Attachment paper1 Flashcards
(119 cards)
What are cultural variations in attachment?
The difference in norms and values that exist between people in different groups.
What is a meta-analysis?
Where researchers combine the findings from multiple studies to draw an overall conclusion.
How do child-rearing practices impact attachment types?
They vary across different cultures and may influence the proportions of different attachment types in different countries.
What did Reebye et al. (2014) find about insecure-avoidant attachment in Britain?
It is seen as a weak attachment and viewed negatively.
How is insecure-avoidant attachment viewed in Germany?
It is viewed as desirable as it promotes independence.
What was the aim of van ljzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s (1988) research?
To assess similarities and differences in the amount of Type A, B, and C classifications across countries, and assess inter- and intra-cultural differences in attachment types.
How many studies were included in van ljzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis?
32 studies from 8 countries.
What methodology was used in van ljzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s research?
All studies used the Strange Situation to assess attachment.
What was the total number of infants involved in the meta-analysis?
1,990 results from infants.
What was the most common classification of attachment type found in all countries?
Secure attachment.
What was the range of secure attachment proportions in different countries?
From 75% in Britain to 50% in China.
Fill in the blank: The percentage of secure attachment in the USA was _______.
65%.
Fill in the blank: The percentage of avoidant attachment in Germany was _______.
22%.
True or False: The proportions of attachment types were consistent across all studies.
False.
List the countries included in the meta-analysis by van ljzendoorn and Kroonenberg.
- USA
- UK
- Holland
- Germany
- Japan
- China
- Israel
- Sweden
What is the main finding regarding attachment types across cultures?
The overall pattern of attachment types was similar to what Ainsworth found
This indicates that while there are variations, core attachment styles are consistent across cultures.
What percentage of infants were securely attached in the US according to one study?
46%
This highlights significant variation in attachment security among different studies within the same country.
What was the sample size in van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis?
Nearly 2000 babies
A large sample size increases generalizability and internal validity.
What cultural variations were observed in attachment types according to the meta-analysis?
Insecure-avoidant attachments were highest in Germany at 35%
Other countries varied between 5% and 26%.
What did van Ijzendoorn and Sagi (2001) find regarding attachment types in Tokyo?
A similar distribution of attachment types to Western studies
This indicates consistency in attachment styles even in urban settings.
True or False: The findings suggest more variation within cultures than between them.
True
This challenges the notion that cultural comparisons are straightforward.
Fill in the blank: The Strange Situation procedure is considered _______.
[culturally biased]
It reflects Western cultural norms and may not accurately assess attachment in other cultures.
What ethical concerns are associated with van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis?
Little ethical concerns
The Strange Situation is generally considered ethically acceptable with minimal risk to children.
What does the variation in insecure-avoidant attachment perception between Britain and Germany suggest?
Cultural differences in child-rearing practices
In Britain, it’s viewed negatively, while in Germany, it’s seen as promoting independence.