attachment: part three Flashcards
(24 cards)
What did Bowlby believe separation from a mother figure would lead to?
lead to maternal deprivation
What is ‘separation’?
Separation - child not being physically in presence of primary attachment figure
What is ‘deprivation’? Can it be avoided?
Deprivation - losing emotional care as a result of separation
Can be avoided if alternative care is offered - separation doesn’t always lead to deprivation
What happens if a child is separated from the caregiver/substitute during the critical period?
If a child is separated for an extended period during the first 30 months (CRITICAL PERIOD) - psychological damage inevitable
How does deprivation during the critical period impact intellectual development?
Extended deprivation of maternal care during critical period may lead to mental retardation and lower IQ - look at Rutter stats
How does deprivation during the critical period impact emotional development?
Extended deprivation of maternal care during critical period may lead to affectionless psychopathy - prevents normal relationship + linked to criminality
What study did Bowbly carry to test the connection between criminality and maternal deprivation?
44 Thieves Study
Bowlby’s 44 thieves study: Procedure
Procedure
- Sample of 44 teenagers accused of stealing (‘thieves’)
- Families interviewed to establish any prolonged separation from mothers
- ‘Thieves’ interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy - signs: lack of affection, guilt, sympathy
Bowlby’s 44 thieves study: Findings and Conclusions
Findings:
- 14 described as affectionless psychopaths - 12/14 had experienced prolonged separation from mothers in first 2 years of their lives
- Only 5/30 left in sample had experienced separations - suggests early maternal deprivation linked to affectionless psychopathy
How did Bowlby’s 44 thieves study supported by other evidence? (+)
(+) Harlow study with monkeys - monkeys suffered long-term psychological affected - mating, socialising etc - to what extent can results be generalised to human behaviour?
State two effects of institutionalisation
- disinhibited attachment - equally friendy to known and unknown people
- damage to intellectual development - if adopted after 6 months of age
Rutter et al Romanian orphan studies: Procedure
- follows group of 165 orphans who experienced very poor conditions before being adopted in Britain
- longitudinal study - does good care resolve bad experiences - physical, cognitive, and emotional development checked at 4, 6, 11 and 15
- control group of 52 adopted British children
Rutter et al Romanian orphan studies: Findings (4)
at age of 11:
- adopted before six months: mean IQ of 102
- between 6 months - 2 years: mean IQ of 86
- after 2 years: mean IQ of 77
- frequency of disinhibited attachment related to age of adopted - much more apparent in adopted after 6 months
Rutter et al Romanian orphan studies: what do the findings support the idea of?
Findings support the idea of a sensitive period in development of attachments - failure to firm an attachment before 6 months has long-lasting effects
Rutter et al Romanian orphan studies: Strengths (2)
(+) Important practical applications
- improvement in child care in institutions - London hospitals
- ‘key workers’ (not large groups) play central role in child’s care
- allows children to develop secure/normal attachments - long-term effects avoided
(+) Supporting evidence - Zeanah Bucharest - confounding variables
Rutter et al Romanian orphan studies: Weakness (1)
- Generalisability - very extreme case of neglect (was this necessary to display true causes?)
Zeanah Bucharest Early Intervention Project: Procedure (2)
- Strange Situation - assed 95 children (around 1-2 years old) who had spent most their lives in institutionalised care
- Control group of 50 never experienced institutionalised care
Zeanah Bucharest Early Intervention Project: Findings
- 19% of institutionalised group securely attached
- 65% - disorganised attachment
Influence of early attachment on later relationships - explain in 3 sentences
- the nature and quality of a child’s first attachment as a template for future relationships - internal working model
- good experience of attachment = good relationship expectations (behaviour, conduct, expectations)
- bad experience of attachment = bad relationship expectations
Influence of early attachment on later relationships: how does this research link into bullying? (4)
- Kerns:- securely attached - likely to form good friendships Myron-Wilson and Smith: - secure - unlikely to be involved - insecure-avoidant - often victims - insecure-resistant - often bully
Influence of early attachment on later relationships: how can an attachment type be passed through generations?
- internal working model impacts parenting style
- attachment type passed through generations
Influence of early attachment on later relationships: Key Study…
- Hazen and Shaver Romantic Relationships
Hazen and Shaver Romantic Relationships: Procedure (2)
- analysed 620 replies to a ‘love quiz’ printed in an American local newspaper
- quiz assessed three different aspects of relationships - respondents’ current and most important relationship, general love experiences, attachment type
Hazen and Shaver Romantic Relationships: Findings (4)
- 56% - secure
- 25% insecure-avoidant
- 19% insecure resistant
- attachment type reflected in their romantic relationships - secure likely to have good and long-lasting relationships, avoidant tended to be jealous and fear intimacy