Attachment - Booklet 1 Flashcards
Caregiver-infant interactions, Role of the father, Schaffer's research into stages of attachment (55 cards)
define attachment
-a close, two way, emotional bond between two individuals
why do we need to form attachments
-emotional security -> social development
-physical + intellectual development
which behaviours indicate an attachment
-proximity
-separation distress
-secure-base behaviours
define altricial
-babies are born at a relatively early stage of development
opposite of altricial
-precocial (born at advanced stage of development eg animals)
benefits of meaningful social interactions between babies and carers
-short term = survival
-long term = emotional relationships
describe caregiver infant interactions
-key interactions are non verbal
-they form the basis of attachment between an infant and caregiver
-the more sensitive each is to the other’s signals, the deeper the relationship
define reciprocity
-when an infant responds to the actions of another person
-they elicit a response from eachother
-turn taking
describe reciprocity
-each person responds to each other (caregiver + infant)
-babies signal with social releasers that they are ready to interact
-normally takes 2/3 times for the mother to notice and respond
e.g - smiling back at someone
define interactional synchrony
-where an infant mirrors/imitates the same actions of another person, for example their facial expressions and body movements
-they interact in time to sustain communication
-mirroring
describe interactional synchrony
-the temporal co ordination of micro level social behaviour
-actions and emotions are mirrored by child and mother and are in time
-a parents speech and infants behaviour become finely synchronised
e.g - infant and caregiver smiling at the same time
why did brazleton describe mother-infant interactions as a dance
-both the parent and child can initiate interactions from each other and take it in turns doing so
aim of meltzoff and moores study
-systematically study infant caregiver interactions, specifically interactional synchrony
procedure of meltzoff and moores study
-controlled observation
-adult model displayed one of three facial expressions or hand movements with fingers moving in a sequence
-dummy placed in the infants mouth during initial display to prevent response
-dummy then removed and childs expression was filmed from different angles
findings of meltzoff and moores study
-there was an association between the infant’s behaviour and that of the adult model
-infants as young as two to three weeks imitated specific facial and hand gestures
conclusion of meltzoff and moores study
-supports interactional synchrony as the infant mirrors the facial and hand gestures as the adult model did so
what did isabella find about infant caregiver interactions
-securely attached mother infant pairs had more instances of interactional synchrony
-so interactional synchrony is associated with better quality attachments
-so it occurs due to strong attachments
AO3 points about infant caregiver interactions
-its hard to know what’s happening when observing infants
-controlled observations capture fine detail
-observations don’t tell us the purpose of synchrony and reciprocity
-infant caregiver interactions aren’t found in all cultures
explain why it is hard to know what is happening when observing infants (AO3 infant caregiver interactions)
-many studies have shown the same pattern of interaction
-but what is observed is only hand movements or changes in expression which are commonly made by babies so may not be deliberate
-behaviour may not have a special meaning as hard to tell from infants perspective if they are conscious or deliberate
explain why controlled observations capture fine detail (AO3 infant caregiver interactions)
-well controlled procedures
-mother and infant filmed often from different angles
-fine details of behaviour can be recorded and analysed
-babies don’t know or care they are observed so behaviour does not change (no demand characteristics)
-results are reliable as can rewatch videos
explain why observations don’t tell us the purpose of synchrony and reciprocity (AO3 infant caregiver interactions)
-feldman points out synchrony and reciprocity simply describe behaviours that occur at the same time
-these can be reliably observed but it doesn’t tell us the purpose of these caregiver-infant interactions
-lacks internal validity as unsure whether babies mirror the behaviour to interact
-so more research is needed
explain why infant caregiver interactions aren’t found in all cultures (AO3 infant caregiver interactions)
-le vine et al reported that kenyan mothers have little physical interactions or contact with their infants, but infants still have a high proportion of secure attachments
-research may be ethnocentric
-so not fully valid in explaining attachments as results of research cannot be generalised to other cultures
describe grossman’s research into the role of the father
-longitudinal study
-looked at parent’s behaviour and it’s relationship to quality of children’s attachments into their teens
-quality of infant attachments with mothers related to attachments in adolescence, but not with fathers
-attachment with fathers less important
-but found quality of play is related to quality of attachments as adolescents
describe what schaffer and emerson’s research showed about the role of the father
-found babies become attached to their mother first (7 months)
-within a few weeks/months formed secondary attachments
-in 75% of their studies attachment formed with father at 18 months
-shown by infants protesting when their father walked away