Argument Types Flashcards

1
Q

Author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity, or when an author uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity

A

Numbers and Percentages Errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assumes that conditions will remain constant overtime, and that what was the case in the past continues in the present and will be the case in the future

A

Time Shift Errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Straw Man

A

The author attempts to attack an opponent’s position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument, making it weaker in the process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Authors misuse information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or they provide information that is irrelevant to their conclusion

A

General Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements

A

Internal Contradiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
-do not confuse a false dilemma with a situation where the author legitimately establishes that only two possibilities exist

A

False Dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method of Reasoning

A

Ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the way in which the author made his or her argument
Ex.:”Which one of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Survey Errors

A
  • The survey uses a biased sample
  • The survey questions are improperly constructed
  • Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable

A

False Analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ask you to identify the answer choice that cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in the stimulus
Ex.: “If the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?”

A

Cannot be True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal Contradiction

A

Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Error of Conditional Reasoning

A

Author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition, or mistakes a sufficient condition for a necessary condition

  • Mistaken Negation
  • Mistaken Reversal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cannot be True

A

Ask you to identify the answer choice that cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in the stimulus
Ex.: “If the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Parallel Reasoning

A

Ask you to identify the answer choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus
Ex.:”which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false
  • Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true
  • Some evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is false
  • Some evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is true
A

Errors in the Use of Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Appeal to Emotion

A

Occurs when emotion or emotionally charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the error of reasoning committed by the author
Ex.:”The reasoning in the astronomer’s argument is flawed because this argument…”

A

Flaw in the Reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Require you to identify a point of contention between two speakers, and thus these questions appear almost exclusively with two-speaker stimuli
Ex.:”Larson and Manuela disagree about whether”

A

Point at Issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Error of Composition

A

An error of composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group or entity to the group or entity as a whole or to each member of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Time Shift Errors

A

Assumes that conditions will remain constant overtime, and that what was the case in the past continues in the present and will be the case in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition, or mistakes a sufficient condition for a necessary condition

  • Mistaken Negation
  • Mistaken Reversal
A

Error of Conditional Reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Point at Issue

A

Require you to identify a point of contention between two speakers, and thus these questions appear almost exclusively with two-speaker stimuli
Ex.:”Larson and Manuela disagree about whether”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Circular Reasoning

A

The premise supports the conclusion, but the conclusion equally supports the premise
- author assumes as true what is supposed to be proved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ask you to identify an assumption of the authors argument

Ex.:”Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above?”

A

Assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad, sweeping conclusion
Exceptional Case/ Overgeneralization
26
• Must be true questions ask you to identify the answer choice that is best proven by the information in the stimulus
Must be True/ Most Supported
27
Ask you to select the answer choice that provides support for the author's argument or strengthen's it in some way Ex.: "Which one of the following, if true, most strengthen's the argument?"
Strengthen/ Support
28
Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Authority
29
* The survey uses a biased sample * The survey questions are improperly constructed * Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses
Survey Errors
30
Must be True/ Most Supported
• Must be true questions ask you to identify the answer choice that is best proven by the information in the stimulus
31
Evaluate the Argument
You must decide which answer choice will allow you to determine the logical validity of the argument Ex.:"The answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an evaluation of the argument?"
32
Numbers and Percentages Errors
Author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity, or when an author uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity
33
Asks you to supply a piece of information that, when added to the premises, proves the conclusion Ex.:"Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn?"
Justify the Conclusion
34
This flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance - Focusing on the motives of the source - Focusing on the actions of the source
Source Argument
35
• Contains a discrepancy or seeming contradiction • Find the answer choice that best resolves the situation Ex.:"Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively resolve the apparent paradox above?"
Resolve the Paradox
36
General Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Authors misuse information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or they provide information that is irrelevant to their conclusion
37
False Dilemma
Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others -do not confuse a false dilemma with a situation where the author legitimately establishes that only two possibilities exist
38
An error of composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group or entity to the group or entity as a whole or to each member of the group
Error of Composition
39
An error of division occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole (or each member of the group) to a part of the group
Error of Division
40
Ask you to attack or undermine the author's argument
Weaken
41
Source Argument
This flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance - Focusing on the motives of the source - Focusing on the actions of the source
42
Ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the way in which the author made his or her argument Ex.:"Which one of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above?
Method of Reasoning
43
Mistaken Cause and Effect
* Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events * Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists * Failure to consider the events may be reversed * Failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect, or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
44
Assumption
Ask you to identify an assumption of the authors argument | Ex.:"Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above?"
45
Exceptional Case/ Overgeneralization
Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad, sweeping conclusion
46
Ask you to identify the answer choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus Ex.:"which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?"
Parallel Reasoning
47
Appeal to Authority
Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
48
* Asks you to find the primary conclusion made by the author | * Are a variant of must be true questions
Main Point
49
Errors in the Use of Evidence
* Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false * Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true * Some evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is false * Some evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is true
50
Author must use each term in a constant, coherent fashion; using a term in different ways is confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Uncertain use of a Term or Concept
51
* Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events * Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists * Failure to consider the events may be reversed * Failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect, or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Mistaken Cause and Effect
52
Justify the Conclusion
Asks you to supply a piece of information that, when added to the premises, proves the conclusion Ex.:"Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn?"
53
Resolve the Paradox
• Contains a discrepancy or seeming contradiction • Find the answer choice that best resolves the situation Ex.:"Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively resolve the apparent paradox above?"
54
You must decide which answer choice will allow you to determine the logical validity of the argument Ex.:"The answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an evaluation of the argument?"
Evaluate the Argument
55
Main Point
* Asks you to find the primary conclusion made by the author | * Are a variant of must be true questions
56
Weaken
Ask you to attack or undermine the author's argument
57
* This error states that a position is true because the majority believe it to be true * An appeal to popular opinion does not present a logical reason for accepting a position, just an appeal based on numbers
Appeal to Popular Opinion/ Appeal to Numbers
58
Appeal to Popular Opinion/ Appeal to Numbers
* This error states that a position is true because the majority believe it to be true * An appeal to popular opinion does not present a logical reason for accepting a position, just an appeal based on numbers
59
False Analogy
Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
60
The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument, making it weaker in the process
Straw Man
61
Uncertain use of a Term or Concept
Author must use each term in a constant, coherent fashion; using a term in different ways is confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
62
Occurs when emotion or emotionally charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Emotion
63
The premise supports the conclusion, but the conclusion equally supports the premise - author assumes as true what is supposed to be proved
Circular Reasoning
64
Error of Division
An error of division occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole (or each member of the group) to a part of the group
65
Strengthen/ Support
Ask you to select the answer choice that provides support for the author's argument or strengthen's it in some way Ex.: "Which one of the following, if true, most strengthen's the argument?"
66
Flaw in the Reasoning
Ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the error of reasoning committed by the author Ex.:"The reasoning in the astronomer's argument is flawed because this argument..."