C1 COPY Flashcards

(193 cards)

1
Q

1

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1.1) intro:Define ‘target capital required’ (give the statistical defn)

A

1

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1. 1) intro:Define ‘target capital required’ (give the statistical defn)
* Capital level corresponding to CTE(99%) on the loss distribution over 1-yr time horizon (CTE = Conditional Tail Expectation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1.1) intro:Are insurers required to meet capital requirements at all times

A

2

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1. 1) intro:Are insurers required to meet capital requirements at all times
* YES!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1.1) intro:Describe scope of consolidation for MCT

A

3

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1.1) intro:Describe scope of consolidation for MCT

  1. MCT ratio is calculated on consolidated basis
    • Includes: any subsidiary parent could operate directly (Ex: other P&C insurer)
    • Excludes: life insurers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1.1) intro:What is an easy proxy for CapAv (Capital Available) that appears on the B/S (Balance Sheet)

A

4

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

(1. 1) intro:What is an easy proxy for CapAv (Capital Available) that appears on the B/S (Balance Sheet)
1. B/S equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define insurance risk

risk of loss..clms..

A

5

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define insurance risk

risk of loss..clms..

  • Risk of loss FROM the potential for claims (from policyholders & beneficiaries)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define market risk

risk of loss..chgs..

A

6

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define market risk

risk of loss..chgs..

  • Risk of loss FROM changes in prices in various markets
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

7

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define credit risk

risk of loss..counter-parties..

A

7

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define credit risk

risk of loss..counter-parties..

  • Risk of loss FROM counterparty’s potential INABILITY or UNWILLINGNESS to fully meet contractual obligations due to the insurer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

8
E (2016.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define operational risk

risk of loss..processes..

A

8
E (2016.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts

MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ

Qz-1 defns:Define operational risk

risk of loss..processes..

  • Risk of loss FROM inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems or from external events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

10
E (2015.Fall 19.) 2.000 pts

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

Qz-2 (2.1) CapAv:4 considerations in defining MCT CapAv (Capital Available)

MCT-APAS

A

10
E (2015.Fall 19.) 2.000 pts

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

Qz-2 (2.1) CapAv:4 considerations in defining MCT CapAv (Capital Available)

MCT-APAS

  1. AVAILABILITY: is the capital element (fully paid) and (available to absorb losses)
  2. PERMANENCE: until when is a capital element available
  3. ABSENCE: ask whether a capital element has an absence of (encumbrances) & (mandatory servicing costs)
  4. SUBORDINATION: is the capital element (subordinated to rights of policy holders and creditors) in (an insolvency or winding-up)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

11

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

(2.1) CapAv:What are the 3 broad components of capital available (3)

A

11

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

(2.1) CapAv:What are the 3 broad components of capital available (3)

  1. Category A (common equity)
  2. Category B
  3. Category C
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

12

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

(2.2) CapCompLims:When is excess category B & C capital included in capital available (2)

A

12

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

(2.2) CapCompLims:When is excess category B & C capital included in capital available (2)

  1. (w/ OSFI approval) & (plan to return to compliance ASAP)
  2. Must be due to event(s) beyond insurer’s control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

16
E (2017.Spring 24b.i) 0.500 pts

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

Qz-2 supp:Describe impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT capital available

A

16
E (2017.Spring 24b.i) 0.500 pts

MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE

Qz-2 supp:Describe impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT capital available

  • If unregistered reinsurance goes UP then CapAv goes DOWN
  • Reduction = max(0, D) WHERE D = (UEP + O/S + ReIns Recv) - (ReIns Pay + NOD + LOC) SUMMED over all reinsurers separately
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

17

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.2) margins:On what basis should claims and premium be put before calculating capital required for insurance risk

A

17

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.2) margins:On what basis should claims and premium be put before calculating capital required for insurance risk

  • The data should be NET of (reinsurance, salv/sub, SIRs) and EXCLUDE (PfADs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

18

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.3) ReIns:What is the $-limit on LOC (Letters of Credit) for obtaining capital credit against unregistered reinsurance

A

18

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.3) ReIns:What is the $-limit on LOC (Letters of Credit) for obtaining capital credit against unregistered reinsurance

  • LOC limit = 30% x (UEP ceded + O/S recoverable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

25

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Define ‘earthquake premium reserve’ (EPR)

A

25

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Define ‘earthquake premium reserve’ (EPR)

  • Voluntary accumulation of earthquake premiums (must not exceed PML500)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

26

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:If earthquake premium is implicit in total premium, what must the insurer demonstrate

reasonableness of allocation..

A

26

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:If earthquake premium is implicit in total premium, what must the insurer demonstrate

reasonableness of allocation..

  1. Demonstrate reasonableness of premium allocation to earthquake coverage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

27

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:When can EPR be reduced (2)

A

27

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:When can EPR be reduced (2)

  1. When there is material decrease in eqk-X
  2. To establish a (claims, LAE) provision post-event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

28

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Is EPR included in reserve amounts on B/S

A

28

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Is EPR included in reserve amounts on B/S

  • Yes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

29

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

(4.5) Cats:What is the formula for MCT capital required for nuclear reserves

A

29

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

(4. 5) Cats:What is the formula for MCT capital required for nuclear reserves
* Nuclear reserve = NWP x 1.25 (may reverse after 20 years UNLESS there is credible data not to do so)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

30
E (2019.Spring 18b.) 1.000 pts

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Explain the impact on MCT components of a decrease in ER (Earthquake Reserves)

A

30
E (2019.Spring 18b.) 1.000 pts

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Explain the impact on MCT components of a decrease in ER (Earthquake Reserves)

  • Need only 4 items for 1.0 pts:
  1. Capital available doesn’t change
  2. Capital required for insurance risk decreases
  3. Capital required for market risk doesn’t change
  4. Capital required for credit risk depends on use of unregistered reinsurance for earthquakes
  5. Capital required for operational risk decreases (because insurance risk decreases)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

31
E (2018.Fall 26d.) 0.250 pts

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:True or false: MCT takes into account flood risk

A

31
E (2018.Fall 26d.) 0.250 pts

MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK

Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:True or false: MCT takes into account flood risk

  • It could be both true & false:
    1. Flood risk would be part of general insurance risk (if it were sold)
    2. But flood is not currently given special consideration like earthquake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

34

MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK

Qz-5 (6.2) Off B/S Items:What are some examples of off-B/S sheet exposures (4)

A

34

MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK

Qz-5 (6.2) Off B/S Items:What are some examples of off-B/S sheet exposures (4)

  1. Structured settlements
  2. NOD (Non-Owned Deposits)
  3. LOC (Letters of Credit)
  4. Derivatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

35

MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK

(6.2) Off B/S Items:General method for CapReq(off-B/S): + problem

CRX x RF

A

35

MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK

(6.2) Off B/S Items:General method for CapReq(off-B/S): + problem

CRX x RF

  • CapReq = (CrdRsk exposure x RskFctr) | Problem: face amount of off-B/S exposure (may not reflect) true CrdRsk exposure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

36

MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK

Qz-6 general:Is legal risk included in operationl risk? (yes/no)

A

36

MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK

Qz-6 general:Is legal risk included in operationl risk? (yes/no)

  • Yes, legal risk is included as part of operational risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
37 MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 general:**List 2 types of risk that are EXCLUDED from MCT operational risk (2)**
37 MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 general:**List 2 types of risk that are EXCLUDED from MCT operational risk (2)** 1. Strategic risk 2. Reputation risk
26
38 MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 general:**What is the purpose of the cap on operational risk of 30% x CR(0), where CR(0) = Sum (ins, mkt, crd) risk**
38 MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 general:**What is the purpose of the cap on operational risk of 30% x CR(0), where CR(0) = Sum (ins, mkt, crd) risk** * To dampen operational risk for high-volume, low-complexity businesses that have high levels of reinsurance
27
39 MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 general:**What is rapid premium growth linked to (3)**
39 MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 general:**What is rapid premium growth linked to (3)** 1. Mergers 2. New LOBs 3. Changes to products or U/W criteria
28
40 *E (2017.Spring 24b.iii) 0.500 pts* MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 supp:**Impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT OpnRsk**
40 *E (2017.Spring 24b.iii) 0.500 pts* MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK Qz-6 supp:**Impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT OpnRsk** * When unregistered reinsurance goes UP --\> CapReq(OpnRsk) goes UP * OpnRsk DEPENDS on InsRsk & CrdRsk * InsRsk goes UP because unregistered reinsurance is one of its components
29
42 *E (2016.Fall 18c.) 0.500 pts* MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:**Define 'diversification credit'**
42 *E (2016.Fall 18c.) 0.500 pts* MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:**Define 'diversification credit'** * A reduction to capital required RECOGNIZING that not all risk categories are likely to suffer maximum loss simultaneously
30
43 *E (2018.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts* MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:**Does the diversification credit consider correlation between & within all risk components**
43 *E (2018.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts* MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:**Does the diversification credit consider correlation between & within all risk components** * No: 1. Credit & market risk are summed to get asset risk 2. Then the diversification credit considers the correlation between asset & insurance risk
31
55 *E (2017.Spring 19b.) 0.500 pts* MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS supp:**Describe a non-modeled approach to calculating eqk reserves**
55 *E (2017.Spring 19b.) 0.500 pts* MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS supp:**Describe a non-modeled approach to calculating eqk reserves** * Use the 'standard' approach: 1. Calc ERX = [max(EastCan.PTIV, WestCan.PTIV) - deduc], where PTIV = Property Total Insured Value 2. THEN calc ER (Earthquake Reserve) the same way as in the modeled approach
32
56 *E (2015.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts* MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS Qz-8 supp:**Purpose of establishing a supervisory target MCT (3)**
56 *E (2015.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts* MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS Qz-8 supp:**Purpose of establishing a supervisory target MCT (3)** 1. Early warning for management 2. Threshold for OSFI intervention 3. Accounts for (all risks in MCT ratio) + (non-modeled risks, off-B/S risks) + MARGIN
33
69 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 intro:**What is the purpose of MfADs (Margins for Adverse Deviations)** to reflect..
69 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 intro:**What is the purpose of MfADs (Margins for Adverse Deviations)** to reflect.. * To reflect a degree of uncertainty inherent in an actuarial best estimate
34
70 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 intro:**What are some broad methods for calculating MfADs (2)** deterministic, stochastic
70 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 intro:**What are some broad methods for calculating MfADs (2)** deterministic, stochastic 1. Deterministic: select percentages directly based on knowledge of the situation 2. Stochastic: use quantile methods based on a statistical analysis
35
71 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**What is the technical defn of MfAD (Margin for Adverse Deviation)** difference between.. assumption..
71 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**What is the technical defn of MfAD (Margin for Adverse Deviation)** difference between.. assumption.. * Difference between (ASSUMPTION for actual calculation) and (ASSUMPTION for best estimate calculation)
36
72 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**What is the technical defn of PfAD (Provision for Adverse Deviation)** difference between.. result..
72 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**What is the technical defn of PfAD (Provision for Adverse Deviation)** difference between.. result.. * Difference between (RESULT of actual calculation) and (RESULT of best estimate calculation) * The best estimate might be the median of your loss distribution * The actual calculation would be more conservative, maybe the 90th percentile, the difference being the PfAD amounts
37
73 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Categories of MfADs (3)**
73 CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Categories of MfADs (3)** 1. Investment return rates 2. Development on claims 3. Recovery on losses ceded to reinsurer
38
74 *E (2019.Spring 24b.) 1.000 pts* CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 good RskMarg traits:**According to IAIS, when should a risk margin generally be HIGHER/lower (4,1)** information, freq/sev, contract term, loss distribution
74 *E (2019.Spring 24b.) 1.000 pts* CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 good RskMarg traits:**According to IAIS, when should a risk margin generally be HIGHER/lower (4,1)** information, freq/sev, contract term, loss distribution * Risk margin should be HIGHER: 1. When less is known about the estimate 2. For low frequency / high severity LOBs 3. For longer contract terms 4. When there is a wide probability distribution for the losses * Risk margin should be LOWER: 1. With emerging experience
39
76 *E (2017.Fall 27error2.) 0.750 pts* CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION calc:**What is the formula for calculating PfAD for reinsurance ceded**
76 *E (2017.Fall 27error2.) 0.750 pts* CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION calc: **What is the formula for calculating PfAD for reinsurance ceded** * PfAD(re) = MfAD(re) x PV(ceded unpaid losses)
40
77 *E (2019.Spring 24a.i,ii) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 intro:**Deterministic (lower, UPPER) % limits on MfADs (3)**
77 *E (2019.Spring 24a.i,ii) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 intro:**Deterministic (lower, UPPER) % limits on MfADs (3)** 1. Investment return rate ( 25 bps , 200 bps ) 2. Claims development ( 2.5% , 20% ) 3. Reinsurance recovery ( 0% , 15% )
41
78 *E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify CATEGORIES of considerations for selecting MfAD(clms) (3)** ODL
78 *E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify CATEGORIES of considerations for selecting MfAD(clms) (3)** ODL 1. Operations (U/W, claims management, other) 2. Data (on which estimate is based) 3. LOB
42
79 *E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify OPERATIONAL considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -\> (when to pick HIGH/low)** low(SSC), high(op Changes, Turnover, Lack of Guidelines)
79 *E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify OPERATIONAL considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -\> (when to pick HIGH/low)** low(SSC), high(op Changes, Turnover, Lack of Guidelines) * Pick HIGH when there are (operational changes, employee turnover, Lack of Guidelines, inadequate staffing) * Pick LOW when operations are (Stable, Strong, Consistent)
43
80 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify DATA considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -\> (when to pick low)** low(SCH)
80 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify DATA considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -\> (when to pick low)** low(SCH) * Pick LOW when data is 1. Stable 2. Credible 3. Homogeneous
44
81 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify LOB considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -\> (when to pick low)** S
81 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Identify LOB considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -\> (when to pick low)** S 1. Pick LOW when LOBs are "stable"
45
82 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Reasons to select highest MfAD(clms) margin of 20% (3)** tort.new.(+retention)
82 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Reasons to select highest MfAD(clms) margin of 20% (3)** tort.new.(+retention) 1. For significant changes: (tort reform, legal challenges) 2. For a new LOB in new province with limited data 3. For an increase in retentions with limited data for assessing effect
46
83 *E (2019.Spring 24a.iii) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Reasons to select MfAD(clms) higher than 20% (3)** cons3
83 *E (2019.Spring 24a.iii) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Reasons to select MfAD(clms) higher than 20% (3)** cons3 1. If there is unusually high uncertainty 2. If PfAD is already very low because best estimate of claims liability is very low 3. If a stochastic analysis indicates variability not identified using a deterministic analysis
47
84 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Reasons to select lowest MfAD(clms) margin of 2.5% (3)** comm.StrucSett.stoploss
84 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(clms):**Reasons to select lowest MfAD(clms) margin of 2.5% (3)** comm.StrucSett.stoploss 1. LOB commuted to reinsurer and is in runoff 2. LOB has pre-set payments (Ex: structured settlement) 3. Insurer has stop-loss coverage reserved at stop-loss limit
48
86 *E (2016.Spring 29b.ii) 1.000 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(re):**Identify considerations in selecting of MfAD(re) (3)** LR.unreg.FinCond
86 *E (2016.Spring 29b.ii) 1.000 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(re):**Identify considerations in selecting of MfAD(re) (3)** LR.unreg.FinCond 1. Consider ceded Loss Ratio (if high: pick MfAD high) 2. Consider proportion of unregistered reinsurance (if high: pick MfAD high) 3. Consider financial condition of reinsurer (if poor: pick MfAD high)
49
89 *E (2017.Spring 25c.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(inv):**Identify considerations in selecting MfAD(inv) (3)** CFmch.P-Pat.AssRsk
89 *E (2017.Spring 25c.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(inv):**Identify considerations in selecting MfAD(inv) (3)** CFmch.P-Pat.AssRsk 1. MATCHING of cash flows from assets & liabilities (if unmatched: pick MfAD high) 2. ERROR in estimating payment patterns (if uncertain: pick MfAD high) 3. ASSET risk (credit/default & liquidity) (if high risk: pick MfAD high)
50
90 *E (2019.Spring 24a.iv) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(inv):**When may MfAD(Inv) \< 25 bps**
90 *E (2019.Spring 24a.iv) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(inv):**When may MfAD(Inv) \< 25 bps** * When the best estimate of the discount rate (based on insurer's assets) is already below 25 bps
51
92 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(inv):**Formula-based deterministic approaches (2)**
92 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs Qz-2 MfAD(inv):**Formula-based deterministic approaches (2)** 1. Weighted formula 2. Explicit quantification
52
93 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs MfAD(inv):**Weighted formula method**
93 CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs MfAD(inv):**Weighted formula method** 1. MfAD(inv) = iPM - iAM 2. iAM = min [iPM, iRFM x (1-k)]
53
97 CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting Qz-4 docs:**What should be disclosed in MfAD docs**
97 CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting Qz-4 docs:**What should be disclosed in MfAD docs** 1. For explicit assumptions: how margins were selected 2. For stochastic analysis: describe components modeled as random variables, with their distributions & parameters
54
98 CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting Qz-4 docs:**Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (i)**
98 CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting Qz-4 docs:**Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (i)** 1. Strike balance between (too little, too much) 2. Considering what (qualitative, quantitative) info best serves user's (understanding, decision-making)
55
99 CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting Qz-4 docs:**Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (ii)** SIC
99 CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting Qz-4 docs:**Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (ii)** SIC 1. Sophistication of user 2. Importance of concept to user 3. Complexity of concept * NOTE: cross-reference with materiality paper
56
100 *E (2018.Fall 26a.) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: Qz-5 supp:**In general, would MfADs be the same for claim & premium liabilities**
100 *E (2018.Fall 26a.) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: Qz-5 supp:**In general, would MfADs be the same for claim & premium liabilities** * No, claim & premium liabilities have different risk profiles
57
104 *E (2015.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: Qz-5 supp:**What is the difference between PV & APV (Present Value & Actuarial Present Value)**
104 *E (2015.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: Qz-5 supp:**What is the difference between PV & APV (Present Value & Actuarial Present Value)** 1. PV: accounts only for the time value of money 2. APV: accounts for the time value of money AND includes a risk margin for (investment return, claims development, reinsurance recovery)
58
105 *E (2016.Fall 24a.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: Qz-5 supp:**Is APV always smaller than the undiscounted liabilities**
105 *E (2016.Fall 24a.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: Qz-5 supp:**Is APV always smaller than the undiscounted liabilities** * NO: it depends on the balance between the discount factor (which decreases APV) & the MfADs (which increase APV)
59
109 *E (2015.Spring 19c.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: supp:**In general, what are possible choices for selection of ceded discount rate**
109 *E (2015.Spring 19c.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: supp:**In general, what are possible choices for selection of ceded discount rate** 1. Risk-free rate 2. Rate used by reinsurer to discount the same liabilities
60
113 *E (2014.Fall 21a.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: supp:**Identify some risks not explicit in calculation of policy liabilities or MCT capital required (5)** SRFI.ID
113 *E (2014.Fall 21a.) 0.500 pts* CIA.MfAD SUPP: supp:**Identify some risks not explicit in calculation of policy liabilities or MCT capital required (5)** SRFI.ID 1. Strategic 2. Reputational 3. Fraud 4. Innovation 5. International development * NOTE: CAS answer seemed to include several 'normal' risks
61
129 *E (2016.Spring 18b.) 0.500 pts* CCIR.ARINSTR: All Qz-1 general:**Define 'non-deferrable commission'** commissions..relating/varying..hence
129 *E (2016.Spring 18b.) 0.500 pts* CCIR.ARINSTR: All Qz-1 general:**Define 'non-deferrable commission'** commissions. .relating/varying..hence * Commissions not exclusively RELATING TO and VARYING with the acquisition of premium HENCE not recoverable over the term of the unexpired policy
62
130 *E (2013.Fall 21b.) 0.250 pts* CCIR.ARINSTR: All Qz-1 general:**Ways of accounting for time value of money in calculating excess (deficiency) ratio**
130 *E (2013.Fall 21b.) 0.250 pts* CCIR.ARINSTR: All Qz-1 general:**Ways of accounting for time value of money in calculating excess (deficiency) ratio** 1. Explicitly calculate investment income and add to excess amount 2. Discount the undiscounted amounts (back to the SAME POINT IN TIME) to reverse effects of discounting
63
131 *E (2013.Fall 23a.) 0.750 pts* MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 intro:**Give examples of company characteristics not captured in MSA ratios (4)**
131 *E (2013.Fall 23a.) 0.750 pts* MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 intro:**Give examples of company characteristics not captured in MSA ratios (4)** 1. Subjective analysis of market position 2. Quality of management 3. Quality of reinsurance 4. Prospects for growth & innovation
64
132 *E (2013.Fall 23c.) 0.500 pts* MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 intuition:**What does diversification score measure**
132 *E (2013.Fall 23c.) 0.500 pts* MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 intuition:**What does diversification score measure** 1. Measures how closely the insurer tracks the overall Canadian market (in terms of geographic & LOB spread) 2. If diversification score \> 65 --\> company is highly diversified
65
133 MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 intuition:**Give examples of an insurer with a low/high diversification score**
133 MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 intuition:**Give examples of an insurer with a low/high diversification score** 1. Low: niche insurers 2. High: national, multi-line writers
66
156 *E (2015.Spring 26c.) 0.500 pts* MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 calc:**Compare the MSA ratios: ROE ROR**
156 *E (2015.Spring 26c.) 0.500 pts* MSA.RATIOS: All Qz-3 calc:**Compare the MSA ratios: ROE ROR** * Just give formulas & intuition: 1. ROE: return to SHs per unit of capital 2. ROR: income relative to revenue-generating capacity
67
162 *E (2018.Spring 12a.iii) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 intro:**Objective of FA (Facility Association)** ensure..for..unable
162 *E (2018.Spring 12a.iii) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 intro:**Objective of FA (Facility Association)** ensure..for..unable 1. ensure auto insurance availability * For.. 2. all owners & licensed drivers * Who are.. 3. unable to obtain coverage through the voluntary market
68
163 *E (2018.Spring 12a.i) 0.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 intro:**Description of FA (who created FA, etc..)** created by..non-profit..
163 *E (2018.Spring 12a.i) 0.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 intro:**Description of FA (who created FA, etc..)** created by..non-profit.. 1. Created by insurance industry 2. (unincorporated, non-profit) of (ALL auto insurers)
69
164 *E (2018.Spring 12a.ii) 0.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 intro:**Mission of FA** administer, enhance stability, minimize market share
164 *E (2018.Spring 12a.ii) 0.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 intro:**Mission of FA** administer, enhance stability, minimize market share 1. Administer residual market mechanisms 2. Enhance MS (market stability) through RSPs 3. Minimize MS (market share), so consumers benefit from private mkt
70
165 *E (2019.Spring 8a.) 0.750 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Types of risk-sharing mechanisms administered by FA (3)**
165 *E (2019.Spring 8a.) 0.750 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Types of risk-sharing mechanisms administered by FA (3)** 1. FARM (Facility Association Residual Market) 2. RSPs (Risk-Sharing Pools) 3. UAF (Uninsured Automobile Fund)
71
166 *E (2017.Spring 7a.ii) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Key purpose of FARM** ..minimize market share
166 *E (2017.Spring 7a.ii) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Key purpose of FARM** ..minimize market share * Provide coverage for risks that cannot be placed privately (also, FARM seeks to minimize market share)
72
167 *E (2017.Spring 7a.i) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Key purpose of RSP** market stability
167 *E (2017.Spring 7a.i) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Key purpose of RSP** market stability 1. Enhance market stability by allowing insurers to pool bad risks that have passed their own U/W criteria * (premiums & losses are shared)
73
168 FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Key purpose of UAF** ..(no,inadeq)..
168 FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Key purpose of UAF** ..(no,inadeq).. * Provide compensation in cases of (no, inadequate) insurance
74
169 *E (2019.Spring 8b.) 0.750 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Where does FA operate its various mechanisms**
169 *E (2019.Spring 8b.) 0.750 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**Where does FA operate its various mechanisms** 1. FARM: everywhere except provinces with public auto (BC,MB,SK,QC) 2. RSP: (ON, AB, NS, NB), note that Quebec operates its own RSP, called PRR 3. UAF: Atlantic Provs
75
170 FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**FARM - what are servicing carriers**
170 FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 org:**FARM - what are servicing carriers** * Member companies contracted by FA to issue/administer policies and adjust claims
76
171 *E (2017.Fall 13a.) 1.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) areas of operational differences (6)** RA(CC)(P.claims)
171 *E (2017.Fall 13a.) 1.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) areas of operational differences (6)** RA(CC)(P.claims) * RA(CC)(P.claims): memory trick - read it as 'RACK-P dot Claims' 1. R: rates 2. A: admission 3. C: customer knowledge 4. C: # customers placed 5. P: participation ratio 6. Claims: U/W & claims admin
77
172 *E (2018.Spring 12b.i) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - rates**
172 *E (2018.Spring 12b.i) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - rates** * FARM: rates set by FA * RSP: uses rates of ceding company
78
173 *E (2018.Spring 12b.ii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - admission**
173 *E (2018.Spring 12b.ii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - admission** * FARM: only if agent/broker can't place risk with voluntary company * RSP: use U/W rules of ceding company
79
174 *E (2017.Spring 7b.iii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - customer knowledge**
174 *E (2017.Spring 7b.iii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - customer knowledge** * FARM: yes * RSP: no
80
175 *E (2014.Fall 13a.iv) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - # customers placed**
175 *E (2014.Fall 13a.iv) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - # customers placed** * FARM: can be unlimited * RSP: depends on province, usually a % of: (T.V.PPA.NF.TPL) direct car-yrs, that is, (total, voluntary, PPA, non-Fleet, TPL) direct WE
81
176 *E (2016.Fall 10a.) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - participation ratio**
176 *E (2016.Fall 10a.) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - participation ratio** * FARM: established separately by (jurisdiction, class, AY) * RSP: (T.V.PPA.NF.TPL) direct EE (i.e. Total, Voluntary, PPA, Non-Fleet, Third Party Liability)
82
177 *E (2017.Spring 7b.ii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - clms admin & U/W**
177 *E (2017.Spring 7b.ii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-2 org:**(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - clms admin & U/W** * FARM: uses servicing carriers (or 3rd party) * RSP: ceding company handles it
83
178 FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 Board of Directors & Members:**Functions of FA's board of directors (4)**
178 FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 Board of Directors & Members:**Functions of FA's board of directors (4)** 1. RATE CHANGES: approve rate changes & filings 2. EXPENSES: authorize expenses 3. STANDARDS: establish standards for servicing carriers & RSP users 4. COMMITTEES: appoint committees & subcommittees
84
179 *E (2017.Spring 7c.) 1.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 FARM:**5 classes of business for determing a member's participation ratio**
179 *E (2017.Spring 7c.) 1.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-1 FARM:**5 classes of business for determing a member's participation ratio** * FARM: 1. (1) PPA (Non-Fleet, Non-Pool) 2. (2) all auto EXCLUDING (1) and RSPs * RSPs 1. (3) RSP in Ontario (except cat claim funds for ON accident benefits from insolvent insurer) 2. (4) RSPs in (AB, NB, NS) * UAF (Uninsured Automobile Fund): 1. (5) UM claims + the ON cat claim fund excluded from (3)
85
180 *E (2018.Spring 12c.) 0.750 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 RSP:**What are the minimum requirements for risk-sharing pool transfer eligibility (5)**
180 *E (2018.Spring 12c.) 0.750 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 RSP:**What are the minimum requirements for risk-sharing pool transfer eligibility (5)** 1. PPA only 2. Insured can't be eligible for FARM 3. Policy must satisfy statutory minimum coverage requirements 4. Insurer must follow proper classification & rating, and provide documentation 5. Insurer must use approved rates
86
181 *E (2016.Fall 10c.i) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 RSP:**Describe how RSP operates regarding actual transfer of premium from insurer to pool**
181 *E (2016.Fall 10c.i) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 RSP:**Describe how RSP operates regarding actual transfer of premium from insurer to pool** * Transferred premium = premium charged NET OF premium payment service charges
87
182 *E (2016.Fall 10c.ii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 RSP:**Describe premium reimbursement from pool to insurer**
182 *E (2016.Fall 10c.ii) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 RSP:**Describe premium reimbursement from pool to insurer** * Reimbursement = % of written premium (as an expense allowance) * Includes: 1. claims adjustment 2. LAE, acquisition 3. Operating expenses * Excludes: taxes, license, fees
88
183 *E (2018.Spring 12d.i) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 ON RSP:**In Ontario, why is only 85% of each transferred risk covered** to maintain incentives
183 *E (2018.Spring 12d.i) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 ON RSP:**In Ontario, why is only 85% of each transferred risk covered** to maintain incentives * Insurer retains incentives to (manage claims well, use effective U/W, maintain adequate pricing) * Otherwise they could simply off-load bad consequences of poor management * Note that FARM transfers 100% of risk
89
184 *E (2018.Spring 12d.ii) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 ON RSP:**In Ontario, why is there a limit of 5% of (voluntary, PPA, Non-Fleet exposures) that can be transferred to the pool**
184 *E (2018.Spring 12d.ii) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 ON RSP:**In Ontario, why is there a limit of 5% of (voluntary, PPA, Non-Fleet exposures) that can be transferred to the pool** * Same as b.i + prevents insurer from sending all new policies to pool for first yr, then cherry-picking renewals from pool in yr 2
90
185 FA.DUTIL: ALL AB RSP:**What are the 2 types of RSPs in Alberta**
185 FA.DUTIL: ALL AB RSP:**What are the 2 types of RSPs in Alberta** 1. GRID: * for risks subject to statutory maximum premium 2. Non-GRID: * for any risks the insurer feels are under-priced (similar to the Ontario RSP)
91
186 FA.DUTIL: ALL AB RSP:**What is the difference between the Alberta GRID & non-GRID regarding pool transfer limits**
186 FA.DUTIL: ALL AB RSP:**What is the difference between the Alberta GRID & non-GRID regarding pool transfer limits** 1. GRID: * no limit on # risks transferred 2. Non-GRID: * limit = 4% x (Total, Voluntary, Non-Fleet, PPA) written car-yrs
92
187 FA.DUTIL: ALL AB RSP:**What is the reason for the difference in transfer limits between the Alberta GRID & non-GRID pools**
187 FA.DUTIL: ALL AB RSP:**What is the reason for the difference in transfer limits between the Alberta GRID & non-GRID pools** 1. GRID: * because Alberta law requires insurer to accept risks for which they have no control over price 2. Non-GRID: * because Alberta law has a take-all-comers rule
93
188 *E (2018.Fall 10.) 1.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 ON vs AB:**Identify differences between the ON and AB RSPs**
188 *E (2018.Fall 10.) 1.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 ON vs AB:**Identify differences between the ON and AB RSPs** 1. Difference 1: * ON has 1 RSP * AB has 2 RSPs (GRID & non-GRID) 2. Difference 2: * ON RSP covers 85% of ceded risk * AB RSPs cover 100% of ceded risk 3. Difference 3: * ON has a 5% limit on risks that can be ceded * AB GRID has no limit (non-GRID has 4% limit)
94
189 FA.DUTIL: ALL NB RSP:**Describe the New Brunswick RSP (who it serves, condition for transfer, transfer limit)**
189 FA.DUTIL: ALL NB RSP:**Describe the New Brunswick RSP (who it serves, condition for transfer, transfer limit)** 1. Who it serves: * New Brunswick risks with New Brunswick insurers 2. Transfer condition: * Household must have at least 1 recently licensed driver with a good driving record 3. Limit 1. = 8% x (Total, Voluntary, Non-Fleet, PPA) direct written exposures
95
190 FA.DUTIL: ALL NS RSP:**Describe the Nova Scotia RSP (who it serves, condition for transfer, transfer limit)**
190 FA.DUTIL: ALL NS RSP:**Describe the Nova Scotia RSP (who it serves, condition for transfer, transfer limit)** 1. Who it serves: * Nova Scotia risks with Nova Scotia insurers * (inexperienced drivers) * Transfer condition: * At least 1 household member is a driver with \< 6 years experience with no accidents/convictions * Limit * = no limit
96
191 *E (2015.Fall 7d.) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**How is the RSP used to lower total LR (Loss Ratio)**
191 *E (2015.Fall 7d.) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**How is the RSP used to lower total LR (Loss Ratio)** * Cede policies to RSP that have a higher LR than the RSP average * Then other companies will end up subsidizing the losses on these policies * ALSO: ceding the maximum amount lowers PR for RSP
97
192 *E (2015.Spring 12.) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**Is it possible to sustain a RSP running a profit**
192 *E (2015.Spring 12.) 0.500 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**Is it possible to sustain a RSP running a profit** * No: members only cede worst (unprofitable) risks so over time time the pool would become unprofitable (not sustainable)
98
194 *E (2014.Spring 9a.) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**How does a rate freeze (at inadequate rates) impact availability of coverage**
194 *E (2014.Spring 9a.) 0.250 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**How does a rate freeze (at inadequate rates) impact availability of coverage** * Availability for that class is reduced - insurers would stop accepting risks because they are unprofitable
99
196 *E (2013.Fall 7.) 1.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**Justify ROE = 15% for high-risk business (vs regulator's ROE of 10%) (2)**
196 *E (2013.Fall 7.) 1.000 pts* FA.DUTIL: ALL Qz-3 misc:**Justify ROE = 15% for high-risk business (vs regulator's ROE of 10%) (2)** 1. Higher risk justifies higher returns to compensate 2. Using lower ROE may cause insurer's not offer product (reduces availability for consumer)
100
200 *E (2016.Fall 27e.) 0.750 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Identify components of the premium liabilities (or policy liabilities in connection to UPR) (4+2)** clms.re.main.ContComm
200 *E (2016.Fall 27e.) 0.750 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Identify components of the premium liabilities (or policy liabilities in connection to UPR) (4+2)** clms.re.main.ContComm According to the definition in Section 1 of the source text: * Policy liabilities in connection with unearned premium (premium liabilities) are: * liabilities for future events.. * relating to the APV on the unexpired portion of the policies in-force at the valuation date.. * consisting of: 1. future claim & adjustment expense 2. reinsurance costs (net only) 3. maintenance costs * But this definition is incomplete and should also include: 1. ​​contingent commissions * The examiner's report also accepted these other answers: 1. PDR or DPAE 2. premium adjustments for swing-rated or retro-rated policies
101
201 *E (2014.Fall 25b.i) 0.250 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Define 'DPAE asset' (Deferred Policy Acquistion Expense) & give examples of such costs (3)** portion..incurred..
201 *E (2014.Fall 25b.i) 0.250 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Define 'DPAE asset' (Deferred Policy Acquistion Expense) & give examples of such costs (3)** portion..incurred.. * An ASSET that is the portion of prepaid acquisition expenses related to the UNEXPIRED PORTION OF THE POLICY & incurred when the policy issued * Example: 1. commissions, 2. TLF (Taxes, Licenses, Fees), 3. advertising
102
202 *E (2014.Fall 25b.ii) 0.250 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**What is the purpose of DPAE asset** recognizes..overPT
202 *E (2014.Fall 25b.ii) 0.250 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**What is the purpose of DPAE asset** recognizes..overPT 1. To RECOGNIZE prepaid expenses over policy term PROVIDED such costs are recoverable from equity in UPR 2. Matches premiums with expenses
103
203 CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Define 'UEComm' (Unearned Reinsurance Commissions)**
203 CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Define 'UEComm' (Unearned Reinsurance Commissions)** * A LIABILITY arising from uneared commission on Reinsurance ceded FOR the unexpired portion of the ceded policy
104
204 CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Define 'PDR' (Premium Deficiency Reserve)**
204 CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**Define 'PDR' (Premium Deficiency Reserve)** * A LIABILITY arising when (equity in the NET UPR) \< 0
105
205 *E (2018.Fall 26c.) 0.250 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**True or false: if there is a premium deficiency then DPAE must = 0**
205 *E (2018.Fall 26c.) 0.250 pts* CIA.PrLiabs 1: INTRODUCTION Qz-1 defns:**True or false: if there is a premium deficiency then DPAE must = 0** * True: * ==\> one of PDR & DPAE is always 0 * ==\> if PDR \> 0 there is a premium deficiency hence no DPAE asset * ==\> if DPAE \> 0 then unearned premium is sufficient to cover premium liabilities hence no PDR is required
106
207 *E (2019.Spring 14d.) 0.500 pts* CIA.PrLiabs APPENDICES: CALCULATING DPAE/PDR Qz-3 calc:**Methods for estimating the loss ratio for premium liabilities (4)** RICE
207 *E (2019.Spring 14d.) 0.500 pts* CIA.PrLiabs APPENDICES: CALCULATING DPAE/PDR Qz-3 calc:**Methods for estimating the loss ratio for premium liabilities (4)** RICE * RICE 1. Ratemaking analysis 2. Industry benchmarks 3. Claims liabilities loss ratio 4. Expert judgment * (in other words, just ask Alice)
107
210 *E (2019.Spring 14c.) 0.750 pts* CIA.PrLiabs APPENDICES: CALCULATING DPAE/PDR Qz-4 calc:**Explain the impact on ROE if DPAE is reduced**
210 *E (2019.Spring 14c.) 0.750 pts* CIA.PrLiabs APPENDICES: CALCULATING DPAE/PDR Qz-4 calc:**Explain the impact on ROE if DPAE is reduced** * Recall: 1. ROE = (net income) / equity * Now: 1. If DPAE decreases then equity decreases * (because equity = assets - liabilities) 2. If equity decreases then ROE increases But 3. If DPAE decreases then more premium acquisition is recognized in the current period 4. If more premium acquisition is recognized then (net income) decreases 5. If (net income decreases) then ROE decreases * Conclusion: 1. Overall effect is uncertain
108
213 *E (2013.Fall 20b.) 0.750 pts* CIA.PrLiabs APPENDICES: CALCULATING DPAE/PDR calc:**How can evaluating by LOB then summing give different values for 'equity in the unearned premium'**
213 *E (2013.Fall 20b.) 0.750 pts* CIA.PrLiabs APPENDICES: CALCULATING DPAE/PDR calc:**How can evaluating by LOB then summing give different values for 'equity in the unearned premium'** 1. Basically doing LOBs together means that DPAE for one LOB can offset PDR for another 2. Then just relate to given numbers
109
214 *E (2017.Fall 9a.) 0.750 pts* IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 ExecSumm:**Specific reasons for non-coverage of overland flooding (3)** adverse.under.maps
214 *E (2017.Fall 9a.) 0.750 pts* IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 ExecSumm:**Specific reasons for non-coverage of overland flooding (3)** adverse.under.maps 1. Adverse selection (if offered, would be too expensive) 2. Govt under-investment in risk (planning, mitigation) 3. Lack of effective flood hazard maps
110
215 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 ExecSumm:**Examples of government under-investment in flood management (4)** BAIL (me out!)
215 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 ExecSumm:**Examples of government under-investment in flood management (4)** BAIL (me out!) 1. BUILDING codes (obsolete) 2. ASSET management (poor) 3. INFRASTRUCTURE (lack of) 4. LAND-use planning (inadequate)
111
216 *E (2019.Spring 9c.) 2.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 ExecSumm:**Preconditions for strong flood risk management culture (4)** maps.IA$
216 *E (2019.Spring 9c.) 2.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 ExecSumm:**Preconditions for strong flood risk management culture (4)** maps.IA$ 1. FLOOD MAPS: for planning & risk management 2. INFRASTRUCTURE: levies, sewers 3. AWARENESS: of [risk, risk mitigation, financial management] by policyholders 4. INCENTIVES: for Individual risk mitigation should be encouraged by limited govt compensation $s
112
217 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 intro:**Most common type of natural disaster in Canada**
217 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 intro:**Most common type of natural disaster in Canada** * Overland flooding
113
218 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (intro):**Trends making financial management of floods difficult (5)** growth (popn,..), concentration, weather, building, under-investment
218 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (intro):**Trends making financial management of floods difficult (5)** growth (popn,..), concentration, weather, building, under-investment 1. GROWTH (popn | density | asset values) 2. CONCENTRATED development in flood-prone areas 3. Severe WEATHER 4. Vulnerability due to obsolete BUILDING codes 5. UNDER investment
114
219 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (Ins):**Coverage availability**
219 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (Ins):**Coverage availability** * Residential: * Overland flooding: no * Sewer: yes, by endorsement * Auto, commercial: * Overland flooding: yes
115
220 *E (2016.Fall 8d.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (Ins):**Why do insurers often cover uninsured floods (2)**
220 *E (2016.Fall 8d.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (Ins):**Why do insurers often cover uninsured floods (2)** 1. Multi-peril causes from sewer (covered) & overland flooding (not covered) * Difficult to separate so insurers just pay everything 2. Avoid reputational damage & political pressure
116
221 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (Ins):**Why is overland flooding not insurable (2)** insurability requires: RUU
221 IBC.FLOOD 1: Introduction Qz-1 Fld FinMgmt (Ins):**Why is overland flooding not insurable (2)** insurability requires: RUU 1. Insurability requires (Randomness, Uncertainty, Uncorrelated risks) 2. Floods are (predictable, correlated) & large # of properties are affected at the same time
117
222 *E (2019.Spring 9b.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 variables:**Categories for international flood management approaches (6 variables)** m(pur.pak.price)sGov
222 *E (2019.Spring 9b.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 variables:**Categories for international flood management approaches (6 variables)** m(pur.pak.price)sGov 1. MODEL: * Public or private 2. PURCHASE: * Mandatory or voluntary 3. PACKAGING: * Bundled or optional 4. PRICING: * Set by government or risk-based pricing 5. SUBSIDIES: * Provided by other policyholders or through taxes 6. GOVERNMENT ROLE: * Insurer or enabler
118
223 *E (2018.Spring 9a.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies variables:**Categories for international flood management approaches (6 variables)** m(pur.pak.price)sGov
223 *E (2018.Spring 9a.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies variables:**Categories for international flood management approaches (6 variables)** m(pur.pak.price)sGov 1. MODEL: * Public or private 2. PURCHASE: * Mandatory or voluntary 3. PACKAGING: * Bundled or optional 4. PRICING: * Set by government or risk-based pricing 5. SUBSIDIES: * Provided by other policyholders or through taxes 6. GOVERNMENT ROLE: * Insurer or enabler
119
225 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**Describe the U.K. flood insurance program with respect to the 6 variables**
225 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**Describe the U.K. flood insurance program with respect to the 6 variables** 1. Private 2. Voluntary 3. Bundled with homeowner's insurance 4. Uses risk-based-pricing 5. Cross-subsidized by policyholders 6. Government is an enabler through (risk mitigation, flood mapping, zoning) * UPTAKE = 95%
120
226 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - purpose (3)** SA25
226 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - purpose (3)** SA25 1. Sustainability 2. Maintain AA (affordability & availability) 3. 25-yr transition to full private risk-based pricing
121
227 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - how does it work (4)** target.exclude
227 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - how does it work (4)** target.exclude 1. Target only high-risk properties (identified through risk-mapping) 2. Excludes homes built after 2009 to discourage building in high-risk areas 3. (if insurer's risk-based-price is \> price ceiling) (charge ceiling & cede to flood reinsurance) 4. (if insurer's risk-based-price is ≤ ceiling) insurer may retain risk
122
228 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - how is affordability ensured**
228 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - how is affordability ensured** * Price ceilings
123
229 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - what is the role of Govt (3)** ceilings.FinRelief.inv
229 IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 UK:**U.K. flood insurance - what is the role of Govt (3)** ceilings.FinRelief.inv 1. Set price ceilings 2. Financial relief for cats exceeding pool capacity 3. Infrastructure investment
124
230 *E (2019.Spring 10b.ii) 0.750 pts* IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 U.S.:**Evaluate the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program using criteria for evaluating government programs**
230 *E (2019.Spring 10b.ii) 0.750 pts* IBC.FLOOD 2: Case Studies Qz-2 U.S.:**Evaluate the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program using criteria for evaluating government programs** 1. Is it insurance or welfare: * it is insurance because people pay premiums and only covered losses are paid out 2. Is it necessary: * yes, due to climate change and that private flood insurance is insufficient 3. Is it efficient: * yes, costs are lower because there are no commissions or advertising costs
125
231 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Why is having a flood insurance program better than Govt disaster relief** indemnifies, incentivizes
231 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Why is having a flood insurance program better than Govt disaster relief** indemnifies, incentivizes 1. Insurance INDEMNIFIES whereas Govt provides basic relief only 2. Insurance INCENTIVIZES through risk-based pricing whereas Govt relief is taxpayer funded, so no individual incentive for risk-mitigation
126
232 *E (2018.Fall 11b.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Cause & remedies for low uptake of flood insurance**
232 *E (2018.Fall 11b.) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Cause & remedies for low uptake of flood insurance** * CAUSE: * Adverse selection * REMEDIES: 1. Make mandatory 2. Bundle with other products/perils 3. Taxpayers subsidies for high-risk insureds * Public/government admnistration
127
233 *E (2019.Spring 9a.) 0.500 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Advantages of bundling flood insurance**
233 *E (2019.Spring 9a.) 0.500 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Advantages of bundling flood insurance** 1. Higher uptake 2. Reduces adverse selection (since not only high-risk insureds will purchase) 3. Promotes affordability (cross-subsidization of high-risk insureds by low-risk insureds)
128
234 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**State 1 advantage & 1 disadvantage of bundling flood insurance for low-risk policy holders**
234 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**State 1 advantage & 1 disadvantage of bundling flood insurance for low-risk policy holders** 1. DISADVANTAGE: low-risk would subsidize high-risk 2. ADVANTAGE: weather trends mean previously low-risk areas may suffer a flood disaster, and bundling ensures low-risk areas are covered
129
235 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Role of insurer in private flood insurance** UPEC
235 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 InsR Role:**Role of insurer in private flood insurance** UPEC 1. U/W: distinguish low & medium rsks from HIGH risks 2. PRICING: use risk-based pricing 3. EDUCATION: educate policyholders regardings risks, financial management, and mitigation 4. CLAIMS: pay covered losses in timely manner
130
236 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Role of Govt in supporting private flood insurance (4)** MESA
236 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Role of Govt in supporting private flood insurance (4)** MESA 1. MITIGATION: promote mitigation of risk (structural: infrastructure,...) & (non-structural: zoning,...) 2. EDUCATION: regarding awareness & management of flood risk 3. SUBSIDIES: provide subsidies to high-risk households where risk-based pricing is unaffordable 4. ASSESSMENT: of risk through accurate flood plain maps
131
237 *E (2018.Fall 11a.i) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Describe 2 advantages & 2 disadvantages of a public & mandatory flood insurance system**
237 *E (2018.Fall 11a.i) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Describe 2 advantages & 2 disadvantages of a public & mandatory flood insurance system** * public & manadatory: * Advantages: 1. High participation 2. Affordability (high participation spreads risk & lowers cost) * Disadvantages: 1. Government rates may not be actuarially sound 2. Low risk subsudizes high risk (unfair)
132
238 *E (2018.Fall 11a.ii) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Describe 2 advantages & 2 disadvantages of a private & voluntary flood insurance system**
238 *E (2018.Fall 11a.ii) 1.000 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Describe 2 advantages & 2 disadvantages of a private & voluntary flood insurance system** * private & voluntary: * Advantages: 1. Risk-based pricing means rate are actuarially sound 2. Risk-based pricing incentivizes policyholder to mitigate risk (& receive reduced rates) * Disadvantages: 1. Adverse selection (only high-risk customers will purchase) 2. Rates may be unaffordable (due to adverse selection)
133
239 *E (2017.Fall 9c.) 0.500 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Why may Govt still need to supplement private flood insurance**
239 *E (2017.Fall 9c.) 0.500 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 Govt Role:**Why may Govt still need to supplement private flood insurance** 1. Private insurance may have coverage limits that are exceeded in a major disaster (so Govt pays amount not covered) 2. Govt may subsidize otherwise uninsurable risks through taxation
134
240 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 CdnImpact:**How can flood insurance unaffordability for high-risk customers be addressed (2)** bundle.sub
240 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 CdnImpact:**How can flood insurance unaffordability for high-risk customers be addressed (2)** bundle.sub 1. BUNDLING: bundle flood with standard homeowner's policy (low-risk customers subsidize high-risk) 2. SUBSIDIES: Govt can provide subsidies through taxation
135
241 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 CdnImpact:**How is Canada starting to address flood management issues** EAP -- NDMP
241 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 CdnImpact:**How is Canada starting to address flood management issues** EAP -- NDMP * 2014 EAP (Economic Action Plan) proposes developing NDMP (National Disaster Mitigation Plan)
136
242 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 CdnImpact:**NDMP objectives (general)**
242 IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 CdnImpact:**NDMP objectives (general)** 1. Proactive approach to disaster risk management 2. Reduce impact of natural catastrophes on Canadians
137
245 *E (2016.Spring 11c.) 0.250 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 calc:**Identify policy conditions to discourage development in a flood plain (2)**
245 *E (2016.Spring 11c.) 0.250 pts* IBC.FLOOD 3: Best Practices Qz-3 calc:**Identify policy conditions to discourage development in a flood plain (2)** 1. Require flood protection for policy activation 2. Large, risk-based deductible
138
246 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 intro:**What is GF2 (Growing Forward 2)** (f-p-t) framework
246 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 intro:**What is GF2 (Growing Forward 2)** (f-p-t) framework * Comprehensive (federal-provincial-territorial) framework for (Canada's agricultural sector)
139
247 *E (2018.Spring 8a.) 0.750 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 intro:**What are the BRMs (Business Risk Management) programs in GF2 (6)** ISIR, AdvPmts, WLPIP
247 *E (2018.Spring 8a.) 0.750 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 intro:**What are the BRMs (Business Risk Management) programs in GF2 (6)** ISIR, AdvPmts, WLPIP 1. Agri-Insurance (protects against Production Loss) 2. Agri-Stability (protects against Margin Decline) 3. Agri-Investment (Investment Fund for small losses) 4. Agri-Recovery (protects against Disaster) 5. Advance Payments Program (low-interest loans for Cash Flow management) 6. WLPIP - Western Livestock Price Insurance Program (protects against flucutuations in livestock prices)
140
248 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 intro:**How are the BRMs (Business Risk Management) programs funded**
248 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 intro:**How are the BRMs (Business Risk Management) programs funded** 1. (BRM: 1,2,3,6): Agri-Insurance, Agri-Stability, Agri-Investment, WLPIP: * FUNDED BY (producer-provincial-federal) 2. (BRM 4): Agri-Recovery: * FUNDED BY (provincial-federal) 3. (BRM 5): Advance Payment Program (5): * FUNDED BY (federal)
141
249 *E (2017.Spring 8a.) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Probable yield** expected..measures..
249 *E (2017.Spring 8a.) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Probable yield** expected. .measures.. * Expected yield of an agricultural product (measures coverage in yield-based plans)
142
250 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Balance-back factor**
250 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Balance-back factor** * (factor applied to aggregate premium) to correct for (individual discounts & surcharges)
143
251 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Risk-splitting benefits** ind..subset..
251 CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Risk-splitting benefits** ind. .subset.. * Indemnity based on a subset of production (for a given agricultural product)
144
252 *E (2018.Fall 12b.i) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Reinsurance load**
252 *E (2018.Fall 12b.i) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Reinsurance load** * To account for reinsurance costs when the province purchases reinsurance
145
253 *E (2015.Fall 10a.i) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Uncertainty load (or risk margin)** lim(DAM)
253 *E (2015.Fall 10a.i) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Uncertainty load (or risk margin)** lim(DAM) * A load in rates to account for limitations in (data, assumptions, methods)
146
254 *E (2018.Fall 12b.ii) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Self-sustainability load** deficit.surplus
254 *E (2018.Fall 12b.ii) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Self-sustainability load** deficit. surplus * A load in rates to recover deficits & maintain surplus
147
255 *E (2015.Fall 10b.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Reason for (uncertainty, self-sustainability) load**
255 *E (2015.Fall 10b.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 1,2: INTRO & GLOSSARY Qz-1 glossary:**Reason for (uncertainty, self-sustainability) load** 1. Uncertainty load: covers future contingencies 2. Self-sustainability load: recovers past deficits
148
256 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - what is the content of such certification** ProbYld.Pricing.Self-Sust
256 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - what is the content of such certification** ProbYld.Pricing.Self-Sust * The Actuarial Certification should provide an opinion on: 1. METHOD for calculating probable yield (for deriving exposure for yield-based plans) 2. METHOD for pricing 3. SELF-SUSTAINABILITY of program
149
257 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - why is it required**
257 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - why is it required** * For federal funding
150
258 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - how often is it required**
258 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - how often is it required** 1. Frequency is determined using a RISK-BASED approach 2. At least every 5 yrs
151
259 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - what triggers the requirement of a new certification (2)** chgs(PD.M).new
259 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 intro:**Actuarial Certification - what triggers the requirement of a new certification (2)** chgs(PD.M).new 1. Significant changes in program design or methods 2. New crops
152
260 *E (2018.Fall 12a.) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 regulation:**Key elements of Canadian Agri-Insurance Regulation (4)**
260 *E (2018.Fall 12a.) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-2 regulation:**Key elements of Canadian Agri-Insurance Regulation (4)** 1. Minimum deductible = 10% 2. Probable yields must reflect DEMONSTRATED production capabilities (to prevent over-insurance) 3. Rates must be ACTUARIALLY SOUND (include self-sustainability load + relevant costs) 4. Actuarial Certification is required (if uncertified, then federal govt may reduce premium contributions to province)
153
261 *E (2016.Spring 8a.i) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of AgriIns plans:**Identify the main types of Agri-Insurance plans & provide examples of each** y(I-C).ny(WAM)
261 *E (2016.Spring 8a.i) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of AgriIns plans:**Identify the main types of Agri-Insurance plans & provide examples of each** y(I-C).ny(WAM) 1. Yield-based plan (individual OR collective) 2. Non-yield-based plan (weather derivative, acre-based, mortality for livestock)
154
262 *E (2016.Spring 8a.ii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of plans:**When does yield-based plan pay**
262 *E (2016.Spring 8a.ii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of plans:**When does yield-based plan pay** * Pays when: (individual OR collective production) \< (production guarantee) FOR a specified agricultural product
155
263 *E (2016.Spring 8b.i) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of plans:**What is the coverage trigger for a non-yield based, weather derivative plan**
263 *E (2016.Spring 8b.i) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of plans:**What is the coverage trigger for a non-yield based, weather derivative plan** * TRIGGER: when pre-determined meteorological thresholds are breached REGARDLESS of actual production
156
264 *E (2016.Spring 8b.ii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of plans:**What is the coverage trigger for a non-yield based, tree mortality plan**
264 *E (2016.Spring 8b.ii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 types of plans:**What is the coverage trigger for a non-yield based, tree mortality plan** * TRIGGER: when more than a certain % of trees are destroyed by an insured peril REGARDLESS of actual production
157
265 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**What is the formula for probable yield in a yield-based plan (easy - just say it in words)**
265 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**What is the formula for probable yield in a yield-based plan (easy - just say it in words)** * Average of yearly production yields
158
266 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**Adjustments to historical yields - what is the purpose of such adjustments**
266 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**Adjustments to historical yields - what is the purpose of such adjustments** * To reflect current production capability (similar to on-leveling premiums)
159
267 *E (2017.Spring 8b.) 1.000 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**Adjustments to historical yields - what are the triggers for making such adjustments (5)** (changes in farming, program, data), perennials, crop quality
267 *E (2017.Spring 8b.) 1.000 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**Adjustments to historical yields - what are the triggers for making such adjustments (5)** (changes in farming, program, data), perennials, crop quality 1. A change in farming or management practices 2. A change in insurance program design 3. A change in data source or data collection technique 4. Maturity of perennials (yield would vary over their life cycle) 5. Quality variation of crop from year-to-year (due to insured perils or other cause)
160
268 *E (2017.Spring 8c.i) 1.000 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**Stabilizing methods for probable yields - identify the stabilizing methods (6)** Alice Can Select Cool Smoothing Techniques
268 *E (2017.Spring 8c.i) 1.000 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-3 probable yields:**Stabilizing methods for probable yields - identify the stabilizing methods (6)** Alice Can Select Cool Smoothing Techniques \>**A**lice **C**an **S**elect **C**ool **S**moothing **T**echniques: 1. Average: * Use a long-term average of historical yields (15-25yrs) 2. Cap: * cap data to limit year-over-year changes 3. Split: * split basic & excess coverage since excess coverage is more volatile 4. Cushion: * Give data outliers smaller weights when averaging (to cushion their effect) 5. Smooth: * Apply floors/ceilings to data points (to smooth the effect of outliers) 6. Transition (rules): * Use transition rules after introducing a new yield method (to smooth the transition)
161
269 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS probable yields:**How do you calculate probable yield given NO missing years of data**
269 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS probable yields:**How do you calculate probable yield given NO missing years of data** * Probable yield = avg ( production yield over all years )
162
270 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS probable yields:**How do you calculate probable yield when there ARE missing years of data**
270 CHEV.AGRIC 4a: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS probable yields:**How do you calculate probable yield when there ARE missing years of data** * Probable yield = avg (production yield over all years) * But FILL IN missing years with: (Provincial Avg x index) * Where INDEX = avg ( Production Yld / Provincial Yld ) USING yrs for which producer data is available
163
271 *E (2016.Spring 8c.i) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 prod G&L:**Formulas - yield-based plans: (PG, L) or Production Guarantee & Liability**
271 *E (2016.Spring 8c.i) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 prod G&L:**Formulas - yield-based plans: (PG, L) or Production Guarantee & Liability** 1. PG = APC 2. L$ = APC x (insured unit price) * Where A = insured Area P = Probable yield per unit of area C = coverage level %
164
272 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 prod G&L:**Formulas - non-yield-based plans: (PG, L) or Production Guarantee & Liability**
272 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 prod G&L:**Formulas - non-yield-based plans: (PG, L) or Production Guarantee & Liability** * PG formula is not applicable since there is NO production guarantee for non-yield-based plans * L$ = (# insured units) x (insured unit price)
165
273 *E (2016.Spring 8c.ii) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 indemnity:**Yield-based plan - formulas: indemnity $s**
273 *E (2016.Spring 8c.ii) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 indemnity:**Yield-based plan - formulas: indemnity $s** * Indem$ = MAX(0, PG - AP) x (insured unit price) * Where * PG = Production Guarantee * AP = Actual Production
166
276 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 indemnity:**Non-yld-based plan - types of weather events that are covered (3)**
276 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 indemnity:**Non-yld-based plan - types of weather events that are covered (3)** 1. Excessive rainfall 2. Drought 3. Freeze
167
277 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 indemnity:**Non-yld-based plan - identify variables that affect compensation in such plans (3)** #.$.deduc
277 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 indemnity:**Non-yld-based plan - identify variables that affect compensation in such plans (3)** #.$.deduc 1. # units affected 2. Insured price 3. Deductible
168
278 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - what are included/excluded in rate calculations for production insurance programs**
278 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - what are included/excluded in rate calculations for production insurance programs** 1. Expected losses only (administrative costs are shared between federal & provincial govt)
169
279 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - formula for Prem$**
279 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - formula for Prem$** * Prem$ = PremRt x L$ (Note that PremRt varies by Covg%)
170
280 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - formula for Indem$ (& IndemRt)**
280 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - formula for Indem$ (& IndemRt)** * Indem$ = IndemRt x L$ (Note: First calculate Indem$ using above formula THEN calculate IndemRt THEN feed into PremRt)
171
281 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - what are the consequences of rate instability** fluctuations, adverse selection
281 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - what are the consequences of rate instability** fluctuations, adverse selection 1. Fluctuations in participation, adverse selection
172
282 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - what load factors must be incorporated to arrive at the final PremRt** IRt(UB+/-RS) (alternately or SIR BUDs)
282 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - what load factors must be incorporated to arrive at the final PremRt** IRt(UB+/-RS) (alternately or SIR BUDs) * To get PREMIUM RATE, start with INDEMNITY RATE then incorporate: 1. Uncertainty margin 2. Balance-back factors 3. Individual discount/surcharge 4. Reinsurance load 5. Self-sustainability load
173
283 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - how are NON-yield-based plans priced**
283 CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - how are NON-yield-based plans priced** * Same as yld-based plans (IRt(UB+/-RS) * But possibly with extra considerations * EXAMPLE: weather-derivative plans may have extra considerations like temperature thresholds
174
284 *E (2015.Fall 10c.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - identify pricing considerations for weather derivative plans (2)** weather: data, effects
284 *E (2015.Fall 10c.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4b: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-4 premiums:**Production insurance programs - identify pricing considerations for weather derivative plans (2)** weather: data, effects 1. CONSIDERATION 1 - DATA: long-term history of meteorological data (vs producer data) 2. CONSIDERATION 2 - EFFECTS: how weather affects production losses
175
285 *E (2018.Fall 12b.iv) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the federal requirement for self-sustainability (statistical defn)**
285 *E (2018.Fall 12b.iv) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the federal requirement for self-sustainability (statistical defn)** * FOR ALL (base, adverse) scenarios with INITIAL DEFICIT = 6th yr 95th percentile: * MUST RECOVER DEFICIT IN (15yrs: avg, 25yrs: 80% prob)
176
286 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the BASIS for the self-sustainability load selection** Targ($%x.perc)
286 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the BASIS for the self-sustainability load selection** Targ($%x.perc) * LOAD BASIS = (selected target surplus level), and can be expressed in different ways 1. $-value 2. % of liability dollars 3. Multiple of premiums 4. Percentile over a given time horizon
177
287 *E (2018.Fall 12c.(i,ii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the basis for the self-sustainability test**
287 *E (2018.Fall 12c.(i,ii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the basis for the self-sustainability test** * TEST BASIS: 25-yr stochastic simulation of financial position
178
288 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the source of VOLATILITY in stochastic simulations of self-sustainability**
288 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the source of VOLATILITY in stochastic simulations of self-sustainability** * Mainly the indemnity component * Because the (probable yield & premium rate) methodologies are designed to avoid large year-to-year variations
179
289 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the actuary's role regarding the self-sustainability test** design.confirm
289 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**What is the actuary's role regarding the self-sustainability test** design. confirm * The actuary should (design OR confirm) methodology for calculating the self-sustainability load
180
290 *E (2018.Fall 12b.iii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**Actuary - identify adverse scenarios relevant to self-sustainability in agri-insurance**
290 *E (2018.Fall 12b.iii) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**Actuary - identify adverse scenarios relevant to self-sustainability in agri-insurance** 1. Increase in liabilities (increases maximum exposure) 2. Decrease in liabilities * This can be severe when surplus vulnerable after cat since future premiums are lower & deficit recovery takes longer 3. Adverse claims experience 4. Introduction of a new insurance plan 5. Deterioration in market value of investments 6. Combination of the above scenarios
181
291 *E (2017.Fall 8b.) 0.750 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**Test - compare agricultural self-sustainability to DCAT (Similarity, Difference)** (base.adv):FullStoch
291 *E (2017.Fall 8b.) 0.750 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 self-sust:**Test - compare agricultural self-sustainability to DCAT (Similarity, Difference)** (base.adv):FullStoch 1. SIMILARITY: both consider (base, adverse) scenarios 2. DIFFERENCES: agricultural self-sustainability uses a fully stochastic simulation over a longer time horizon
182
292 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 GovtRe:**Is Govt reinsurance for agri-insurance considered traditional reinsurance**
292 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 GovtRe:**Is Govt reinsurance for agri-insurance considered traditional reinsurance** * No, it's an optional deficit-financing scheme * Province may finance deficits as they occur VERSUS regularly contributing to a govt reinsurance fund
183
293 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 GovtRe:**Describe the FUNDING mechanism for govt reinsurance for agri-insurance**
293 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 GovtRe:**Describe the FUNDING mechanism for govt reinsurance for agri-insurance** 1. Provincial producer programs contribute a % of premium to (provincial & federal) reinsurance 2. Amount is based on (surplus position & risk profile) 3. Must self-sustain for 25 yrs
184
294 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 GovtRe:**What triggers govt reinsurance for an agri-insurance program**
294 CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 GovtRe:**What triggers govt reinsurance for an agri-insurance program** * When SURPLUS of the production insurance fund is DEPLETED * Note that indemnities net of private insurance are paid out of production insurance fund first *(shout-out to IK!))*
185
295 *E (2015.Spring 14a.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the FEDERAL govt in agri-insurance programs** guidelines, financing
295 *E (2015.Spring 14a.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the FEDERAL govt in agri-insurance programs** guidelines, financing 1. Develop guidelines for production insurance programs 2. Provide financing mechanism when programs are in deficit position
186
296 *E (2015.Spring 14b.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the PROVINCIAL govt in agri-insurance programs** rates, claims
296 *E (2015.Spring 14b.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the PROVINCIAL govt in agri-insurance programs** rates, claims 1. Determine (probable yield, premium rate) 2. Manage claims
187
297 *E (2015.Spring 14c.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the PRODUCERS in agri-insurance programs** pay, report
297 *E (2015.Spring 14c.) 0.500 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the PRODUCERS in agri-insurance programs** pay, report 1. Pay their share of the premium 2. Report yields
188
298 *E (2018.Spring 8c.) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the PRIVATE INSURANCE & reinsurance in agri-insurance programs** unInsured perils, reinsurance for govt
298 *E (2018.Spring 8c.) 0.250 pts* CHEV.AGRIC 4c: PRODUCTION INSURANCE PROGRAMS Qz-5 roles:**Identify the roles & responsibilities of the PRIVATE INSURANCE & reinsurance in agri-insurance programs** unInsured perils, reinsurance for govt 1. PRIVATE INSURANCE: provides coverage (for producer) for perils not covered under govt insurance (Ex: fire) 2. REINSURANCE: provides reinsurance for Govt INSURANCE
189
299 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Compare the different triggers for: (1) Actuarial Certification (2) Historical Adjustments to Probable Yield (3) Risk Transfer Test**
299 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Compare the different triggers for: (1) Actuarial Certification (2) Historical Adjustments to Probable Yield (3) Risk Transfer Test** 1. Actuarial Certification: * Significant changes in program design or methods * New crops 2. Historical Adjustments to Probable Yield: * A change in farming or management practices * A change in insurance program design * A change in data source or data collection technique * Maturity of perennials (yield would vary within their life cycle) * Quality variation of crop from year-to-year (due to insured perils or other cause) 3. Risk Transfer Test: * Inception of contract * When contract change significantly alters expected future cash flows
190
300 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Examples of areas where Actuarial Certifications are required (4)**
300 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Examples of areas where Actuarial Certifications are required (4)** 1. Agricultural Insurance Production Programs 2. Risk Transfer Analysis 3. Valuation of Reserves 4. Rate Filings (certain aspects)
191
301 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Examples of areas where Transition Rules are used (2)**
301 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Examples of areas where Transition Rules are used (2)** 1. Agricultural Insurance - Probable Yield calculation: * After a new methodology is introduced * Use "transition rules" or "stabilizing methods" to prevent sudden large changes 2. Rating: * Prevents individual policyholders from getting a big rate change all at once
192
302 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Examples of areas where stochastic models are used**
302 CHEV.AGRIC: SUPP Qz-6 Bloom's Taxonomy:**Examples of areas where stochastic models are used** 1. Agricultural Insurance * For adverse scenarios in self-sustainability model 2. DCAT scenarios * When risk distribution is easily inferred 3. MfADs * Where the cost distribution is skewed, and deterministic methods may not work well
193