April 2, Lec9, Pt3: Nutri Interventions: Who Does What and How? Flashcards
(35 cards)
Gov’s role in combating hunger and malnutrition?
- Moral leadership/guarantor of a human right (religious institution also can serve the moral leadership role)
- Gov can conduct policies and interventions at a scale (no other actor can mobilize the scale of resources like the gov)
- Coordination of efforts (Gov more effective at leading and coordination efforts)
- Regulatory interventions (only the gov has the authority to regulate)
- industry can create voluntary regulations (voluntary labeling/fortification) but less comprehensive - Info interventions: Gov’s more likely to be able to provide trusted info
- Private companies also give lots of nutri info, but not 100% trustworthy - Cost effectiveness of gov interventions: sometimes gov do things at lower costs
- Public good nature of benefits (Many nutri issues have widespread benefits for society, but only small benefits for indivs. Positive externalities to better nutri
Econ cost-benefit of GOV in nutri interventions: YAYS and NAYS
YAYS:
- well financed
- long-term view
- can mobilize big resources
NAYS:
- slow and bureaucratic
- politicized decision making
Econ cost-benefit of NON-GOV ORGS in nutri interventions: YAYS and NAYS
YAYS
- fast moving
- connections to the community
NAYS
- coordination issues
- indiv decision making
- low sustainability
Econ cost-benefit of PHILANTHROPHIES in nutri interventions: YAYS and NAYS
YAYS
- can access financing
- can move fast
NAYS
- coordination issues
- donor driven agenda, less accountable to community
- low sustainability
Econ cost-benefit of OTHER COUNTRIES in nutri interventions: YAYS and NAYS
YAYS
- well financed
- long-term view
- can mobilize big resources
NAYS
- donor driven agenda
- coordination issues with host gov
who should be prioritized/helped by nutri interventions?
- kids
- mothers
- the poor
- ppl of certain region
Why not everyone?
Why would we prioritize some people and not others with nutri interventions?
- Better “return on investment” for some types of people (cost-benefit calcs)
- Morality
- Vulnerability
Regarding ‘Why Should wE Prioritize some Ppl not Others?’:
-> Describe [Better “return on investment” for some types of ppl/cost-benefit calcs]
- Healthy kids have long lives to live = largest potential benefit
- Well nourished kids learn more = increased benefit
Regarding ‘Why Should wE Prioritize some Ppl not Others?’:
-> Describe [Morality]
- Kids aren’t responsible for their own poverty
- Are adults responsible for their poverty and not worthy?
Regarding ‘Why Should wE Prioritize some Ppl not Others?’:
-> Describe [vulnerability]
- Choose ppl most vulnerable to nutri harms
- Is the goal to reduce potential long-term harms?
Define: targeting “leakage”
Errors of inclusion
to nontargeted indivs, households, regions
Define targeting “Exclusion”
Errors of exclusion
missing intended beneficiaries
Consequences for targeting errors
Over inclusion
- added costs
- disincentives to work
Exclusion
- lower impact
- humanitarian/moral consequences
Draw graph ‘Targeting: Inclusion and Exclusion of Groups’
TARGETED, FOOD INSECURE -> 1. Successful targeting
TARGETED, FOOD SECURE -> 2. Inclusion error (Leakage)
NOT TARGETED, FOOD INSECURE -> 3. Exlucsion error (Under-coverage)
NOT TARGETED, FOOD SECURE -> 4. Successful targeting
Define: ‘mean tested’
having income thresholds determined by one’s income (from tax forms), wages (weekly paychecks), and assets (bank accounts, real estate).
Move poverty programs in the US are __________
means tested
Advantages of means tested ppoverty programs
Improves targeting: only people who meet criteria receives program
- No program leakage
Disadvantages of means testing poverty program
- Administrative burden, harder to sign up, time consuming
- Exclusion of those who don’t meet burden
Poverty is better at doin what than food insecurity?
Poverty has clearer lines for determining who is eligible than food insecurity
How to decide what is the right poverty line?
Draw the “Level of Poverty” versus “Targeted by the Intervention?” graph
Poor+Targeted: Correct Targeting
NotPoor+Targeted: Inclusion error (leakage)
Poor+NotTargeted: Exclusion error (Under coverage)
NotPoor+NotTargeted: Correct Targeting
Draw the “Level of Poverty” versus “Targeted by the Intervention?” graph
Poor+Targeted: Correct Targeting
NotPoor+Targeted: Inclusion error (leakage)
Poor+NotTargeted: Exclusion error (Under coverage)
NotPoor+NotTargeted: Correct Targeting
What was the one exception to the “we hate leakage” mantra?
Short term COVID efforts
How was Covid being an exception to “we hate leakage” mantra look like?
- Everyone was eligible for free vaccines/testing kits/masks
- Child tax credit given to everyone irrespective of their income
- Businesses got Covid money without filing out forms
Equitable Access includes:
- Online accessibility
- Mobile accessibility
- Call Center accessibility
- Local Office accessibility
- Application burden
- Customer satisfaction