biopsych Flashcards
2 main function of CNS
control of behaviour
regulation of psychological processes
4 main area of brain
cerebrum
cerebellum
diancephalon
brain stem
cerebrum
- further divided into 4 lobes
(FPOT) - split down in the middle into 2 halves called cerebral hemisphere
- each hemisphere is specialised for specific behaviour and the 2 halves communicate via the corpus callosum
cerebellum
sits beneath cerebrum
- involves in contolling a persons motor skill and balance, coordinating muscles for precise movement
brain stem
regulates automatic function that are essential for life
spinal cord
it relays info between body and brain
allows brain to monitor and regukate bodily process
diaencapharon
beneath cerebrum and above stem cell
within this area is thalamus and hyperthalamus
thalamus
relay station of nerve impulse coming from senses routing them to appropriate part of the brain
hyperthalamus
regulates body temp, hunger and thirst
controls of hormone from pituary gland
function of PNS
relay nerve impulse from CNS to body
relay nerve from body to CNS
somatic nerve impulse
these nerve has sensory and motor neuron
reflex actions
in emergency situation, info wont go to CNS and it would make an automatic decisions
autonomic nervous psychology
body carries out some actions without your conscious awareness such as breathing
sympathetic nervous system
uses neurotransmitter which has stimulating effects
exhibitory neurotransmitter
makes the post synaptic cell more likely to fire
inhibitory neurotransmitter
an off switch
decreases the likelihood of neuron firing
flight or fight
our bodies physiological response to an event that is perceived as an threatening or danger
acute stressor
when your are faced with threat your amygdala is activated
amygdala assosiates sensory signals with emotions
amygdala sends a distress signal to hyperthalamus which communicates with the rest of the body through SNS ( sympathetic neuron system)
chronic stress
ongoing
SNS
send dignals to adrenal medulla, which responds by releasing the adrenaline to the bloodstream
Nervous system w evaluation
The Nervous System
The nervous system is a specialized network of cells that acts as the body’s primary internal communication system. It has two main functions:
To collect, process, and respond to information from the environment.
To coordinate the working of different organs and cells in the body.
➤ 1. Central Nervous System (CNS)
Brain: The center of all conscious awareness. The outer layer, the cerebral cortex, is highly developed in humans and is responsible for thinking, perception, and voluntary movement.
Spinal cord: Connects the brain to the rest of the body and is responsible for reflex actions. It passes messages to and from the brain and the peripheral nervous system.
➤ 2. Peripheral Nervous System (PNS)
The PNS transmits messages, via neurons, to and from the CNS.
Divided into:
Somatic Nervous System (SNS): Controls voluntary movements by transmitting signals from the sense organs to the CNS and from the CNS to muscles.
Autonomic Nervous System (ANS): Controls involuntary functions such as heart rate, digestion, and breathing.
Sympathetic nervous system: Prepares the body for fight or flight.
Parasympathetic nervous system: Returns the body to a rest and digest state.
strength is the significant real-world applications that stem from research into the nervous system. Understanding how different components of the CNS and PNS function has led to the development of treatments for a range of neurological and psychological conditions. For example, electrical stimulation techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) are now used to treat Parkinson’s disease and severe depression by targeting specific brain areas. In addition, insight into the functioning of the autonomic nervous system has informed techniques for managing anxiety and stress, such as biofeedback and relaxation training. This demonstrates the positive impact on society that such research can have and supports the argument for investment in neuroscientific research.
❌ 3. Reductionism: Oversimplification of Human Behaviour
Despite its strengths, one criticism of the nervous system approach is that it tends to be biologically reductionist. That is, it reduces complex behaviours and mental processes to purely biological mechanisms — such as neural impulses and neurotransmitters — and often ignores the influence of psychological, social, and environmental factors. For example, while aggression has been linked to increased activity in the amygdala, social learning theory would argue that aggression is largely learned through imitation and reinforcement. This narrow focus limits our understanding of behaviour by overlooking the interactionist approach, which integrates multiple levels of explanation. While biological reductionism allows for scientific testing, it may lack ecological validity when applied to the full range of human experience.
❌ 4. Ethical and Methodological Issues in Research
A further limitation relates to the ethical and methodological constraints associated with researching the human nervous system. Much of the evidence comes from animal studies or from individuals with rare brain damage, such as the case of Phineas Gage, whose frontal lobe damage altered his personality. While such case studies are valuable for hypothesis generation, they suffer from low generalisability, as findings from unique individuals may not apply to the wider population. In addition, animal research raises ethical concerns, and the extent to which animal models can represent human behaviour is contested. Therefore, while these studies offer insights, the methodological issues may undermine the strength of conclusions drawn.
Neurons and synaptic transmission
Neurons are nerve cells that transmit information throughout the nervous system using electrical and chemical signals. They form the building blocks of the nervous system.
➤ Types of Neurons:
Sensory Neurons: Carry information from the sensory receptors (e.g., skin) to the CNS.
Relay Neurons: Connect sensory and motor neurons; found in the brain and spinal cord.
Motor Neurons: Carry messages from the CNS to effector (e.g., muscles or glands).
Neuron Type Direction Function
Sensory Body → CNS From senses to brain
Relay Within CNS Connects neurons
Motor CNS → Body Sends messages to muscles/glands.
➤ Structure of a Neuron:
Dendrites: Receive signals from other neurons.
Cell Body: Contains the nucleus and maintains the cell.
Axon: Carries the electrical impulse away from the cell body.
Myelin Sheath: Fatty layer that insulates the axon and speeds up transmission.
Nodes of Ranvier: Gaps in the myelin sheath that allow for faster impulse transmission.
Axon Terminals: End of the neuron; where neurotransmitters are released into the synapse.
➤ Synaptic Transmission:
The process by which neurons communicate with each other through chemical signals across a gap called a synapse.
Steps:
An electrical impulse (action potential) travels along the axon.
It reaches the axon terminal, triggering the release of neurotransmitters from vesicles into the synaptic cleft.
These chemicals cross the synapse and bind to receptor sites on the postsynaptic neuron.
This can result in excitatory (increasing the chance of the next neuron firing) or inhibitory (reducing the chance of firing) effects.
Common neurotransmitters:
Dopamine (pleasure, reward)
Serotonin (mood)
When a neuron is in a resting state the inside of a cell is negatively charged compared to the outside. When a neuron is activated by a stimulus, the inside of the cell becomes positively charged for a split second causing action potential to occur. This creates an electrical impulse that travels down the axon towards the end of the neuron
Evaluation:
One strength is that research into neurons and synaptic transmission is based on highly scientific methods, such as brain scans, electrophysiology, and post-mortem studies. These allow researchers to observe and measure neural activity in real time, which improves the validity and reliability of findings. For example, EEGs can track electrical activity in neurons, supporting our understanding of how impulses travel and when neurotransmitters are likely to be released.
✅ 2. Real-World Applications
Understanding how neurons and synaptic transmission work has led to the development of drug treatments for various psychological conditions. For example, SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) increase serotonin availability in the synaptic gap, which helps treat depression. Similarly, dopamine-related treatments help manage Parkinson’s disease. This demonstrates the practical benefits of knowledge in this area, supporting the importance of biopsychological research.
❌ 3. Reductionist View of Behaviour
A limitation is that focusing solely on neurons and neurotransmitters may be biologically reductionist. This approach reduces complex human behaviour and mental health conditions to just brain chemistry, ignoring environmental, social, or psychological factors. For example, while low serotonin is linked to depression, cognitive-behavioural factors like negative thinking patterns also play a major role. This means the explanation, while useful, may be too simplistic for a complete understanding.
❌ 4. Issues with Causality
Many studies in this area are correlational. For example, just because low levels of dopamine are found in patients with schizophrenia, we cannot conclude that this causes the disorder. It could be that the disorder leads to changes in dopamine, not the other way around. This issue with causality weakens the explanatory power of the neurotransmitter-based view.
Localisation of function is the theory that different areas of the brain are responsible for specific physical and psychological functions. This contrasts with the idea that all parts of the brain work together (holism).
➤ Brain Hemispheres and Lateralisation
The brain is split into two hemispheres (left and right), each controlling the opposite side of the body (contralateral control).
Some functions are lateralised, meaning they are more dominant in one hemisphere:
Left hemisphere: language, logic.
Right hemisphere: spatial abilities, emotions, creativity.
➤ Key Areas of the Brain and Their Functions
Brain Area Location Function
Motor Cortex Frontal lobe (both sides) Controls voluntary movement
Somatosensory Cortex Parietal lobe Processes sensory information (touch, pressure)
Visual Cortex Occipital lobe Processes visual information
Auditory Cortex Temporal lobe Processes sound information
Broca’s Area Left frontal lobe Responsible for speech production
Wernicke’s Area Left temporal lobe Responsible for language comprehension
➤ Supporting Case Studies
Broca (1861): Studied a patient nicknamed “Tan” who could understand language but couldn’t speak. Autopsy showed damage to a small area in the left frontal lobe (now called Broca’s area).
Wernicke (1874): Identified a region in the left temporal lobe responsible for understanding language. Damage here caused fluent but meaningless speech (Wernicke’s aphasia).
Evaluation:
✅ 1. Strong Case Study Evidence
The theory is supported by clinical evidence such as Broca’s and Wernicke’s patients. These case studies show that damage to specific brain areas leads to predictable deficits in function, which supports the idea of localisation. Brain scans (e.g. fMRI) also support this: for instance, listening tasks activate Wernicke’s area, while speaking tasks activate Broca’s area, providing scientific confirmation.
✅ 2. Brain Scan Evidence
Modern techniques like fMRI and PET scans provide more objective and reliable evidence. For example, Petersen et al. (1988) found that Wernicke’s area is active during listening tasks, and Broca’s area during reading and speaking. These technologies support the idea that certain functions are localised, strengthening the scientific credibility of the theory.
❌ 3. Contradictory Research – Equipotentiality
Lashley (1950) proposed the theory of equipotentiality, arguing that higher cognitive functions (like learning) are not localised but instead distributed throughout the cortex. His research on rats showed that removing parts of the brain did not necessarily stop them from learning mazes, suggesting the brain can adapt and reorganise functions (brain plasticity). This challenges strict localisation.
❌ 4. Individual Differences
There is evidence that localisation may vary between individuals. For example, some people have language centres in the right hemisphere or have more bilateral representation (both sides involved). Gender differences have also been noted: women may have more bilateral language functions than men. This suggests localisation may not be as fixed as once believed.
❌ 5. Plasticity – Brain Rewiring
Research on brain plasticity shows that the brain can reorganise itself after injury. For example, if a stroke damages the Broca’s area, other areas can take over language functions. This challenges the idea that functions are strictly tied to specific areas and suggests the brain is more flexible than the localisation theory claims.
➤ What is Hemispheric Lateralisation?
Hemispheric lateralisation refers to the idea that certain mental processes or behaviours are more dominant in one hemisphere of the brain than the other.
The left hemisphere is typically responsible for:
-Language
-Logical reasoning
-Analytic thought
The right hemisphere is typically responsible for:
- Visual-spatial tasks
- Creativity
- Emotion recognition
- Musical and holistic processing
Despite this, the two hemispheres communicate via the corpus callosum, a bundle of nerve fibres that transfers information between them.
In vision, each eye receives light from both the left and right visual fields. The left visual field from both eyes is processed by the right hemisphere of the brain, and the right visual field from both eyes is processed by the left hemisphere. This crossing of visual information allows the visual cortex to compare the slightly different images from each eye, which helps with depth perception through binocular vision.
Split-brain research involves studying individuals who have had their corpus callosum surgically cut — usually to treat severe epilepsy. This procedure prevents the two hemispheres from communicating, allowing researchers to study each hemisphere’s functions in isolation.
➤ Key Study: Sperry (1968)
Aim:
To investigate the effects of severing the corpus callosum on cognitive functioning and to explore hemispheric lateralisation.
Procedure:
Participants: 11 individuals with split brains.
Visual information was presented to one visual field only (either the left or right), which is processed by the opposite hemisphere. For example, if a word was shown to the left visual field, it would be processed by the right hemisphere.
Key Findings:
When a word was shown to the right visual field (left hemisphere) → participants could say it. When a word was shown to the left visual field (right hemisphere) → participants could not say it, but could draw it with their left hand. When two different words were presented (e.g., “key” to the left visual field and “ring” to the right), participants would draw a key with the left hand and say “ring.”
Conclusion:
This provides strong evidence for language being lateralised to the left hemisphere. The right hemisphere has some ability for non-verbal processing, such as drawing and spatial awareness.
✅ 1. Scientific and Highly Controlled Research
Sperry’s research used standardised procedures and controlled conditions (e.g., presenting stimuli for a fraction of a second to one visual field), which made it possible to isolate and test the functioning of each hemisphere. This increases the internal validity and reliability of the findings. The research was also pioneering and remains influential in our understanding of brain lateralisation.
✅ 2. Support for Functional Specialisation
The findings clearly demonstrate that language is lateralised to the left hemisphere in most people, and that the right hemisphere has strengths in spatial and visual processing. This has been supported by brain imaging studies (e.g., fMRI), which show activation of different hemispheres during different tasks. This strengthens the argument for hemispheric specialisation in cognitive processes.
❌ 3. Small and Unusual Sample
Sperry’s sample was very small (only 11 participants), and all had a history of epilepsy and had undergone a major surgical procedure. This limits the generalisability of the findings to the wider population. The effects observed may be due to the epilepsy itself or the brain’s adaptation to the surgery, not necessarily the loss of the corpus callosum.
❌ 4. Oversimplification of Lateralisation
While the research supports hemispheric differences, later research suggests the distinction between the left and right hemispheres is not absolute. In reality, most tasks involve both hemispheres working together — the brain is highly integrated. For example, even in language processing, some right hemisphere involvement has been found, particularly in understanding tone or metaphor.