Attachment Flashcards
(40 cards)
Definition of ‘reciprocity’
A description of how two people interact. A type of interaction between caregiver and child in which both individuals respond to each others actions with mutual responsiveness, and elicit responses from each other
Definition of ‘Interactional synchrony’
Mother and infant reflect both the actions and emotions of the other and do this in a co-ordinated way
Definition of ‘attachment’
A deep and enduring emotional bond that connects one person to another across time and space
Explain ‘reciprocity’
- Babies and mothers spend lot of time in intense and pleasurable interaction
- Babies have periodic ‘alert phases’ and signal they are ready for interaction, mothers pick up on this and respond to infant alertness around 2/3 times (Feldman and Eidelman 2007)
- From 3 months, this interaction becomes more frequency and involves close attention to each others verbal signals and facial expressions (Feldman 2007) - element of these interactions is reciprocity
- Baby may take active (not passive) role as mother and child can initiate interactions and take turns doing so. Brazleton et al. (1975) describe this as a dance and they respond to each others moves
Explain ‘reciprocity’
- Takes place when mother and infant interact in such a way that their actions and emotions mirror the other
- Meltzoff and Moore (1977) observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony in infants as young as two weeks:
- An adult displayed one of three facial expressions or one of three distinctive gestures. Childs response was filmed and identified by independent observers
- An association was found between expression or gesture the adult had displayed and the actions of the babies
- Interactional synchrony is important for development of mother-infant attachment
- Isabella et al. (1989) observes 30 mothers and infants together and assessed the degree of synchrony and quality of mother-infant attachment. Found high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-infant attachment
Evaluation of observing infants:
- Many interactions between mother and infants have shown the same patterns of interactions (Gratier 2003)
- What is being observed is only hand movements or changes in expression. Difficult to be certain what is the infants perspective - whether the movements are deliberate
- Cannot know for certain that behaviours seen in mother-infant interaction have a special meaning
On the other hand…
- Normally well controlled procedures and being filmed from multiple angles, can later be analysed
- Good validity as babies wouldn’t show demand characteristics due to being filmed
Parent-infant attachment
(When attachment to mother
When attachment to others/father)
- Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found that the majority of babies did become attached to their mother (around 7 months)
- Then few weeks/months after formed secondary attachments (including father)
- 75% infants studied, an attachment was formed with father by 18 months (determined by the infants protested when father walked away)
The role of the father
- Grossman (2002) carried out longitudinal study looking at both parents behaviour and its relationship to the quality of children’s attachments into their teens
- Quality of infant attachment with mothers was related to children’s attachments in adolescence but not fathers. Suggesting the father attachments are less important
- However, quality of fathers play with infants WAS related to adolescent attachments and therefore fathers have a different role in attachment - play and stimulation, less nurturing
Fathers as primary carers
- When take on main caregiver, they may adopt behaviours in past associated to mothers
- Tiffany Field (1978) filmed 4 month old babies in face to face interaction with primary caregiver mothers and secondary caregiver fathers, and primary caregiver fathers.
Primary caregiver fathers, like mothers, spent more time smiling, imitating and holding infants than secondary caregiver fathers.
These behaviours appears more important in building an attachment with the infant , therefore fathers can be the more nurturing attachment figure.
Role of fathers evaluation: children without fathers
MacCallum and Golombok (2004) have found that children growing up in a single or same-sex parent families do not develop any differently from those in two-parent heterosexual families.
Suggests fathers role as a secondary attachment figure is not important
Evaluation of role of fathers: Why don’t father generally become primary attachments?
- Could be result of traditional gender roles (woman more caring)
- Therefore fathers don’t feel they have to act at all
- Female hormones (oestrogen) create higher levels of nurturing and therefore woman biologically pre-disposed to be primary attachment figure (Taylor et al 2000)
Evaluation: Mother-infant interaction socially sensitive
- Socially sensitive as suggests that children may be disadvantaged by child-rearing practices
- (e.g. mothers who return to work shortly after a child is born, restrict the opportunities for achieving interactional synchrony, Isabella et al.)
- Suggests that mothers should not return to work so soon
- Fox (1977) research shows working mothers have plenty of time for such interactions after working hours
What did Schaffer and Emerson research?
Stages of Attachment
When did Schaffer and Emerson conduct study?
1964
Schaffer and Emerson Research: Participants
60 babies
31 male
29 female
From Glasgow
From skilled working-class families
Schaffer and Emerson Research: Procedure
- Babies and mothers visited at home very month for first year and again at 18 months
- Researchers asked the mothers questions about the kind of protest their babies showed in 7 everyday separation (e.g. adult leaving the room, a measure of separation anxiety)
- This was designed to measure the infants attachment. The research also assessed stranger anxiety
Schaffer and Emerson Research: Findings
- Between 25 - 32 weeks of age about 50% of the babies showed signs of separation anxiety towards a particular adult (usually mother)
- Attachment tended to be the caregiver who was most interactive and sensitive to infant signals and facial expressions (reciprocity). Not necessarily the person who infant spent most time with
- By age of 40 weeks, 80% of babies had a specific attachment and almost 30% displayed multiple attachments
What are Schaffer and Emerson’s 4 stages of attachment?
Stage 1: Asocial stage
0-8 weeks
- Happier when in presence of humans
- Show some preference for familiar adults, find it easier to calm
- Behaviour towards inanimate objects and humans are similar
Stage 2: Indiscriminate attachment 2-7 months - Prefer humans than inanimate objects - Recognise and prefer familiar adults - Do not show separation or stranger anxiety, not different towards any one person
Stage 3: Specific attachment
7-9 months
- Show separation (from one person, normally mother) and stranger anxiety
- Formed a specific attachment, termed primary attachment figure, with person who offers most interaction
Stage 4: Multiple attachment
10+ months
- Form multiple attachment to other adults who spend time with (secondary attachments)
Schaffer and Emerson Research Evaluation: Validity
Carried out in family homes and observation done by parents. Behaviour of babies will therefore be unaffected.
Good external validity
Schaffer and Emerson Research Evaluation: Longitudinal Design
Strength
Good internal validity, no confounding variables of individual differences between participants (unlike cross-sectional design)
Schaffer and Emerson Research Evaluation: Sample
Good sample size (60)
All from same class and area and 50 years ago is a limitation
Cannot generalise
Schaffer and Emerson 4 Stages of Attachment Evaluation: Studying asocial stage
Difficult to make judgements about babies based on observations of behaviour as they are immobile and have poor coordination.
Schaffer and Emerson 4 Stages of Attachment Evaluation: Conflicting evidence
Collectivist cultures (multiple caregivers, families work together) babies form multiple attachments from the outset
(Ijzendoorn et al. 1993)
Schaffer and Emerson 4 Stages of Attachment Evaluation: Measuring multiple attachment
Because they get distressed, doesn’t mean they have an attachment to that person
Bowlby (1969) pointed out that children have playmates as well as attachment figures and may get distressed when a playmate leaves the room, but this does not signify attachment
Limitation of Schaffer and Emerson’s stages as their observation does not leave us a way to distinguish behaviour shown towards secondary attachment figures and shown towards playmates