research methods Flashcards
dependent variable
variable that is measured by the researcher
independent variable
measures the effect of this change on the DV
directional hypothesis
researcher makes clear the sort of difference between 2 condition or 2 groups of people
non-directional hypothesis
there is a difference between 2 condition or 2 groups of people but not specified.
operationalisation
being more specific
Extraneous variable
in an experiment an IV is manipulated to see how this effects the DV.
Any variable other then IV that effects the DV.
These additionn and unwatedx variables should be removed
confounding variables
Its kinda of an Extraneous variable that varies systematically with IV.
So we cant tell if the change in the DV is because of the IV or the compounding variable
demand characteristic
any cue of the researcher or research situation may give which makes the participent feel like they can guess the aim of the situation
investigator effect
An unwanted influence of the researcher’s behaviour (conscious or unconscious) on the DV measured.
randomisation
use of chance to reduce the effects of bias from investigator effect
standardisation
using the exact same formalised procedure and instruction for every single participant involved on the research process
What are the 4 types of experiment
1) Laboratory
2) Field
3) Quasi
4) Natural
Laboratory
are conducted in highly controlled environment. Does not need to be a lab, it could also be a bed but highly controlled
strengths of laboratory
1) high degree of control - control over confounding and extraneous variables - therefore can establish cause + effect - high internal validity
2) replication - researcher can repeat experiment due to high lvls of control. so can increase reliability
limitations of laboratory
Low ecological validity - high degree of control makes the situational artificial. - lacks mundane realism
Lacks generalisability
- lab artifical and not like everyday life
- lacks external validity
Due conducting in a lab
- participants may not know what the experiment is but would know that they are being tested, so may change their behaviour - demand characteristic
field
in more of a natural environment and not in a lab but variables are still being controlled
strength of field
1) High ecological validity as it is more natural - more mundane realism
2) controlled IV
limitation of field
have no control over extraneous variables and confounding variables therefore cause and effect between IV and DV are more difficult to establish.
Ethical issue - If participants don’t know that they are being involved in a study, they can not consent to being in a study and might constitute an invasion of study
quasi
is based on an existing difference between ppl. No one manipulates the DV and IV cannot change
strength of quasi
controlled condition - replicable. These strengths are similar to lab
limitations of quasi
confounding variables presented making it harder to conclude that the IV caused DV
IV is not deliberately changed by the researcher and therefore we cannot claim that the IV has caused any observed change
natural
Researcher measures the effect of IV on DV, however researcher has no control over the IV and cannot change it.
IV has to be natural and not actually the setting
strengths of natural
high external validity as they involve they study of real world issues or problems as they happen
limitation of natural
natural occurring events so not able to replicate
confounding and extraneous variables become a problem
lack realism
Demand characteristic