Case Law Flashcards

(24 cards)

1
Q

Explain R v Callister?

What offence does it relate to?

A

The offenders intent can be judged on the following;

1.The actions of the offender before, during and after the event.
2.The surrounding circumstances.
3.The nature of the offence.

Used for intent generally for all applicable offences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain R v Taisalika

What does this reference?

Where would you use this case law?

A

Using this helps identify the intent of assault in exam answer.

The nature of the injuries that was sustained point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent that caused this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain R v Rapana & Murray

A

Dealing with disfigurement.

Disfigure covers not only the permanent damage but also temporary damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain DPP v Smith

Hint: dealing with GBH

A

‘Bodily harm needs no explanation and grievous means no more or no less than really serious’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain R v Waters

Hint: Wounds

A

A wound is breaking of the skin with existence of blood flow. Can be internal or external.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain R v Tipple

Hint: Recklessness

A

Requires the knowledge of being so or having appreciation of risk. But made the deliberate decision to run the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain R v Donovan

Hint: harm/injuries sustained

A

Bodily harm includes any hurt or injury that is set to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim.

It need not be permanent but must be more than merely temporary or trifling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain R v TIHI

Hint: intent, relates to s191 agg wounding

A

It must be shown the offender meant to cause specified harm or foresaw their actions undertaken were likely to exposed others to the risk of suffering it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain R v Wati

Hint: Proof of the commission of the crime committed

A

There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime by either the person committing the crime or person who is avoiding arrest or facilitate flight.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain R v STURM

Hint: relates to s191 (1)(a)

A

To stupefy means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person which seriously interferes with that persons mental or physical ability to offer resistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain R v Crossan

Hint:

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain R v Crossan

Hint: incapable of resistance
s191 Agg Wounding factor

A

Incapable of resistance includes a powerlessness of the will as well as a physical incapacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define intent

Hint: act & result

A

There must be an intention to:

Commit a deliberate act.
To get a specific result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define ‘wounds’

A

Breaking of the skin with a flow of blood. May or may not be serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define ‘Maims’

Hint: Limb or senses

A

Mutilating, crippling or disabling a body part so as to deprive victim of the use of a limb or senses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define ‘disfigures’

A

To deform, deface, alter the figure or appearance of a person.

Does not need to be permanent.
Remember: R v Rapana & Murray

17
Q

NAME the elements to
Wounding with intent to cause GBH

A

With intent to cause GBH
To any person
Wounds
Any person

18
Q

Name the act & section for an intent to cause GBH wounding charge.

With the intent proven

A

CA61 s188(1) 14yrs imprisonment

19
Q

Explain transferred malice

A

Not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim. Where mistaken identity of a person or harm inflicted on another is accidental he/she is still criminally responsible.

20
Q

What is the case law for Recklessness?

A

Cameron v R

Recklessness is established if;
(a) defendant recognised that there was real possibility that:
(i) their actions would bring a forbidden result and/or
(ii) the forbidden circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk their actions were unreasonable.

21
Q

What is meant by stupefy?

What is the case law supporting this?

A

Means to induce a state of stupor, groggy or insensible, to dull the senses or faculties.

R v Sturm
Means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system which really interferes with victims mental/ physical ability in any way.

Incapable of resistance.

22
Q

What is the difference between

23
Q

What is the difference between GBH & wounds?

A

Wounds, maims and disfigures refer to type of injury caused.

Grievous refers to the degree or seriousness of the injury.

24
Q

What are the elements of wounding with intent reckless disregard?

Name act & section.

A

CA61 s188 (2) 7yrs imprisonment

•With reckless disregard for the safety of others
•Wounds, maims, disfigures or causes GBH
•To any person