Aggression Flashcards
Neural - The limbic system (amygdala)
Amygdala: • Responsible for quickly evaluating the emotional importance of sensory information
and prompting an appropriate response.
Kluver & Bucy - destruction of amygdala in a dominant monkey
caused it to lose its dominant place in the social group.
Monkeys failed to recognise the ‘emotional importance of events’
Neural - the limbic system - hippocampus
• Involved in formation
In of LT memories, so animals can compare conditions of current
threat with similar past experience. Impaired hippocampal function may cause the amygdala to respond inappropriately sensory stimul
Boccardi et al - habitually violent offenders exhibited abnormal hippocampal functioning
Neural mechanism - serotonin
Typically inhibits the function of the amygdala.
• If an individual has low levels of serotonin:
→ the inhibitory effect is removed
→ the amygdala becomes more active
→ the individual is more likely to respond aggressively
X
• Drugs that reduce serotonin levels increase aggressive behaviour.
• Mann et al gave 35 healthy participants dexfenfluramine (depletes serotonin) and found an increase in hostility and aggression scores on a
questionnaire in males, but not females.
Hormonal mechanism - testosterone
Testosterone produces male characteristics • It is thought to be linked to aggressive behaviour for
several reasons:
• Males are generally more aggressive than females Males become more aggressive towards other males at a time in development (21-35) when testosterone
levels are at their highest (Daly and Wilson) Animal castration studies, e.g. Wagner et al - aggression levels in mice decreased following castration, and then increased when the mice were
later injected with testosterone. Studies of prison populations, e.g.
Dabbs et al - measured salivary testosterone in violent and non-violent criminals. Those with highest
levels had a history of violent crimes.
Hormonal mechanism - progesterone
There is some evidence that progesterone plays a role in aggressive behaviour in
women. • Levels of progesterone vary throughout the menstrual cycle and are lowest during
and just after menstruation. • Ziomkiewicz et al found a negative correlation between progesterone levels and self-
reported aggression.
Research support for neural mechanisms
Pardini et al conducted a longitudinal study whereby participants with varying histories of violence were subjected to MRI scans. The participants with lower amygdala volume exhibited higher levels of aggression and violence, even
when confounding variables were controlled. Rosado et al compared a sample of dogs that had been referred due to their aggressive behaviour towards humans, with a control sample that did not exhibit aggressive behaviour. The aggressive dogs had significantly lower
serotonin levels than the non-aggressive dogs.
RS for hormonal mechanisms
For example, Dolan et al found a positive correlation between testosterone levels and aggressive behaviour in a sample of 60 male offenders in UK maximum security hospitals. These men mostly had personality disorders and
histories of impulsively violent behaviour. Further evidence for this link comes from animal studies. For example, there is evidence that during mating season there is an increase in both testosterone
levels and aggressive behaviour in male rhesus monkeys.
Biological reductionism
According to this explanation, aggression is the result of neural and hormonal influences alone, however there are studies that contradict this. For example, Albert et al found no correlation between testosterone levels and violent
behaviour among prison inmates. Other psychologists would argue that aggression may be the result of other factors instead. For example, Bandura suggested that aggressive behaviour is
exhibited due to the observation and imitation of violent role models.
Genetic factors - twin studies
Coccaro et al - direct physical assault, 50% MZ, 19% DZ
Verbal aggression, 28% MZ, 7% DZ
Genetic factors - adoption studies
Hutchins and Mednick -
14,000 adopted males in Denmark, adoptee most likely to become criminal if biological and adoptive parents were. Biological had a greater influence
Genetic factors - The MAOA gene
High levels of gene (MAOA-H)
Low levels (MAOA-L)
Caspi et al, boys with MAOA-L more likely to exhibit antisocial behaviour, but only if they had been mistreated as children
Boys with H variant who were maltreated and L variant who weren’t maltreated didn’t display antisocial behaviour
Strength - RS for genetics
Miles and Carey, meta analysis 24 twin studies and adoption studies, aggressive antisocial behaviour was a consequence of genetic contributions
Influence of genes increases with time.
Strength - MAOA explains gender differences
Niehoff MAOA linked to X chromosome, women inheriting the same gene are unaffected compared to men
Weakness of genes - biological determinism
Coccoro et al should be 100%. Zimbardo suggested it’s due to deindividuation
Ethnological - adaptive function of aggression
Lorenz - main function of aggression is adaptive
It’s beneficial to survive because a defeated animal is rarely killed just forced to move territory
It establishes dominance
Ritualistic aggression
Lorenz, displaying claws and teeth etc
Assess relative strength of opponent before fighting
Appeasement displays - inhibit aggressive behaviour and signal defeat
Innate releasing mechanisms and fixed action patterns
Biological structure or process which is activated by a sign (environmental stimulus) that in turn triggers a FAP which is a fixed action pattern which is a sequence of stereotypical preprogrammed behaviours
Characteristics of FAPs
- stereotyped
- universal
- unaffected by learning - same for everyone regardless of experience
- ballistic - once triggered can’t be stopped
- single purpose
- responds to specific sign stimulus
Key study of ethnological
Tinbergen - presented sticklebacks with a series of wooden models with different shapes. Found that regardless of shape of the model had a red spot (IRM) the sticklebacks would become aggressive and attack it (FAP), FAPs we’re stereotypical l, universal and ballistic
Evaluations of ethnological explanation
RS - Kluver and Bucy, amygdala of dominant monkey destroyed, became less aggressive. Has an innate basis supporting IRM
Ignores nurture, FAP has been replaced with behaviour pattern as they can be modified by experience
Goodall observed chimpanzees. Males slaughtered another community in a premeditated fashion not needing an IRM, violence continued despite signals of appeasement
Evolutionary explanation
Sexual jealousy - major motivator in males, cause of paternity uncertainty. Men are at risk of cuckoldry which is when a man unknowingly invests his recourses into children that aren’t his leaving him with fewer resources for his owb
Mate retention strategies
Wilson and daly identified two strategies
- direct guarding - vigilance over partners behaviour, controlling and restricting autonomy
A negative inducements - issuing threats or consequences of infidelity “I’ll kms if you leave me”
Physical violence against partner
Wilson et al found that women who reported mate retention strategies were twice as likely to experience physical violence of these women 73% needed medical attention and 53% said they feared for their lives
Evolutionary explanation of bullying
Bullying is a maladaptive behaviour which is the result of poor socialisation or child abuse however could be seen as adaptive
Bullying traits attract females as it shows dominance and protection, wards of potential rivals and makes them less vulnerable to aggression against them