A Doll's House - Henrik Ibsen Flashcards
(23 cards)
Biography of Henrik Ibsen
- Norwegian writer born in 1864
- Called the “father of realism” in drama
- May be attributed to his rough start at being a writer (poor, unsuccessful)
- Pioneer of Modernism
Historical Context of A Doll’s House
1870s:
- Strict VICTORIAN social codes, restriced the rights of women, especially married women
- The actions that married women would do are limiting the point of A Doll’s House
Women who ar not married and earned their wages - Christina
Women who are married - Nora
Key facts about “A Doll’s House”
Full Title: A Doll’s House (Norwegian: Ett dukkehjem)
* When Written:1879
* Where Written:Dresden, Germany
* When Published:Published and first performed in
December 1879
* Literary Period: Realism; modernism
* Genre: Realist modern prose drama
* Setting:A town or city in Norway
* Climax:When Torvald discovers the letter from Krogstad
revealing Nora’s secret
* Antagonist: At first Krogstad, then Torvald
Antagonist is dubious, some moral cases for/against people could be drawn to the times (though Torvald is the symbol of the system)
How was “A Doll’s House” received by the Victorian audience in Norway?
- Lots of critics because of ADH’s criticism against the 19th century marriage customs including married woman abandoning her family in order to gain a sense of self.
Act 1 Summary
- Nora Helmer enters cheerfully on Christmas Eve, carrying gifts. A porter delivers a Christmas tree.
- Her husband Torvald Helmer, newly promoted to Bank Manager, affectionately scolds her for overspending.
- He calls her pet names (“little skylark,” “little squirrel”), showing his condescending affection.
- Nora is excited about their improved finances; Torvald emphasizes caution and debt avoidance.
- Mrs. Kristine Linde, an old friend, arrives after 8 years. She is a widow seeking employment.
- Nora promises to help her and reveals a secret: she borrowed money years ago to save Torvald’s life by taking him to Italy, secretly working and saving to repay it.
- Dr. Rank, a close family friend, visits briefly. He shares Torvald’s disapproval of Nils Krogstad, an employee at Torvald’s bank.
- Krogstad arrives, speaks with Torvald, then confronts Nora privately—he’s the one she borrowed from.
- He threatens to reveal her forgery of her father’s signature unless she convinces Torvald not to fire him.
- Nora tries to persuade Torvald, but he refuses.
Act 2 Summary
- It’s Christmas Day. Nora is anxious and nervous about the secret being revealed.
- Mrs. Linde helps her prepare for a costume ball; Nora will dance the tarantella dressed as an Italian fisher girl.
- Mrs. Linde presses Nora for more details, but Nora remains vague.
- Torvald enters; Nora again pleads for Krogstad’s job. The more she pushes, the angrier he becomes. He sends the dismissal letter.
- Dr. Rank visits and confides he is terminally ill. Nora flirts with him, possibly to ask for help, but stops when he admits he loves her.
- Krogstad returns, asks if Nora has told Torvald, and reveals he wants to run the bank. He leaves a letter detailing the debt and forgery in Torvald’s mailbox.
- Nora tells Mrs. Linde everything. Mrs. Linde says she and Krogstad used to love each other and offers to speak with him.
- To stall Torvald, Nora asks him to rehearse the tarantella. She dances frantically, unnerving him.
- Mrs. Linde returns; Krogstad wasn’t home, but she left him a note.
- Nora, panicked, declares she has only thirty-one hours to live—hinting at suicide.
Act Three Summary
- Mrs. Linde and Krogstad meet. She admits she left him years ago to support her family.
- Now both single, she proposes they marry so she can help raise his children and find meaning again.
- Krogstad is thrilled and offers to retract the letter, but Mrs. Linde insists the truth must come out.
- Nora and Torvald return from the ball. Mrs. Linde urges Nora to be honest and leaves.
- Torvald expresses desire for Nora, but she resists. Dr. Rank stops by briefly, leaves death-symbolic calling cards.
- Nora attempts to leave to end her life but is stopped when Torvald finds Krogstad’s letter.
- Furious, Torvald accuses her of ruining him. He refuses to let her raise the children, though he says they must remain together for appearances.
- A second letter arrives: Krogstad has returned the IOU and dropped the blackmail.
- Torvald rejoices, forgives Nora, and says she is now doubly his—both wife and child.
- Nora reveals she was ready to die because she believed he would protect her. His reaction proved otherwise.
- She says he is a stranger to her, and that she must leave to discover herself and learn who she really is.
Torvald pleads, promises to change, but Nora firmly walks away.
- The play ends with the slam of the front door—Nora leaving behind her marriage and old life.
Character: Nora Helmer
- Heroine, a young woman married to Torvald Helmer and has three children
- People reduce her as a “spendthrift”
- Plays along with Torvald’s pet names: “skylark”, “songbird”, “squirrel” and “pet”
- Treated like a child by Torvald: macaroons (secrecy)
- Child, animal imagery — not yet a “proper woman” (no self actualization)
- Hides her borrowing money from Krogstad and forgery
- Torvald finds out, is outraged. After knowing he is saved, Nora realizes the shallowness of Torvald’s love
- She decides that she was never happy in her life and marriage. Resolves to leave to find herself
Character: Torvald Helmer
- lawyer, recently promoted to Bank Manager
- doesn’t like his own children: “unbearable to anyone except mothers”
- straightforward and traditional in his beliefs about marriage and society — treats Nora like a pet than a real person
- superiority complex against Nils Krogstad: concerneed about his status and reputation (see how he reacts to his rep being saved)
Character: Kristine Linde
- old friend of Nora (foil)
- independent MODERN woman who had a loveless marriage bc of money
- no children due to finances
- in love with Krogstad but K cannot financially support her
- TRADITIONAL: she feels a genuine desire to have people to take care of (not something that is forced upon her)
- Values honesty: encourages Nora to tell the truth by leaving Krogstad’s letter in the letterbox
Character: Dr. Rank
- doctor, best friends with Torvald and Nora
- had feelings for Nora (notably different dynamic than Nora and Torvald)
- Cynical, terminal illness (due to drinking father)
Character: The Nursemaid
- Nurse to both Nora and Nora’s childre
- parallel to Nora and Christine: did what she had to do to survive—leave her own children to provide for them via work
Generational effect of the patriarchy
also Christine + Nursemaid = Nora’s outcome (left family + independence [pre-Krog Christine])
Theme: Love and Marriage
🔹 Nora and Torvald’s Marriage: Surface vs. Reality
- The play centers on the marriage between Nora and Torvald.
- At first, their marriage appears loving and joyful.
- Torvald uses affectionate pet names for Nora; Nora expresses happiness in her role as wife.
- Their relationship seems to contrast positively with others in the play (Krogstad/Mrs. Linde, Dr. Rank).
🔹 Contrasts with Other Characters
- Krogstad and Mrs. Linde’s past marriage choices were based on necessity, not love, and were unhappy.
- Dr. Rank never married and has secretly loved Nora for years.
🔹 Love vs. Social Rules
- Nora and Torvald’s marriage, though based on love, is still shaped by strict societal expectations:
- The husband (Torvald) makes decisions.
- The wife (Nora) must be obedient and support her husband’s image.
- A successful marriage boosts Torvald’s public reputation.
🔹 Nora’s Secret Act of Love
- Nora illegally borrows money from Krogstad to save Torvald’s life—without telling him.
- This act breaks both the law and societal/marital rules.
- Nora views her action as a selfless, loving sacrifice.
🔹 Society Condemns Nora’s Love
- Despite being done out of love, society sees Nora’s act as immoral and illegal.
- Society prioritizes obedience and reputation over love.
🔹 Nora’s Expectation vs. Reality
- Nora believes Torvald will take the blame when her secret is revealed.
- She expects him to protect her, even if it ruins his career.
- This expectation shows Nora’s belief in mutual love and sacrifice.
- Reality: Torvald is horrified by the risk to his reputation and blames Nora instead.
- His response proves that his love is conditional and based on maintaining appearances.
🔹 Disillusionment with Marriage
- Nora realizes Torvald was never “playing a role”—he truly values reputation above love.
- This shatters her view of their relationship and of marriage itself.
- She concludes that true love may be impossible within a socially constructed marriage.
🔹 Krogstad and Mrs. Linde: An Alternative Vision
- Their renewed relationship offers a contrast to Nora and Torvald:
- Built on equality, mutual respect, and purpose.
- Mrs. Linde desires to care for someone out of love, not duty.
- Krogstad sees Mrs. Linde as a partner who can help him restore his integrity, not a trophy.
- Their choice to marry again does not conform to societal expectations, suggesting hope beyond traditional marriage norms.
Would you like this turned into printable cards or a study sheet format next?
Theme: Gender
🔹 Women’s Restricted Roles
- The play critiques the limited roles of women in 19th-century society.
- Women were infantilized—not seen as full individuals capable of independence or decision-making.
🔹 Nora’s Treatment by Others
- Nora is consistently treated like a child:
- Torvald calls her his “pet” and his “property.”
- He implies she’s too irresponsible or unintelligent to handle money.
- Krogstad and Dr. Rank also fail to take her seriously.
- Even Mrs. Linde calls her a “child.”
🔹 Nora’s Compliance and Hints of Resistance
- Nora plays along with this infantilization:
- Refers to herself as “little Nora.”
- Says she would never disobey her husband.
- But she also reveals her frustration:
- She secretly borrowed money—a bold and illegal action.
- Calls it her “pride” and says managing money felt “almost like being a man.”
🔹 Nora’s Growing Dissatisfaction
- Nora initially enjoys the independence of handling money but eventually regrets the secrecy.
- Over time, her dissatisfaction with her role as a woman deepens.
- In the final act, she tells Torvald she’s not treated as a thinking, independent person.
🔹 Nora’s Radical Choice
- She leaves her husband and children to find herself and gain autonomy.
- Torvald begs her to stay and promises to change, but she doesn’t believe change is enough.
- Nora’s departure implies the problem is deeper than Torvald himself—it’s systemic.
🔹 Critique of Domestic Life
- The play critiques domestic life as an institution that:
- Legally and culturally infantilized women.
- Prevented them from being treated as full individuals.
- Nora’s choice to leave represents a rejection of society’s entire framework for womanhood.
🔹 Male Gender Roles
- Men are also confined by societal expectations:
- Torvald and Krogstad are ambitious and status-driven.
- They are expected to be providers and to protect their reputations.
- Torvald’s first concern after Nora’s secret is revealed is his own reputation.
- Krogstad is obsessed with redeeming his name and hopes to take over Torvald’s job at the bank.
Would you like me to compile this with Part 1 into a single study pack or help you make these into printable/reviewable flashcards?
Theme: Money and Work
🔹 The Role of Money in the Plot
- Every major character in the play is affected by financial need.
- Torvald is newly promoted and expects a “big fat income,” but still insists Nora must be frugal.
- Mrs. Linde urgently needs a job after her husband’s death.
- Her hiring at the bank leads to Krogstad’s threat to expose Nora, as he loses his position.
🔹 The Symbolism of the Bank
- The bank is more than a workplace—it symbolizes the power of money in the characters’ lives and relationships.
🔹 Money as Power
- Torvald controls Nora’s spending, showing his dominance over her.
- Krogstad uses Nora’s debt to gain leverage over both her and Torvald.
- Power dynamics in the play are heavily shaped by who controls money.
🔹 Gender and Financial Oppression
- Nora and Mrs. Linde are financially disadvantaged because they are women.
- At the time, women had limited access to earning money, reflecting the sexism of the era.
- Their dependence on men for money is a form of systemic oppression.
🔹 Double-Edged Nature of Money
- Nora is initially proud of having “raised” the money for the trip to Italy.
- But the debt becomes a burden, bringing fear, shame, and anxiety.
- The play shows that money can empower, but it also brings danger and distress.
Theme: Deceit
🔹 Nora’s Secret
- Nora seems obedient and honest at the start of the play.
- It is soon revealed she is hiding a major secret:
- She borrowed money from Krogstad to finance a trip to Italy.
- She claims this trip saved Torvald’s life.
- This contradicts her repeated claims that she has never lied or disobeyed Torvald.
🔹 Deception and Its Consequences
- Nora’s deceit is exposed to Mrs. Linde, who urges her to confess to Torvald.
- Mrs. Linde believes a marriage cannot survive without complete honesty.
- Both Nora and Krogstad are revealed to have committed forgery.
🔹 The Fallout of Deception
- Krogstad’s forgery destroys his reputation.
- Nora’s actions force her to re-examine her identity, marriage, and place in society.
- Ultimately, this leads to her decision to leave her husband and children.
🔹 Deceit as a Social Survival Tool
- Deceit is shown as a corrupting and destructive force, yet it has complex motivations.
- Nora’s deception is driven by love, not selfishness.
- She lied to save Torvald’s life, not to harm anyone.
🔹 Societal Laws and Female Autonomy
- Nora would not have needed to lie if women were legally allowed to handle finances.
- Her dishonesty was a consequence of societal restrictions, not a moral failing.
- The play suggests that the fault lies more with society than with Nora herself.
Theme: Individual vs. Society
🔹 Nora’s Self-Sacrifice
- Nora spends most of the play putting others before herself:
- Her forgery and debt to Krogstad are not for personal gain but to protect Torvald.
- She never considers how it affects her own well-being.
- Near the end, Nora plans to kill herself—not out of shame, but to prevent Torvald from ruining himself by taking the blame.
🔹 Women and Meaning Through Service
- Nora and Mrs. Linde both find purpose through serving others:
- Nora: as a dutiful wife and mother.
- Mrs. Linde: feels life is meaningless without someone to care for.
🔹 Nora’s Realization and Transformation
- Nora realizes that prioritizing duty to her husband and children cannot bring true happiness.
- When Torvald fails to sacrifice for her, she understands:
- The love she believed in was an illusion.
- Society’s structure prevents real, equal love.
- As a result, she chooses to leave her family and pursue her individual identity.
- The play ends with Nora placing her personal growth and truth above society’s expectations.
🔹 Krogstad’s Parallel Journey
- Krogstad is initially obsessed with restoring his reputation after being punished for forgery.
- He wants to gain back societal respectability at all costs.
- In Act 3, through Mrs. Linde, he realizes:
- True happiness comes not from society’s approval, but from personal integrity.
- Like Nora, he learns that self-respect is more important than outward status.
🔹 Shared Moral: Inner Worth Over Public Image
- Both Nora and Krogstad come to understand:
- Society’s opinion is meaningless without self-respect and autonomy.
- Real fulfillment lies in being true to oneself, not conforming to roles imposed by others.
Symbol: Christmas Tree
- family, happiness and unity -> joy of Nora takes in making her home pleasant and attractive (like her home life)
- At the beginning of Act Two: the tree is “bedraggled”, end of Nora’s innocence and foreshadows the fallout of the Helmer family
Symbol: Macaroons
- related to secrecy and Nora’s deceit
- Torvald has banned Nora from eating macaroons and Nora lied that she never disobeyed.
- She also lied to Dr. Rank that some of the macaroons are eaten by Mrs. Linde
- Nora asks for macaroons after the tarantella (association) -> reationship between macaroons and inner passions but must hide in her marriage.
Symbol: The Tarantella
- the show that Nora must put up for Torvald to enjoy
- or alternatively: a side of Nora that she cannot show.
- objectification of Nora via a fiery dance instead of the perfect Victorian wife
- Torvald is more concerned of the impressions of other people
Symbol: The Doll’s House
- a few mentions early on:
- Nora mentioned in Act 1 her daughter’s dolls would likely break -> breaking of family life
- Nora treats her children like dolls: “little dollies” (hint on how the children would likely play the roles society tells them to as society/Torvald did with Nora)
- **Treated like a doll ** (explicitly said in the end): something to amuse the men in Nora’s life
Complete the quote:
“Nora! Just like a woman. Seriously though, Nora, you know what I think about these things [BLANK]! There is something inhibited, something unpleasant, about a home built on [BLANK].”
— Torvald
Themes: Money and work
“No debts! Never borrow!”
“credit and borrowed money”
- Torvald recently received a job promotion but won’t be paid for a few months.
- He scolds Nora for overspending on Christmas gifts.
- Their disagreement highlights their contrasting views on money and debt:
- Torvald: cautious, sees borrowing as irresponsible and immoral.
- Nora: believes spending is acceptable now that financial stability seems assured.
- Torvald makes a sexist remark, saying Nora is acting “just like a woman,” implying women are irrational with money.
- Ironically, Nora has secretly borrowed money, meaning their home is already “built on credit.”
- This irony:
- Undermines Torvald’s perceived control over Nora.
- Challenges the idea that debt automatically leads to unpleasant consequences.
- Foreshadows the eventual collapse of their home and relationship later in the play.
Oh, sometimes I was so tired, so tired. But it was
tremendous fun all the same, [BLANK] . Almost like being a man.
—- Nora
sitting there working and
earning money like that