Bowlby/strange Situation Flashcards

1
Q

Bowlby theory

A

Adaptive
Social releases
Critical period
Monotropy
Internal working model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adaptive

A

Ensure survival of child
Get adaptive advantage
Kept safe warm fed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Adaptive behaviour

A

Rooting - head to cheek whne stroked allow infant take in norishment

Breathing - move arm and leg when someone I face protect oxygen intake

Body temp - tucking legs in to stay warm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social releases

A

Unlock innate tendency in adult to care for them
Physical - baby fave and body proportions
Behavioural - crying cooing smiling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Critical period

A

0-1half years if not fired attachment child damaged socially emotionally intellectually and physically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Monotropy

A

Form a special attachment mum but if non there they are able to bond with another present mother suitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Internal working model

A

Special mode/ schema all future relationships based on early attachment relationships
Good care giver = good relationship poor caregiver = poor relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strength of bowlby

A

Come from Lorenz research
Explain his study
This support bowlby theory and idea of critical period
That some animals form innate attachment time frame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation bowlby hanz and shaver

A

Love quiz questionnaire sent 620 people
Found positive correlation between attachment types later love experiences
Support bowlby IWM and childhood effect relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Weakness of bowlby

A

Lacks validity
Relationship with caregiver stronger not diffent quality
Attach people same feature as caregiver
Bowlby may be incorrect only one person meet criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strange situation

A

Measure security and quality of attachments

Controlled observation 100 American infants observed through 2 way mirror

Secure 66% insecure avoidant 22%. Insecure resistant 12%

Attachement type determined on mum behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Secure attachment

A

Show moderate stranger/separation distress accept comfort in reunion stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Insecure avoidant

A

Children explore freely don’t seek proximity no reaction when left no contact whne return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Insecure resistant

A

Seek greater proximity than others explore less huge stranger/separation anxiety resist comfort when reunited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weakness strange situation

A

Observation overt mum knew being watched
Altered behaviour look like good parent effect response of infant affect validity
Not be accurate representation in real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weakness strange situation

A

Lacks ecological validity
Artificial setting unfamiliar to infant and caregiver react diffent to home not sure if behaviour same I’m not a Noval environment