Attachment π Flashcards
Paper 1
what is attachment?
- close emotional bond between two people (carer and infant)
- characterised by mutual affection and the desire to maintain proximity
- two way process
- endures over time
how do children show they are attached?
- proximity seeking
- separation protest
- pleasure at reunion
- secure base effect
- stranger anxiety
- general orientation of behaviour towards carer
what is proximity seeking?
- desire to be physically close to the carer
- anxiety when this isnβt possible
what is separation protest?
- distress at separation from carer
what is pleasure at reunion?
- quickly settled upon being reunited with carer
what is secure base effect?
- willingness to explore the environment when carer is near
- infant checks regularly that the carer is still in sight
- will demonstrate social referencing
what is stranger anxiety?
- distress at stranger interaction
what does having general orientation of behaviour towards carer mean?
- carer will be the focus
what are the two attachment interactions?
- reciprocity
- interactional synchrony
what is reciprocity?
- non verbal conversation between the carer and infant where the action from the carer elicits a response from the infant
- coordinated actions
- important for later communication and form basis of attachment
what is interactional synchrony?
- imitation of the carer by the infant as an innate response
- not a learned behaviour
who studied interactional synchrony?
- Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
what was the aim of Meltzoff and Mooreβs study?
- to perform the first systematic study of interactional synchrony in infants aged 2 to 3 weeks old
what is the procedure of Meltzoff and Mooreβs study?
- adult model displayed one of three facial expressions or hand movements
- dummy was placed in the infants mouth to prevent a response at first, this was then removed and the infant was recorded imitating the model
- observers could only see the infants on video, not the model
- controlled laboratory observation
- at a later date this was repeated with 2 to 3 day old infants to prove it was an innate response
what were the findings of Meltzoff and Mooreβs study?
- there was an association between the infantβs behaviour and the adult model (imitation)
- same results were found with the 2 to 3 day old infants
- it was an innate response
who criticised Meltzoff and Mooreβs study and why?
Keopke et al
- made original look unreliable and invalid
- repeated their study and found different results
how did Meltzoff and Moore counter Keopke et alβs criticism?
- claimed Keopke et alβs study wasnβt as carefully controlled
what are the problems with testing infants behaviour?
- difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours
- due to infants continuously moving their mouths, etc
who tested the intentionality of infants behaviour and how?
Abravanel and DeYoung
- observed infants interacting with two objects
- one stimulating tongue movements and the others mouth opening/ closing
- found infants between 5 to 12 weeks old not imitating the objects, showing response to social interactions not inanimate objects
what are examples of facial movements Meltzoff and Moore used to study interactional synchrony?
- tongue protrusion
- mouth opening
who found there are individual differences in types of attachments and how can this be used as evaluation for interactional synchrony?
Isabella et al
- found more strongly attached infant-caregiver pairs showed greater interactional synchrony
- children respond to adults depending on the nature of the attachment
- shows we are limited on the reliability of Meltzoff and Mooreβs findings
what was Meltzoffβs βlike meβ hypothesis (2005)?
- explains how infants will acquire an understanding of others thoughts/ feelings
- interactional synchrony helps children to understand the internal mental state of other people
- helps them to develop social relationships
what study investigated the development of attachment and when?
- glasgow babies, 1963
who studied the glasgow babies?
- Schaffer and Emerson