attachment Flashcards
(40 cards)
- What is attachment ?
- Attachment refers to a close relationship (bond) between two people in which both feel more secure in the presence of their attachment figure
- What is reciprocity
- Traditionalist believe that babies take a passive role in attachment, however reciprocity state that both mother and baby take turn at initiating interactions strengthening their bond. Brazelton et al described reciprocity as a dance in which both dancers react to eachothers moves
- What is interactional synchrony?
- Mother and baby replicate each others behaviour signalling a closeness between them eg if baby smiles mother smiles back
- Name one study into international synchrony
- What was the aim of this study
- What was the procedure of the study
- What were the results of this study?
- Melzoff and Moore’s observational study
- To investigate interactional synchrony in infants as young as 2 weeks old
- An adult made 1 of 3 distinct facial expressions and 1 or 3 gestures. The infants reaction was filmed and payed back to independent observers who had it played in real time, slow motion and frame by frame if required. They were made t make notes on behavioural categories, each scored twice
- average rating was 9.2, establishing a strong correlation between the behaviour of the adult pps and the infant pps, signalling the presence of interactional synchrony
- Name a suppletory study into interactional synchrony?
- What was the aim of this study?
- What was the procedure of this study?
- What were the findings of this study?
- Isabelle at al’s correlation study
- To investigate whether there is a link between interactional synchrony and quality of attachment
- 50 mothers and infants were used, researcher assessed quality of attachment (emotional intensity) and interactional synchrony
- The more interactional synchrony the better the relationship
- Evaluate studies into interactional synchrony
- Puts too much pressure on mother- The link implies through isabelle et als study put pressure on mothers to be with their child to prove that interactional synchrony that seems critical for a good heathy attachment. This makes lifestyle choices like going back to work increasingly difficult for mothers to make. Hence the studies finding is largely unpopular with modern feminists and is accused of being unethical
Helpful for society- Crotwell found a 10 minute interactional therapy session helped 20 low income mothers form attachments with their child compared o a control group. This demonstrates how this psychological research has aided the development of attachment therapies to help society most unable subsections
High level of control- observational studies included the filming of behaviour so it could be revisited and analysed in great depth increasing the likelihood of accurate findings and conclusions. Furthermore babies do not understand the basics of the world around them and therefore are never going to guess that aim of the study, therefore there is no risk of demand characteristics that would devalue results
Doesn’t establish purpose- its been pointed out that although interactional synchrony is easy to observe it is merely a behaviour, establishing that it is there tells us nothing about its purpose. Isabelle et als study attempt at doing so but in reality only establishes a correlation between the behaviour and a good attachment, one doesn’t necessarily cause the other
Hard to observe infants- because infants are small so are their movements, making them harder to pick up on, furthermore they are immobile meaning their behaviour is eve further limited. Such large conclusions perhaps shouldn’t be derived from such minimal evidence
What is schaffer and emersons understanding of the role of the father?
Babies tend t attach to their mother firstvatvaroundb7 months. At the 3% rate they attach to fathers first, 27% rate have their mother and father as their joint object of attachment and 75% will attach to their fathers by 18 months
- Name on study into the role of the father
- What was its aim?
- What was the procedure?
- What were the findings?
- Grossman’s longitudinal study
- To investigate how the role of the mother and father in attachment plays into a child’s later attachments in adolescents
- It was a longitudinal study in which the role of the mother and father were assessed, the child was then followed in till adolescence where their attachments were assessed
- The role of the father was centred around play and correlated with the quality of attachment their child would develop later on in life. The others role was centred round nurturing, the quality of attachment wit the mother affected the type of attachment her child would develop in adolescent. Tis implies that the mother and father have their own separate roles, the fathers being more of a secondary one
- Name one study into the role of the father?
- What was the aim of this study?
- What was its procedure?
- What were the findings?
- Tiffany et al
- To investigate the role of a father as a primary care giver
- Primary caregiving mothers and fathers along with secondary caregiving fathers were filmed having face to face interactions with their babies
- It was found that primary caregiving fathers (just like mothers) spent more time smiling at and holding their babies. This suggest that gender has nothing to do with caregiving and instead its dependent on the level of interaction
- Evaluate studies into the role of the father
- reduces pressure put on mother- suggesting that the father can also for fill the role of primary caregiver makes lifestyle choice like going back to work easier for mothers to make
studies interested in different research questions- some studies are concerned with fathers as a primary caregiver whist others are more interested In fathers as a secondary caregiver. These conflicting interests making it increasingly difficult to answer the fundamental question ‘what is the role of the father’
doesn’t explain why fathers tend to take secondary roles- may be due to social expectations or biological influences (eg hormone) research however doesn’t attempt t answer these major questions. if there are issues in attachment then the origins of these issue must be understood for any change to take place
evidence to undermine fathers having a role at all-McCallum and Golobok conducted a study that conducted on the note that children on families with single or same sex parents develop attachment in the same way as a child from a more conventional family unit would
social bias effect in observational studies- We are more likely to recall schemas (what we would expect to see) instead of what we actually saw. we expect fathers to be less affectionate therefore we under play the observations of fathers being openly affectionate
- Name one study into stages of attachment
- What was the aim of that study?
- What was the procedure of that study?
- What were the findings of that study?
- Schaffer and Emerson’s longitudinal study
- To investigate when attachment forms, its emotional intensity and to whom it is directed
- As a longitudinal study, 60 babies were used (31 male, 29 female) for mainly working class families from Glasgow. They were visited by a researcher evert month for their first year of life and then again at 18 months. The mother was interviewed as the researcher asked abut how the baby protested in 7 everyday situations (eg mum leaving the room) to establish separation anxiety. Stranger anxiety was also tested through the presence of the researcher
- 25-32 weeks 50% showed separation anxiety indicating specific attachment
40 weeks 80% indicated that they had a specific attachment, 30% had multiple attachments
attachments tended to be with who was the most responsive to the child, not who they spent the most time with
- Evaluate one study into the stages of attachment
- good external validity- natural experiment, tested in their own homes behaving how they normally would. This is an indication of how everyday babies develop in their homes
problems with generalisability- from a specific part of Britain (Glasgow) and all having the same socio-economic background
good internal validity- babies cannot show demand characteristics at a matter of weeks old, also y using a longitudinal study instead of a cross sectional design the issue of individual differences is ruled out. The DV is a direct result of the IV
- name and explain one theory on the stages of attachment
- Schaffer and Emerson’s theory- there are distinct and specific stages every baby goes through
Asocial stage- happens during the first few weeks of life, involves the baby beginning to recognise family people, whom they show a slight preference to but generally happier to be around anyone than alone. The baby will show no preference for animate objects over inanimate objects
indiscriminate stage(2-7 months)- baby now shows a preference for animate objects, is still happy to be cuddled by anyone (no separation or stranger anxiety)
specific attachment stage (around 7 months)- baby shows preference for family people, stranger and separation anxiety implies a specific attachment to the person whom is most responsive to them
multiple attachment stage(by 1 year)- baby begins to branch out and form other attachments, 29% of babies did this within one month of forming their primary attachment in their study
- Evaluate one theory on the stage of development
- methodological issues with supporting study- only tested separation and stranger anxiety, attachment is far more complex than that
issue with strange situation- may be measuring whether or not you are a playmate instead of attachment figure
conflicting debates on multiple attachment- Bowlby argued that multiple attachments only happen after the specific attachment, however psychologists that work in collectivist cultures disagree with that
issues with measuring indiscriminate stage- large conclusions drawn from such small evidence, at that stage of development babies do not have the tools to express themselves
- Research into imprinting
- Lorenzo studies 12 gooselings in his ethology experiment, using a cross sectional design in an attempt to investigate the power of imprinting (biological readiness to form a strong bond with mother- assumed to be the first animate object seen). As the gooselings were halved, one condition would hatch and have their first object they see be him, whereas the others would be left in their natural habitat and their real mother first. They were then mixed up to see in an open space who they would follow, their real mother or Lorenz.
Lorenz’s gooselings followed him, he argued this was due to imprinting. He used this information to identify the critical period which as a few hours after hatching or birth, if an attachment didn’t form then it never would
- Research into sexual imprinting
After the success of his initial gooseling experiment Lorenz prepared a follow up experiment regarding how imprinting affects later sexual preference. He used a peacock who was reared in a reptile zoo, who had imprinted on a giant tourist. He peacock later went on to display mating behaviour towards giant tortoises. Lorenz concluded that this meant we innately has sexual preferences for those who share traits with our mother or father
- Evaluate Lorenz’s research
- issues with generalising- mammalians are far more developed and therefore have complex emotional and cognitive systems that animals do not share. finding cannot be generalised from ethology studies
conflicting research- Guiton et al conducted a study in which chick were made to imprint on yellow washing up gloves, despite this they grew up to show mating behaviour towards their own species
- Name one study into contact comfort
- What was the aim of this study?
- What was the procedure of this study?
- What were the findings of the study?
- Harlow’s monkeys
- To investigate contact comfort in attachment
- 16 monkeys split into groups deprived of their real mother, put into cages, under one condition they were given a wire mother that displaced ilk, in another they were given a cloth mother that dispensed milk. to further test attachment monkey were put in high stress situations eg a noise making monkey was put in their cage
- regardless of which dispensed milk the monkeys would go to the cloth mother for contact comfort when afraid
monkeys developed to be aggressive as they were deprived of their real mother, and had poor skills to deal with their own offspring (often killing them)
This lead Harlow to conclude that there as a critical period of 90 days, if attachment didn’t form in that time then it never would and consequences of early deprivation are irreversible
Evaluate Harlows research
theoretical value- helps us understand the importance of contact comfort in the formation of development, research has played a role I many discussions surround theory’s of attachment
practical value- zoos make sure orphaned animals have a mother or father figure to avoid negative irreversible affects of early deprivation
unethical- monkeys subjected to intense emotional distress, validated as animals that are the most similar to humans ie they suffer as we do, However many have argued the ends justly the means
- Describe the Learning Theory
- The Learning theory is based on the principle of classical conditioning (learning through association) first proposed by Pavlov and operant conditioning (learning through consequence) first proposed by skinner. The theory places an emphasis on food hence why the term ‘cupboard love’ is often used when discussing the theory.
For example, a mother is the NS, which innately triggers no response, Food however us a UCS as it produces the UCR of pleasure as it prevents hunger. Wen the mother feeds the baby this is the NS being matched with eth UNS, eventually pairing the make the mother the CS, which produced the CR of pleasure. This is how attachments are formed
Attachments are sustained through operant conditioning. This works by rewarding both mother and baby, for example if baby is fussy and mother tends to it the mother can then feel relaxed, this is positive reinforcement fore her. When baby smiles and the mother reacts by cuddling it this is pleasurable for the baby, and is therefore positive reinforcement
Within this understanding attachment is a secondary drive. Hunger, what attachment centres around is a primary drive as we innately get pleasure from eating when we are hungry, attachment therefore is a secondary drive as it only forms as a consequence
evaluate the Learning theory
Focus on association may be correct- lots of psychologist agree with the ide of classical conditioning, but the focus on food being the sole object of the association has been widely rejected. Its been suggested the theory should look at UCS other than food
conflicting animal studies- Lorenz geese and Harlows monkeys has nothing to do with who feeds them
conflicting human studies- Schaffer and Emerson, its about who is the most responsive
more modern learning theory- attachment behaviour is modelled and rewarded when replicated
reductionist- ignores major findings in the attachment field of psychology eg the importance of interactional synchrony (Isabelle et al)
Bolwby’s theory- evolutionary theory
innate- attachment happens naturally as a way of survival for n otherwise vunrable infant
monotropy- one important primary care-giver that is more important than the rest
law of continuity- care should be predicable on constant
law of accumulation-separation periods add up therefore ‘the best dose is a 0 dose’
social releasers- innate behaviours adults deem as ‘cute’ that activate their attachment system eg cooing
critical period- first 2 years a child attachment system is the most active, he later said that is more of a sensitive period but attachment outside of those 2 years would be difficult
internal working model- a mental framework of the first relationship formed that the child will carry with them throughout life and use as a template for future relationships
evaluate Bowlby’s theory
socially sensitive- law of accumulation makes lifestyle choices harder for mum
issue with monotropy- Schaffer and Emerson found 27% of babies in their study attached to mum and dad at the same time
support for critical period- Brazelton et all asked caregivers to ignore their babies social releasers, the babies were extremely distressed as a result, some crawled into a ball on the floor
support for internal working model- bailey et al: 99 mums compared their attachment with the ones they have with their babies, those who had bad attachments with their mums were the most likely to have bad attachments with their babies
more to do with genetic- Kegan argued some babies are genetically made to be social and therefore will form better attachments
The Strange situation
Designed to investigate a child’s attachment type through key attachment behaviours
conducted (usually) in high controlled lab setting with a two way mirror so psychologist can observer behaviours
5 attachment behaviours are measured, proximity seeking, secure base behaviour and exploration, Stanger anxiety, separation protest, response to reunion
stages to the experiment. 1) baby encouraged to play,2) Stanger enters and attempts to play with baby,3) mum leaves,4) mum returns and Stanger leaves, 5) mum leaves baby is alone, 6) stranger enters 7) stranger leaves and mum enters
3 attachment types
secure- 60-75% of British toddlers
insecure avoidant- 20-25%
insecure resistant- 3% of British toddlers