Arguments for the Existence of God Flashcards

1
Q

what is the foundations of the teleological argument

A

through the observation of purpose and regularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is Aquinas’ fifth way

A

he observed that natural objects do not behave randomly but move towards certain goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is an example of natural objects moving towards goals

A

a flower moving towards sunlight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why does the idea of Purpose for Aquinas suggest a creator

A

things in the world cannot direct themselves therefore there must a being directing us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is Aquinas example of a being directing something

A

an Archer directs an arrow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how can Aquinas’ argument be summarised for the teleological argument

A

all things show evidence of design
this suggests that something is directing us
things that lack knowledge cannot achieve anything unless directed
therefore they are directed by something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does William Paleys argument consist of

A

the combination of complexity and purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does Paleys use of a watch support the idea of God

A

a watch is clearly designed by a being due to both its purpose and complexity, telling the time and use of cogs, the same could br said about a rock being a ‘cog’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is an example of a complex natural thing with purpose

A

the human eye.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is does Paley further argue

A

the universe appears to behave according to some order of Rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how does Hume argue against there teleological argument

A

there exists nothing in the universe to which a universe can be compared, therefore you cannot infer anything.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why is the teleological arguments vagueness on the creator an advantage

A

both heir argument don’t claim too much, only that there is a creator not an abrahamic God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why is evil a weakness of the teleological argument

A

suffering shows a ‘bad design’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how does Darwins theory critic the teleological argument

A

the world as not created perfectly, rather through evolution and natural selection, life has become ordered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how does Paley argue against the problem of evil

A

even a broken watch has a designer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the basis of the cosmological arguement

A

God is necessary for the explanation for the existence of the universe

17
Q

what is Aquinas’ 1st way

A

we observe things that are in motion, motion means being moved so there must be a first mover.

18
Q

what is Aquinas’ 2nd way

A

as there is a first cause, there cannot be an infinite regress, so the first call must be God

19
Q

what is Aquinas’ 3rd way

A

we observe all contingent things, everything can’t be contingent then it will lead to infinite regress. therefore there is a necessary being which is God

20
Q

summary of Aquinas’ three ways

A

1 - first mover
2 - first cause
3 - necessity among contingency

21
Q

what it Leibniz sufficient reason?

A

even if we cant know or find out what the reason is, there must be one.’from nothing, nothing comes’

22
Q

what is a weakness of the cosmological argument relying on infinite regress

A

just because we cant imagine infinite regress doesn’t mean it is not possible. purely ruling it out is not a strong argument.

23
Q

what is Humes idea of necessary existence against god

A

things in the universe such as energy can be the necessary existence not God.

24
Q

how is the causal principle a strength

A

it is empirically justifiable to assume that everything has a cause

25
Q

what is Anselm’s ontological argument summarised as

A

something that exists is greater than something that does not exist.

26
Q

how can Anselm’s argument be seen as circular logic

A

Bertrand Russel shows how it is not possible to fault Anselm but it is not a convincing argument.

27
Q

Anselm famous quote

A

than which nothing greater can be concieved.

28
Q

what is Gaunilos response to Anselm’s argument

A

the argument of the perfect island, if you think of the greatest island, it must exist otherwise it is not the greatest thing

29
Q

Anselm’s defence to Gaunilo’s arguement

A

Gaunilo’s island is contingent on the sea and land, God is not a contingent being.

30
Q

what is Aquinas’ argument against Anselm

A

everyones God would be different, and is subjected to human limitation.

31
Q

what is Kants objection to the ontological argument

A

existence is not part of the essence of something, to say a hundred dollars is real does not add anything to the dollar

32
Q

what is Descartes Ontological arguement

A

Gods existent is self evident like it is evident that a triangle has three sides. for Descartes, existence is a property of perfection.

33
Q

what is Descartes analogy of the mountain

A

the valley is implied as part of a mountain the same that God is implied as part of existence.

34
Q

what is Humes harsh criticism of the teleological arguement

A

the universe must of been created by an Infant deity through the amount of suffering