Flashcards in Authentication of Writings Deck (12):
What 3 potential issues are likely when a writing is at issue?
(2) best evidence
In what ways may a WRITING be authenticated? What are the rule for each method?
(1) witness's personal Knowledge (observation of writing/signing)
(2) proof of Handwriting (layperson, expert comparison, or jury comparison)
(3) Circumstantial (appearance, contents, distinctive characteristics, etc.)
(4) Ancient documents (≥20 years old, facially free of suspicion, and found in a place of natural custody)
(5) Solicited reply (evidence that document was received in response to prior communication to alleged author)
List the self-authenticating documents
(1) Official publications
(2) certified copies of public Records on file in public office
(3) Newspapers or periodicals
(4) trade inscriptions and Labels
(5) Acknowledged document (notarized with author)
(6) commercial Paper)
(mnemonic: LA PORN)
How is a photograph authenticated?
Witness testimony on personal knowledge that the photo is a fair and accurate representation of what it portrays
What is the best evidence rule?
A party seeking to prove the contents of a writing must either:
• produce the original writing, or
• provide an acceptable excuse for its absence
When there is an excuse for the original under the best evidence rule, how may the contents of a writing be proven?
by secondary evidence: oral testimony or a copy
What other forms count as writings under the best evidence rule?
sound recordings, x-rays, and films
When are the two most common situations when the best evidence rule arises?
(1) legally operative documents, or
(2) witness testifies to facts she learned solely from reading about them in a writing
What is an original writing for the best evidence rule?
ORIGINAL (any of the following):
• whatever the parties intended to be the original
• any negative of film or print from it
• computer print-out
• any counterpart produced by any mechanical means that accurately reproduced the original
A handwritten copy is neither an original or a duplicate
When is a duplicate admissible under the best evidence rule?
to same extent as original, unless it would be unfair, or genuine question is raised as to authenticity of original
Under the best evidence rule, what are allowable excuses for non-production of the original?
(1) lost or cannot be found with due diligence
(2) destroyed without bad faith
(3) cannot be obtained with legal process