MOM criminal behaviour Flashcards
(31 cards)
what are the 2 big MOM criminal behaviour
anger management
restorative justice
what is the aim of anger management
MOM 1 CB
the aim is to reduce an emotional response (anger) by re-conseptualising the emotion using a range of cognitive behavioural skills. anger management has become one of the most common rehabilitation programmes used both in prisons and in after care
what are the 2 aims of the use of anger management with prisoners
MOM 1 CB
the short-term aim is to reduce anger and aggression in prisons where it is a serious issue.
the longer-term aim of rehabilitation and reduction of recidivism especially for violent criminals
explain anger in prisoners
MOM 1 CB
criminals have a tendency towards irrational thinking, (hostile attribution bias)- this is when someone has a leaning towards always thinking the worst. for example someone smiles at you but you think the person is actually thinking badly about you. this can lead to increased anger
key aims of anger management
MOM CB
is to change the way a person handles anger and aggression- the situation itself may not be changeable but a person can change the way they think about it and so can change their behaviour
Novaco’s three aims
MOM 1 CB
cognitive restructuring: greater self-awareness and control over cognitive dimensions of anger.
regulation of arousal: learning to control the physiological state
behavioural strategies: e.g. problem solving skills,
explain the stress innoculation model
MOM 1 CB
aims to provide a kind of vaccination against future ‘infections’ The therapy tends to be conducted with a group of offenders either inside/outside prison. e.g. during probation
explain conceptualisation
MOM CB
in the initial phase, clients learn about anger generally, how it can be both adaptive and non-adaptive. they analyse their own patterns of anger and identify situations which provoke anger in them.
explain skill aquisition and rehersal
MOM CB
in the second phase, clients are taught various skills to help manage their anger (e.g. self-regulation, cognitive flexibility and relaxation) They are also taught better communication skills so they can resolve conflict assertively without being angry
explain application and follow thoruhg
anger management MOM CB
clients app;y the skill initially in controlled and non-threatening situations such as role plays of situations that previously made them angry. they receive extensive feedback from the therapist and other group members. later clients can try out their skill in real world settings.
explain how anger management can be used with offenders comes from Jane Ireland who….
anger management MOM CB
Jane Ireland assessed the effectiveness of an AM programme with 87 young male offenders. an experimental group of 50 took part in the treatments, 37 other were placed on a wait list. prisoners receiving AM therapy, showed an improvement of at least one of the ‘angry behaviours’ they were being checked for. 8% deteriorated and there was no change for the control group
what is the second MOM criminal behaviour
restorative justice
define RJ what is the concept
second MOM CB
the concept is that offenders should in some way restore the situation to what it was before their crime was committed
explain Carrabine et al
MOM criminal behaviour RJ
reported that in the last 20 years it has moved from the margins of criminology to the centre of the field. The failure of custodial sentencing to reduce offending behaviour has led to the search for alternative approaches
aims of restorative justice
MOM CB
RJ usually involves communication with the victim. may be payment, writing a letter or a chat. offenders are often offered RJ as an alternative to a prison sentence, if the victim has agreed. RJ can address the rehabilitation of offender and attonement for wrongdoings.
explain rehabilitation of offenders
MOM CB RJ
The victim has an opportunity to explain the real impact of the crime enabling the offender to understand the effects on the victim. offenders may learn to take the perspective of others, reduces the likelihood of re offending.
the offender is encouraged to take responsibility for the crime and rhis is hoped to have an effect on their future behaviour. due to needing to actively participate, their attitudes crime may change.
explain atonement for wrongdoing
MOM CB- RJ
offenders may offer concrete compensation for the crime (money/community work) but more importantly showing their feelings of guilt.
explain the victims perspective
MOM CB RJ
RJ can reduce their sense of victimisation as they feel they have a voice. a victim may develop a greater understanding of the offender by listening to their account, may reduce the victims sense of being harmed
Wachtel and McCOld- theory of RJ
MOM CB RJ
their starting point is that the focus should be on relationships rather than punishment. crime harms people and their relationship, restorative justice requires that harm to be healed as much as possible. early models of RJ focused on the offender and victim only but more recent ideas recognise the effect on the wider community. for successful RJ the victim seeks reparation, offender must take responsibility and the community aims to achieve reconciliation to maintain a healthy society. full restoration involves all three stake holders.
Evaluation: effectiveness
success of anger management programmes
anger management programmes are successful in reducing anger. Taylor and Novaco report 75% improvement rates in those who had participated in an AM programme
however Kevin Howels found that anger management programmes only showed moderate benefits and in one study only one person showed improvements
Effectiveness:
Limitations of anger management programmes
CBT in general isn’t for everyone, some offenders don’t like to reflect on their style of thinking. such individuals may well drop out of voluntary anger management programmes for offenders. one alternative is the use of drama-based courses which are less reliant on verbal ability and more engaging. Blacker et al found a number of these type of courses have proved successful. it is also probably true that anger management programmes are best as part of a wider therapeutic.
ethical implications :
lack of voluntary consent +
therapist conflict
anger management
in lots of cases, offenders are required to participate in anger management programme (e.g. condition of probation) unethical as could lead to poor outcomes for the pps. ethical issues are also a balance between costs and benefits so the costs to valid consent could be weighed against the benefits for individual and society through anger reduction
when these interventions are used within prisons there are conflicts for a therapist because they have a duty to the instiution and their client. e.g. a client might tell the therapist information that could threaten the security of the prison or may confess details of the crimes they’ve comitted. breaching therapeutic confidence is only acceptable in the most serious of circumstances. proposes a dilemma for the therapist and would damage the clients trust.
social implications
financial implications
benefits for prison environment
the cost to the economy of re-offending is at least £9.5 billion per year. any method that may reduce this is beneficial to society. if offenders learn to control their anger better once they are released from prison this may prevent them from committing further crimes.
anger management programmes have benefits for prison staff and other prisoners when used in prison environments, they have the potential to reduce aggression and violence, if we accept that anger and aggression are linked. even without the link, aggression alone leads to a hostile environment
effectiveness of restorative justice
Effectiveness from the victims perspective
good evidence that victims who taken part in RJ schemes found it was beneficial. the UK restorative justice council reports 85% satisfaction from victims face-to-face meetings with their offenders. (a large range of crimes)
victims also claim a greater sense of satisfaction than when cases go through mainstream court (Dignan 2005)
