Areas of Functioning Flashcards
(25 cards)
Supporting evidence for localisation of function?
Petersen et al. and Phineas Gage.
What does Petersen et al. support?
localisation of function
describe Petersen et al.
used brain scans to demonstrate that Broca’s area was active during a verbal reasoning task, and Wernicke’s area was active during a listening task.
what does Phineas Gage support?
localisation of function
describe phineas gage
Gage had a metal pole impale his frontal lobe. people reported changes to his personality after this event.
contradictory evidence for localisation of function?
danelli et al.
what does danelli et al. contradict?
localisation of function
describe danelli et al.
investigated a young boy who lost most of the left hemisphere of his brain, removing his linguistic abilities. however, after intensive rehabilitation, he developed sufficient linguistic skills.
supporting evidence for functional recovery?
danelli et al.
what does danelli et al. support?
functional recovery
supporting evidence for neuroplasticity
maguire et al.
what does maguire et al. support?
neuroplasticity
describe maguire et al.
compared the MRI scans of 16 male taxi drivers to 50 non-taxi drivers. the posterior hippocampus, which is associated with spatial and navigational skills, was significantly larger in the taxi drivers, and the volume of the hippocampus was positively correlated to time spent as a taxi driver.
what does ratcliffe et al. show?
gender bias in neuroplasticity
evidence for gender bias in neuroplasticity?
ratcliffe et al.
describe ratcliffe et al.
examined 325 patients with brain trauma who had completed rehabilitation. when assessed on cognitive skills a year later, women performed better on attention, memory, and language, while men had better visual skills.
what does huttenlocher contradict?
neuroplasticity
contradictory evidence for neuroplasticity?
huttenlocher
describe huttenlocher
found that neuroplasticity reduces with age.
what does sperry et al. support
hemispheric lateralisation
supporting evidence for hemispheric lateralisation?
sperry et al.
describe sperry et al.
investigated split brain patients with epilepsy whose corpus callosum had been cut down the middle, so no information from the left hemisphere could travel to the right hemisphere. found that participants couldn’t describe what was seen in their left visual field, while they could easily do this with an object in the right visual field. participants were able to identify a matching object to the object in their left visual field through touch, using their left hand. if two words were shown, one in each visual field, the participant would name the object in the right visual field, and grab the object from the left visual field with their left hand. when asked to identify matching faces, the face shown in the left visual field was consistently selected from a list of other faces, while the face from the right visual field was ignored.
contradictory evidence for hemispheric lateralisation?
turk et al.
what does turk et al. contradict?
hemispheric lateralisation