Arguments For The Existence Of God Based On Observation Flashcards

1
Q

What is the ao1 spec

A

The cosmological argument, the teleological argument, challenges to arguments from observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the ao2 spec

A

Whether Cosmological jumps to the conclusion of a transcendent creator, whether teleological can be defended against challenge of chance, whether the logical fallacies can be overcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who was Aquinas

A

Presented cosmological and teleological argument in the 13th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was William paley

A

Christian scholar who presented teleological argument in 19th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who was David Hume

A

Agnostic Scottish philosopher and historian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are Aquinas’s first 3 ways

A

Argument from motion, argument from causation, argument from contingency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the argument from motion

A
  1. All things that move or change do so because something has acted upon them
  2. Infinite regression is impossible
  3. There must be an external unmoved mover, which we call God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Aquinas’s second wayb

A

Causation
1. All effects come from a cause
2. Infinite regression is not possible
3. There must be a first uncaused cause, which we call God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Aquinas’s third way

A

Contingency:
If all beings were contingent, then at one time nothing existed and nothing could exist now, so something necessary exists.
Infinite regression is impossible, so there must be a being who has in itself it’s own necessity, which we call God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Aquinas’s 5th way

A

Things which lack knowledge act for a purpose - all natural things have purpose
This purpose comes from God and he guides all things to achieving his purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Aquinas’s analogy of the archer

A

Nature is like an arrow shot from an archers bow as it has direction, purpose and is moving towards a goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the context of when Paley was writing

A

Lots of scientific progress was being made at this time, so people learned about the world and used this knowledge for design arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What analogy does paley use to demonstrate his point

A

Analogy of the watchmaker
Similarly to how a watch is complex and implies the existence of a watchmaker, the natural world is complex implying the exist of a designer (God)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Paley use the example of an eye

A

It shows there is a designer as it is so complex and protected by the skull, which illustrates God designed us that way as he cares for us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is design qua purpose

A

Paleys idea that the fact that everything has a purpose shoes that there must be a designer - uses te analogy of the watchmaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is design qua regularity

A

Paley’s idea that the fact that the universe works like clockwork in predictable patterns shows that there is a designer

17
Q

Who was Charles darwin

A

19th century scientist discovered natural selection and evolution

18
Q

How does Paley respond to the problem of evil with the watchmaker analogy

A

If a watch we found was imperfect, we would still assume it had a designer - the quality is irrelevant

19
Q

What does David Hume say about the problems with using observation (4 things)

A

Fallacy of composition - things in the world have a cause, but the world doesn’t have a cause
Problem of induction
Confusing causation and correlation
We can’t compare our universe to any other universe

20
Q

What does David Hume criticise about using analogies

A

Can’t compare the natural universe to a machine as it is a circular argument - they have chosen the conclusion that they want

21
Q

What does David Hume say is a logical fallacy

A

Rejecting infinite regress
The leap to the God of classical theism

22
Q

What is the Epicurean hypothesis that Hume uses

A

Idea that order can come from chaos