Caregiver-infant interactions :Reciprocity and interactional synchrony Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Define attachment and what are the two ways the strength of attachment can be seen in? (3)

A

*A close two way emotional bond between two individuals
- In which each person seeks closeness and feels more secure when close to their attachment figure
*The strength of the bonds: Reciprocity and interactional synchrony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define reciprocity

A
  • A mutual turn taking form of interaction.
    *Both caregiver and infant contribute to the interaction by responding to the others signals and cues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define interactional synchrony

A
  • An infant mirrors the actions of another person,
  • For example, their facial expressions and body movements

Doen simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is imitation

A

When an infant copies the caregivers expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is sensitive responsiveness and give examples

A

*The caregiver correctly interprets the meaning of the infants communication
*and is motivated to respond appropriately
-Provide milk
-Change nappy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is body contact

A

*Physical contact that is necessary for bonding
*Especially in the first few hours of life e.g. breastfeeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three characteristics of attachment and define them

A

1.Proximity-People try to stay physically close to those who are attached

2.Separation distress- People are distressed when an attachment figure leaves their presence

3.Secure base behaviour- Even when you are independent of our attachment figures we tend to make regular contact with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Meltzoff and Moore (1977)-Interactional synchrony (7)

A
  • Meltzoff and Moore (1977) conducted a systematic study of interactional synchrony
  • Found that infants as young as two or three weeks old imitated facial and hand gestures
  • Study was conducted using an adult model who displayed one of three facial expressions
  • A dummy was placed in the infant’s mouth during the initial display to prevent any response
  • Following the display the dummy was removed from the child’s mouth and their expression was filmed
  • It was found infant responses matched the experimenters facial expressions
    –>which suggests the ability to observe and reciprocate through imitation is present from a very young age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give a contradictory study to Meltzoff and Moore’s (1977) study (2)

Contradictory study of Meltzoff and Moore (1977)

A

*Oostenbroek et al (2016) tested a much wider array of actions and tracked behaviour longitudinally in infants over the first 9 weeks of life
*They replicated the original M&M finding for tongue protrusion but across the board there was no evidence of imitation for other behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Condon and Sander (1974) -Pro (3)

Investigates interactional synchrony

A

*Condon and Sander (1974) videotaped interactions between adults and infants focusing on the movements of the infants in response to adult speech .
*Using a detailed frame by frame analysis of the video recordings, they found evidence of interactional synchrony between the infants movements and the rhythmic patterns of the adults speech.
*These results show even from birth humans have an innate ability for social interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

General pro for Condon and Sander (1974) watching babies (3)

High internal validity

A

*Many studies use multiple observers,blind to the true aims of the experiment
*To provide inter-rater reliability or even use complex camera systems to document and slow down micro sequences of the interactions between caregivers and infants.
*The high control of infant studies indicates high internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

General con about the findings of caregiver-infant interactions (5)

A

*Infants cannot directly communicate their thoughts or emotions.
*Therefore, findings in caregiver-infant interaction research depends on inferences which are considered unscientific.
*Inferences are assumptions about the infant’s internal mental states based on observed behaviour. *However inferences could be mistaken for example researchers should not claim imitation behaviour is intentional,
* it may be imitation is an unconscious automatic response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Con about social sensitivity and women who go to work (3)

A

*Social sensitivity is a concern when investigating child rearing techniques including norms around caregiver-infant interactions,
*some women may find their life choices critisiced such as mothers who decide to return to the workplace shortly after giving birth
*and cannot develop a high level of interactional synchrony with their infant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the names of the studies in this chapter (Give the year with a short description too)

A
  • Oostenbroek et al (2016)-Coopied Meltzoff and Moore’s study and tested for a wider array of actions–>only foudn tongue protusion
  • Meltzoff and Moore (1977)-Used an adult model to express certain facial and hand gestures in which the baby had to imitate
  • Condon and
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly