attachment Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

define attachment

A

close two way emotional bond between two over time
comfort, closeness, security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define secure base behaviour

A

use attachment figure as safe base for exploration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

explain reciprocity in caregiver infant interactions

A

two way process of responding, turn taking
infants and caregivers are both active
causes bond and sensitivity to needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain interactional synchrony in caregiver infant interaction

A

mirror actions and emotions
coordinated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who came up with research on interactional synchrony and explain it

A

meltzoff and moore
observed in 2 week old babies
adults displayed expression
babies response filmed and labelled
babies expressions mirrored adults more than chances predict
non participant observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explain a strength of research into caregiver infant interactions

A

controlled procedures
filmed in lab
researchers can analyse, won’t miss actions
inter rater reliability, more than 1 observer
babies dk being observed, behaviour more likely to be natural
t/f high internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain a limitation of research into caregiver infant interaction

A

hard to interpret babies
lack co ordination, actions may not be deliberate e.g small hand movements
can’t be certain infant is mirroring and has special importance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain strength of research into caregiver infant interactions: supporting evidence

A

isabella at al observed 30 mothers and babies together
assessed synchrony & quality of mother baby attachment
found high levels of synchrony associated w/ better quality mother baby attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what psychologists came up with stages of attachment

A

schaffer and emerson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name the stages of attachment

A

asocial stage
indiscriminate attachment
specific attachment
multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain the asocial stage

A

behaviour towards humans & inanimate objects are similar
preference for familiar people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain indiscriminate attachment

A

2-7 months
preference for humans > inanimate objects
accept comfort from anyone but prefer familiar people
no stranger or separation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain specific attachment

A

stranger & separation anxiety for primary attachment figure
person who offers most interaction rather than most time
65% of time mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain multiple attachments

A

form secondary attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain schaffer and emerson research

A

60 babies, glasgow
mother acted as observer, measured babies attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

name 2 strengths of stages of attachment

A

high external validity
real world application

17
Q

explain strength of stages of attachment: good external validity

A

observed at home by mothers
babies less distracted, act naturally won’t show demand characteristics

18
Q

explain strength of stages of attachment: real world application

A

useful to parents
first two stages babies can be comforted by day care workers
but starting day care w/ specific attachment baby may be distressed
t/f helpful for planning

19
Q

name two limitations of stages of attachment

A

mothers as observers
babies coordination

20
Q

explain limitation of stages of attachment: mothers as observers

A

subjective
social desirability bias mothers may not be truthful in interviews
may not have reported babies signs of anxiety
t/f results may not be accurate, low internal validity

21
Q

explain limitation of stages of attachment: babies coordination

A

asocial stage poor coordination
difficult to observe if anxious
babies may be social but can’t express through actions
t/f research may not support theory strongly as can’t rely

22
Q

describe imprinting

A

innate readiness to develop a strong bond w/ mother

23
Q

who conducted a study on geeslings for animal studies of attachment

24
Q

what was lorenz’s procedure

A

randomly divided 12 geesling eggs
control group hatched w/ mother, experimental group hatched w/ lorenz in an incubator

25
what were lorenz's findings
experimental group followed him everywhere, control group followed mother even when mixed up imprinted on lorenz as first moving object they saw critical period is a few hours sexual imprinting effects mating preferences, display courtship behaviour on species imprinted
26
explain a limitation of lorenz's geesling study
lacks generalisability to humans chick's imprint instantly, humans two way process for emotional attachment t/f can't be applied to humans
27
explain a strength of lorenz's research
regolin and vallortigara chicks imprinted on moving shape combinations e.g triangle w/ rectangle different shape combinations were placed, chicks followed original supports idea of innate drive to imprint on moving objects during critical period
28
what was harlow's procedure
he used 16 monkeys and wire mothers wire mother had milk bottle, cloth mother didn't scared the baby
29
what were harlow's findings
monkey cuddled cloth mother for comfort when frightened wire mother only used for food critical period is 90 days maternal deprivation irreversible, aggressive, attacked and killed children unskilled at mating
30
what was harlow's conclusion
contact comfort forms attachments not food effects are irreversible
31
explain a strength of harlow's study
bowbly's study irreversible effects maternal deprivation internal working model
32