Alex's China & the World Economy Part A: Housing Sector I. Explaining the high saving rates in China - 4. The Role of Siblings Flashcards
(6 cards)
Which source is this whole section based on?
Zhou, W. (2014). Brothers, household financial markets and saving rate in
China. Journal of Development Economics, 111, 34-47
The Role of Siblings in Chinese Household Saving (Zhou, 2014)
Zhou (2014) explores how brothers affect household saving behavior in China.
In underdeveloped financial markets, family acts as a safety net.
2008: Over 80% of debtors borrowed from family/relatives; <20% from financial institutions.
One-Child Policy reduced sibling numbers → weakened informal safety nets → increased saving.
Mechanisms:
Risk-sharing: More brothers = less need to save for emergencies.
Parental support: Brothers share the cost of supporting aging parents.
Empirical Evidence on Siblings and Saving Rates
Data: 2002 China Household Income Project (CHIP).
When asked how they’d raise 10,000 RMB in an emergency:
60% said “family/relatives”
<3% said “financial institutions”
Findings:
Households with 0 or 1 brother save more than those with 2+ brothers.
Number of sisters has little effect, except among younger generations.
Population policy context:
1979–2015: One-Child Policy → fewer siblings → higher saving.
Statistical Relationship Between Brothers and Saving
Figure 6: More brothers → lower saving rate, not driven by income.
Regression model:
Controls for total siblings and household characteristics.
Coefficient on “brother” is negative and significant.
One brother instead of a sister reduces saving rate by 4.7%.
Effect is weaker in rural areas (due to village-level risk-sharing).
Why Do Brothers Reduce Saving?
Income uncertainty and health risk:
Households with higher risk show stronger brother effects.
Risk measured via wage stability and health status.
Regional financial development:
Brother effect is smaller in areas with:
Higher insurance density
More foreign banks
Parental support:
Fewer surviving parents → smaller brother effect.
Male children are culturally expected to support parents.
How do income levels influence the effect of brothers on saving behavior?
Table 6: Brother effect is strongest among low-income/low-asset households.
Confirms that brothers:
Extend borrowing limits
Provide risk-sharing
Zhou (2014) concludes:
One additional brother reduces saving rate by at least 5 percentage points.
Decline in brothers explains 38% of the rise in urban saving rates (1990–2005).
Highlights the urgent need to develop formal financial markets as sibling-based safety nets decline.