Bandura Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

A

whether a child would learn aggression by observing a model and would reproduce this behaviour in the absence of the model, and whether the sex of the role model was important.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hypotheses

A
  1. Observed aggressive behaviour will be imitated.
  2. Observed non-aggressive behaviour will be imitated.
  3. Children are more likely to copy a same-sex model.
  4. Boys will be more likely to copy aggression than girls.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research method

A

Lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Research design

A

Independent measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IV

A
  • model-type: aggressive or non-aggressive model
  • model-gender: whether the model is the same gender as the child or not.
  • learner-gender: whether the child was a boy or girl.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DV

A

The behaviour the child displayed, which was measured through a controlled observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sample

A

72 children, 3-6 years, 36 girls and 36 boys, opportunity sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Procedure before experiment

A

Before the experiment, the children were observed in their nursery school by the experimenter and a teacher who knew them. They were rated on 4 five-point scales measuring physical aggression, verbal aggression, aggression to inanimate objects and anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Procedure during experiment

A

They were assigned to 3 groups with their aggression levels matched. 51 children were rated by 2 observers and similar ratings were produced therefore, there is inter-rater reliability.
12 boys and 12 girls were in control groups who saw no model. The remaining children were divided equally by sex between aggressive and non-aggressive model groups, and within those, between same and opposite same-sex models.
The experimenter and children were in the ‘play area’ where they made potato prints. In the opposite corner of the room there was a table, chair, Tinkertoy set, mallet, and a 5-foot Bobo doll. This is where the model sat, in the conditions where there was one. The experimenter remained in the room but appeared to be working quietly at their desk. After the model behaviour for each condition, The experimental procedure continued when all participants were deliberately mildly annoyed. Children were told that they could play with the toys in the room, but 2 minutes into playing, they were told to stop. They were informed that the toys were reserved for other children and that the toys were the experimenter’s very best.

The child was observed for 20 minutes through a 1-way mirror. The experimental room had a 3-foot Bobo doll, a mallet and other toys. Their behaviour was observed in 5-second intervals. There was an inter-rater reliability score of 0.89.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Model behaviour in non aggressive condition

A

the model assembled the Tinkertoy set for 10 minutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Model behaviour in aggressive condition

A

the model assembled the toy for a minute and then attacked the Bobo doll. For 9 minutes the aggressive sequence was repeated 3 times. Aggressive comment made: “Kick him.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

model behaviour in control condition

A

the student did not see any model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results

A

Children exposed to aggressive models imitated their exact behaviour. They were significantly more aggressive than the children in other groups. Imitation was greater for boys than girls. Boys were more likely to imitate physical aggression and girls were more likely to imitate verbal aggression.

The average imitative physical aggression for male subjects with male models was 25.8 which is much higher than that for female subjects which was 7.2. This exhibits that boys imitated physical aggression more than girls. However, with a female model girls imitated less aggression than with the male model. Girls with female models imitated an average of 5.5. Boys with female models imitated an average of 12.4.
For non-aggressive play, girls played with dolls and boys played with guns. Comments were made on sex-typed behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusion

A
  1. Observation and imitation cause behaviour to be learnt without reinforcement.
  2. Observed aggressive behaviours are imitated.
  3. Observed non-aggressive behaviours are imitated.
  4. Children are more likely to copy a same-sex model.
  5. Boys are more likely to copy aggression than girls.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths

A
  1. High internal validity
  2. High reliability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weakness

A
  1. Low generalisability
17
Q

Application to everyday life

A

The study shows that when children (especially boys) are exposed to violence or aggression in real life or through the media, the models influence their behaviour.