Attachment Flashcards
(23 cards)
Ainsworth’s Study
- Home observations during 1st year
- Identified 4 mother/parent behaviors that influence development of attachment category
Four Mother/Parenting Behaviors
- Sensitivity
- Acceptingness
- Cooperativeness
- Accessibility
Sensitivity
Attends to and correctly interprets baby’s signals (indicating his/her wants & needs)
Sensitivity ≠ Warmth
B mothers > A mothers = C mothers
Acceptingness
Expresses positive feelings about (having) the baby
But realistically acknowledges challenges
B mothers > C mothers > A mothers
Cooperativeness
supports baby’s autonomy (development of independence)
Minimizes unnecessary control of behavior
An American &/or individualistic cultural value?
B mothers > A mothers = C mothers
Accessibility
available to baby
responsive to baby even when baby is not distressed; doesn’t ignore baby
B mothers > A mothers = C mothers
Direct Influences
- Infant temperament
Jerome Kagan’s radical position: infant temperament determines Ainsworth’s parenting behaviors
“Goodness of fit” position: Difficult babies require especially good parents
Indirect Influences
- Outside stressors
e.g., economic, job, etc.
May make it harder to be sensitive, accepting, cooperative, accessible
Bowlby’s Definition of Attachment
- close special relationship that infant develops with major caretaker
Usually mom, but not necessarily
How does Proximity help an infant survive?
Importance of “physical proximity” (physical closeness)
Phase 1 (Bowlby)
Birth – 6 wks
“Pre-Attachment” or “Promiscuous Attachment Behaviors”
Produces cute behaviors that attract adults (resulting in physical proximity)
Baby not selective about audience
Phase 2 (Bowlby)
- 6 wks to 6-8 months
“Attachment in the Making” or “Selective Attachment Behaviors”
Same cute behaviors, but they are directed more to attachment figure(s)
Crying still not selective
Bowlby ambivalent about whether baby “wants” the physical proximity (or is s/he just more responsive to familiar stimuli)
Phase 3 (Bowlby)
- 6-8 mo to 18-24 months
“Clearcut Attachment” or “New Attachment Behaviors”
Motor development results in “self-produced locomotion”
Phase 4 (Bowlby)
- 18-24 mo to death “Reciprocal Attachment” Why “til death”? Internal Working Model Why “reciprocal”? - Parent attached to child as well.
Strange Situation Procedure
- Created by Mary Ainsworth Procedure induces mild/moderate stress because babies show attachment most clearly when under stress Stresses Unfamiliar environment (lab) Unfamiliar person (research assistant) Separation from mother Most appropriate for 12-18 month olds
Group A
usually not upset when mom leaves room; ignore or avoid her during reunion episode; very involved with toys
Group B
- may or may not cry when mom leaves (70%); greet her positively during reunion (different forms of positive greeting); if cry, are easily comforted on reunion
Group C
may be passive or very upset when mom leaves; shows mixed positive and negative response during reunion; positive = approach mom; negative = upset and can’t be comforted
Group D
category identified by Mary Main; babies show bizarre behavior during reunion (walk backwards or look sideways when approach mom; temporary immobilization)
Interpretation of Attachment Group Categories
Group A: Avoidant-Insecure
Group B: Secure
Group C: Ambivalent or Resistant-Insecure
Group D: Disoriented or Disorganized Insecure
Controversies
Are Group A babies really insecure/maladjusted?
How common are the Group D babies?
Sroufe’s Longitudinal Study
- Children: 10 yrs old
2 week “sleep-away” camp
Cabin composition
Mix of children with A, B, & C baby classifications
Counselors don’t know “who is who”
Measures
Counselor ratings of social/emotional adjustment
Ratings of mothering behavior (HOME scale administered before camp)
Summer Camp Study
Children: 10 yrs old
2 week “sleep-away” camp
Cabin composition
Mix of children with A, B, & C baby classifications
Counselors don’t know “who is who”
Measures
Counselor ratings of social/emotional adjustment
Ratings of mothering behavior (HOME scale administered before camp)
Analyses designed to resolve controversy:
Which influences the adjustment ratings?
Early attachment category?
Quality of later mothering behavior?
Attachment hypothesis vs. Continuity of Care hypothesis
Results:
Both are significant predictors (i.e., influences)
One predicts more strongly
Later mothering predicts more strongly
Development after 10 years
Both early attachment and later parenting influence adjustment
Which is stronger has varied across studies
Sample findings
Early attachment predicts satisfaction with romantic relationships during early 20’s (although later adjustment predicts more strongly
Early attachment predicts later parenting sensitivity (for those who became parents)