agency theory of obedience Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

why did Stanley Milgram investigate obedience?

A
  • Milgram wanted to explain the atrocities committed by the Nazis and investigate obedience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what did historians believe about Nazi soldiers’ obedience?

A
  • historians believed Nazi soldiers had a character flaw that made them more obedient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was Milgram’s view on Nazi soldiers’ obedience?

A
  • Milgram did not believe Nazi soldiers had a character flaw
  • he wanted to test if ‘normal’ people would obey authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did Milgram’s experiment involve?

A
  • Milgram used healthy participants to administer electric shocks to an innocent confederate to test obedience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Milgram conclude from his research?

A
  • Milgram concluded that everyone is capable of extreme obedience, even if it involves hurting someone, which likely serves an evolutionary or societal function
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the nature of human society?

A
  • human society is hierarchical, with many people at the bottom and a few at the top
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why did hierarchical societies survive?

A
  • hierarchical societies evolved for survival
  • those with a hierarchy survived, while others died out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what function does a hierarchy serve in society?

A
  • a hierarchy creates social order and harmony, stabilising society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why is obedience necessary in society?

A
  • obedience maintains social order
  • without it, society would face chaos and breakdown
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what happens if people see themselves as individuals in a social situation?

A
  • if people see themselves as individuals, they will act autonomously, avoiding aggression in threatening situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does Evolution Theory suggest about avoiding aggression?

A
  • Evolution Theory suggests that avoiding aggression aids survival and is a good survival strategy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the basis of Evolution Theory?

A
  • Evolution Theory, based on natural selection, states that tendencies that aid survival are passed on through genes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how are we prepared to be obedient?

A
  • we are innately prepared to be obedient, as exposure to authority figures teaches this behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is socialisation?

A
  • socialisation is the process of learning society’s rules and norms through agents like teachers and parents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is an autonomous state?

A
  • in an autonomous state, individuals see themselves as having power and control over their actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what do individuals in an autonomous state believe about their actions?

A
  • they believe their actions are voluntary and they have free will to make their own decisions
17
Q

what happens when someone moves from an autonomous state to an agentic state?

A
  • they may receive an instruction from an authority figure, leading them to shift into an agentic state
18
Q

what is an agentic state?

A
  • in an agentic state, individuals act as agents for others, typically in authority
19
Q

what happens to an individual’s conscience in an agentic state?

A
  • their conscience is not in control
  • they lose the ability to make decisions independently
20
Q

what happens to free will in an agentic state?

A
  • individuals lose free will and no longer make their own decisions
21
Q

what is moral strain?

A
  • moral strain occurs when people are asked to do something they feel is immoral or unjust
22
Q

how does moral strain affect individuals?

A
  • it makes individuals feel uncomfortable, anxious, and distressed in the situation
23
Q

why do individuals experience anxiety in moral strain?

A
  • anxiety arises as they contemplate dissent and consider acting against what they’ve been socialised to do
24
Q

why do individuals shift to an agentic state?

A
  • to alleviate moral strain, individuals shift to an agentic state, displacing responsibility onto the authority figure
25
what does shifting to an agentic state do for an individual?
- it absolves the individual from the consequences of their actions by **shifting responsibility to the authority figure**
26
what can disobedience to authority figures produce?
- disobedience can **produce relief** once the individual has **removed themselves from the situation**
27
what is the agentic shift?
- the agentic shift is the **change from the autonomous state to the agentic state** when **confronted with a legitimate authority figure**
28
how do we judge others in the agentic shift process?
- we **quickly judge** if others are **higher or lower than us in the social hierarchy** and whether they have **legitimate authority**
29
supporting evidence: M
**Milgram** - first obedience experiment - **65%** of ppts obeyed an authority figure and potentially harmed an innocent confederate - evidence for agency theory: ppts showed **moral strain** (anxiety) when given the order to harm - many participants believed the responsibility for their actions lay with the **experimenter**, not themselves - this demonstrates **displacement of responsibility**
30
other things (strength): My Lai
- **american soldiers** were ordered to shoot the occupants of My Lai, suspected of being Vietcong soldiers - **lieutenant Calley** instructed his division to enter the village and shoot, despite **no return of fire** - the soldiers **massacred old men, women and children** after Calley’s orders - in his **court martial**, Calley claimed he was **just following orders** - justification has been cited in real-life cases of atrocities and offers support for agency theory involving **displacement of responsibility**
31
supporting evidence: H et al
**Hofling et al** - a **stooge doctor** called a nurse late at night, instructing her to administer **twice the daily dose** of a drug to a patient - the doctor told the nurse that he would **sign the prescription later**, violating hospital policy - **21 out of 22 nurses** followed the doctor’s orders and attempted to give the medication - the nurses **displaced personal responsibility** onto the authority figure (the doctor), supporting **agency theory**
32
other things (weakness): individual differences
- **agency theory** does not explain **individual differences** in obedience and dissent - **dissent** can occur due to various factors, such as **personality type, gender,** and **situation** - this suggests that **obedience** is a more **complex process** than agency theory accounts for
33
other things (weakness): definition and measuring
- concepts of **autonomy** and **agency** are difficult to define and measure - **agency** is a **state of mind** that, according to **Milgram**, is switched on when given an order by an authority figure - **agency** is an internal mental process that cannot be directly measured, only **inferred** from the **behaviour** of the agent
34
other things (weakness): evolution + CA
- there is **no direct evidence** for the **evolutionary basis** of obedience - we cannot **study obedience** directly in our evolutionary past or find **archeological evidence** for this behaviour - **however**, **similar hierarchical systems** exist in **animal groups**, such as primates, with similar sanctions for obedience - it can be **inferred** that obedience has evolved to serve some form of **survival function** for **social groups**
35
other things (weakness): F + R
- **agency theory** does not explain the **motivational issues** behind obedience - **French and Raven** identified **five bases of power** that motivate and influence behaviour: **legitimate power, reward power, referent power, expert power and coercive power** - these bases are said to provide a **better explanation** of obedience - they offer a more comprehensive explanation for **Milgram’s findings** in his experiments
36
other things (weakness): P
- **Perry** questioned **internal validity** of Milgram’s study - she argues that many **ppts saw through the deception** in the exp - **Perry** reviewed **released evidence** from **Yale University archives** of Milgram’s study - evidence suggests that many ppts **questioned** whether **shocks were real**