Causation 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Causation is an element of ___ crimes but not __ crimes

A

result, conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus reus requires (1) (2) (3)

A

(1) a voluntary act or omission
(2) causes
(3) the social harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A _____ for causation is employed in criminal as opposed to torts

A

stricter test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

But for cause does not show that the ____ it merely ___

A

D is the primary cause, narrows the field of actors who may be held criminally liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

But for cause asks ____

A

but for D’s voluntary act or omission would the social harm have occurred when it did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Generally intent to do one thing cannot ___

A

be used as substitute for an intent to do another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Transferred intent doctrine holds that a shooter can be liable for intentionally killing even if ___

A

that person was an unintended victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Burrage facts

A

D gave victim heroin. Victim had other drugs in his system and died after taking the heroin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Burrage statute

A

The CSA imposes a 20 year min sentence to one who distributes Schedule 1/2 drugs and death or serious bodily harm results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Burrage holding

A

D didn’t cause the death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Burrage reasoning

A

(1) “results from” requires but-for causation but here without heroin victim still may have died
(2) can’t use substantial factor test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why can’t Burrage use substantial factor test

A

only appropriate for multiple independent factors that could have independently caused the death. Here, each drug contributed but none was an independently sufficient cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Paroline facts

A

D possessed 2 child porn images of victim so victim wanted 3.4 million

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Paroline holding

A

determine how much D contributed to the victim’s overall harm in order for there to be justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Paroline reasoning

A

(1) but for causation can’t be satisfied here
(2) not possible to prove her losses would be less (and by how much) but for one possessor’s individual role in the large, loosely connected network in which her images circulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Paroline shows that but for tests can’t ___

A

always produce just outcomes so may need other causation tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Proximate cause is a question of whether ___

A

fair and just to hold D liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If D direct cause, then __

A

proximate cause is met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

If there are intervening causes after D conduct but before harm and contribute to the harm Defendant is proximate cause unless the intervening cause is ____

A

extremely unusual or bizarre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

If there are intervening causes after D conduct but before harm and contribute to the harm D is not a proximate cause unless the intervening cause is ___

A

foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

King facts

A

K flew plane to transport marijuana and crashed it killing the victim. Charged with felony homicide

22
Q

King statute

A

Second degree felony homicide is the killing of one accidentally contrary to the intention of the parties while in the prosecution of some felonious act

23
Q

King holding

A

For the felony murder rule to apply, the death of a victim must be directly related in time, place, and causal connection to defendant’s commission of a felony

24
Q

King reasoning

A

No causal connection between felony of drug distribution and killing by a plane crash

25
King says that felony homicide death must be ___
from an act caused by the felon from some effort to further the felony
26
King says that maybe if K ____ then conduct furthering felony
flying plane in reckless manner to avoid detection
27
King says that K can't be liable simply because ___
in plane at time of the felony
28
Henderson facts
D encountered intoxicated man robbed him and left on side of the road partially undressed and in near zero degrees. Victim struck by car and died.
29
Ds in Henderson argued that the _____ caused the death
truck driver negligence (10 mph and no attempt to swerve or stop)
30
Henderson statute
A person is guilty of murder in second degree when under circumstances
31
Henderson holding
the ultimate harm was foreseeable as being reasonably related to acts of the accused
32
Henderson reasoning
the determination that Kibbe acted recklessly included a finding that the ultimate harm was foreseeable and that Kibbe caused Stafford's death
33
Henderson says that the jurors likely would have considered a causation instruction ____ so ____
consistently with their consideration of the recklessness instruction, the additional definition would not have influenced the verdic
34
Cleaves facts
Victim had AIDS and wanted to avoid suffering. C helped tie victims hands and held to bed as victim strangled himself
35
Cleaves holding
Sufficient evidence to affirm conviction for second degree murder
36
Marti facts
D fixed the gun to enable his gf to kil herself. She was intoxicated at the time and had been depressed.
37
Marti D argues that once he set down gun ___
his participation in Gloria's death ended as a matter of law (no causation)
38
Marti Trial court instructed the jury as to criteria for determining ___
whether intervening act of Gloria shooting herself was also a superseding act
39
Marti holding
Instruction on causation appropriate. only intervening causes which are also superseding relieve D of liability
40
Marti reasoning
jury needed to determine whether the intervening act of the victim shooting herself was also a superseding act
41
An intervening cause is a an ____
independent force which actively operates in producing harm to another after the actor's negligent act or omission has been committed
42
Commonwealth v Carter facts
Charged with involuntary manslaughter for victim suicide. Texts between her and victim helping plan the suicide and downplaying his fears. During phone call during the suicide, C instructed the victim to get back into car full of carbon monoxide
43
Commonwealth v Carter holding
evidence sufficient to support judge's finding C committed involuntary manslaughter
44
Common v. Carter reasoning
chain of causation broken when victim left the vehicle Until victim got out of truck, victim cause of own suicidal actions
45
Carter says that after victim got out of the car the D ____
overpowered his will and caused the death
46
Why did Carter court say C overpowered victim's will?
(1) in weakened state when left the car (2) consistent with other suicide attempts where he would stop before too late (3) Once got back in the truck, D did nothing to help
47
Deutsche Bank (DB) Facts
Victims killed in terrorist attack. Bank allegedly was a member in a conspiracy to commit acts of terror by providing financial services to Iranian financial institutions
48
DB says that in determining proximate cause _____ are all relevant factors
foresee ability, directness, substantiality
49
DB says a cause is superseding when it is ___
a cause of independent origin that was not foreseeable
50