biological Flashcards

(86 cards)

1
Q

maguire et al (2000)
aim

A
  • investigate whether neuroplasticity occurs in London taxi drivers who need to memorize the area to get their license
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

maguire et al (2000)
procedure

A
  • a sample of 16 healthy right handed london taxi drivers
  • had their brains scanned using an MRI
  • their brains were compared with non taxi drivers with the same characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

maguire et al (2000)
results

A
  • the posterior (rear) of the hippocampus was significantly bigger in taxi drivers
  • the anterior (front) of the hippocampus was larger in the control group
  • positive correlation between years of experience being a taxi driver and the size of the posterior hippocampus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

maguire et al (2000)
conclusion

A
  • hippocampus is the region of the brain associated with memory
  • posterior hippocampus is related to spatial memory and navigation
  • taxi drivers have a mental map which causes the increase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

maguire et al (2000)
evaluation

A
  • supports neuroplasticity and localization of function
  • can be easily replicated, lab setting
  • statistical analysis of data
  • no ethical concerns
  • controlled, age, gender, occupation etc
  • people that have a larger posterior hippocampus more likely to do a job involving navigation
  • not generalizable, women, ethnicities, other occupations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

draganski et al (2004)
aim

A
  • investigate whether structural and functional changes happen in the brain after learning a new motor skill
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

draganski et al (2004)
procedure

A
  • MRI scans, see changes participants learning to juggle
  • randomly allocated 2 groups, juggling and non juggling (control)
  • brains scanned 3 times, before learning, 3 months after learning, 3 months after stopping juggling
  • scans compared to control group of non jugglers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

draganski et al (2004)
results

A
  • before learning to juggle 1st scan, no difference
  • group of jugglers second scan, 2 areas of the brain significantly different size than control
  • third scan, difference became smaller
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

draganski et al (2004)
conclusion

A
  • watching balls and learning to move in response strengthened neural connections in the brain responsible for the activity
  • temporary, rely on continuing the activity or else neural pruning took place
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

draganski et al (2004)
evaluation

A
  • supports neuroplasticity and localization of function
  • field experiment, juggling occurred in natural conditions
  • random allocation to groups, standardization of measurement, high internal validity
  • well controlled, able to be replicated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

harlow (1849)
aim

A
  • investigate how serious damage to the left frontal lobe impacts behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

harlow (1849)
procedure

A

phineas gage was a railroad worker who suffered a severe accident
- metal rod went through his skull almost fully destroying his left frontal lobe
- harlow observed gage’s behaviour after the accident and interviewed people who knew him both before and after

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

harlow (1849)
results

A
  • gage’s personality changed dramatically due to the brain damage
  • before he was responsible and capable
  • after he was highly emotional and unable to control impulses
  • incapable of following through with plans
  • began to behave inappropriately using vulgar language, acting violent and potentially touching children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

harlow (1849)
conclusion

A
  • frontal lobe plays an important role in personality
  • impacts goal setting, self regulation and following social norms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

harlow (1849)
evaluation

A
  • supports localization of function
  • not possible to replicate this study so not generalizable
  • gage’s behaviour was inconsistent and there is unclear information
  • don’t know that much information about his personality before the accident so we don’t know how much his personality actually changed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

rosenzweig and bennet (1961)
aim

A
  • investigate neuroplasticity in rats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

rosenzweig and bennet (1961)
procedure

A
  • rats were randomly placed in one of two different environments
  • one was enriched environment (EE) where rats played with toys, games and a maze
  • other was the deprived environment (DE) where they were alone in a cage with no toys
  • rats either spent 30 or 60 days in their enclosures and were then killed to examine the changes in their brains
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

rosenzweig and bennet (1961)
results

A
  • rats in the EE had a heavier frontal lobe and thicker cortex in comparison to rats in the DE
  • a thicker cortex means more neural connections
  • frontal lobe is important in decision making and self control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

rosenzweig and bennet (1961)
conclusion

A
  • being in a more stimulating environment causes new connections to form which changes brain structure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

rosenzweig and bennet (1961)
evaluation

A
  • supports neuroplasticity
  • lab experiment so extraneous variables were controlled
  • cause and effect relationship as rats were randomly chosen for each group
  • questionable if rats apply to humans even though we have genetic similarity
  • ethical issues as the rats were killed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

antonova et al (2011)
aim

A
  • investigate the role of the neurotransmitters acetylcholine and scopolamine on spatial memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

antonova et al (2011)
procedure

A
  • participants 20 men, average age 28
  • randomly allocated scopolamine injection or saline injection (placebo)
  • brains scanned using fMRI scans whilst finding their way around a VR maze, mainly looking at the hippocampus
  • after one trial participants returned 1 month later injected with whichever solution they didn’t recieve before and rescanned
  • double blind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

antonova et al (2011)
results

A
  • scopolamine reduced activity in the hippocampal area
  • scopolamine injection group made more errors than placebo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

antonova et al (2011)
conclusion

A
  • scopolamine decreases acetylcholine action in the brain, acetylcholine is associated with spatial memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
antonova et al (2011) evaluation
- randomized groups that experienced both conditions, double blind, well controlled - cause and effect relationship
26
walderhaug et al (2007) aim
- investigate the role of serotonin on mood regulation and impulsivity in men vs women
27
walderhaug et al (2007) procedure
- 83 healthy participants, acute tryptophan depletion, decreases serotonin levels in the brain - randomized, double blind experiment - behavioural measures were taken of impulsivity and mood
28
walderhaug et al (2007) results
- men exhibited more impulsive behaviour, did not alter mood - women mood worsened, more cautious behaviour, linked with depression - women, impacted serotonin transportation in the synapse
29
walderhaug et al (2007) conclusion
- women and men appear to respond differently to neurochemical changes
30
walderhaug et al (2007) evaluation
- small number of participants - results may not be generalizable to a wider range of people - able to be replicated
31
martinez and kesner (1991) aim
- investigate the role of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in spatial memory formation
32
martinez and kesner (1991) procedure
- rats trained to run in a maze - randomly divided into groups - group 1: injected with scopolamine, blocks acetylcholine receptor sites, reduces availability of acetylcholine - group 2: injected with physostigmine, increases availability of acetylcholine - group 3: control group, no injections
33
martinez and kesner (1991) results
- group 1 rats scopolamine and less acetylcholine, more mistakes and slower in comparison to group 2 physostigmine and more acetylcholine
34
martinez and kesner (1991) conclusion
- the neurotransmitter acetylcholine increases spatial memory
35
martinez and kesner (1991) evaluation
- able to replicate - reliable, well controlled
36
rogers (2011) aim
- investigate the role that serotonin plays in perceiving emotional intimacy
37
rogers (2011) procedure
- participants were 40 healthy male adults - half the participants received a drink with tryptophan in it which increases levels of serotonin and the other half had a drink without it - after participants were given photos of couples and asked to rate how "intimate" and "romantic" the couples seemed
38
rogers (2011) results
- participants with lower serotonin (did not have tryptophan) rated the couples less intimate and romantic than the other group
39
rogers (2011) conclusion
- serotonin plays a role in how humans judge the closeness of people's relationships - possible implications of depression as they perceive their relationships as less than they are
40
rogers (2011) evaluation
- casual relationship between the levels of serotonin and ratings of relationships - rating closeness is not something people would do in real life, low ecological validity - only in one culture (british) findings should be replicated on a bigger scale
41
carré et al (2016) aim
- investigate the impact of personality and testosterone on aggressive behaviour
42
carré et al (2016) procedure
- 100+ healthy male participants randomly allocated 2 groups - personality regarding dominance and impulsivity were assessed using questionnaires - group 1: testosterone injection - group 2: placebo - decision making game designed to test aggression after social provocation within the game by a partner (actually the computer)
43
carré et al (2016) results
- only increase in testosterone was not enough to provoke aggression - more aggression = additional testosterone, low impulse control, high dominance - just additional testosterone ≠ aggression, need traits
44
carré et al (2016) conclusion
- increased levels of testosterone are not the only reason for aggressive behaviour but also personality
45
carré et al (2016) evaluation
- only men - double blind, reliable, well controlled
46
albert (1986) aim
- investigate the impact of testosterone on aggression in alpha male rats
47
albert (1986) procedure
- identified alpha males by size and strength, measured aggression levels - randomly divided alpha male rats into 4 groups - group 1: castration - group 2: castration, implant empty tubes - group 3: castration, implant tubes of testosterone - group 4: cut open and sewn up (control) - measured change in aggression levels before and after surgery
48
albert (1986) results
- 1 and 2 rats whose testosterone levels were diminished displayed less aggression - 3 and 4 rats testosterone levels remained the same so there was no significant change in behaviour - 2 had testosterone replaced after, aggression increased
49
albert (1986) conclusion
- testosterone plays an important role in aggression and dominance - higher testosterone = higher levels of aggression and dominance
50
albert (1986) evaluation
- well controlled variables, lab experiment, replicability, reliable - ethical issues experimenting on animals
51
wedekind et al. (1995) aim
- investigate whether women prefer male odour with a different MHC than their own
52
wedekind et al. (1995) procedure
- 44 male students wear the same T-shirt 2 consecutive nights, kept in plastic bag between the nights, remain as odour free as possible - mean age 25, all participants classified immune system similarity via a blood test, - after wearing shirt, 49 female students asked to rate each shirt/6 for pleasantness and odour intensity, through a hole in a cardboard box - 3 shirts MHC similar, 3 shirts MHC dissimilar
53
wedekind et al. (1995) results
- women more pleasant MHC dissimilar, opposite if on oral contraceptive pill
54
wedekind et al. (1995) conclusion
- suggests the existence of a human pheromone to assist in the role of mating - birth control mimics pregnancy, more likely to look for similar familial to support child vs better immune system for future child dissimilar mate
55
wedekind et al. (1995) evaluation
- low ecological validity, act on scent? - replicable, well controlled
56
doty (2010)
- no scientific definition about what a human pheromone actually is - human pheromones have not been chemically isolated - shouldn't assume because it happens in animals it also happens in humans -multiple chemicals in the environment at the same time, why would one more from a human influence behaviour in other members of the same species
57
savic et al (2009) aim
- investigate whether human pheromones exist and how they impact our brains
58
savic et al (2009) procedure
- researchers exposed participants (24 men and women) to the smell of two chemicals - chemicals were almost identically to naturally produced sex hormones, testosterone and estrogen - as participants smelled the chemicals their brains were scanned with a PET machine
59
savic et al (2009) results
- hypothalamus became activated in men when they smelled the female hormone and in women when they smelled the male hormone - hypothalamus is linked to sexual behaviour and not normally activated by other smells
60
savic et al (2009) conclusion
- suggests sex pheromones exist in humans and they influence sexual behaviour
61
savic et al (2009) evaluation
- well controlled lab experiment showing a causal relationship between the chemicals (IV) and activity in the hypothalamus (DV) - small number of participants, needs to be replicated to confirm - measured changes in brain activity not actual behaviour - would these people act on the brain activity? unknown
62
francis et al (2003) aim
- investigate how the interaction between genes and the environment impacts how rats nurture their offspring
63
francis et al (2003) procedure
- mothers separated into groups of either high licking or low licking - licking in rats is a sign of care and affection - after 12 hours of being born rats with high licking mothers were switched to rats with low licking mothers and vice versa
64
francis et al (2003) results
- rats raised by high licking mothers were less stressed and grew up to be high licking mothers too even if their biological mother was a low licker - lost the methyl groups around high licking causing that gene to be turned on
65
francis et al (2003) conclusion
- being in a loving environment impacts genes - those epigenetic changed genes are passed on to the next generation
66
francis et al (2003) evaluation
- well controlled experiment - use of animals is less unethical, switching human babies in real life? - easier to study across generations due to rats and not humans - done on rats so not sure generalizable to humans
67
suderman et al (2014) aim
- investigate the impact of childhood abuse on DNA
68
suderman et al (2014) procedure
- 45 year old men, blood DNA analyzed
69
suderman et al (2014) results
- increased methylation of the gene PM20D1 in the sample who suffered abuse - associated with control over eating habits, greater prevalence of obesity
70
suderman et al (2014) conclusion
- environmental trigger (abuse) can contribute to the methylation of PM20D1 which contributes to a persons food intake - suggests interactions between genes and environmental influences can predispose a person to behave in a certain way
71
suderman et al (2014) evaluation
- only 45 year old men, lacks generalizability - lots of extraneous variables
72
kendler et al (2006) aim
- investigate concordance rates of MDD in monozygotic and dizygotic twins
73
kendler et al (2006) procedure
- swedish national twin registry, 15,000+ complete twin pairs - phone interviews over 4 years to diagnose MDD using the DSM-4 or prescription for antidepressants
74
kendler et al (2006) results
- average concordance rate across all twins 38% - no correlation between number of years lived together, suggests heritability - monozygotic female 44%, dizygotic female 16%, men lower for both
75
kendler et al (2006) conclusion
- environmental factors influence MDD as concordance rates for MZ twins would have been higher - MZ twins concordance higher than DZ, genes still play a role - heritability higher in women than men
76
kendler et al (2006) evaluation
- large sample size - only swedish people, generalizability?
77
mcgue et al (2000) aim
- investigate the genetic and environmental influences on adolescent addiction to tobacco and marijuana
78
mcgue et al (2000) procedure
- 626 pairs of twins born in the same year - interviewed about their history and experience of tobacco (legal) and marijuana (illegal), drug use, home life and a questionnaire
79
mcgue et al (2000) results
- slight heritability for marijuana, no significant difference between men or women - tobacco 40-60% heritability - participants that took drugs regularly, part of family life, parents other members, normal home environment
80
mcgue et al (2000) conclusion
- environment appeared to be more influential in determining drug use than genetic inheritance
81
mcgue et al (2000) evaluation
- extraneous variables - all born in the same year, generalizability?
82
gottesman and goldsmith (1994) aim
- find the concordance rate of juvenile delinquency in monozygotic twins vs dizygotic twins
83
gottesman and goldsmith (1994) procedure
- studied 85 sets of young twins - looked at criminal conviction records
84
gottesman and goldsmith (1994) results
- the concordance rate of juvenile delinquency in MZ twins was 0.91 (91%) - when compared to 0.73 (73%) for DZ twins. - if one identical twin broke the law, there was a 91% chance the other twin had - For DZ twins, this dropped to 73%.
85
gottesman and goldsmith (1994) conclusion
- suggests genetics is a factor, if behaviour was because of environmental factors, we would expect closer or identical rates of concordance between MZ and DZ twins. - they’re higher for MZ twins, we know genetics is a factor but since it’s not 100% for MZ twins, it’s not the only factor.
86
gottesman and goldsmith (1994) evaluation
- high ecological validity - shows nature has a role in criminal activity - can't be sure of the environment they grew up in, extraneous variables