asse midterm Flashcards

1
Q

in response to a need to assess mastery in an emerging
occupation or profession; Can be traced to thoughts

A

Test
Conceptualization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

IQ tests; Comparing test takers to each
other

A

Norm-Referenced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Licensing exams; Mastery of particular material or skills

A

Criterion-Referenced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

to evaluate whether they should be
included in the final form of the
instrument; Attempts to determine how best to measure a targeted construct

A

PILOT WORK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

process of setting rules of assigning numbers in measurement

A

Scaling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

known for developing methodologically sound scaling methods

A

L.L. Thurstone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Measures test performance as function of age

A

Age Based Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Measures test performance as function of grade level

A

Grade Based Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

transforms raw scores into scores ranging from 1 to 9

A

Stanine Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Unidimensional

A

Measures one trait or dimension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Multidimensional

A

Measures multiple traits or dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Comparative

A

Compares test taker’s to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Categorical

A

Places test takers into discrete categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

grouping of words, statements,
or symbols on which judgments of the
strength of a particular trait, attitude, or emotion indicated by the test taker

A

Rating Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The final test score is obtained by
summing the ratings across all the items

A

Summative Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Each item presents the test-taker with the five alternative responses, usually on an agree-disagree/ approve-disapprove continuum

A

Likert Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Test takers are presented with pairs of stimuli which they are asked to
compare

A

Method of paired comparisons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

One method of sorting, entails judgments of a stimulus in comparison with every other stimulus on the scale

A

Comparative Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Stimuli are placed into one of two or more alternative categories that differ
quantitatively with respect to some continuum

A

Categorical Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

scaling method yielding ordinal-level measures; Items on it range sequentially from weaker to stronger expressions of the attitude, belief, or feeling being measured

A

Guttman Scale (Scalogram Analysis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Obtain data presumed to be interval in natures; Direct estimation method; no need to transform responses into another scale.

A

Thurstone’s Equal Appearing Intervals Method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

well from which items or will not be drawn from the final version of the test

A

Item Pool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Variable such as the form, plan, structure, arrangement, and layout

A

Item Format

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Require test taker to select a response from a set of alternative responses

A

Selected-response format

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Require test takers to supply or to create the correct answer
Constricted-response format
26
requires the examinee to provide a word or phrase that completes a sentence
Completion Item
27
completion item; can be a word, a term, a sentence, or a paragraph
Short answer item
28
requires the test taker to respond to a question by writing a composition
Essay item
29
the higher the score on the test, the higher the test-taker is on the ability, trait, or other characteristic that the rest purports to measure
Cumulative scoring
30
category scoring; responses earn credit toward placement in a particular class or category with other test-takers whose pattern of responses is presumably similar in some way
Class scoring
31
comparing a test-taker’s score on one scale within a test to another scale within that same test
Ipsative scoring
32
administered to a representative sample of test-takers under conditions that simulate the conditions that the final version of the test
Test Tryout
33
reliable and valid; helps to discriminate test takers
good test item
34
test data will undergo different types of statistical scrutiny
ITEM ANALYSIS
35
measure of proportion of examinees who answered the item correctly
ITEM-DIFFICULTY INDEX
36
obtained by calculating the proportion of the total number of test takers who answered the item correctly
p-value
37
.4-.6
good range
38
applicable for personality tests but instead of correct answer, it only measures the percent of people who said yes/agreed to the item
Item-Endorsement Index
39
statistic designed to provide an indication of the degree to which a test is measuring what it purports to measure
ITEM-VALIDITY INDEX
40
provides an indication of the internal consistency of a test; the higher this index, the greater the test's internal consistency
ITEM-RELIABILITY INDEX
41
indicates how adequately an item separates or discriminates between high scorers and low scorers on an entire test
ITEM DISCRIMINATION INDEX
42
discrimination index of 0.3 or greater
highly discriminating
43
can play a role in decisions about which items are working well and which items are not
ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVES
44
Basically hard to detect and no such method has achieved universal acceptance
Guessing
45
A biased item is an item that favors one particular group of examinees in relation to another when differences in group ability are controlled
Item Fairness
46
The closer an item is to the end of the test, the more difficult it may appear to be
Speed Test
47
designed to explore how individual test items work
Nonstatistical procedures
48
designed to shed light on the test-taker’s thought processes during the administration of a test
Thinking Aloud Test Administration
49
revision typically involves rewording items, deleting items, or creating new items
Expert Panels
50
study of test items, typically conducted during the test development process in which items are examined for fairness to all prospective test-takers and for the presence of offensive language, stereotypes, or situations
sensitivity review
51
revalidation of a test on a sample of test takers other than those on whom test performance was originally found to be a valid predictor of some criterion
Cross-validation
52
a test validation process conducted on two or more tests using the same sample of test takers
Co-validation
53
multifaceted capacity that manifests itself in different ways across the lifespan
Intelligence
54
believed that the most intelligent people are those equipped with the best sensory abilities
Francis Galton
55
write about the components of intelligence (reasoning, judgment, memory, and abstraction)
Alfred Binet
56
stated that intelligence is the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally and to deal effectively with his environment.
David Wechsler
57
research focused on the development of cognition in children; Intelligence may be conceived of as a kind of evolving biological adaptation to the outside world.
Jean Piaget
58
an organized action or mental structure that, when applied to the world, leads to knowing or understanding
Schema
59
actively organizing new information so that it fits in with what already is perceived and thought
Assimilation
60
changing what is already perceived or thought so that it fits with new information
Accommodation
61
Child develops ability to exhibit goal-directed, intentional behavior; develops the capacity to coordinate and integrate input from the five senses;
Sensorimotor Period
62
Child’s understanding of concepts is based largely on what is seen; the child’s comprehension of a situation, an event, or an object is typically based on a single, usually the most obvious, perceptual aspect of the stimulus
Preoperational Period
63
Reversibility of thought now appears
Concrete Operations Period
64
Increased ability to abstract and to deal with ideas independent of his or her own experience
Formal Operations Period
65
proposes that intelligence is composed of two factors: general intelligence “g” and specific intelligence “s”
Charles Spearman
66
formulated a framework wherein the 150 different mental intellectual abilities were organized within three dimensions – Operations, Content, and Products
Joy Paul Guilford’s Structure of Intellect Theory (SI)
67
stated that every individual possesses different levels of seven primary mental abilities: word fluency, verbal factor, numerical factor, inductive reasoning, memory, spatial visualization, and perceptual speed
Louis Leon Thurstone’s Multiple Factor Theory of Intelligence
68
introduced the idea of having multiple intelligence which consists of: logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, linguistic, musical, spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal
Gardner’s Theory on Multiple Intelligence
69
differentiates between fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence
Cattell and Horn’s Theory on Intelligence
70
ability to think on the spot and solve new problems; ability to understand relationships between various concepts and solve novel problem
fluid intelligence
71
knowledge and skills that accumulate and develop through learning and experience; application of learned information, comprehension, and wisdom acquired over time
crystallized intelligence
72
the chronological age equivalent of one’s performance on a test or a subtest
Mental Age
73
assess and measure intelligence in children; among the earliest intelligence tests developed by psychologist Alfred Binet and his colleague Theodore Simon
Binet Scales
74
designed to measure a person's cognitive abilities across various domains
Wechsler Tests
75
Primarily designed for individuals aged 16 and older, the WAIS assesses intellectual functioning in adults
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
76
geared toward assessing the intellectual abilities of children aged 6 to 16 years
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)
77
Developed for children between the ages of 2 years 6 months and 7 years 7 months; measures intellectual functioning in young children
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)
78
non-verbal intelligence test; designed to assess an individual's ability to perceive and think clearly, abstractly, and solve problems without relying on language or cultural knowledge; developed by John C. Raven
Raven’s Progressive Matrices
79
widely used assessment tool designed to assist in self exploration, vocational exploration, and career development
Occupational Aptitude Survey and Interest Schedule
80