Behavioural W5 Flashcards

1
Q

If what 3 things hold, then preferences can be represented by expected utility function

A
  1. Completeness: q greater or equal than r, r greater or equal to q, or both.
  2. Transitivity: if q is greater than r, and r is greater than s, then q is greater than s.
  3. Continuity: s: if q is greater than r and r is greater then s, there must be a probability p such that (p : q ; 1-p : s) ∼ r.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

show independence

A

For all q, r, s and all probabilities p, we have that if q is greater than r, then (p : q ; 1-p : s) is greater than
(p : r ; 1-p : s).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the violations of the independence axiom

A
  1. Allais Paradox - Common Ratio Effect. Common Consequence Effect. Both aren’t compatible with EUT.
  2. Ellsberg Paradox - Ambiguity aversion and source dependence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe the unusual disease

A

violation of the principal of description invariance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the reflection effect

A

people’s attitudes towards risk changes depending on if they are working with gains or losses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the endowment effect

A

people place higher value on goods they already own compared to identical items they don’t own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are preference reversals

A

when individuals’ preferences change depending on the way options have been framed or presented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the original prospect theory and what are the 5 key points

A

A framework for understanding decision-making under uncertainty.
1. Editing
2. Evaluation
3. Value Function
4. Reference Dependence
5. Probability Weighting Function.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

describe editing

A

individuals transform choice options through six operations: coding, combination, segregation, cancellation, simplification, and detection of dominance. These operations help individuals simplify and compare different prospects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe evaluation

A

Prospects are then evaluated based on whether they are strictly positive, strictly negative, or regular. This evaluation involves subjective probability weighting and a value function that captures how individuals perceive gains and losses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe value function

A

The value function reflects how individuals evaluate gains and losses relative to a reference point. It exhibits loss aversion, meaning losses are felt more strongly than equivalent gains, and diminishing sensitivity, where the impact of gains and losses decreases as their magnitude increases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe reference dependence

A

Prospect theory emphasizes that individuals perceive changes from a reference point rather than absolute levels. This leads to a focus on gains and losses rather than final outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe probability weighting function

A

Unlike traditional expected utility theory, which uses additive probabilities, prospect theory introduces a probability weighting function that transforms probabilities into decision weights. This function tends to overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities, with discontinuity at extreme probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the criticisms of the original prospect theory

A

Criticism of the original Prospect Theory includes concerns about the ad-hoc nature of the editing phase, its limitations in handling prospects with more than two non-zero outcomes, and the potential for violations of stochastic dominance, which can lead to inconsistencies in decision-making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the cumulative prospect theory

A
  1. Removal of editing phase
    2.
17
Q

describe removal of editing phase

A

CPT eliminates the ad-hoc editing phase present in the original Prospect Theory. This simplifies the evaluation process and allows for the assessment of prospects with any number of non-zero outcomes.

18
Q

describe Updated Probability Weighting Function

A

CPT introduces a specific probability weighting function with a specified functional form. Instead of transforming each probability separately, CPT transforms cumulative probabilities, ensuring that the sum of transformed decision weights is 1. This eliminates potential violations of stochastic dominance.

19
Q

describe evaluation of prospects

A

In CPT, the overall evaluation of a prospect involves computing the positive and negative parts separately. These parts are determined by ranking gains and losses from lowest to highest in absolute value and applying the probability weighting function relevant to the sign of the outcome.

20
Q

describe computation of weights

A

The weights for gains and losses are computed as the difference between the probability weight of events that are at least as large as the event being considered and the probability weight of events that are strictly larger. This computation ensures that larger outcomes are given higher weights.

21
Q

describe functional form and curvature

A

CPT assumes a specific functional form for the value function, which governs its curvature. Empirically, the value function for gains is more curved than for losses.

22
Q

what are the criticisms of the cumulative prospect theory

A

Criticisms of Cumulative Prospect Theory include its lack of a normative basis, as it is not grounded in axioms with normative status like Expected Utility Theory (EUT). Additionally, questions arise regarding the choice of reference point and how it should be determined in decision-making contexts.