Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

When two people mirror what the other is doing in terms of their facial and bodily movements. This includes imitating emotions as well as behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reciprocity?

A

Responding to the action of another with an action, where the actions of one partner elicit a response from the other partner.

The responses are not necessarily similar as in interactional synchrony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between interactional synchrony and reciprocity?

A

IS is two people being in tune, while reciprocity is turn taking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the strengths of Meltzoff and Moore’s caregiver-infant interactions study?

A
  • Infants made little response to inanimate objects which were intended to simulate tongue/mouth movements, which suggests that they were initially making a specific social response to other humans
  • It provides an explanation for how infants begin to acquire an understanding of what other people are thinking and feeling, and thus are able to conduct relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the weaknesses of Meltzoff and Moore’s caregiver-infant interactions study?

A
  • Infants’ mouths are in fairly constant motion, so it is difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours
  • There is variation between infants; a more securely attached child may show greater interactional synchrony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Meltzoff and Moore believe about the infants’ behavioural responses?

A

That they are innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the stages of attachment?

A
  1. Indiscriminate attachment
  2. The beginnings of attachment
  3. Discriminate attachment
  4. Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who came up with the stages of attachment, and what research did they conduct?

A

Schaffer and Emerson conducted a longitudinal study of 60 babies from Glasgow.

The children were studied in their homes monthly for the first 18 months of their lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who discovered the theory of sensitive responsiveness? What is it?

A

Schaffer and Emerson discovered that attachments were most likely to form with carers who were sensitive to the baby’s signals, rather than the person they spent the most time with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the first stage of attachment

A

Indiscriminate attachment
Birth - 2 months old

Infants react to any animate or inanimate objects. IS and reciprocity are key interactions to change that.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the second stage of attachment

A

The beginnings of attachment
Around 4 months

Infants become more social and prefer human company to inanimate objects. They can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people, but they do not yet show stranger anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the third stage of attachment

A

Discriminate attachment
By 7 months

Infants show preference for a main figure they are attached to, experience separation anxiety with them and joy at reunion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the fourth stage of attachment

A

Multiple attachments
By 18 months

Infants develop a wider circle of secondary attachments eg. father, siblings. Infants also display separation anxiety in these relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the weaknesses of Schaffer and Emerson’s attachment study?

A
  • The stages suggest that development is rather inflexible, so a child would be classed as abnormal if they did not follow the pattern. However, infants have individual differences and in some cultures multiple attachments may come first
  • The sample was biased; it was from a working-class population in the 1960s. Parental care has changed considerably since then, so you could not apply the same rules. If this study was conducted today, the findings might be different
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are fathers necessary? Why are they usually the secondary attachment figure?

A

They are often the secondary attachment figures because the female hormone oestrogen underlies caring behaviour, so women are generally more inclined to form a strong bond with a child.

However, research has consistently highlighted that fathers are often more playful and good at providing challenging situations for their children, which gives them a different role. Also, it may be that a lack of sensitivity from fathers fosters problem-solving and makes greater cognitive demands on children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Lorenz research and what did it show?

A

Lorenz studied imprinting in goslings.
He took some eggs and divided them into 2 groups; one remained with their mother, and the other in an incubator next to him.

He found that the goslings took no notice of their natural mother and imprinted on him, and that there was a critical period of 2 days; if they did not see a moving object in this time, they would not imprint.

He noted that the effects of imprinting were irreversible and long lasting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Harlow research and what did it show?

A

Harlow studied 8 infant monkeys; for 4, the milk bottle was on the wire mum, and for 4, it was on the cloth mum.
He found that all 8 monkeys spent most of their time with the cloth mum whether or not the milk bottle was on it.

These findings suggest that infants do not develop an attachment to the person who feeds them but to the person offering comfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were the long-lasting effects of Harlow’s study?

A

the motherless monkeys developed abnormally, both socially and sexually. they could not interact with other monkeys or show normal mating behaviour/cradle their own babies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of Lorenz’s research?

A

+ there is research support for imprinting; Guiton demonstrated that leghorn chicks exposed to yellow rubber gloves for feeding them during their first few weeks became imprinted on the gloves

  • it is now understood that imprinting is not so irreversible- it is a more ‘plastic and forgiving mechanism’. Guiton also found that it is fairly reversible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the weaknesses of Harlow’s research?

A
  • There was a confounding variable; the two heads of the mums were different, so the infant monkeys may have preferred the cloth mum because it had a more attractive head. This means the research lacks internal validity
  • You cannot generalise animal behaviour to human behaviour
  • Morally/ethically wrong; there was long lasting harmful effects on the monkeys
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does learning theory suggest? What does this contrast with?

A

That attachment is based on provision of food alone.

This contrasts with Bowlby’s later theory of attachment; he suggested that it was formed more due to the provision of emotional security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is classical conditioning? Who studied it?

A

Where a carer feeds a baby enough times for the infant to come to associate the pleasure that feeding brings with the carer. Food goes from an unconditioned stimulus to a conditioned stimulus, and the pleasure is a conditioned response.

Pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is operant conditioning? Who studied it?

A

Infants feel a drive to reduce the discomfort felt when hungry, so they feel pleasure when fed (negative reinforcement). Hence, the food becomes a primary reinforcer because it supplies the reward.
Attachment occurs because the child seeks the person who can supply the reward.

Skinner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the difference between classical and operant conditioning?

A

Classical conditioning is by association, whereas operant conditioning is by reward and punishment

25
Q

What are the weaknesses of learning theory?

A
  • It is based on research with animals
  • Contact comfort is more important than food, supported by Harlow’s research which is supported by Schaffer and Emerson
  • Learning theory assists attachment, but it is not the main drive. Bowlby provides a better explanation
26
Q

Why does attachment form according to Bowlby?

A

Attachment behaviour evolved because it serves an important survival function; human infants cannot care for themselves

27
Q

What is monotropy?

A

The idea that the one relationship than an infant has with their primary attachment figure is of special signifiance in emotional development

28
Q

When is the critical period? What did Bowlby later propose?

A

The critical period is up to 2.5 years; if an infant does not form an attachment in this time, attachment will not occur later on (continuity hypothesis)

Bowlby later proposed a sensitive period of up to 5 years.

29
Q

What are social releasers?

A

Innate social behaviours or characteristics that elicit caregiving and lead to attachment
eg. smiling, eye contact

30
Q

What are the strengths of Bowlby’s theory of attachment?

A
  • Evidence still points to a hierarchial model; healthy development requires one relationship ‘higher’ than the others.
  • There is continuity between early attachment and later emotional/social behaviour
31
Q

What are the weaknesses of Bowlby’s theory of attachment?

A
  • There is a ‘sensitive’ period rather than critical; it is not impossible for attachments to form after 2.5 years
  • An infant’s temperament may explain attachment behaviour; infants with an ‘easy’ temperament are more likely to become strongly attached because it is easier to interact with them
32
Q

What were the 3 attachment types defined from the Ainsworth’s Strange Situation?
What were the percentages of children for these types?

A

Secure attachment - 64%
Insecure avoidant - 22%
Insecure resistant - 12%

33
Q

What was the aim of the strange situation experiment?

A

To assess individual differences in attachment, and how infants behave under mild stress

34
Q

Describe Ainsworth’s strange situation experiment

A

100 middle class American infants were observed through a one-way mirror on their response to:

1) separation from the caregiver
2) reunion with the caregiver
3) response to a stranger
4) the environment/willingness to explore

35
Q

Describe a securely attached child in the experiment

A
  • willing to explore
  • moderate stranger anxiety
  • easy to soothe after separation
  • enthusiastic at reunion
36
Q

Describe an insecure avoidant child in the experiment

A
  • willing to explore
  • low stranger anxiety
  • low separation anxiety
  • avoids contact on reunion
37
Q

Describe an insecure resistant child in the experiment

A
  • unwilling to explore
  • high stranger anxiety
  • high separation anxiety
  • seeks and rejects contact upon reunion
38
Q

What are the strengths of Ainsworth’s experiment?

A
  • The observations had high reliability; the judges found almost perfect agreement when rating exploratory behaviour
  • Research can be used to improve childrens’ lives
39
Q

What are the weaknesses of Ainsworth’s experiment?

A
  • Main and Solomon proposed a insecure-disorganised type D, characterised by a lack of consistent patterns. Such infants lack a coherent strategy for dealing with the stress of separation. Not all children will fit into a category
  • Behaviour may change depending on which parent the infant is with; they may be classified as a different type when interacting with their father. Therefore the experiment has low internal validity
40
Q

Who conducted a meta-analysis of attachment behaviour? How many countries did they conduct it in?

A

Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg

8 countries

41
Q

What were the findings of the cultural variations meta-analysis?

A

They found that the differences were small; secure attachment was the most common classification in every country.

Insecure-avoidant was the next most common in every country except Israel and Japan (collectivist cultures).

42
Q

What are the weaknesses of the cultural variations meta-analysis?

A
  • Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg were not actually comparing cultures but countries; there are numerous subcultures which would show different results, but the results were generalised to the country
  • A securely attached child is a different thing in America to what it is in Japan; Japanese children may appear to be insecurely attached according to western criteria, whereas they are securely attached by Japanese standards. They value independence more than dependence
43
Q

What is Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis?

A

The disruption of an attachment bond, even in the short term, leads to serious and permanent damage to a child’s emotional, social and intellectual development

44
Q

What are the consequences of maternal deprivation?

A
  • An inability to form attachments in the future
  • Affectionless psychopathy
  • Problems with cognitive development
  • Delinquency (problems in adolescence)
45
Q

What are the required conditions for these consequences to occur?

A
  • The deprivation occurring during the critical period

- There being no other substitute mother/caregiver

46
Q

What was the 44 juvenile thieves study?

A

Bowlby analysed the case histories of 88 patients from his London clinic; 44 had a history of theft, and 44 were a control group.

47
Q

What were the findings of the 44 juvenile thieves study?

A
  • 86% of the affectionless thieves (12 out of 14) experienced frequent separations compared with 17% of the other thieves

It suggests that early separations are linked to affectionless psychopathy, i.e. lack of continuous care can lead to mental disorders

48
Q

What are the strengths of the 44 juvenile thieves study?

A
  • Bowlby’s study and theory had a huge impact on post-war thinking about childrearing; it led to major social change in hospitals. Parents were allowed to visit and stay with their children
  • There is research support for long-term effects
49
Q

What are the weaknesses of the 44 juvenile thieves study?

A
  • Psychological separation can also lead to deprivation; it isn’t just physical.
  • Not all children are affected by emotional disruption in the same way; those who are more securely attached may be more resilient.
50
Q

How did Rutter test the effects of institutionalisation?

A

He studied 165 Romanian orphans at regular intervals (4, 6, 11 and 15 y/o) on their physical, social and cognitive development.

Their progress was compared to a control group of 52 British adopted children.

51
Q

What were the findings of Rutter’s orphan studies?

A

At the time of adoption, the Romanian orphans lagged behind their British counterparts in all measures of physical, social and cognitive development.

Orphans adopted at 6 months did as well as their British counterparts, and showed great improvement at 4 y/o.

Significant deficits remained in a substantial minority of individuals, showing that the long-term consequences may be less severe than once thought.

52
Q

What did Rutter discover in his follow up of the orphan studies?

A

He discovered there were negative effects linked to long-term institutionalisation. 50% of 11 year olds show disinhibited attachment

53
Q

What are the long-term effects of institutionalisation?

A
  • physical underdevelopment
  • intellectual underfunctioning
  • disinhibited attachment
  • poor parenting
54
Q

What are the strengths of Rutter’s orphan studies?

A
  • It changed the way children were looked after so that they were more cared for in hospitals, and babies were adopted at an earlier stage
  • the study was longitudinal
55
Q

What are the weaknesses of Rutter’s orphan studies?

A
  • individual differences: some children are not as affected as others
  • deprivation is one factor only; the conditions in the institutions were appalling and may have also had an effect. they had less cognitive stimulation
56
Q

How did Hazan and Shaver study the influence of early attachment?

A

They placed a ‘Love quiz’ in a newspaper, which asked questions about current attachment experiences and attitudes towards love.

They analysed 620 responses: 205 from men, and 415 from women.

57
Q

What were the results of Hazan and Shaver’s study?

A

56% securely attached
25% avoidant
19% anxious

Very similar to the proportions in Ainsworth’s study, which suggests that there is a link between early attachment and adult relationships

58
Q

what are the weaknesses of Hazan and Shaver’s study?

A
  • overly deterministic; suggests the effects are fixed, but people can change from childhood to adulthood.
  • research is correlational, not causational; other variables can affect results eg. temperament
  • relies on early memory, which is not accurate