An Inspector Calls Analysis Flashcards
(34 cards)
Explain what Mr Birling symbolises
Birling is corrupt and unfeeling, caring nothing for the people he has power over. He symbolises capitalism.
Explain the possible connotations of Mr Birling’s name
Arthur is named after King Arthur, to symbolise how much power he has in society as a rich manufacturer, magistrate and Lord Mayor. This is also used ironically, because King Arthur is a symbol of good rule - he’s an idealised king, unlike Mr Birling, who Priestley wants the audience to detest.
Explain how Mr Birling links to 1945 politics
- When he describes himself, ‘I’m talking as a hard headed, practical man of business” which is an allusion to the “hard headed man of business”, a phrase used by a prime minister between the wars, to show how the business owners made profits from the war. This was echoed in the Labour Party Manifesto of 1945.
- Priestly wanted to show that socialism is the idea of caring for everyone in society, which he believed would save them from another war.
- War was a way of making profit, for example creating solider’s uniforms that would be used by millions and building panes that would be destroyed and need replacement.
Explain how Mr Birling uses capitalism to his advantages
- Capitalism treats women as commodities. Birling is willing to sell his daughter to Gerald as a business opportunity. Firstly, he wants her to accept the infidelity: “Now, Sheila, I’m not defending him. But you must understand that a lot of young men…”
- Mr Birling refers to the marriage as an ‘alliance’ between companies. He sees this mariage as a way to improve business.
Explain the possible connotations of Mr Birling’s reference to the Titanic
- His reference to the Titanic as “unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable” is dramatic irony intended to make him look stupid and, as a symbol of rich capitalists, make them look stupid also.
- In addition, the Titanic possibly represents the upper classes - Priestley wants to show that their power and privilege will also be sunk by the peace and election which follow the second world war.
State the themes are represented through the character Eva Smith
- Priestly uses her as a construct to represent the working classes, the “millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths.”
- But she also represents the female workforce. Priestley does this because it is women who now have the vote in 1945, but didn’t in 1912.
- Women are therefore the ones who are most likely to reject the lack of power they have had, and vote for a Labour government and a socialist society.
Explain how Eva Smith represents female empowerment
- Women also have by far the most to gain economically. The root of Eva’s tragedy is that she does not have economic independence
- She is lucky to get the Milwards job, as a vacancy only occurs due to the death of the previous worker through “influenza”.
- Over a million women have also been lucky in the Second World War, as they took on the jobs left by men conscripted into the armed forces. They know that, like the women who were employed in the first world war, they will lose their jobs if the government is dominated by capitalists.
Explain what Eva Smith’s names possibly symbolise
- Eva is named after Eve, the mother of mankind in Genesis. This means Priestley wants her to represent women of every class, not just the working classes.
- He does this by focusing on the sexual exploitation she suffers.
- This idea of exploitation is also spelled out in her choice of name, Daisy Renton.
- This clearly implies how she sees her relationship with Gerald as for “rent”
- This is ironic as Gerald recieves a set of rooms for free from a friend who went to Canada for 6 months. However, when the friend comes back, Gerald abandons Eva as he would have to find mother house for her to live in and start paying rent. This is no longer ‘convenient’ for Gerald.
Explain the economic bargain that women are forced to make through the character of Eva Smith
- Eva accepts the economic bargain which Gerald offers, security and accommodation in exchange for him to sexually exploit her.
- This is the same bargain which Sheila is being asked to make in accepting Gerald even though he has been unfaithful to her. Society encourages women to accept this and call it love. The way out of this, of course, is employment.
- An employed woman does not have to accept a husband who is unfaithful. Priestley wants the women in his audience to seek this status.
Explain how the consequences of sexual exploitation are shown through the character Eva Smith
- In her choice of disinfectant, Priestley is pointing out his disgust at the sexual exploitation which has led Eva to this terrible decision.
- Eva would rather die than accept anything from Eric. Not just his stolen money, or his offer of marriage. She even rejects his child. She wants to be cleansed, or purified of every trace of Eric, hence the disinfectant.
- This is a quite astonishing decision and truly reflects Priestley’s anger not just at the financial inequalities, but at terrible sexism in his patriarchal society.
- This is what makes it a feminist play.
Explain what the Inpector represents
- The Inspector is a proxy for Priestley’s socialist views. The simple part of his message is delivered just before he leaves.
- His socialist message is that we are “intertwined” with everyone, and so have a responsibility to the working classes, in their “millions and millions and millions”.
- “We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.”
Explain how Priestly shows the theme of Christianity in AIC through the Inspector
- “We are members of one body” is a deliberate echo of the communion, because 80% of a 1945 audience would be regular church goers, and the Biblical allusion would be obvious to them. This links Priestley’s socialist message, that “we are all responsible for each other” to the Christian message which even the most anti socialist capitalist will already accept in Christian teaching.
- This is much more persuasive than simple politics – it tells his audience that the only moral, Christian society must also be socialist.
Explain how Priestly has made this an anti-war play
- His very final words are “And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they well be taught it in fire and blood and anguish. Good night.”
- The prediction of “fire and blood and anguish” is clearly a description of both World Wars.
- Priestley is making a direct link between capitalism and the desire for war.
Explain how war is an economic consequence of capitalism
- The “lesson” is that in order to expand markets and defeat competition, Britain will go to war against its main economic rival, Germany, with devastating consequences for the upper classes, who lost more sons.
- This was due to their status as officers - officers led from the front, and of course were much more likely to be shot once out of the trenches.
Explain the feminist message presented by the inspector
- There is a feminist message. It is “men”, not ‘man’ or ‘mankind’ who must learn this lesson.
- The Inspector is appealing directly to Priestley’s female audience, and inviting them to see war as a male idea. Voting for socialism will also reject Churchill, the great wartime Prime Minister.
- This is extraordinary when we look back on it. Churchill was arguably the most popular Prime Minister Britain had ever had. But he was forever identified with war.
- Like Priestley, his female audience rejected war, and Labour won a landslide victory.
Explain how the stage directions have an effect on the portrayal of the inspector
- As the teacher, the Inspector has made his point, and the death of Eva smith and her child has had a powerful impact on the Birlings - “Eric is brooding” while Sheila is “quietly crying.”
- However, in performance, this scene can possibly be portrayed with outrage and quite aggressive anger. In the stage directions, there is a “front door slam” which is the last sound of the Act.
Explain the political purpose of the play
- The family of 1912 reject the lesson, so the two World Wars happen.
- The play is a further chance for the lesson to be learned by the audience.
- Priestly had a popular radio show, but Winston Churchill told the BBC to sack Priestly has he did not like his socialist views. Therefore, Priestly is trying to show that the upper class has too much power.
- That’s the political purpose of the play, with the Inspector and Priestley taking on the role of the teacher.
State 4 main points about Sheila
- Although she learns the Inspector’s lesson, she cannot act on it, because she has no political voice, or social power.
- In 1912, women have no vote. Priestly sets the play in 1912 to show how women had a lack of power.
- She cannot become independent of her parents except through marriage.
- She does not dismiss Gerald, but offers to “start again” and doesn’t refuse the engagement ring, saying only “not yet”.
Explain how Shiela symbolises the patriarchal society in the play
- The patriarchal society is likely why her learning the lesson is not enough to prevent the second phone call, and the second death of Eva. Perhaps either Sheila did not learn her lesson because she went back to Gerald, or she learnt her lesson but was powerless to act and forced to go back to Gerald.
- It also suggests that she will be forced by the patriarchal society to marry Gerald. He is at least “honest” about his affair. Sheila is grateful for this.
- It implies she knows that any upper class male is likely to have affairs and be deceitful. Gerald’s regret makes him stand out in contrast to the way another husband might exploit and deceive her.
Explain how Sheila represents how women were disenfranchised (having no right to vote)
- Financially, and socially, Sheila won’t find a better husband. Priestley implies that Sheila will be unable to resist marrying him because she has no reasonable alternative. This, of course, is a tragedy.
- She has learned the Inspector’s lesson, but is powerless to act on it. Even if she behaves as though “we are all of one body”, it makes little difference to society, as she has no vote, and being female she can’t influence society by being an MP or running her father’s business.
Explain how Priestly shows that men are the main problem through Shiela
- The inspector leaves towards the beginning of act 3, and Shiela acts in the place of the inspector, asking her family similar questions.
- Sheila delivers part of Priestley’s message, that “men” are the danger to society, and “men” have twice taken the country to war.
State some main points about Sybil Birling
- Symbolises the uncaring nature of capitalism, “But I accept no blame for it at all.”
- Symbolises pride - the Morality Play
- Symbolises class prejudice - “girls of that class.”
Explain Sybil Birling’s name
- Sybil is named after the Sibyls from Greek myth, who were famous for their gifts of prophecy and the ability to see into the future. This is ironic, as Sybil is blind to the truth
- She knows nothing of Eric’s alcohol addiction, is totally unaware of Alderman Meggarty’s sexual attacks on young women, has no idea Eric is in a relationship with Eva, or that he has got her pregnant.
- When she is confronted with the truth, she refuses to believe it: “I don’t believe it. I won’t believe it…”
- She also exhibits this blindness by expecting Sheila to turn a blind eye to Gerald’s infidelity, “just as I had” - social blindness
- The sexist patriarchal society has forced her to accept the injustice of the man that she is married to so that she could live a happy life.
Explain Sybil Birling’s link to welfare state
- Sybil is kept till last because she represents the last resort, the safety net that society should provide to the poor.
- In 1945, this was the birth of the welfare state.
- In 1912 and between the war, welfare was often left to charities. This is what Priestley is wants to change. So, he shows how charity cannot possibly work.
- Priestly is trying to show the need for the government to provide help instead of charities, which is a flawed system because the rich provide the money for charities, so the rich decided who gets the welfare. Therefore, this money will not be distributed equally.