Attitudes and Attitude Change Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

define attitude

A

a general feeling or evaluation (positive or negative) about some person, object or issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the three component model proposed by Rosenberg & Hovland (1960) that explains what attitudes consist of?

A

ACB components

A - affective
C - cognitive
B - behavioural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

explain the affective component (Rosenberg & Hovland, 1960)

A

attitude consists of expressions of feelings towards an attitude object

e.g.: thought of eating meat makes me FEEL sick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain the cognitive component (Rosenberg & Hovland, 1960)

A

attitude consists of beliefs about an attitude object

e.g.: I BELIEVE it is unhealthy and wrong to eat meat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain the behavioural component (Rosenberg & Hovland, 1960)

A

attitude consists of overt/verbal statements concerning behaviour

e.g.: I will only eat vegetarian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what two dimensions can attitudes be?

A

1/ simple dimension
2/ complex dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what happens to attitudes when they are complex and evaluated consistently?

A
  • become stronger
  • more extreme (positive or negative)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happens to attitudes if they are complex and evaluated inconsistently?

A
  • become weaker as they become more complex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the function of attitudes?
(Katz, 1960)

A

1/ knowledge function
2/ utilitarian function
3/ ego-defensive
4/ value expressive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain knowledge function

A
  • attitudes used as a way of understanding world we live in
  • having different attitudes/feelings can provide sense of meaning and cohesion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain utilitarian function

A
  • attitude used to help achieve positive outcome and avoid negative ones
  • in particular group there may be particular attitudes towards particular things
  • having that particular attitude toward thing can mean no punishment/rejection from group
  • positive way to act in group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain ego-defensive

A
  • attitude used to protect one’s self-esteem from the world
  • if you are able to explain world in way it makes sense to you, feel good in your group –> this impacts self-esteem
  • if you believe good things and have positive attitude it will make you feel good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain value expressive

A
  • attitude used to express one’s core values and self-concept
  • used to voice particular values
  • can be a view into our world
  • enables us to understand the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

where do attitudes come from?
Identify some explanations

A
  • mere exposure effect
  • attitudes learnt from others (social learning):
    classical conditioning, instrumental behaviour
  • self-perception theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain the mere exposure effect
(Robert Zajonc, 1968)

A

idea that repeated exposure to stimuli = having more favourable attitudes toward that stimuli (Zajonc, 2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

outline a study into the mere exposure effect
(Harrison and Zajonc, 1970)

A
  • exposed ppts to novel words repeatedly (25 times)
  • found exposure to that novel word = related to increased perception that they felt more favourable towards that particular word
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

explain attitudes learnt from others (social learning): classical conditioning

A
  • idea that repeat association between objects that are not related can elicit a positive attitude due to the positive association of one of the objects
  • e.g.: Pavlov’s dogs developed positive attitude towards the bell after it being associated with food
  • related to attitude, a positive association of one thing that when associated with something else elicits a positive attitude towards that thing (e.g.: celebrity endorsements)
18
Q

explain attitudes learnt from others (social learning): instrumental conditioning

A
  • idea that if behaviour is followed by a positive consequence, behaviour is more likely to be repeated
  • behaviour that is followed by negative consequence is less likely to be repeated
19
Q

outline study into explain attitudes learnt from others (social learning): instrumental conditioning
(Insko, 1965)

A
  • ppts were rung up and asked their attitude towards particular topic
  • whatever ppts said, experimenter either gave positive or negative feedback
  • found that ppts reported more favourable attitudes towards topic if they had received positive feedback
20
Q

explain self-perception theory

A
  • idea that we infer attitudes from our own behaviours
  • how we behave, we believe is who we are
  • e.g.: I read at least one novel a week –> therefore I must enjoy reading novels
21
Q

identify some ways that attitudes are measured/revealed?

A
  • self - report and experimental paradigms
  • physiological measures
  • measures of overt behaviour
22
Q

what are some examples of self-report and experimental paradigms?

A
  • attitude scales
  • implicit association task
    (looks at unconscious attitudes and biases)
23
Q

what are some examples of physiological measures?

A
  • skin resistance
  • heart rate
  • pupil dilation

how these react to particular stimuli

24
Q

what are some examples of measuring overt behaviour?

A
  • frequency of behaviour
  • trends and preferences over various objects
  • non-verbal behaviour
25
why is it important to study attitudes?
- attitudes predict behaviour - understanding core of self-concept
26
outline LaPiere (1934) famous study on racial prejudice
- involved Chinese couple visited over 250 restaurants, coffee shops, hotels - they received service 95% of the time without hesitation - each place of hospitality received a letter asking if they would accept members of Chinese race - 92% responded that they would not - shows mismatch between the intention and the behaviour (maybe attitude doesn't always predict behaviour)
27
identify things that impact how well attitudes predict behaviour
1. how strong the attitude is 2. whether attitude is formed through direct exposure 3. how attitude is measured
28
explain 'how strong the attitude is' impacts how well attitude predicts behaviour
- if attitude is complex and consistent = strongest type of attitude --> this would predict behaviour - if attitude is complex and inconsistent = moderate type of attitude
29
explain how 'whether attitude is formed through direct exposure' impacts how well attitude predicts behaviour
- shown that direct experience of something leads to a strong attitude (which will ultimately predict behaviour)
30
explain how 'how attitude is measured' impacts how well attitude predicts behaviour
- how specific the questions about topic are - how we ask the question can predict behaviour - if we are very specific, may get stronger connection between attitude and behaviour
31
what is the theory of planned behaviour?
- theory proposes people make decisions as a result of rational thought processes - behaviour is influenced by intention - intention = good indicator of behaviour - intention is influenced by 3 things: - attitude toward behaviour (+ or -) - subjective norm (social expectation around object) - perceived behavioural norm (internal - how you feel in yourself when in control, or external - whether you feel others are controlling your life) - perceived control has direct effect on behaviour - components can interact and control your behaviour
32
what is cognitive dissonance? (Festinger, 1957)
where we have unpleasant state or tension when we have 2 or more conditions/thoughts that do not fit together
33
how do we reduce the dissonance from cognitive dissonance?
- counter-attitudinal behaviour changing one of the components feel the discomfort/dissonance - strive to reduce dissonance reduce the dissonance by changing inconsistent cognition
34
Outline Festinger (1957) study into cognitive dissonance?
- had ppts complete series of counting task with dice - task = very boring - told ppts to lie and tell next ppt that task = very fun - three groups of conditions - one group got no money to lie - one group got $1 to lie - one group got $20 to lie - then asked what they truly thought of experiment
35
what are the findings of Festinger (1957) study into cognitive dissonance?
- those given $20 said they felt ok with lying - being paid $20 provides reason for lying and doing task so no dissonance is experienced - those given no money said that task was boring - those given $1 experiences dissonance and said the task was truly enjoyable - $1 is not incentive enough to lie - group experience dissonance so when they lied and said they enjoyed it, they started to believe it themselves - attitude towards task = changed
36
how is dissonance reduced?
strategy 1 = reduce importance e.g.: i know lots of people who smoke and they haven't got lung cancer strategy 2 = add element e.g.: i need to smoke or the stress i'll suffer will be unhealthy strategy 3 = change one element e.g.: i'll stop smoking
37
identify two dual-process models of persuasion
1/ Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) 2/ Heuristic-systematic Model
38
explain the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986)
proposes there are two routes of thought processes 1 - central route - follow message closely - very analytical - try to read what person is saying in that argument - required high effort - leads to enduring change 2 - peripheral route - where the argument itself is not listened to - more so the cues around the article - such as attraction - requires very low effort - leads to temporary changes
39
explain the heuristic-systematic model of persuasion (Chaiken, 1980)
proposes two pathways of processing 1 - systematic processing - follows message of argument carefully - scans for available arguments 2 - heuristic processing - looks for mental shortcuts - i.e.: stats don't lie
40
identify a difference between the ELM and HSM models of persuasion processing
- ELM argues pathways are independent; you either look in depth of focus more on attraction - HSM argues pathways can happen together
41
Identify real life ways where persuasion is used to change attitudes
- political campaigns - advertising/sales - encouraging socially valuable behaviours - volunteering organ donation