Attachment (P1) Flashcards

(125 cards)

1
Q

Define reciprocity

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

A description of how two people interact

Caregiver-infant interaction is reciprocal in that both caregiver and baby respond to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define interactional synchrony

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Caregiver and baby reflect both the actions and emotions of the other and do this in a co-ordiated (synchronised) way

the temporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reciprocity

Describe alert phases

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Babies have periodic alert phases in which they signal they are ready for interaction

Research shows that mothers typically pick up on and respond to their baby’s alertness around 2/3rds of the time

This varies according to the skill of the mother and external factors (stress)

From around 3 months this interaction tends to become increasingly frequent and involves the baby and mother paying close attention to each other’s verbal signals and facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reciprocity

Describe active involvemnt

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Traditional views of childhood suggested babies have a passive role

Now seems babies take an active role as well as the caregiver

Both caregiver abd baby can initiate interactions and take turns doing so

Interaction is similar to a dance as they respond to eachother’s moves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

interactional synchrony

Describe the process of synchrony beginning

A

**Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
**
observed beginning of interactional synchrony in babies as yung as 2 weeks old

An adult displayed 1 of 3 facial expressions or 1 of 3 distinctive gestures

Baby’s response was filmed and labelled by independent observers

Babies’ expression and gestures were more likely to mirror those of the adults more than chance would predict i.e. there was a significant association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interactional synchrony

Describe the importance for attachment

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Interactional synchrony is important to the development of caregiver-infant interactions

Isabella et al (1989)
observed 30 mothers and babies together and assessed the degree of synchrony. Also assessed the quality of mother-baby attachment
findings - high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachment (e.g. emotional intensity of the relationship)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define attachment

A

Close two-way emotional bond between 2 indivduals in which each individual sees the other as essential forr their own emotional security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can we recognise an attachment?

A

Proximity (trying to stay physically closer to their attachment figure)

**Seperation distress **(show signs of anxiety when attachment figure leaves their presence)

Secure-base behaviour (even when independent of attachment figures tend to make regular contact with them e.g. babies regularly return to their attachment figure while playing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are strengths of research into caregiver-infant interactions?

Caregiver-infant interactions

A
  1. Filmed observations
  2. Research support

  1. Research typically filmed in a laboratory. Means that other activity that might distract a baby can be controlled. Filmed allows observations to be analysed multiple times. Therefore less likely reearchers will have missed any behaviours. Also allows more researchers to record data establishing inter-rater reliablilty of observations. Babies don’t they’re being observed so behaviour doesn’t change (issue in overt observations). Data collected has good validity and reliability
  2. Evidence that suggests early interactions are important. Isabella et al (1989) found that achievement of international synchrony predicted the devlopment of a good quality attachment. This means that on balance caregiver-infant interaction is probably important in development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are limitations of research into caregiver-infant interactions?

Caregiver-infant inter

A
  1. Difficulty observing behaviours
  2. Observing a behaviour doesn’t reveal its developmental importance

  1. Young babies lack co-ordination and much of their bodies are almost immobile. The movement observed are just small hand movements or subtle changes in expression. Difficult to determine what is taking place from the baby’s perspective (e.g. can’t tell if a movement is caused by something caregiver has done). Cannot be certain that the behaviours seen in caregiver-infant interactions have a special meaning
  2. Feldman (2012) points out that ideas like synchrony (and by implication reciprocity) simply give names to patternns of observable caregiver and baby behaviours. These are robust phenomena as they cab be reliably observed but they still may not be particularly useful in understanding child development as ut does not tell us the purpose of these behaviours. Cannot be certain from observational research alone that reciprocity and synchrony are important for a child’s development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define stages of attachment

Schaffer’s stages of attachment

A

Many devlopmental theories identify a sequence of qualitatively different behaviours linked to specific ages

In the case of stages of attachment qualitatively different infant (baby) behaviours are linked to specific ages and all babies go through them in the same order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define multiple attachments

Schaffer’s stages of attachment

A

Attachments to 2 or more people

Most babies appear to develop multiple attachments once they have formed one strong attachment to one of their careers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe stage 1

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Asocial stage

First few weeks of life

Behaviour towards humans and inaminate objects similar

Not entirely asocial, they prefer to be with other people

Also tend to show a preference for the company of familar people and are easily comforted by them

Currently forming bonds with certain people which turn into basis of later attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe stage 2

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Indiscriminate attachment

2-7 months

Clear prefrence for being with other huans rather than inanimate objects

Recognise and prefer company of familar people

Still accept comfort from any person

Don’t show seperation anxiety or stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe stage 3

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Specific attachment

From around 7 months start to display the signs of attachment towards one person

Signs include stranger anxiety and seperation anxiety

Baby has formed a specific attachment to a person known as the primary attachment figure

Primary attachment figure isn’t necessarily the individual the child spends most time with but one who offers the most interaction and responds to the baby’s signals with the most skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe stage 4

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Multiple attachments

By 1 year-old majority of babies had developed multiple attachments

Shortly after babies start to show attachment behaviour (e.g seperation and stranger anxiety) towars 1 person they extend this to multiple attachments with others they regularly spend time with known as secondary attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe sample of Schaffer and Emerson’s research?

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

60 babies

31 male

29 fenale

All from Glasgow and working-class families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe procedure of Schaffer and Emerson’s research

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Researchers visited babies and mothers in their own homes every month for the 1st year and again at 18 months

Researchers asked the mothers questions about the kind of protest their babies showed in 7 everyday seperations

Designed to measure the babies attachment and assessed stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s research

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

identified 4 distinct stages in the development of infant attachment behaviour

  1. Asocial stage
  2. Indiscriminate attachment
  3. Specific attachment
  4. Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are strengths of Schaffer and Emerson’s stages of attachment?

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A
  1. Good external validity
  2. Real-world application

  1. Most of the observations (though not stranger anxiety) were made by parents during ordinary activities and reported to the researchers. The alternative would’ve been to have researchers present to record observations. This might’ve distracted the babies or made them feel more anxious. This means it is highly likely that the participants behaved naturally while being observed
  2. Practical application in day care (where babies are cared for by a non-family adult outside their home). In the asocial (1) and indiscriminate (2) stages day care is likely to be straightfoward as babies can be comforted by any skilled adult. However Schaffer and Emerson’s research tells us that day care especially starting day care with an unfamiliar adult may be problematic during specific attachment stage (3). This means that parents use of day care can be planned using Schaffer and Emmerson’s stages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are limitations of Schaffer and Emerson’s stages of attachment?

A
  1. Poor evidence for the asocial stage
  2. Poor validity of the research which the stages of attachment are based on

  1. Limitation is the validity of the measures they used to assess attachment in the asocial stage. Young babies have poor co-ordination and are fairly immobile. If babies less than 2 months old felt anxiety in everyday situations they might’ve displayed this in hard-to-observe ways. This made it difficult for mothers to observe and report back to researchers on signs of anxiety and attachment in this age group. This means that the babies may have actually be quite social but because of flawed methods they appear to be asocial
  2. There are issues with asking the mothers to be the ‘observers’. They were unlikely to be objective observers. They might’ve been biased in terms of what they noticed and what they reported (e.g. might not have noticed when their baby was showing signs of anxiety or may have misremembered it). This means that even if babies behaved naturally their behaviour may have not been accurately recorded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define the term father

The role of the father

A

In attachment research the father is anyone who takes on the role of the main male caregiver

This can be but is not necessarily the biological father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Describe attachment to fathers

The role of the father

A

Evidence suggests fathers are much more less likely to become babies’ first attachment figure compared to mothers

Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found majority of babies 1st became attached to their mother at around 7 months. In only 3% of cases the father was the first attahment. In 27% of cases the father was the joint 1st object of mother with the mother

Fathers become important attachment figures. 75% of the babies studied by Schaffer and Emerson formed an attachment with their father by 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Do adult male caregivers make a unique contribution to early development?

The role of the father

A

Grossmann et al (2002)

carried out a longitudinal study where babies’ attachments were studied until they were teens.

Looked at both parents’ behaviour and its relationship to the qualty of their baby’s later attachments to other people

Quality of a baby;s attachment with mothers but not fathers was related to attachments in adolescence.

This suggests that attachment to fathers is less important than attachment to mothers

Grossmann et al also found the quality of fathers’ play with babies was related to the quality of adolscent attachments.

This suggests that fathers have a different role from mothers. Fathers’ role is more to do with play and stimulation, less with emotional development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What does a baby's relationship with their primary attachment figure form the basis of? | The role of the father
All later close emotional relationships
26
Describe fathers as primary attachment figures | The role of the father
When fathers take on the role of primary caregiver they are able to adopt the emotional role more typically associated with mothers ## Footnote Field (1978) filmed 4-month-old babies in face-to-face interaction with primary caregiver mothers, secondary caregiver fathers and primary caregiver fathers. Primary caregiver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding babies than the secondary caregiver fathers. These are all part of the process of attachment formation Can provide responsiveness required for a close emotional attachment but perhaps only express this when given the role of primary caregivers
27
What are strengths of research into the role of the father? | The role of the father
1. Real-world application 2. Lines of research may not be in conflict ## Footnote 1. Can be used to offer advice to parents. Parents agonise over decision of who should be the primary caregiver. Mothers may feel pressured to stay at home because of stereotypical views of mother's and father's roles. Fathers may feel pressured to focus on work rather than parenting. In some families this may not be the best economic solution. Research into the role of the father can be used to offer reassuring advice to parents. For example heterosexual parents can be informed that fathers are capable of becoming primary attachment figure. Also lesbian-parent and single-mother families can be informed that not having a father around doesn't affect a child's development. Parental anxiety about the role of the father can be reduced 2. It could be that fathers typically take on distinctive roles in two-parent heterosexual families, but that parents in a single-mother and lesbian-parent families simply adapt to accomodate the role played by fathers. When present fathers tend to adopt a distinctive role but families can adapt to not having a father
28
What are limitations of research into the role of the father? | The role of the father
1. Confusion over research questions 2. Conflicting evidence ## Footnote 1. The question "what is the role of the father?" in the context of attachment is ectremely complicated. Some researchers attempting to answer this question actually want to understand the role of fathers as secondary attachment figures. But others are more concerend with fathers as a primary attachment figure. The former have tended to see fathers as behaving differently from mothers and having a distinct role. The latter have found that fathers can take on a maternal role. This makes it difficul to offer a simple answer to the role of the father as it really depends on what specific role is being discussed 2. Research into the role of the fathers vary according to methodology used. Longitudinal studies (e.g. Grossmann et al) have suggested that fathers as secondary attachment figures have an important and distinct role in their child's development involvong play and stimulation. We would therefore expect that children growing up in lesbian-parent and single-mother families would develop differently from those in two-parent heterosexual families. In studies (e.g. McCallum and Golombok 2004) consistently show that these children do not develop differently from children in two-parent heterosexual families. Leaves question as to whether fathers have a distinct role remains unanswered
29
Define animal studies | Animal studies of attachment
Studies carried out on non-human animal species rather than on humans either for practical or ethical resons ## Footnote Practical because animals breed faster and researchers are interested in seeing results across multiple generations
30
# Lorenz's research When did Lorenz first observe imprinting? | Animal studies of attachment
As a child ## Footnote A neighbour gave him a newly hatched duckling that then followed him around
31
# Lorenz's research Describe the procedure of Lorenz's research | Animal studies of attachment
Randomly divided a large clutch of goose eggs Half the eggs were hatched with the mother goose in their natural environment The other half hatched in an incubator where the first moving objectthey saw was Lorenz
32
# Lorenz's research Describe the findings of Lorenz's research | Animal studies of attachment
Incubator followed Lorenz everywhere whereas the control group followed their biological mother When the 2 groups were mixed up the control group continued to follow the mother and the experimental group followed Lorenz Phenomenom called imprinting - bird species who were mobile from birth, attach tp and follow the first moving object they see Identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to take place. Depending on the species this can be as brief as a few hours after hatching/birth. If imprinting does not occur within that time Lorenz found that chicks didn't attach themselves to a mother figure
33
# Lorenz's research Describe Lorenz's case study on sexual imprinting | Animal studies of attachment
Describe a peacock that had been reared in the reptile house of a zoo where the first moving objects the peacock saw after hatching were giant tortoises. As an adult this bird would only direct courtship behaviour towards giant tortoises Lorenz concluded the peackock had undergone sexual imprinting
34
# Harlow's research Describe the sample of Harlow's research
16 rhesus monkeys
35
# Harlow's research: importance of contact comfort Describe the procedure of Harlow's reseach
Reared 16 baby monkeys with 2 wire model mothers In one condition milk was dispensed by the plain-wire mother in the second condtionthe milk was dispensed by the cloth-covered mother
36
# Harlow's research: importance of contact comfort Describe the findings of Harlow's research | Animal studies in attachment
Monkeys prefered to cuddle with the cloth-covered mother rather than the plain-wire mother Also sought comfort from the cloth-covered mother when frightened (e.g. by a noisy mechanical teddy bear) regardless of which mother dispensed milk ## Footnote This showed that contanct comfort was of more importance to monkeys than food when it came to attachment behaviour
37
# Harlow's research: maternally deprived monkeys as adults Did early maternal deprivation have a permanent effect?
Yes ## Footnote Researchers found sevre consequences
38
# Harlow's research: maternally deprived monkeys as adults Monkeys reared with ____ mothers only were the most dysfunctional | Animal studies in attachment
plain-wire
39
40
# Harlow's research What were characteristics of maternally deprived monkeys as adults? | Animal studies of attachment
Aggressive Less socialable Bred less than typical monkeys Unskilled at mating When they became mothers some neglected thier young and others attacked their young (even killing them)
41
# Harlow's research When was the critical period for normal development? | Animal studies in attachment
90 days ## Footnote A mother figure had to be introduced to a young monkey within 90 days for an attachment to form After this period attachment was impossible and damge done by early deprivation became irreversible
42
# Lorenz's research What is a strength? | Animal studies of attachment
Research support ## Footnote Regolin and Vallortigara (1995) - support Lorenz's idea of imprinting Chicks were exposed to simple shape combinations that moved such as a triangle with a rectangle in front A range of shape combinations were then moved in front of them and they followed the original most closely This suppots the view that young animals are born with an innate mechanism to imprint on a moving object present in the critical window of development as predicted by Lorenz
43
# Lorenz's research What is a limitation? | Animal studies of attachment
Generalisabilty to humans ## Footnote The mammalian attachment system is quite different and more complex than in birds. For example in mammals attachment is a two-way process soit isn't just the young who become attached to their mothers but also the mammalian mothers show an emotional attachment to their young This means that it is probably not appropiate to generalise Lorenz's ideas to human
44
# Harlow's research What is a strength? | Animal studies of attachment
real-world applications ## Footnote It has helped social workers and clinical psychologists understand that a lack of bonding experience may be a risk factor in child development allowing them to intervene to prevent poor outcomes Also now understand the importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys in zoos and breeding programmes in the wild Value of research is not just theoretical but practica;
45
# Harlow's research What is a limitation? | Animal studies of attachment
Generalisabilty to humans ## Footnote Ability to generalise findings and conclusions from monkeys to humans Rhesus monkeys are much more similar to humans than Lorenz's birds and all mamals sharesome attachment behaviours However the human brain and human behaviour is still more complex than that of monkeys Not appropiate to generalise Harlow's findinfs to humans
46
Who proposed Learning theory? | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
Dollard and Miller
47
Define learning theory | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
A set of theories from the behaviourist approach in psychology that emphasises the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour ## Footnote Explanations for learning of behaviour include classical and operant conditioning
48
Describe process of classical conditioning in attachment | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
When the caregiver provides food over time they become associated with food When the baby sees the caregiver there is an expectation of food Once conditioning has taken place the sight of the caregiver produces a conditioned response of pleasure Conditioned pleasure response is love (attachment is formed, caregiver becomes attachment figure) ## Footnote Uncondtioned Stimulus - Food Unconditioned response - Pleasure Neutral stimulus - Caregiver Conditioned stimulus - caregiver Conditioned response - pleasure
49
Describe process of operant conditioning in attachment | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
Baby crying leads to a response from the caregiver e.g. feeding As long as the caregiver provides the corrrect response, crying is reinforced The baby then directs crying for comfort towards the caregiver who responds with comforting socal suppressor behaviour two-way process, caregiver recieves negative reinforcement because the crying stops (escaping from something unpleasant) Mutual reinforcement strengthens attachment
50
Explain attachment as a secondary drive | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
Hunger is a primary drive (an innate biological motivator) we are motivated to eat in order to reduce the hunger drive As caregivers provide food the primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them Attachment is thus a secondary drive learned by an association between the caregver and the satisfaction of a primary drive
51
What is a limitation? | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
1. Counter evidence from animal studies 2. counter-evidence from human studies ## Footnote 1. Lorenz's geese imprinted on the first moving object they saw regardless if whether this object was associated with food. Harlow's monkeys displayed attachment behaviour towards a soft surrogate mother in preference to a wire one which provided milk. Shows factors other than association with food are important in formation of attachments 2. Schaffer and Emerson found that babies tended to form their main attachment to their mother regardless of whether she was the one who usually fed them. Isabella et al found that high levels of interactional synchrony predicted the quality of attachment. This suggests that food is not the main factor in the formation of human attachments
52
What is a strength? | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
1. Some conditioning may be involved ## Footnote 1. Elements of conditioning could be involved in some aspects of attachment. It seems unlikely that association with food plays a central role in attachment but conditioning may still play a role. For example a baby may associate feeling warm and comfortable with the presence of a particular adult and this may influence the baby's choice of their main attachment figure. This means that learning theory may still be useful in understanding the development of attachments **COUNTERPOINT** - Classical and operant conditioning explanations see the baby playing a relatively passive role in attachment development simply responding to associations with comfort or reward. In fact research shows that babies take a very active role in the interactions that produce attachment e.g. Fieldman and Eidelman. This means that conditioning may not be an adequate explanation of any aspect of attachment
53
Define monotropic | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
One particular attacchment is different from all others and of central importance to a child's development
54
Describe monotropy in Bowlby's monotropic theory | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Placed great emphasis on child's attachment to a particular caregiver believing this attachment is more important than others Called this person the 'mother' but they did not need to be female or biological mother More time spent with mother-figure the better
55
What 2 laws clarified the more time spent with the mother-figure the better? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
1. The law of continuity 2. The law of accumulated seperation ## Footnote 1. The more constant and predictable a child's care, the better the quality of their attachment 2. The effects of every seperation from the mother add up
56
What are social releasers | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Babies are born with a set of innate cute behaviours (smiling, cooing, gripping) that encourage attention from adults
57
What is the purpose of social releasers? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
To activate adult social interaction and so make an adult attach to the baby ## Footnote Recognised attachment was reciprocal process and the mother and baby are hard wired to become attached
58
When is the critical period? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
around 6 months to 2 yrs ## Footnote around 6 months when the infant attachment system is active Lasts till around 2 years
59
What did Bowlby view the critical period as? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Sensitive period
60
What happens if an attachment isn't formed in the critical period | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
A child will find it harder to form an attachment later
61
Define internal working model | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Our mental representations of the world e.g. the representations we have of our relationship to our primary attachment figure This model affects our future relationships because it carries our perception of what relationships are like
62
# Internal working model what expectation would be formed by a child whose first experience is of a loving relationship with a reliable caregiver? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
That all relationships are as loving and reliable ## Footnote They will bring these qualities to future relationships
63
# Internal working model What expectation would be formed by a child whose first relationship involves poor treatment? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Expect similar poor treatment from others and/or treat otherss in that way ## Footnote Tend to form further poor relationships
64
What is the most important affect of the internal working model on children? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Later ability to be a parent themselves ## Footnote People tend to base their parenting behaviour on their own experience of being parented Explains why children from functional families tend to have similar families themselves
65
What are strengths? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
1. Research support - social releasers 2. Research support - internal working model ## Footnote 1. Brazelton et al (1975) observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers. The researchers then instructed the babies' primary attachment figures to ignore their babies' social releasers. Babies (who were prieviously shown to be normally responsive) became increasingly distressed and some eventually curled up and lay motionless. This illustrates the role of social releasers in emotional development and suggests that they are important in the process of attachment development 2. Bailey et al (2007) assessed attachment relationships in 99 mothers and their one-year-old babies. The researchers measureed the mothers' attachment to their own primary attachment figures. The researchers also assessed the attachment quality of the babies. They found that mothers with poor attachment to their own primary attachment figures were more likely to have poorly attached babies. This supports Bowlby's idea that mothers' ability to form attachments to their babies is influenced by their internal working model
66
What are limitations? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
1. Validity of montropy challenged 2. ## Footnote 1. Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found that although most babies did attatch to one person at first, a significant minority formed multiple attachments at the same time. Also although the first attachment does appear to have a particularly strong influence on later behaviour this may simply mean it is stronger not necessarily different in quality from the child's other attachments. For example other attachments to family members provide all the same key qualities (emotional support, a safe base etc) 2. Some psychologists believe that genetic differences in anxiety and socialability affect social behaviour in both babies and adullts. These differences could also impact on their parenting ability (Kornienko 2016). This means that Bowlby may have overstated the importance of the internal working model in social behaviour and parenting at the expense of other factors
67
Define strange situation | Types of attachment
A controlled observation designed to test attachment security. ## Footnote Babies are assessed on their response to playing in an unfamiliar room, being left alone, left with a stranger, and being reunited with a caregiver
68
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe the procedure | Types of attachment
takes place in a room with controlled conditions and a two-way mirror and/or cameras which psychologists can observe from 7 episodes each lasting 3 minutes Beginning: Caregiver and baby enter an unfamilar playroom 1. Baby is encouraged to explore - tests exploration and secure base 2. A stranger comes in, talks to the caregiver, and approaches the baby - Tests stranger anxiety 3. The caregiver leaves the baby and stranger together - Tests seperation and stranger anxiety 4. The caregiver retuurns and the stranger leaves - Tests reunion behaviour and secure base/exploration 5. The caregiver leaves the baby alone - Tests separation anxiety 6. The stranger returns - Tests stranger anxiety 7. The caregiver returns and is reunited with the baby - Tests reunion behaviour
69
# Ainsworth's strange situation Define proximity-seeking | Types of attachment
A baby with a good quality attachment will stay fairly close to a caregiver
70
# Ainsworth's strange situation Define exploration and secure-base behaviour | Types of attachment
Good attachment enables a baby to feel confident to explore using their caregiver as a secure base i.e. a point of contact that will make them feel safe
71
# Ainsworth's strange situation Defines stranger anxiety | Types of attachment
Display of anxiety when a stranger approaches ## Footnote One of the signs of becoming closely attached is a display of anxiety when a stranger approaches
72
# Ainsworth's strange situation Define seperation anxiety | Types of attachment
Protests at seperation from the caregiver ## Footnote Another sign of becoming attached is to protest at seperation from the caregiver
73
# Ainsworth's strange situation Descrive response to reunion | Types of attachment
Babies greet the caregiver's return with pleasure and seek comfort
74
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe the findings | Types of attachment
Found there were distinct patters in the way that babies behaved Identified 3 types of attachment: 1. Secure attachment (Type B) 2. Insecure-avoidant attachment (Type A) 3. Insecure-resistant attachment (Type C)
75
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe Secure attachment: Incuding type | Types of attachment
Type B These babies explore happily but regularly go back to their caregiver (proximity seeking and secure-base behaviour). They usually show moderate seperation distress and moderate stranger anxiety. Securely attached behaviours require and accept comfort from the caregiver in the reunion stage. ## Footnote About 60-75% of British babies are classified as secure
76
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe Insecure-avoidant attachment: including type
Type A These babies explore freely but do not seek proximity or show secure-base behaviour They show little or no reaction when their caregiver leaves and little stranger anxiety They made little effort to make contact when the caregiver returns and may even avoid such contact ## Footnote About 20-25% of British babies are classified as insecure-avoidant
77
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe insecure-resistant attachment: including type | About 60-75% of British babies are classified as secure
Type C These babies seek greater proximity than others and so explore less They show high levels of stranger and seperation distress but they resist comfort when reunited with their caregiver ## Footnote Around 3% of British babies are classified as insecure-avoidant
78
# Ainsworth's strane situation What are strengths of the Strange Situation? | Types of attachment
1. Validity 2. Reliability ## Footnote 1. Predicts a number of aspects of the baby's later development. A large body of research has shown that babies and toddlers assessed as Type B (secure) tend to have better outcomes than others both in later childhood and in adulthood. In childhood this includes better achievement in school and less involvement in bullying (McCormick et al 2016. Kokkinos 2007). Securely attached babies also tend to go on to have better mental health in adulthood (Ward et al 2006). Those babies assessed as having insecure-resistant attatchment and those not falling into Type A, B or C tend to have the worst outcomes. Strange situation measures something real and meaningful in a baby's development 2. Good inter-rater reliabilty. Bick et al (2012) tested inter-rater reliabilty for the strange situation for a team of trained observersand found agreement on attachment type in 94% of cases. This high level of reliabilty may be because the procedure takes place under controlled conditions and because behaviors involve large movements and are therefore easy to observe.
79
# Ainswoth's strange situation What are limitations of the Strange Situation?
1. Culture-bound 2. Strange situation may not be measuring attachment ## Footnote 1. May not be a valid measure of attachment in different cultural contexts. Strange Situation was developed in Britian and USA. It is only valid in Western Europe and USA. A reason for this is that babies have different experiences in different cultures and these experiences may affect their resposnes to the Strange Situation. In a Japanese study Takashi (1990) suggests that this anxiety resonse wasn't due to high rates of attachment insecurity but to the unusual nature of the experience in Japan where mother-baby seperation is rare. It is very difficult to know what the Strange Situation is measuring outside Western Europe and the USA 2. The Strange Situation clearly measures something important that's assocated with later development. However not all psychologists believe this something is attachment. Kagan (1982) suggested that genetically-influenced anxiety levels could account for variation in attachment behaviour in the Strange Situation and later development. Strange situation may not actually measyre attachment.
80
Define cultural variations | Cultural variations in attachment
Culture refers to the norms and values that exist within any group of people Cultural variations then are the differences in norms and vaues that exist between people in different groups
81
# IJzenddornand Kroonenbeg What did their study look at? | Cultural variations in attachment
The proportions of secure, insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant attachments across a range of countries to assess cultural variation Also looked at the differences within the same countries to understand variations within a culture
82
# IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg Describe the procedure | Cultural variations in attachment
Located 32 studies of attachment where the strange situation had been used to investigate the proportions of babies with different attachment types Conducted in eight countries 15 in USA Overall studies yielded results for 1,990 children Data was meta analysed
83
# IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg Describe the findings | Cultural variations in attachment
Wide variations between the proportions of attachment types in different studies In all countries secure attachment was the most common classification Proportion varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China Results of studies in the same country were 150% greater than those between countries ## Footnote In individualist cultures rates of insecure-resistant attachment were similar to Ainsworth's original sample (all under 14%) In collectivist samples (e.g. China) rates were above 25% (rates of insecure-avoidants were reduced)
84
# Simonelli et al (2014) Describe the procedure | Cultural variations in achievement
In Italy Assessed 76 babies aged 12 months using strange situation
85
# Simonelli et al (2014) Describe the findings | Cultural variations in achievement
50% were secure 36% were insecure-avoidant ## Footnote Lower rate of secure attachment and higher rate of insecure-avoidant attachment than found in many studies This is because of increasing numbers of mothers of very young chldren working long hours and using professional childcare Patterns of attachment types vary in line with cultural change
86
# Kyoung Jin et al (2012) Describe the procedure | Cultural variations in attachment
A Korean study Strange situation used to assess 87 babies
87
# Kyoung Jin et al (2012) Describe the findings | Cultural variations in attachment
Overall proportion of insecure and secure babies were similar to most countries with most babies being secure However most of those classified as insecurely attached were resistant and only 1 was avoidant ## Footnote Similar to findings in Japan Japan and Korea have quite similar child-rearing style which may explain the similarity
88
What are the conclusions of cultural variations in attachment? | Cultural variations in attachment
Secure attachments seems to be the norm in a wide range of cultures This supports Bowlby's idea that attachment is innate and universal Cultural practices have an influence on attachment type
89
What are strengths of research into cultural variations in attachment | Cultural variations in attachment
1. Indigenous researchers ## Footnote 1. Most studies were conducted by indigenous researchers. Indigenous psychologists are those from the same cultural background as the participants. For example IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg included research by a German team (Grossmann et al). This kind of research means that many of the potential problems in cross-cultural research can be avoided such as researchers' misunderstandings of the language used by participants or having difficulty communicating instructions to them. Difficulties can also include bias because of one nation's stereotypes of another. This means that there is a chance that researchers and participants communicated successfully enhancing the validity of the data collected
90
What are limitations of research into cultural variation in attachment? | Cultural variations in attachment
1. Confounding variables 2. Imposed etic ## Footnote 1. Impact on confounding variables on findings. Studies conducted in different countries aren't usually matched for methodology when they're compared to reviews or meta-analyses. Sample characteristics e.g. poverty, social class and urban/rural make-up can confound results as can the age of participants. Environmental variables might also differ between studies and confound results. For example the size of the room, availabilty of interesting toys - babies mightt appear to explore more in studies conducted in small rooms with attractive toys compared to large bare rooms. Less visible proximity-seeking because of room size might make a child more likely to be classified as avoidant. This means that looking at attachment behaviour in different non-matched studies conducted in different countries may not tell us anything about cross-cultural patterns of attachment 2. Trying to impose a test designed for one cultural context to another context. Cross-cultural psychology includes the ideas of emic (cultural uniqueness) and etic (cross-cultural universality). Imposed etic occurs when we impose idea or technique that works in one cultural context to another. An example of this is the use of babies' response to reunion with the caregiver in Strange Situation. In Britain and USA lack of affection on reunion may indicate an avoidant attachment but in Germany this would be seen as independence rather than insecurity. Therefore the part of Strange Situation may not work in Germany. This means that the behaviours measured by the strange situation may not have the same meanings in different cultural contexts and comparing them across cultures is meaningless
91
Define term maternal deprivation | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
The emotional and intellectual consequences of seperation between a child and their mother or mother-substitute ## Footnote Bowlby proposed that continous care from a mother is essential for normal psychological development and that prolonged seperation from this adult causes serious damage to emotional and intellectual development
92
Define the term seperation | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Child not being in the presence of the primary attachment figure
93
When does physical seperation lead to deprivation? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
If the child becomes deprived of emotional care (which can happen even if a mother is physically present) extended seperation can lead to deprivation
94
What is the critical period? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
2 and a half years of life for psychological development ## Footnote If a child is seperated from their mother in the absence of suitable substitute care and so deprived of her emotional care for an extended duration during this critical period then psychological damage was innevitable Continuing risk up to the age of 5
95
What are the effects of maternal deprivation on development? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Intellectual development Emotional development
96
Describe how maternal deprivation affects children's intellectual development? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Delayed intellectual development characterised by abnormally low IQ ## Footnote Gofarb (1947) Found lower IQ in children who had remained in institutions as opposed to those who were fostered and thus had a higher standard of emotional care
97
Describe how maternal deprivation affects children's emotional development | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Affectionless psychopathy (the inability to experience guilt or strong emotion towards others) ## Footnote This prevents a person from developing normal relationships and is associated with criminality
98
What did Bowlby (1944) research? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
The link between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation ## Footnote 44 thieves study
99
# 44 thieves study Describe the procedure | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
* 44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing * All thieves were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy * Their families were interviewed to establish whether the thieves had prolonged early seperation from their mothers * The sample was compared to a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionally disturbed young people
100
# 44 thieves study Describe the findings | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
* 14 of the 44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths. 12 of these had experienced prolonged seperation from their mothers in the first 2 years of their lives * Only 5 of the remaining 30 thieves had experienced seperations * Only 2 participants in the control group of 44 had experienced long seperations
101
# 44 thieves study Describe the conclusions | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Prolonged early seperation/deprivation caused affectionless psychopathy
102
What are limitations of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
1. Flawed evidence 2. Deprivation and privation 3. Critical versus sensitive periods ## Footnote 1. 44 thieves study flawed because it was Bowlby himself who carried out both the family interviews and assessments for affectionless psychopathy. Biased because he knew in advance which teenagers he expected to show signs of psychopathy. Bowlby was also influence by the findings of Goldfarb's (1943) research on development of deprived children in wartime orphanages. This study has probems of confounding variables because children had experienced early trauma and institutional care as well as maternal deprivation 2. Confusion between different types of early experience. Rutter (1981) Deprivation refers to the loss of the primary attachement figure after attachment has developed. Privation is the failure to form an attachment. Rutter suggested the long-term damage Bowlby associated with deprivation was the result of privation. Children studied by Goldfarb and the 44 thieves study may have been prived than deprived. Bowlby had overestimated the seriousness of the effects of deprivation. 3. Bowlby suggested damage was innevitable if a child had not formed an attachment in the first 2 and a half years of life. However there is evidence that suggests in many cases good quality aftercare can prevent most of this damage. Koluchova (1976) reported the case of the Czech twins who had experienced physical and emotional abuse from age of 18 months until 7 years old. They received excellecnt care and by their teens they had recovered fully. This means that lasting harm ia not inevitable in cases of sevre privation.
103
What are strengths of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation? | Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Research support ## Footnote Levy et al (2003) * Showed that seperating baby rats from their mothers for as little as a day had a permanent effect on their social developmnet though not other aspects of development * This means that although Bowlby relied on flawed evidence to support the theory of maternal deprivation there are other sources of evidence COUNTERPOINT: * Animal study * Ethical issues
104
Define the term institutionalisation | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
The effects of living in an institutional setting ## Footnote Term 'institution' refers to a place like a hospital or orphanage where people live for long continous periods of time. There is often little emotional care provided.
105
# Rutter et al's research Describe the procedure | Romanian orphan studies: Institutionalisation
* Followed a group of 165 Romanian orphans for many years * Orphans had been adopted by families in the UK * Physical, cognitive and emotional development has been assessed at ages 4,6,11,15 and 22-25 yrs * 52 children from the UK adopted around the same time = control group
106
# Rutter et al's research Describe the findings | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
* When 1st arriving in the UK adoptees showed signs of delayed intellectual development and majority was malnourished * Age 11 the adopted children showed differentail rates of recovery that were related to their age of adoption * Mean IQ: adopted before 6 motnhs = 102. Adopted between 6 months - 2 yrs = 86. Adopted after 2 yrs = 77 * Differences in IQ remained at age 16 * ADHD was more common in 15 - and 22-25-year-old samples (Kennedy et al 2016) * Children adopted after 6 months = disinhibted attachment * Children adopted before age of 6 months rarely displayed disinhibted attachment
107
# Rutter et al's research What is disinhibted attachment? | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
Symptoms include: * attention-seeking * clinginess * social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all adults Children adopted after 6 months showed signs of disinhibted attachment
108
# Zeenah et al's research Describe the procedure | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
* Assessed attachment in 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months who had spent on average 90% of their lives in institutional care * Compared to control group of 50 children who had never lived in an institution * Attachment type measured using strange situation * Carers were asked about unusual social behaviour including clingy, attention-seeking behaviour directed inappropiately at all adults (measure of disinhibted attachment)
109
# Zeanah et al's research Describe the findings | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
* 74% of the control group were classed as securely attached * Only 19% of the institutional group were securely attached * Description of disinhibited attachment applied to 44% of institutionalised children * Description of disinhibited attachment applied to less than 20% of the controls
110
What are the effects of institutionalisation? | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
* Disinhibited attachment * Intellectual disability
111
Describe disinhibited atachment as an effect of institutionalisation | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
* Children are equally friendly and affectionate towards familiar people and strangers * Rutter (2006) explained disinhibited attachment as an adaptation to living with multiple caregivers during the sensitive period for attachment formationand Bowlby's critical period. * In poor wualiy institutions (like those in Romania) a child might have 50 careers but doesn't spend enough time with any to be able to form a secure attachment
112
Describe intellectual disability as an effect of institutionalisation | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
* Most children in Rutter's study showed signs of intellectual disability when they arrived in Britain * Most of the children adopted before 6 months old caught up with the control group by 4 yrs ## Footnote Appears damage to intellectual development as a result of institutionalisation can be recovered provided adoption takes place before age of 6 months (age attachment forms)
113
What are strengths of Romanian orphanage studies? | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
1. Real-world application 2. Fewer confounding variables ## Footnote 1. Application to improve conditions for children growing up outside their family home. Romanian orphan studies have improved psycholigists' understanding of the effect of early institutionalisation care and how to prevent the worst of these effects (Langton 2006). This had led to developments in the condtions experienced by lookd-after children i.e children growing up in the care system. For example childen's homes now avoid having large numbers of caregivers for children. Now have 1 or 2 key workers who play a central role n emotional care. Institutional care is now seen as an undesirable option for children. Considerable effort is made to accomdate such children in foster care or to be adopted 2. There were many orphan studies before the Romanian orphans became available to study (e.g. orphans studied during WW2). Many of the children studied in orphanages had experienced varying degrees of trauma and it is difficult to disentangle the effevts of neglect, physical abuse. Howwever the children from Romanian orphanages had been handed over by loving parents who couldn't financially support them. Results less likely to be confouded by other negative early experiences (higher internal validity)
114
What are limitations? | Romanian Orphan Studied: Institutionalisation
1. Lack of adult data 2. Confounding variables ## Footnote 1. Current lack of data on adult development. The latest data from Rutter et al's research looked at the children in their early-to mid-20s. This means we do not currently have data to answer some of the most interesting research questions about the long-term effects of early institutional care. These research questions include the lifetime prevalance of mental health probelms and participants' success in forming and maintaing adult romanic and parental relationships. It will take a long time to gather this data because of the longitudinal design of the study. It will take time befire it is known more completely what the long-term effects are. 2. Studying children from Romanian orphanages might have introduced confounding variables. The quality of care in these institutions was remarkably poor with children receiving very little intellectual stimulation or comfort. This means that the harmful effects observed in the Romanian orphns may represent the effects of poor institutional care rather than institutional care per se.
115
Define the term internal working model | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
Our mental representations of the world ## Footnote e.g. the representation we have of our relationship to our primary attachment figure. This model affects our future relationships because it carries our perception of what relationships are like
116
# Internal working model Bowlby (1969) | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
Suggested that a baby's 1st relationship with their primary attachment figure leads to a mental representation of this relationship This internal working model acts as a template for future childhood and addult relationships
117
# Relationships in childhood Kerns (1994) | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
Securely attached babies tend to go on to form the best quality childhood friendship whereas insecurely attached babies later have friendship difficulties
118
# Relationships in childhood Myron-Wilson and Smith (1998) | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
Assessed attachment type and bullyiing involvement using standard questionnaires in 196 children aged 7-11 from London Secure children were very unlikely to be involved in bullying Insecure-avoidant children were the most likely to be victims and insecure-resistant children were most likely to be bullies
119
# Relationships in adulthood McCarthy (1999) | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
* Studied 40 adult women who had been assessed when they were babies to establish their early attachment type * Those assessed as securely attached babies had the best adult friendships and romantic relationships * Adults classed as insecure-resistant as babies had poblems maintaining friendhips * Adults classes as insecure-avoidant struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships
120
# Relationships in adulthood Bailey et al (2007) | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
* Considered the attachments of 99 mothers to their babies and to their own mothers * Mother-baby attachment was assessed using the Strange Situation * Mother's attachment to their own mother assessed using an adult attachment interview * Majority of women had the same attachment classifications born to their babies and their own mothers
121
# Adult relationships Describe Hazan and Shaver (1987)'s aim | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
Study of the association between attachment and adult relationships
122
# Adult relationship Describe Hazan and Shaver (1987)'s procedure | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
* Analysed 620 replies to a 'love' quiz printed in an American newspaper * Quiz had 3 sections * 1st assessed respondents' current or most important relationship * 2nd assessed general love experiences (e.g. number of partners) * 3rd assessed attachment type by asking respondents to choose which of 3 statements best described their feelings
123
# Adult relationships Describe Hazan and Shaver (1987)'s findings and conclusions | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
* 56% of respondents were identified as securely attached * 25% insecure-avoidant * 19% insecure-resistant * Those reporting secure attachments were the most likely to have good and long-lasting romantic experiences * The avoidant respondents tended to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy * Findings suggest that patterns of attachment behaviour are reflected in romantic relationships
124
What are strengths of the research into the influence of attachment on childhood and adult relationships? | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
Research support ## Footnote * Reviews of such evidence (e.g. Fearson and Roisman 2017) have concluded that early attachmenr consistently predicts later attachment, emotional well-being and attachment to own children * How strong the relationship is between early attachment type and later development depends both on the attachment type and the aspect of later development * Whilst insecure-avoidant attachment seems to convey advantages for future development disorganised attachment is strongly associated with later mental disorder * Secure attachment as a baby appeas to convey advantages for future development while disorganised attachment appears to seriously disadvantage children COUNTERPOINT * Not all evidence supports the existence of close links between early attachment and later development * Regensburg longitudinal study (Becker-Stoll et al 2008) followed 43 individuals from 1 yrs old * At age 16 attachment was assessed using the adult attachment interview and there was no evidence of continuity * not clear to what extent quality of early attachment really predicts later development
125
What are limitations of the research into the influence of attachment on childhood and adult relationships? | Influence of early attachment on later relationships
1. Validity isues with retrospective studies 2. Confounding variables ## Footnote **1** * Early attachment is assessed retrospectively * Most research on the link between early attachment and later development aren't longitudinal (i.e. don't assess attachment in early life and then revisit the same person later in life) * Instead researchers usually ask adolscent or adult participants questions about their relationship with parents and identifiy attachment type from this * This causes validity issues as it relies on honesty and accurate perception of the participants * It is very hard to know whether what is being asessed is early attachment or adult attachment * Measures of early attachment used in most studies may be confouded with other factors making them meaningless **2** * Some studies do assess attachment in infancy (e.g. McCarthy) which means that the assessment of early attachment is valid * Even these studies have validity issues because associations between attachment quality and later development may be affected by confounding variables (e.g.parenting style may influence both attachment quality and later development) * Alternatively genetically influenced- personality may be an influence on both factors * Can never be entirely sure that it's early attachment and not some other factor that is influencing later development