Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Criminal Law > Actus Reus 1 > Flashcards

Actus Reus 1 Flashcards

(87 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

First actus reus principle

A

person should not be convicted solely on basis of thoughts but must also have done a social harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Second actus reus principle

A

act must be voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Third actus reus principle

A

No crim liability for an omission unless person failed to act in an instance where there is a legal duty to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fourth actus reus principle

A

Status crimes are unconstitutional (punish for conduct not for being type of person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Most crimes in US have four elements

A

(1) voluntary act or omission when legal duty to act (2) prohibited mental state (3) chain of causation linking defendant actions with social harm (4) concurrence between mens rea and actus reus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stanley facts

A

during search officers found obscene films

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stanley holding

A

1A protects mere private possession of obscene material within one’s own home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stanley emphasized right to be free from __

A

unwanted govt intrusions into one’s property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stanley says 1A protects the right to ____ even if materials obscene so long as ___

A

receive info and ideas, possession within confines of one’s private home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

There was no compelling reason to outweigh Stanley’s privacy interest because ___

A

no evidence of distribution/selling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

No actus reus in Stanley because the govt cannot dictate what a person ___

A

thinks, reads or watches in privacy of their own home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stanley court thinks that criminalizing possession of certain materials would unduly ___

A

intrude on freedom of thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A volitional act requires ____ and definitely requires more than just __

A

human agency/acting self, brain activity (not seizure hitting person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Habitual acts (chain smoker lighting up without thinking about it) are ____

A

still voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For voluntariness, consciousness is __

A

a matter of degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Martin v State facts

A

officers arrested him at home and then took him onto highway where he engaged in disorderly actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Martin v. State holding

A

M punished for involuntary conduct so can’t be upheld

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Under Martin, to be convicted for being drunk in public you need to ___

A

have voluntarily put yourself there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

State v. Decina facts

A

man with history of epilepsy loses consciousness while driving and swerved onto sidewalk killing 4 people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Decina holding

A

Conduct was voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Under Decina, _______ his failure to consider these renders him criminally liable

A

aware of condition he knows may produce such consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Main difference between Martin and Decina

A

wide vs. narrow time-framing construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Counterargument why Martin should be voluntary

A

voluntary act 1 (beating his wife) causes act 2 (public drunkenness) and is foreseeable in wider timeframe, probability of epileptic blackout lower than probability ending up in public after behavior likely to gain police attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Seminal though case

A

Stanley v. Georgia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Involuntary conduct cases
Martin and Decina
26
Status cases
Robinson and Powell
27
Robinson facts
Police found scar tissue and needle marks on arm. Denied taking drugs and said from military service
28
Robinson statute
to be under influence of or addicted to drugs
29
Robinson statute did not require ___
use or possession
30
Robinson holding
SCOTUS says this violates the 8A, cruel and unusual punishment
31
Robinson reasoning
Addiction is an illness and punishment for having a disease is cruel
32
Powell facts
chronic alcoholic charged with being drunk in public
33
Powell holding
being drunk in public not a status
34
Why doesn't Robinson apply in Powell
(1) Unlike P, R was arrested merely for addiction not criminal conduct, being drunk in public (2) If Robinson applied where to draw the line?
35
Powell dissent
Like Robinson no control over behavior. Once drunk would appear in public without volition, under compulsion of disease of chronic alcoholism
36
Powell White concurrence
Maybe some cases where drunkenness a status but here he failed to show necessary actions (omission crime)
37
To be an omission crime must ___ + ___
cause social harm, mens rea
38
Criminal liability can be based on omission if defendant ___
had legal duty to act and was capable of acting, but did not
39
5 situations where legal duty to act
(1) personal relationship (2) contractual duty (3) statutory duty to act (4) defendant created risk to victim (5) defendant voluntarily assumes care of someone in need
40
What are two dimensions of capable to act?
physically capable + known the facts giving rise to need for action
41
If mother in a lake and does not know the daughter is drowning five feet away then she is ____
not liable for failure to rescue
42
Beardsley facts
affair with woman who overdosed. Knew she was in a stupor and asked assistant to move her to the movement. She died
43
Beardsley holding
No legal duty here
44
Beardsley reasoning
(1) moral duty not the same as legal duty (2) not husband and wife (3) more like a houseguest (no duties) than a wife
45
Erb facts
Met woman for first time that day and drove to mother's house. She used heroin and passed out. He didn't know where she lived so he left her on a lawn and she died
46
Erb holding
No legal duty
47
Erb reasoning
(1) No criminal liability based on failure to act unless legal duty (2) He didn't create the peril, she supplied and injected herself with the drug (3) didn't know her, no special relationship
48
Ibeagwa facts
two young unsupervised children drowned in a pool. mother was notified by a neighbor that they were unsupervised while she was at work
49
Ibeagwa holding
can be liable, conduct showed conscious disregard for consequence of leaving young children unsupervised
50
Ibeagwa reasoning
(1) omissions can be actus reus when legal duty present (2) special parental relationship (3) knew unsupervised
51
Kuntz facts
K and long term partner had altercation. She stabbed him later claiming self defense. didn't call for medical assistance after stabbing him
52
Kuntz holding 1
Yes legal duty based on relationship + creating peril
53
Kuntz holding 2
but when justifiably use force to fend off aggressor, no duty to assist in any way that conceivably creates risk of injury
54
American bystander rule
no legal duty on a person to rescue or summon aid for another person at risk
55
Kuntz qualification
Legal duty to act may attach once person is safe but only if (1) prosecutor can show knowledge of facts indicating duty to act AND (2) person physically capable of performing the act
56
Lindaman facts
required to register as sex offender but didn't
57
Lindaman holding
Statutory duty to register so appropriate to convict for omission
58
Bajakajian facts
traveled internationally with 350K and failed to report so forced to forfeit the money
59
Bajakajian holding
Allowed forfeiture because money involved in crime but reduced the forfeiture to 15K and fined 5K
60
Bajakajian reasoning
(1) full amount would violate 8A excessive fines clause (2) forfeiture of 350 grossly disproportionate to seriousness of the crime
61
Smith v. State facts
high school principal didn't report sex crime on campus for four hours
62
Smith holding
Statute not unconstitutionally vague
63
Smith reasoning
(1) statute doesn't define immediate but dictionary provides sufficient clarity (2) before reporting conducted own investigation and performed unrelated tasks (3) irrelevant that unaware that student-on-student rape constituted child abuse
64
Why did dictionary provide sufficient clarity in Smith?
Statute doesn't need exclusive time limit, immediately means prompty without intervening events or delays (not 24 hours)
65
Smith's own investigation contradicted the ___ AND __
plain meaning of immediate, undermines purpose of protecting children in the statute
66
Why is it irrelevant that Smith didn't know student on student rape constituted child abuse?
mandatory reporters could avoid liability by simply refusing to learn statutory definitions
67
Park facts
P cited for violating FDA sanitation regs. P was Pres and COO of Acme Foods. FDA had sent him two letters regarding unsanitary conditions in the warehouses
68
Park holding
corporate officers can be held criminally liable when he had the ability to prevent the occurrence or correct it after the fact
69
Park reasoning
(1) conceded that providing sanitary condition something responsible for (2) only way corporation can act is through individuals on its behalf (3) requirements stringent but no more so than public right to expect of those who voluntarily assume positions of authority
70
Osborne facts
four explicit photos of a minor found in his home
71
Osborne holding
Freedoms of 1A can be limited if govt strong enough interest -> Ohio can prohibit possession of child porn given gravity of interest in this context
72
What is the govt interest in Osborne
protecting children from exploitation and victimization through resharing of explicit images
73
How is Osborne distinct from Stanley
interest of protecting children/targeting child porn market more compelling that GA wanting to keep minds pure
74
Possession ___ the act requirement
satisfies
75
Is possession really a way of ____?
criminalizing bad thoughts
76
Page facts
found oxy she acquired through old prescription. State said felony because possessed drug outside timeframe of intended use
77
Page holding
person doesn't violate the statute because they fail to take medication as prescribed
78
Page reasoning
(1) valid prescription exception to possession statute (2) remains valid after prescription ends (3) defendant burden to prove valid prescription and then state must prove prescription invalid
79
Possession cases
Page, Osborne
80
Why criminalize possession?
(1) destroy the market (2) proxy offense (assumption someone carrying drugs up to no good)
81
Criminalizing possession satisfies the act requirement when ___ or ___
you acquired it, failed to get rid of it (omission offense)
82
Arguments for criminalizing revenge porn
(1) empirical connection between non-consensual porn and societal harm (2) need to destroy market through people who possess it (3) need criminalization to show moral condemnation
83
Why does the Revenge Porn article suggest Stanley wrongly decided?
(1) certain possession of obscene material should be criminalized (2) maybe all adult porn should be since no method to verify consent
84
Mitchell facts
Black man upset after watching movie where black boy beat by white man so he instigated friends to beat up white boy walking past
85
Mitchell holding
Court can consider associations/beliefs when determining what sentence IF abstract beliefs motivate conduct
86
Mitchell reasoning
(1) physical assault not "expressive conduct protected by 1A" (2) differentiates between thought crime and sentence enhancement (3) crimes motivated by racial bias deserve enhanced penalties because those crimes are more harmful to victims and society
87

Criminal Law (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions