criminal damage Flashcards

1
Q

what type of offence is criminal damage?

A

either way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is criminal damage by fire called?

A

arson- triable either way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 3 types of criminal damage?

A

simple CD, aggravated CD, simple arson, aggravated arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the AR of simple criminal damage?

A

dmaage/destruction of property belonging to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

expand on destroy or damage

A

includes physical harm, and impairment of value/usefulness of property e.g. removing a aprt of a machine, damage doesnt have to extensive and is determiend in a common sense way Roe v Knigerlee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is property?

A

must be tnagible, includes real property and personal property including money, animals included if tame e.g. pet/zoo or if being reduced into possession , flowers in a garden can but wild mushrooms, foliage etc cannot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

expand on belonging to another

A

cannot be committed agianst one’s own property, perosn must: have custody or control of it, having in it any propeitary interest or right or have a charge on it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the mens rea for simple criminal damage?

A

intend to damage/destroy property or to be reckless as to such damage or destruction and know that the property belongs to another or be reckless as to whether the property belongs to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is the test for recklessness subjective or objective?

A

R v G- subjective- Ds state of mind- they must foresee the risk of damaging it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what if the person honestly believes the property is their own?

A

they cannot be convicted as they lack mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the situations in which a D has a lawful excuse as a defence to simple criminal damage?

A

SUBJECTIVE TEST- belief in consent of the a person who was entitled to give permission for the damage to be caused, belief of consent from person they thought was entitled to give permission, belief they would have had permission, belief they would have had the consent of the person who they thought was entitled to give permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what about intoxication?

A

can be a lawful excuse as only requirement is that the belief was honestly held

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

is the need for protection a lawful excuse?

A

if they believed their property or another’s was in immediate need of protection and they believed that the means of protection they adopted were reasonable having regard to all the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the two. stage test to determine whether it was Ds real purpose to protect their property?

A

court must be satisfied that the accused honestly believed their action was protecting or capable of protecting property (subjective)i.e. no ulterior motive R v Hunt, then court rules as a matter of law whether this amount to a purpose of protecting the property (objective) R v Hill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how is the immediacy of the need of protection tested?

A

subjectively- Johnson v DPP there must be evidence of need of immediate protection i.e. must be immediate threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how is reasonableness of the damage tested?

A

subjectively- based on what D believed was reasonable at the time

17
Q

what is the actus reus of aggravated criminal damage

A

destroy or damage property

18
Q

what is the mens rea for aggravated criminal damage?

A

intend to destroy or damage any property or be reckless as to whether any property is damaged/destroyed

intend by the destruction or damage to endanger the life of another or to be reckless as to whether another’s life might be endangered

19
Q

can the property belong to the D?

A

yes

20
Q

does the person’s life actually have to be in danger?

A

no- R v Dudley