Arguments for the existence of God Flashcards

1
Q

Design qua Purpose

A

The clear and evident purpose of the complex structures seen in nature is evidence they were designed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Design qua Regularity

A

The order and regularity of the universe is evidence of a designer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inductive form of design argument

A

Most complex systems have a designer

the universe is a complex system

the universe is likely to have a designer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Paleys example of regularity

A

solar system

sun close enough to support human life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Paleys example of purpose

A

eyes of animals
crocodile and eagle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hume’s criticisms of Paley

A

-Multiple Gods
-Universe could’ve grown like a vegetable
Some complex systems aren’t designed
-Epicurean hypothesis- infinity means universe would’ve eventually taken this shape

Even if there is a Designer, no proof its christian God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hume’s quote about multiple designers

A

“A great number of men join in building a house or ship, in rearing a city, in framing a commonwealth”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Paleys response to “some complex things are not designed”

A

Paley says no one actually believes this

he say natural laws clearly reflect divinity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paley’s response to multiple designers

A

have you ever seen a council create something as coherent as the universe?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ex- Nihilo

A

“out of nothing”

this is how aquinas says the world was created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Argument from Motion

A

All things have been moved by another, since this cant go back infinitely because infinite regress, there must be a first mover

the unmoved mover is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Argument from causation

A

Everything has a cause
infinite regress is impossible
there must be an original, uncaused cause
this is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Argument from contingency and necessity

A

Some contingent beings exist
in order to avoid and infinite regress, there must be a necessary being
God is the only necessary being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

fallacy of composition

A

just because components have a certain property, the entire thing doesnt have the same property

rectangular bricks in cylindrical tower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Principle of sufficient reason

A

everything in the universe must have a cause. as a result, every contingent fact must have an explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Steady state universe

A

Russell

Why is an infinite regress impossible? it simply could’ve always been

the universe is made of contingent and therefore likely is contingent

17
Q

Anselm’s definition of God

A

That that which nothing greater can be conceived

18
Q

Descartes definition of God

A

the supremely perfect being

19
Q

Anselm’s ontological argument

A

Anything that exists in reality is better than in imagination
god is the best possible thing you can imagine
God exists in reality

analogy of the painter

20
Q

analogy of the painter

A

painter is going to paint a picture

is the idea of the picture before its painted better than the finally product

anselm says its obvious that he final product is better as its real

21
Q

Descartes ontological argument

A

God is the supremely perfect being
existence is perfection
God is therefore not perfect if he doesnt exist

22
Q

Descartes example of God and existence

A

highlands and lowlands
rivers and banks

23
Q

Gaunilo’s criticism of Anselm

A

You can apply ttwngcbc to anything

for example:
perfect island

24
Q

Anslem’s response to Gaunilos perfect island

A

you can only apply TTWNGCBC to necessary beings
the perfect island is defined differently by everyone
island has no intrinsic maximum

25
Irreconcilable contradiction
God cannot be conceived to not exist if you can imagine something to not exist, its not God
26
strength of ontological argument
uses a ride definition of God as its basis
27
weakness of ontological argument
only works if we all define God the same way
28
Kant's criticism of Descartes ontological argument
existence is not a predicate claiming the existence of something adds nothing to its definition (marko exists. Ok? I know?)
29
Deflationary theory of truth
saying something is true adds nothing to its definition
30
What does Kant say about existence
it must be emperically verified it cant be logically assumed so existence cannot remain in the definition of something
31
Mill's criticism of the Design argument
He say Paley is being too selective and notes that there are also problems with creation evil and suffering death