. The aim of the Company was to create a monopoly over the spice trade and destroy Dutch and a French interests. The company started by setting up its own substantial army and establishing bases in India (initially for restocking) in Calcutta (Kolkata), Madras (Chennai) and Bombay (Mumbai)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What attitude did they show towards the Indian people?

A

-Initially, the East India Company claimed for have no political powers or objectives, although it did display a paternalistic attitude towards the Indian people and rapidly expanded its power and influence, somewhat aggressively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What aggression did it show to Indian people?

A
  • when influential Indian Rulers or leaders died without an heir, their land/titles/ fortunes were taken by the British
  • Sepoys were deployed outside the home region which was seen as disrespectful
  • Rumours that ammunition cartridges issued by the British for the Sepoys were greased with animal fat= rebelled against the British because of this as they were vegetarian and didn’t eat pork (had to put gun in mouth to load)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a Sepoy?

A
  • An Indian soldier who works for the British
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did this aggression result in?

A
  • this resulted in the Indian Mutiny of 1857. 400 British men, women and children were massacred. In response , entire villages were massacred by the British
  • 1 year after Queen Victoria put the control of India in writing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the British Raj?

A

In 1858, the East India Company was abolished and the British Monarch, Queen Victoria, became the ruler of India. The governance of India was changed. The new system became known as the British Raj.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the different levels of the British Raj:

A
  • Diagram in notes of it
  • A Secretary of State for India, based in Britain, was chosen by Queen Victoria and Parliament to have responsibility for Indian Affairs
  • In India itself, the position of Viceroy was supreme
  • The Indian Civil Service (ICS) ensures that British laws, rules and regulations were implemented in India. In theory, Indian civilians were allowed to join this service. However, requirements said that members of the Civil Service had to undergo examinations and a university eduction in Britain. In 1905, only 5% of the ICS were Indian ( mainly due to requirements eg: had to be university educated in Britain)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were princely states? Why did Britain become the paramount power?

A

-Many areas of India were still not ruled directly by the British. Indian princes ruled about 35% of the country, consisting of 565 separate princely states. Each of these states has its own laws, languages, holidays, ministers and rulers but was still under the ‘protection’ of Britain. The British (after the Mutiny) did not want to use violence to get their support but instead consolidated their power through a policy of ‘divide and rule’; one aristocrat was pitched against another. Loyalties were often purchased (bribery).The princely states were forced to acknowledge Britain as the paramount power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Summary- what was the East India Company (EIC)?

A
  • set up in 1600
  • aimed to create a monopoly over the spice trade
  • set up its own army and bases in India
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the paternalistic attitude?

A

-the superior attitude that the EIC had over India despite having no political powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is The Indian Mutiny 1857?

A
  • 400 British men, women and children were massacred
  • in response, entire villages were massacred by the British
  • As a consequence of the mutiny, a new governance was drawn up
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What happened in 1858?

A

-The British Raj was set up by Queen Victoria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the ‘Divide and Rule’ idea?

A

-The British Strategy of provoking rivalries and differences of current rulers (princes) to prevent them uniting in opposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the paramount power?

A

-Britain became the most powerful force under the British Raj

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What were relationships like between Britain and India before 1914?-Imperialism

A
  • India was often referred to as the ‘Jewel in the crown’ of the British Empire
  • It was indispensable to British power and prestige around the globe and provided access to vast resources and manufacturing industries
  • Initially these were cotton goods but by the beginning of the 20th century, this included: iron, steel and engineering products
  • yet, the British elite became more aloof and racist. In the time of the East India Company, the British merchants had learnt the language and immersed themselves in Indian culture. By 1914, most members of the British Raj kept themselves deliberately separate. They were distrustful of Indians and contemptuous of Indian ‘Backwardness’
  • This wasn’t true of all British people. Businessmen, missionaries and Anglo-Indians (those of joint British and Indian descent) did not have the same experience as those in the Raj elite
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What happened in the partition of Bengal?

A
  • The Indian province (county) of Bengal contained a population of 78 million people (twice the population of Britain’s)
  • In 1905, the viceroy, Lord Curzon, decided that the province of Bengal should be partitioned as part of the ‘divide and rule’ policy.
  • This was because the area was prone to unrest: the growing, educated middle-class left out of the Indian Civil Service (ICS) were high in number here. The Indian Nationalist Congress Party was also growing in popularity in this area
  • There was no formal consultation with the Indians. Instead, two new provinces were created by the British in 1905: Western Bengal and Eastern Bengal. Western Bengal’s population became predominantly Hindu (42 million Hindus, 9 million Muslims) whilst Eastern Bengal had a majority of Muslims (18 million Muslims: 12 million Hindus)
  • The partition created a precedent for the reorganisation of territory and government along religious lines
  • In response , the Indian Nationalist Congress Party launched a campaign of swadesh (a campaign not to buy something-known as Boycott in English), in particular against Lancashire cotton, which was publicly burned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What happened in 1909 with The Indian Council?

A
  • after the Bengal agitation, Lord Morley (Secretary of State) proposed an increase of Indian involvement in its own government. His ideas, affectionately nicknamed the Morley-Minto reforms, were discussed throughly in British Parliament
  • The Indian Councils Act was passed in 1909. The Act resulted in a small number of Indian members being added to the legislative councils. Council seats were also reserved for Muslims and other social groups, including the university educated. (In fact, minority groups were more largely represented in the councils than they would have been if it were strictly proportionate to population numbers).
  • This set a crucial precedent; minority groups were initially supportive of the British. However, having granted Muslims these honours powers, the British felt able to REVERSE the partition of Bengal, which they did in 1911. The British realised that pleasing the Hindus was probably of greater importance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

By 1900 there was a growing nationalist movement in India and some political groups were created- what were these?

A

1) Indian National Congress Party- created in 1855, the Congress became the driver of independence campaigns. Members included both Hindus and Muslims as the party made an early decision not to alienate religious groups and therefore weaken its claim to speak for the whole of India. They adopted a strategy of lobbying MPs in London, writing newspaper articles, demanding education and administrative positions (of course, the party could not stand for elections because there were not any!)
2) The Muslim League- in 1906 the All-India Muslim League was founded in Bengal. The fury shown by the Hindus after the Bengal partition had convinced Muslims that when Indians were granted any powers by the British, Muslims would be overwhelmed by a Hindu majority. The league became a debating society for its educated, middle class Muslim members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

In the early 1900a, what split was there within the congress party?

A

-It was between moderates and radicals. The moderates, led by Gopal Krishna Gokhale, hoped for political reform and believed in peaceful, lawful methods. The radicals, led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak, argued that the lack of consultation over the Bengal partition showed that the British would never be fair to Indians. They wanted more urgent, direct and even violent action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What were the main three things that came away from The partition of Bengal?

A

1) The British were in control
2) The British will make decisions on religious lines
3) The British will make decisions without consultation of Indian people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

So, overall how did those in the British Raj treat Indians?

A
  • became more aloof and racist
  • contemptuous of ‘Indian backwardness’
  • distrustful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What happening in Bengal (summary) and how did this impact on the relationship?

A
  • thought should be split based on ‘divide and rule’ policy- western and eastern Bengal was created
    1) No consultation
    2) Always in favour of Hindus (reversed in 1911)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How did India feel after the Indian Councils Act 1909?

A
  • (happier) more involvement and inclusion eg: added to legislative councils
  • minority groups were more largely represented
  • turned angry when the Partition of Bengal was reversed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What was the National Indian Congress Party and the Muslim League?

A
  • National Indian Congress:
  • 1855
  • Wanted Independence
  • Both Hindus and Muslims
  • lobbed MPs in Britain
  • split between moderates and radicals

Muslim League:

  • 1909
  • All India Muslim League
  • Muslims angry- thought always be in favour of Hindus
31
Q

To what extent did the creation of nationalist groups impact on the relationship between Britain and India?

A
  • created more of a strain on their relationship, one wanting Independence and one wanting Muslim dominance
  • religious rivalries
  • more violent action (Lobbed MPs in Britain and Muslim League taking more action)
  • But Indian people did have more confidence- are being represented more
32
Q

Overall, how would you summarise the relationship by 1914? What were the greatest opportunities and greatest threats?

A

Opportunities:

  • more of an equal representation
  • can see more opportunities for Indians

Threats:

  • religious rivalry
  • Only promises- not much action
  • British slightly losing control especially with radicals ?
33
Q

What are some of the strengths of the British Raj / Britain governing India?

A
  • Although probably doing for Britain’s own interests they did improve some infrastructure such as roads and railways
  • India gained more access to Europe through the empire
  • Britain brought with them ideas such as the education systems, law and order
  • A strength for Britain was that it consolidated their power but did weaken India’s (weakness)
  • Indian army reorganised
  • put an end to unethical Indian Traditional Practices
34
Q

What were the weaknesses for Britain governing India?

A
  • Dominated by British culture- forced upon them, original culture banned, ignored and forgotten
  • Economy- colonies economy was failing because the profit went back to Britain
  • Lots of different viceroys- kept changing, only lasted a couple of months/ few years= not a steady relation which wouldn’t improve attitudes improve towards viceroys or have better co-operation between them
  • Exploitation- used workforce for Britain
  • India lost control of own country- important decisions made in Britain
  • physical distance- separation from Indian society and culture, wouldn’t understand traditions and don’t see true effects and impacts
  • Little representation of Indian people in systems like the British Raj
  • Lead to extinction of a lot of indigenous tribes
  • took land and resources
  • people treated brutally and insensitive to social norms
  • those in control in Britain would have very outdated backgrounds, a lot of them had old military history and traditional views, can see on British Raj some like the Princes treated like a separate entity- no connection or integration
  • Prohibited industrialisation and kept loads of Indians in poverty growing cotton, metals like steel…
35
Q

Where can you find a list of all of the Secretaries of State and viceroys for India 1858-1948?

A

In India notes- timeline- blue folder (may have changed)

36
Q

How many Indian soldiers fought in the First World War?

A

1 million

37
Q

Why were they fighting? Who did they fight with?

A
  • Fought alongside the U.K., Australia, New Zealand…
  • they were not conscripted like they were in Britain, it was voluntary, they chose to fight
  • some believe if they fought they could gain independence but this was never promised officially
  • Indians were crucial in backing up the U.K.
  • Heavy casualties
  • Not equipped for modern war but fought anyway eg: equipped for tribal wars, had obsolete weapons and different training. First time met with chemical warfare, heavy artillery … because of this moved to Middle East for second half of war, used to climate and fighting style
38
Q

Which Indians in particular supported the British involvement in the First World War?

A
  • 27 of the largest princely states put their armies at the disposal for Britain
  • support from Congress, the Muslim league and princely states
39
Q

By 1918, how many soldiers had enlisted?

A

827,000

40
Q

How many Indian Soldiers died in the First World War?

A

64,500 Indian soldiers died in the war

41
Q

Why did Indians sign up to fight?

A
  • part of a well-established ancestral tradition, obligation to whoever was their emperor
  • looked at more favourably in caste system
  • attitude that they were fighting for king or empire
  • thought if they fought they could gain independence as a reward
42
Q

Where did the Indian armies serve during the FWW?

A

-embarked from Karachi on 24th August 1914, reaching Marseilles on 26th Sept and fought in the Battle of Ypres

43
Q

Why did the Indians suffer heavy losses in the Middle East?

A
  • Sikhs by early November were down 385 soldiers

- under equipt, badly led- could not afford to divert supplies from Europe

44
Q

How much had Indian revenues contributed to the allied war effect by 1918?

A

-£146 million to war effort

45
Q

What were the negative economic impacts on India as a consequence of the First World War?

A
  • increased taxation, shortages of fuel and rising prices (home front impact)
  • disrupted normal trading, created exchange rate problems and imposed the demands of the military- prices of food grains rose 93%
46
Q

Who benefitted economically in India during the war?

A
  • Indian manufacturing industries eg: cotton, steel, iron, sugar…
  • shareholders saw their dividends rocket
47
Q

What were the consequences of India’s high economic contributions?

A
  • local disturbances- viceroy received reports

- Political consequences for the Raj

48
Q

Where can you find India in the First World War summarised?

A

Notes- blue folder (may have changed)

49
Q

Give some examples of how brutally the British treated Indians- famines:

A

1) The Great Bengal Famine:
- drought and there wasn’t enough food for the population, people were starving
- Churchill ordered that food should be procured from Bengal and shipped off to Europe to aid the war effort but mostly to increase RESERVE stocks in Europe in the event of a FUTURE possible invasion from Greece or Yugoslavia
- 1940s British officials made Churchill aware of this- told him people were dying (couldn’t afford high prices, grains were scarce), Churchill replied- “I hate Indians they are a beastly people with a beastly religion. It’s all their fault anyway for breeding like rabbits”
- ships of wheat from Australia were docking at Calcutta port, some suggested it should be disembarked and given to the Indian people to save lives but Churchill said no and ordered for it to be sent for Europe to improve RESERVE stocks. More people died- reached 4.3 MILLION
- British officials in Calcutta sent a memorandum to Churchill about the consequences of his actions, Churchill wrote on the margin of the file-“Why hasn’t Ghandi died yet?”
- This happened after 64,500 Indian soldiers died in WW1 voluntarily assisting Britain which was crucial in winning the war

50
Q

Give some examples of how brutally the Indian people were treated- work camps:

A
  • In the 1870s because of some backlash about the amount of people dying from famine, the British still gave no aid but set up work camps so they could work for their food.
  • The rations given to the Indians in these work camps was LESS than half of what Hitler gave the Jews in the Nazi concentration camps before killing them in the gas chambers, even though they were doing Manuel labour all day every day
51
Q

Where can you get more examples and statistics?

A

Notes- Dr Shashi Tharoor- Looking Back at the British Raj in India Lecture-HW

52
Q

What was the Montagu Declaration?

A
  • 20th August 1917

- Edwin Montagu (Secretary of state) agreed to change political geography of India= set up of British Raj

53
Q

What evidence is there that the Montagu Declaration lead to some Indian self-governance:

A
  • committed the British government to granting some form of self-governance to India
  • montagu visited India and criticised those who wanted more British participants in government
54
Q

What evidence is that there was little or no significant steps towards Indian self governance:

A
  • no timescale was given for the declaration
  • vague promises- just to increase ‘representation’- how?
  • not granting- just promise
55
Q

What was the Rowlatt Commission and Rowlatt Acts?

A
  • Mr ST Rowlatt (a Scottish judged pointed by the Gov) set up a commission to investigate claims of conspiracies
  • Bengal, Bombay and the Punjab accused of being centred for revolutionary activity
  • proposals of the committee were incorporated into the Anarchial and Revolutionary Crimes Act (aka Rowlatt Acts)- any local disturbance would be classed under this
56
Q

What evidence is there that the Rowlatt Commission and Rowlatt Act led to some significant steps towards Indian self-governance:

A
  • Jinnah resigned from his position in the council
  • Led riots eg: Hartals (riot) in the Punjab and Amritsar. The British lost control of Amritsar
  • the act was eventually repealed in 1922
57
Q

What evidence is there that there was little or no significant steps towards Indian Self-governance- Rowlatt Commission and Rowlatt Acts

A
  • The British Raj was accused of focusing on repression. Imposed acts such as imprisonment without trial, no juries, censorship etc (tightening repression- went through even though opposed by Indians)
  • The acts went ahead despite opposition from the Indian Legislative Council
58
Q

What is the Amritsar Massacre?

A
  • 1919
  • The British sent troops to stop the ‘rioting’ in Amritsar
  • Brigadier General Rex Dyer Warner against the holding of ‘meetings and assemblies’ and established a curfew
  • 400 (debated, some Indians say 700) Indians in the crowd were shot
  • Dyer then introduced martial law (things like curfews, limit on gatherings…) in Amritsar ( perceived attack- large gathering which is banned)
59
Q

What evidence is there that there were some significant steps towards Indian Self-governance (Amritsar Massacre):

A
  • some Britons were furious at Dyer’s (forced to resign) actions. His actions were condemned. He was forced to reign and return to England
  • The Indian National Congress set up its own enquiry. The findings arise deep feelings of anger and frustration at the British Raj (no official apology)
60
Q

What evidence is there that there was little or no significant steps towards Indian self-governance?

A
  • some Britons felt that Dyer had acted within his line of duty
  • Michael O’Dwyer (governor of the Punjab) was only gently reprimanded for his involvement - one of the eleven provinces
61
Q

What was the Montagu-Chelmsford report and government of India act?

A
  • 1919
  • Edwin Montagu and Viceroy Lord Chelmsford had been working on the Montagu Declaration
  • it became law (the Government of India Act) in December 1919
62
Q

What evidence is there that there was some significant steps towards Indian self-governance?

A
  • the viceroy was to be advised by a council of 6 civilians, 3 of whom had to be Indians (still lots of British eg: commander in chief of British Army in India had to be present)
  • franchise was extended, after 1919 about 10% of adult male population was enfranchised (but still linked to tax payments)
  • provincial and central legislative councils were enlarged
  • provincial councils given control over Indian education, agriculture, health, local self- government and public works
  • shifted more of the decision-making to the provinces
  • Britain governed India only by the consent of the Indian people
  • further step to self-governance
  • reserved seats in all provincial legislatures for different religious groups and special interest eg: university graduates

Overall
➡️provincial councils- control over education, agriculture, health…
➡️Act creates a Dyarchy (a division of power)
➡️Wanted more India involvement in decision making

63
Q

What evidence is there that there was little or no significant steps towards Indian self-governance= The Montagu Chelmsford Report and Government of India Act:

A
  • act created a dyarchy-a division of power which was unequal between Indians and British
  • the viceroy could enforce laws even if the legislative councils rejected them and could choose own officials
  • British retained control of military matters, foreign affairs, currency, communications and criminal law
  • some right wing fest they would lose India

Overall:
➡️Dyarchy remained unequal
➡️The British kept control of military matters, foreign affairs, currency…
➡️The act was controversial in Britain
➡️RW= MPs were convinced would lose India- protested the reforms
➡️LW= not far enough

64
Q

What could you use as some of your criteria for ‘significant steps’ towards Indian self-governance:

A
  • Indian participation
  • representation
  • power/ control of the British
  • Willingness of British
  • British Raj and government support for self governance
  • decrease in repression
  • Holding British Raj leaders accountable
  • long term, permanent, wide reaching
  • legislation passed and enforced
65
Q

What is a Dyarchy?

A

Government by two independent authorities. In India, this system divided power in the provinces between the Indians and the British from 1919 to 1935

66
Q

Look at Dr Shashi Tharoor

A

Summary booklet- really good facts and arguments

67
Q

What is nationalism? Give some examples

A

-identification with ones own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations

  • INC (Gokhale, Tilak, Ghandi), Nehra
  • Muslim League- Jinnah

-allegiance, love of country, willing to go to war, promote but strong right wing views can promote terrorism

68
Q

What did the INC do?

A
  • adopted strategies of lobbying MPs in London, writing newspaper articles, demanding education and administration positions
  • wanted to unite India, religion didn’t matter, try not to alienate (both Hindus and Muslims)
69
Q

What did the Muslim league do?

A

1906, Bengal

  • fury shown by Hindus after Bengal, convinced Muslims that British would always favour a Hindu majority
  • league became debating society for educated, middle class Muslim members
70
Q

The Indian National Congress- key members and actions:

A
  • Ghandi- strong friendship with Gokhale
  • Used method of Satyagraha
  • some examples used:
    1) refusal to leave the district of Gujarat
    2) Fasted until the situation was resolved
  • boycott cotton for British authorities
  • were some successes in the satyagraha eg: dealt with industrial problems but some historians argue it was other methods of protest which was more successful eg: political realignments

-Ghandi worked on developing connections with 2 important communities that had been neglected by congress politicians= Muslims and businessmen

71
Q

What is satyagraha?

A

(Made up by Gandhi) means truth and obstinacy , used by Gandhi to mean ‘true force’ or ‘soul force’

Followers applied it to non-cooperation with the British authorities eg: hartals (passive resistance)

72
Q

What was the Lucknow Pact? Key actions…

A
  • this was the union of the INC and Muslim league
  • this took place in 1915
  • 3 reasons why the Muslim league and INC began to work together:
    1) Muslim League= changer stance (no longer co-operating with the Raj) due to the partition of Bengal. In 1913 demand from the Raj was included in their objectives-brought closer to the aims of congress
    2) Declarations of war against Turkey- 1914 causes resentment among those Muslims who regarded Sultan of Turkey as their Caliph-most important spiritual leader (at time was part of the Ottoman Empire. Overall leader of Muslims- the Caliph lived there and Britain had declare war on Turkey)
    3) Jinnah- chief spokesperson, willing to work with congress, guaranteed Muslims a voice and an enhanced Islamic identity

Main result of the Lucknow Pact:

  • unifying League and congress
  • number of Muslims= laid down province by province and should be separate electorates for all communities (electorate= eligible to vote therefore meant the Indian people would always have representation in Muslim community and will be equal)

Action taken by the newly-strengthened INC:
- urged Britain to issue a proclamation stating that their aim was to confer self-governance on India in the near future

Weakness of the Lucknow Pact:
- separate electorates was an agreement between congress and the league- no power to impose it

73
Q

What was the Home Rule League?

A
  • more on a local scale
  • 1916
  • focused on domestic affairs eg: no demand on army and security but did want it on things such as education

2 examples of the new Home Rule League:

1) Bal Tilak’s Home Rule League-32,000 members- west India
2) The All-India Home Rule League- Annie Besant- became widespread throughout India

2 actions if the Home Rule Leagues:

  • toured, public lectures, joined each other’s leagues, rallies, pamphlets…
  • Jinnah joined Besant’s All India Home Rule League
  • Indian people signed petitions
  • spread political awareness in previously un-politicised provinces
  • built on by Ghandi- attractive to rural areas
  • 2 ways in which the British tried to stop the progress of the Home Rule Leagues…
    1) Tilak was arrested for sedition (conspiring) - 40,000 ruppees
    2) Besant was interned (confined) in June 1917
  • was actually counter-productive
74
Q

What was the Reponse to British legislation and Amritsar?

A
  • The INC responded to the Government of India Act (1919) by rejecting the Montagu- Chelmsford reforms and boycotted the first elections held under 1919 act
  • doesn’t go far enough although gave them education… = only appeased
  • Ghandi responded to the Amritsar massacre by calling for Satyagraha (1919) and hold hartals throughout India- direct and non-violent action
  • Ghandi however was unsuccessful and failed to stop the violence as it would only work if everyone involved understood its basics tenets and didn’t use it as a pretext for other agenders
  • growth of nationalism post FWW:
  • Turned thousands of loyal Indians against the Raj- believed Amritsar showed the face of British rule and any British reform to Indian Independence was a lie
  • uniting of groups- British threat