Arson Flashcards
What is section 267 (1)(a)?
Arson
Intentionally OR
recklessly
Damages by fire or by means of any explosive
Any property
If he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
What is section 267(1)(b)?
Intentionally OR
recklessly
And without claim of right
Damages by fire OR
By means of any explosive
Any immovable property or any vehicle, ship or aircraft
In which that person has no interest
What is section 267(1)(c)?
Intentionally
Damages by fire OR
By means of any explosive
Any immovable property or any vehicle ship or aircraft
with intent to obtain any benefit or cause loss to any other person
Section 267 (2)(a)?
Intentionally OR
Recklessly
Without claim of right
Damages by fire OR
By means of any explosive
Any property
In which that person has no interest (other than property referred to in subsection (1))
267(2)(b)
Intentionally OR
Recklessly
Damages by fire OR
By means of any explosive
Any property
With intent to obtain any benefit OR
Cause loss to any other person
Section 267(3)
Intentionally
Damages by fire OR
Damages by means of any explosive
Any property
With reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Section 267(4)?
In this section at section 269 benefit means any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service, or valuable consideration
What are the elements of intention?
Deliberate act with intent to prove a specified result (aim object purpose)
R v Collister
Circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent can be inferred can include;
-offenders actions and words before during and after
-surrounding circumstances
-nature of the act itself
Definition of recklessness
Consciously and deliberately taking of an unjustified risk
R v cameron
Recklessness is established if;
-the defendant recognized there was a real possibility that his or her actions would bring about the prescribed result and/or
-the proscribed circumstances existed and
-having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable
In regards to reckless ness what are the two tests?
The defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk (subjective test)
Whether a reasonable person would have taken the risk (objective test)
R v tipple
A deliberate decision to the risk anyway
R v Archer
Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of it’s use or value
Damages by fire or explosive
Involves burning, charring, melting, blistering of paint or significant smoke damage
In general terms, any change in an object that impairs it’s value or usefulness may constitute as damage
What is the definition of fire
Fire is the result of the process of combustion, a chemical reaction between fuel and oxygen, triggered by heat
What is the definition of explosive
Any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in it’s normal state is capable either of decomposition at such a rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect
What are examples of explosives
Gun powder
Nitroglycerine
Dynamite
Gun-cotton
Blasting powder
Fulminate of mercury or other metals
Coloured flares
Fog signals
Fuses
Rockets
Percussion caps
Detonators
Cartridges
Ammunition of all descriptions
What does the definition of an explosive not include?
Fireworks as defined in section 2 of the hazardous substances and new organisms act 1996
Firearms
Define property
Real and personal property and any real estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt and any thing in action and any other right or interest
Define knows or ought to know
Subjective Test: what was the defendant thinking at the time, did the defendant know human life was likely to be endangered
Objective Test: if there is insufficient evidence that the defendant was conscious of the risk the objective test should be applied. What would a reasonable person have thought and would they have recognized the risk?
Define danger to life
Danger to human life and someone other than the defendant
Define claim of right
Belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to the offence alleged. Belief can be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law
Four parts of belief required for claim of right?
Belief in a proprietary or possessory right in property
Belief about the property in relation to the offence alleged
Belief must be at the time of the conduct
Belief must be actually held by the defendant