Addiction - Learning Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

Weaknesses of the learning approach to addiction?

A

Limited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strengths of the learning approach to addiction?

A

Treatment implications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Limitations of learning approach to addiction?

A

Fails to explain why only some people become addicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Treatment implications of learning approach to addiction?

A

Drummond et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Drummond et al?

A

‘Cue exposure’ uses cues without giving the opportunity to engage, leading to stimulus discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Learning approach to gambling initiation researcher?

A

Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Griffiths?

A

Positive reinforcement of physiological buzz, psychological, social and financial rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Brown?

A

Arousal (not winning) is key determinant in gambling addiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Learning approach to gambling maintenance?

A

Intermittent reinforcement
Social approval
Negative reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intermittent reinforcement in gambling researcher?

A

Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Griffiths (IM)?

A

Persistence is strengthened by a win

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social approval in gambling researcher?

A

Lambos et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lambos et al?

A

Peers and family more likely to approve = reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Negative reinforcement in gambling researcher?

A

Rosenthaul and Lesieur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rosenthaul and Lesieur?

A

60% of gamblers reported physical side effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Learning approach to gambling relapse?

A

Conditioned cues

Approach-avoidance conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Conditioned cues in gambling?

A

Generate feelings associated with gambling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Approach-avoidance conflict?

A

Due to both positive and negative consequences they’re motivated to approach and avoid, fluctuating between the two

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Weaknesses of learning approach to gambling?

A

Cannot explain all types of gambling
Reductionist
Why do only some people get addicted?

20
Q

Why can’t the learning approach to gambling explain all types of gambling?

A

e.g. different variable ratios (time between behaviour and consequence) and chances of winning

21
Q

Reductionism in learning approach to gambling?

A

Blaszcynski and Nower

22
Q

Blaszcynski and Nower?

A

2 different pathways: ‘emotionally vulnerable gambler’ (more resistant to change, need to treat underlying vulnerabilities) and ‘behaviourally conditioned pathway’ (least severe)

23
Q

Learning approach to smoking initiation?

A

Kandell and Wu

24
Q

Kandell and Wu?

A

SLT means that young people start due to social models

25
NIDA on smoking initiation?
90% of US smokers started as adolescents due to peers
26
Popularity as a reinforcer in smoking initiation?
Mayeux et al
27
Mayeux et al?
Positive relationship between popularity and smoking after 2 years in 16 year olds
28
Learning approach to smoking maintenance?
Strong conditioned response between nicotine and sensory aspects
29
Learning approach to smoking maintenance researcher?
Franklin et al
30
Franklin et al?
Smoking-related sensory cues become conditioned stimuli
31
Learning approach to smoking relapse?
Conditioned cues | Refusal self-efficacy
32
Conditioned cues in smoking researcher?
Hogarth et al
33
Hogarth et al?
Craving to smoke significantly increased at the presentation of a conditioned stimuli
34
Conditioned cues in smoking?
Activate same areas of brain used in smoking to remind them of positive effects
35
Refusal self-efficacy researcher?
Lawrance and Rubinson
36
Lawrance and Rubinson?
Frequent smoker = less confidence to quit
37
Strengths of learning approach to smoking?
Support Treatment implications Real world applications
38
Weaknesses of learning approach to smoking?
Gender bias
39
Support for initiation in learning approach to smoking?
Karcher and Finn
40
Karcher and Finn?
1.88x more likely to smoke if parents did, 2.64x if siblings did, 8x if peers did
41
Support for relapse in learning approach to smoking?
Thewissen et al
42
Thewissen et al?
Cue predicting smoking -> greater urge to smoke
43
Gender bias in learning approach to smoking?
Lopez et al
44
Lopez et al?
Onset and development of smoking follow different patterns, e.g. women start later
45
Real world applications of learning approach to smoking?
Botvin
46
Botvin?
Effective forms of drug prevention programs (teaching social skills and drug resistance) should target beginner adolescents as it's a crucial development period where they are must vulnerable