Avicenna Flashcards
(35 cards)
Dates
980–1037
Correcting Aristotle
Saw himself as completing and correcting Aristotle, not merely transmitting him
Claimed Aristotle’s Metaphysics was only fully understood after reading it 40 times and then with al-Fārābī’s help
Aristotle’s proof of the First Mover
Believed that Aristotle failed, especially in book Lambda, as he is trying to prove something in metaphysics using a physical premise
Using movement – a lower philosophical science – to prove the existence of a higher philosophical science
Proof for God
Avicenna’s own proof for the Necessary Existent hinges on the contingency of all things: only a being whose essence is to exist can explain why anything exists at all
Hads
Avicenna develops a doctrine of intuition (ḥads), a kind of intellectual illumination that allows the soul – particularly the prophetic soul – to grasp universal truths instantly
Ḥads is particularly important in prophecy, where the prophet’s soul receives truths from the Active Intellect in an immediate and imaginative form
Immortality
Avicenna critiques Aristotle’s denial of personal immortality, insisting that individual souls survive death
Each individual human soul is immaterial, indivisible, and thus not dependent on the body
Ismailism
Shi’a Fatimids in Egypt who were sending secret propagandists to convert Samanids (Sunni, like Avicenna) to Ismaili Islam
Ismailism is a sect of Sh’ia Islam that follows Imam Ismail ibn Jafar as the rightful successor to Imam Jafar al-Sadiq
His brother and father converted
What text illuminates Aristotle?
Farabi’s On the Purpose of Metaphysics
‘Literalists’
Often refers to the ‘literalists’ meaning Syriac Christians who did most of the translations in the Translation Movement
They often rendered the Greek texts word-for-word rather than conveying the intended meanings or concepts in the target language
Hads vs syllogism
Avicenna held that al-ḥads was a higher faculty than syllogistic reasoning, enabling certain exceptional individuals (especially prophets) to access truths directly
Prophets, for Ibn Sīnā, possess a perfected imaginative faculty that allows them to receive universal truths via intuition, bypassing step-by-step rational inference
Intuition (ḥads) and demonstration (burhān) are both valid paths to truth, but ḥads is quicker and more direct, though far rarer
Necessary existence (3)
Avicenna distinguishes between contingent beings (which require causes) and a Necessary Being, which exists by nature
The Necessary Existent is the ultimate cause of all other existents and cannot not exist
This argument departs from Aristotelian metaphysics by positing necessity of existence rather than motion
Aquinas
Richard Frank and Ayman Shihadeh highlight Avicenna’s necessity’s influence on later Islamic and Christian metaphysics, including Aquinas’ concept of necessary being
Argument from motion - Aristotle
Argument from necessity - Avicenna
Faculties of the soul (3)
Avicenna divides the soul into three faculties: vegetative (growth), animal (sensation, movement), and rational (intellect)
He believes the rational soul is immaterial, unique to humans, and capable of abstract thought
The soul originates from the Active Intellect and returns to it through intellectual perfection
Aristotle’s De Anima
Avicenna accepts his tripartite soul but argues that the rational soul is not dependent on the body for its existence or function (is immortal)
Deborah Black
Self-awareness precedes sensory experience, suggesting an immaterial aspect to individual identity
Other accounts of the soul
Avicenna argues against materialist and atomist accounts of soul, prominent in other Islamic schools; Some Muʿtazilīs (especially early ones) held a more physical or atomist account of the soul, seeing the soul as a subtle body or accident attached to atoms
Plato’s chariot (reason, emotive, appetitive)
Reason and revelation
Not contradictory but complementary
Revelation conveys truth to the masses allegorically; reason uncovers it philosophically
Prophets
Prophets, in his view, are those whose intellects and imaginations are exceptionally developed
Dimitri Gutas - R&R
Highlights Avicenna’s effort to reconcile Greek philosophical traditions with Islamic teachings, fostering a unified intellectual framework
Moses Maimonides
Heavily inspired by Avicenna
Revelation may use metaphor or symbol, so it needs philosophical interpretation
Abstraction
Knowledge arises from abstraction: the intellect strips forms from sensory input
Human intellect gains knowledge by separating (or abstracting) universal forms from particular sensory experiences
Types of knowledge
He distinguishes between empirical, rational, and intuitive knowledge
Universals
Avicenna held that only universals are truly knowable; knowledge of particulars is contingent on their relation to universals
God and particulars
God knows particulars ‘in a universal way,’ preserving divine omniscience without contradicting Aristotelian principles
Particulars are changeable, contingent, and cannot be grasped with certainty