Attachments Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

Define attachment

A

A two way emotional bond between two individuals in which each individual see each other as essential for their own security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three characteristics of attachments?

A

Secure base, proximity maintenance, seperation distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a secure base? (characteristics of attachments)

A

When the caregiver provides a good and reliable foundation to the child. Being secure means always being available when needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is proximity maintenance? (characteristics of attachments)

A

When a child aims to explore their surroundings, but still tries to stay close to their primary caregiver, providing them with reassurance and security. It is the desire to be near people we are attached to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is separation distress? (characteristics of attachments)

A

When a child becomes unhappy and sorrowful when they are separated from their caregiver. For example when an infant cries when their mother leaves for work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define interactional synchrony

A

When two people carry out interactions in a coordinated way, in time/in sync. Their actions and emotions mirror each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Meltzoff and Moore find about interactional synchrony?

A

Interactional synchrony in infants can start as young as 2 weeks old. They found that adults who made faces and gestures to the infant, the infant mirrored the faces given by the caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the importance of interactional synchrony (Isabella)

A

Isabella observed 30 babies and mothers. They found that high levels of synchrony was associated with a better attachment between mother and infant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define reciprocity

A

An interaction shows reciprocity when each person responds to the other and elicits a response from them.
> turn taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Care giver interaction evaluation (Ao3)
2 strengths + 1 counter, 1 weakness

A

✅- Controlled observations of mother infant interaction. They recorded mother and infant from different angles, and analysed these recordings. It was also analysed by different research hers (high inter observer reliability). It was a lab setting meaning that EV’s were controlled.

✅- No demand characteristics- Infants didn’t know they were being observed. Research has high validity.
❌ Counter- However, mothers did know they were being observed so may change their behaviour towards infants.

❌ Socially sensitive research- Isabella claimed that high level of synchrony were associated with better quality mother infant attachment. However this is saying that if mother and infant do not have synchrony, they do not have an attachment (bad mother)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aim and methods of Schaffer and Emerson

A

Aim- to investigate the development of attachments in infancy

Method- Longitudinal study on 60 babies, working class families in Glasgow.
Researchers visited mothers and infants in home every month for the first year and then again at 18 months. Self report if babies displayed stranger anxiety and separation anxiety.
> Mother left alone in room
> Stranger approach child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the 4 stages that Schaffer and Emerson found.

A

Stage one- Asocial stage
Stage two- indiscriminate stage
Stage three- specific attachment
Stage 4- multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe stage 1 of Schaffer and Emersons findings + age

A

Asocial stage (first few weeks)
> starts to recognise and form bonds
> babies behaviour towards objects and people are similar
> easy to comfort by anyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe stage 2 of Schaffer and Emersons findings + age

A

Indiscriminate stage (2-7 months)
> Prefers people to objects
> Responds equally to caregivers, no stranger or separation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe stage 3 of Schaffer and Emersons findings + age

A

Specific attachment- (7-9 months)
> Attachment is formed
> Infant starts to look to specific people for comfort and protection
> Shows stranger and separation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe stage 4 of Schaffer and Emersons findings + age

A

Multiple attachments (9 months +)
> Forms several attachments
> Secondary attachments are formed (e.g. father)

17
Q

What is sensitive responsiveness?

A

Attachments are most likely to form with the caregiver who is most interactive and sensitive to infants signals, not just who fed them.

18
Q

Evaluation of Schaffer and Emersons study
1 strength, 2 limitations

A

✅- Longitudinal study- Research was conducted over 2 years meaning that there will be a lot of evidence to support Schaffer and Emersons findings.

❌- Self report method- Mothers reported their infants behaviours through a questionnaire. May be bias as they may want to have presented their infants in a good way, making the results lack validity.

❌- Limited sample- This study only used 60 mother and infants who were working class. This means that we are unable to generalise the results with over family for example family who are middle class from England.

19
Q

What did Grossman study suggest is the role of the father?

A

> Differs to mothers role
Conducted a longitudinal study that suggested that the father’s role is to do with play and stimulation and less to do with nurturing.

20
Q

What did Lamb suggest about the role of the father?

A

> Differs to mothers role
Suggested that children preferred interacting with fathers when in a positive emotional state, whereas mothers are preferred when children are distressed and seeking comfort.

21
Q

What did Hrdy suggest about fathers being the primary care giver.

A

Not equip to be the primary care giver as they are less able to detect distress in infants compared to mothers (due to a lack of oestrogen).

22
Q

What did Lamb suggest about fathers being the primary caregiver?

A

Fathers who become main caregivers quickly develop more sensitivity to children’s needs which suggests that sensitive responsiveness isn’t a biological ability limited to women.

23
Q

Evaluation of the role of the father
1 strength, 2 limitations

A

✅- Real world applications- Lamb suggests that fathers can be the primary caregivers. This means that mothers are able to go back to work and the father can be a primary care giver (economic implications).

❌- The research is heteronormative (stereotypical)- Focuses on the assumption that all children have heterosexual parents. The findings from these studies are not representative of children with single or same sex parents

❌- Clarity- The questions ‘what is the role of the father?’ is more complex than it seems. Some researchers focus on the role of the father as secondary attachment figures and some focus on fathers and the PCG. Question is still unanswered due to conflicting viewpoints (lacks validity)

24
Q

Aim and methods of Ainsworths strange situation study

A

Aim- To observe key attachment behaviours as a way of assessing the baby’s attachment to the caregiver

Method- 100 American infants and their mothers were observed in a pre-set play room.
> Controlled observation
> Used different conditions to test infants, exploration, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, reunion behaviour and mother’s sensitivity.

25
What are the results of Ainsworths strange situation experiment.
Found 3 different types of attachments. > Secure attachent > Insecure resistant > Insecure avoidant
26
Explain a secure attachments
> Most common attachment type Exploration- Explores but uses mother as a safe base Stranger anxiety- moderate, wary of stranger but happy to play if mother is there Separation anxiety- moderate Reunion behaviour- Greets mother warmly Mothers sensitivity- sensitive and responsive to child.
27
Explain Insecure resistant attachment type
> Least common attachment type Exploration- Less likely to explore Stranger anxiety- High, scared even if mother is present Separation anxiety- High (clingy) Reunion behaviour- seeks contact, but resists it= hard to sooth Mothers sensitivity- Inconsistent with their child
28
Explain insecure avoidant attachment type
Exploration- Happily explores- independent Stranger anxiety- Low Seperation anxiety- Low Reunion behaviour- Avoids contact Mothers sensitivity- Ignores and avoids child's needs
29
Conclusions of Ainsworth's strange situation study
> Significant individual differences between infants attachment types > Most American children are securely attached > Appears to be a link between mothers sensitivity and infants attachment type.
30
Evaluation of Ainsworth's strange situation experiment 1 strength, 3 limitations + 1 counter
✅- Good inter observer reliability- Research has found agreement on attachment types in 94% of cases. Under controlled conditions making it easier to replicate and check for reliability. Also, the behaviours such as stranger anxiety are easy to observe. Therefore the observation does not rely on subjective judgements. ❌- Ethical issues- The experiment stresses children due to making them experience separation from mother. Also distressing the mother due to seeing a stressed infant. ✅- Counter- the stress caused is no greater than everyday experiences e.g. infant being left with unfamiliar babysitter. ❌- Low population validity- Only used 100 Americans that were middle class as their sample. Meaning that we are unable to generalise the findings of the experiment to other cultures. ❌- Low ecological validity- Artificial as it was a lab study. Stranger used a script- not a natural behaviour that the infants would see in everyday life. Inaccurate results.