A- social psychological explanations Flashcards
(33 cards)
what is the first social psychological explanation
peer influence
what did Eiser et al. find
that among adolescents, smokers tend to befriend smokers and non-smokers befriend other non-smokers
explain the social learning theory
albert banduro
we all learn through operant and classical and operant conditioning we can also learn through the observation and initiation of others. in order to learn something, the individual needs to be motivated by 2 processes (observing a role model and vicarious reinforcement)
explain what is meant by observing a role model
this is someone the individual may identify with and admire
explain vicarious reinforcement
SLT emphasise that for a behaviour to be imitated it must be seen as rewarding in some way (it is reinforced) they then learn that repeating these behaviours is worth it
how is SLT applied to addiction
an individual may see their friend smoking, these peers may be role models and they may also be rewarded for smoking through having a higher social status and seemed to be enjoying it (vicarious reinforcement)
this results in the individual imitating the smoking behaviour as they expect a reward. young people are most likely to imitate the behaviour of those who they have the most contact with
what determines whether a behaviour (smoking) will persist
experience (pleasant or unpleasant) with the new behaviour will determine whether it continues (direct reinforcement)
what are social norms
rules of behaviour that are considered acceptable within a particular social group (can affect behaviour)
2 types of social norm
descriptive norm
injunctive norm
what is a descriptive norm
an individual’s perception of how much others engage in behaviours such as smoking or drinking
injunctive norm?
what an individual perceives as others approval of the behaviour
how are social norms applied to addiction
can be applied to alcohol consumption, suggested students overestimate the descriptive and injunctive norms within their peer group, they believe their friends are drinking more alcohol then they are (D norm) and that drinking excessively is more socially acceptable than it actually is (injunctive norm)
evidence found to support perceived social norms
Perkins and berkowitz found a high proportion of the students they surveyed believed being intoxicated was only acceptable in certain circumstances, a high proportion also thought their peers thought it was socially acceptable. they feel no need to reduce their consumption as they think that everyone is doing it more than them anyway
a strength of the peer influence explanation of addiction
can be seen in the supportive evidence available
one study that supports the peer influence explanation
Simons-Morton and Farhat reviewed the findings of 40 prospective studies into the relationship between peers and smoking and found that all but one showed a positive correlation between the two. similar results also found for other addictive behaviours
what can Simons-Morton and Farhat research suggest
supports the link between the behaviour of peers and engagement in addictive behaviours, showing a high level of validity within this explanation of addiction
another research study that supports the peer influence explanation of addiction
Clayton and Neighbours compared a number of factors related to alcohol consumption, found that descriptive and injunctive norms were the best predictor of alcohol consumption among a sample of US college students,
problem with Clayton and NEighbours research
they also only looked at US college students, lacking in population validity therefore we cannot generalise the findings, they are limited so cannot generalise to all individuals
what does Clayton and Neighbours research suggest
. more research needs to be carried out over a larger sample to validate the explanation and apply it to all addictions
one weakness of the peer influence explanation
need to maintain caution as a key problem is determining whether the peers influence the individual to engage in the addictive behaviour (peer influence) or whether individuals chose friends because they also engage in the behaviour (peer selection)
evidence to support the weakness of the peer influence explanation
Ennet and BAuman found that pps who were non-smokers at the start of the study and who had smoking friends were more likely to be smoking by the follow up (evidence of peer influence) there was also evidence that individuals had change membership of friendship groups in line with their smoking/non-smoking behaviour (evidence of selectoin)
another weakness of the peer influence explanation
there is contradictory evidence. other evidence suggests that experimenting with drugs while alone is a key factor in the development of addictions. classic image of a teenager experimenting with cigarettes is whilst being alone in their bedroom, recent research has suggested the role of peers may have been over-emphasised. more research needed.
what is the second social psychological explanation
the role of the media
what is the role of the media explanation
it seems likely that the way addictive behaviour are portrayed in the media could have an affect on people’s attitudes towards these behaviours.