Burglary and Aggravated Burglary Flashcards

1
Q

what type of offence is burglary?

A

either way- in crown court maximum sentence is 10 years imprisonment for commercial premises and 14 years for burglary of domestic premises (this reflects public concern)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does s9 of the TA define burglary as? a person is guilty of burglary if…

A

he enters any building/part of building as trespasser and with intent to commit any such offence mentioned below

OR

having entered any building/part of building as a trespasser he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts/attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm

offences- any offences of stealing anything in building or part of building, or inflicting on any person therein any grievous bodily harm therein, and of doing unlawful damage to the building or anything therein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what do both burglaries require?

A

enter a building as a trespasser and know or be reckless that they are a trespasser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what must be present for a s9(1) (a) offence?

A

D must intend theft, infliction of GBH or criminal damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what must be present for a s9(1) (b) offence?

A

D must commit or attempt theft/GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the definition of ‘entry’?

A

R v Collins- entering the building with any part of his anatomy before being invited in- must have made an ‘effective and substantial entry’ and q for jury

R v Brown- must be an ‘effective’ entry but this is a q for jury

R v Ryan- entry of some part of the Ds body into the premises could be an effective entry and irrelevant if they aren’t in position to commit a crime- not always but COULD amount to an entry

summary: can be sufficient for any part of Ds body to count as entry and it is no defence that they weren’t in a position to commit a crime at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what if the D inserts an instrument into the property but not him himself?

A

e.g. a small child? - no authority on this but could be seen as using an instrument

e.g. hook/magnet through letterbox but prior to TA thus was considered an extension of the Ds body but only if it was to commit a theft, not to et the D into the property e.g. to force open a door

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a ‘building’?

A

must have some degree of permanence about it e.g. house, shop, shed, doesn’t matter if it is occupied/inhabited

s9(4) of TA says includes inhabited vehicles/vessels e.g. houseboat whether or not the person living there is there at the time or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a ‘part of a building’?

A

s9(1) of TA- e.g. entering a building lawfully but moves to another part with they don’t have the authority to go- R v Walkington and the D knows or is reckless to the fact that they may not have permission to be in the area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a ‘trespasser’?

A

essential for conviction irrelevant of what they did inside the property- requires proof that the D entered without consent/permission and they knew or were reckless as to this

old law prior to TA says that permission to enter obtained by fraud is not a true permission- R v Boyle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what about entering lawfully but with unlawful purposes?

A

R v Jones and Smith- trespasser if they had permission to enter for lawful purposes but entered for an unlawful purpose and they knew or were reckless that they were exceeding the terms of the permission given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the knowledge or recklessness as to trespass?

A

prosecution must show that the D had a particular state of mind in relation to the fact that they were trespassing (AR and MR must be proved)

MR0 D must know that they were entering as a trespasser or be reckless as to whether they were a trespasser- recklessness would require D to foresee the risk that they do not have permission to enter and go on without justification to take that risk- if they trespass by accident they wont be convicted of burglary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when must the D have the awareness that they are trespassing?

A

R v Collins- MR was at the time of entry into the building- offence complete at this point as long as they knew they were trespassing/acting recklessly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is conditional intent?

A

when the Ds intent is conditional on certain circumstances existing e.g. i will steal the cash fi the safe is open- but this is no defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is aggravated burglary?

A

criminal who are armed then they commit an offence or burglary

s10(1) of TA- burglary when the person has a firearm, imitation firearm, any weapon of offence or any explosive

indictable only offence- maximum sentence life imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a weapon of offence?

A

anything made or used in causing injury

17
Q

must there be knowledge of the weapon?

A

yes but no need to prove they intended to use the weapon during the burglary R v Stones cannot say it was for self defence purposes

R v Kelly- using a weapon taken with the D in the heat of the moment (didn’t actually intend to cause harm with it) is irrelevant and not a defence

18
Q

when must the D have the weapon?

A

At the time of the burglary

19
Q
A