Case Study Questions Flashcards
Can you tell me some characteristics of dry rot? What are the implications of untreated dry rot?
- Cuboidal and rectangular cracking
- Very brittle
- Moisture content 20 to 40 percent
- Affects masonry as well
It will grow and spread to other areas, can affect masonry and will eventually cause loss of structural strength
For the internal tanking solution, a resin membrane was proposed to be lapped up the wall but to what height? What thickness was the SIKA membrane?
250mm and the SIKA membrane lapped 100mm finishing just before finished floor level.
18mm thick SIKA, each coat 6mm thick
What is the difference between signs of rising damp, penetrating damp and condensation?
Condensation - more likely in winter, more likely in poorly ventilated places, black mould patches and spots, water collects on windows etc, walls appear wet.
Penetrating damp - damp patches internally and externally, black mould, discolouration, usually isolated to particular area
Rising damp - tide marks on walls up to one metre, affects lower areas on walls, salts present, disolouration
For the case study, how did you know it was wet rot? What is the difference between dry rot and wet rot?
Dry rot is extensive, spreads across masonry, cuboidal cracking
How do you treat rot?
Treat source, repair timber, fungicide, ventilate and monitor
What does rising damp look like?
Unlikely to be dark mould, continues to 1 metre in height, lower level
Apart from decorations, what repairs did you specify?
Helibar insertion to brickwork where there was cracking due to underground leak.
Timber splice repair due to weathering.
Installation of downpipe clips, trunking end caps, etc
Why did the client select an open tendering method? What are the benefits of alternatives?
- Standing orders, tendering department advised to carry out open tender to increase competition and show a fair process by being open to all contractors.
- Advantages of closed tender is good reputation contractors can be selected, contractor familiar with client processes, less likely to have inaccurate tenders, simpler to analyse tenders, does not require a tender portal or advertising
For the case study, health and safety was mentioned as a concern? Did you report any issues on site? What legislation governs H&S on construction sites?
Yes because the contractor had proven themselves not to be competent in other areas.
Yes I did, not wearing PPE and not an up to date scaff tag.
CDM Regs 2015
What section of a minor works contract governs termination?
Section 6
Why was a seven day notice not the preferred solution?
- Due to quality and progress issues wanted them off site
- Did not want to provide them with the opportunity to rectify their errors
What is novation? Did this take place regarding the new contractor?
Replacing a party to an agreement with a new party
Not proceeded with because there was quality issues with contractor’s work.
What were some conditions of termination? What were the legal documents?
A memorandum of Agreement was produced which both parties signed.
- Contractor to withdraw from site by end of week.
- 2.5% retention to be withheld
- LADs to be charged only for additional professional fees
- Works fairly valued by CA
- SoC taken by contractor and checked by CA
As contract administrator should you be advising to act outside of the contract?
Not usually however may be in best interests of both parties. Contractor had stretched their resources and was not fulfilling their obligations and client was suffering as a result. If I advise to proceed outside of the contract there needs to be another legally enforceable contract in place, like the memorandum of agreement.
Were you acting impartially when advising to terminate outside of the contract conditions?
Yes because it was in best interests of both parties. Approached both parties separately before the meeting to check this was the case.
In contractor’s best interests as they did not have the resources for the project and would have incurred significant LADs.
In client’s best interests as they had lost all confidence in the current contractor and wanted to complete the works timely and satisfactorily.
Why was Minor Works contract selected for this the ext decs project?
It was requested by the client because they were familiar and comfortable with this contract. I had suggested the Intermediate Building Contract however in future I would do this more strongly.
You note more regular inspections were required outside of your scope, did you agree this with the client?
Limited amount of additional inspections took place, I checked with a Partner who confirmed an additional fee was not required.
Why did you have to proceed on an open tender basis? What are weaknesses of this method?
Client are a public body and their procurement department required them to proceed on open tender basis.
Experience of contractors may not be known, lowest price may be incorrectly priced when there’s that many contractors, tender analysis more complex, could lead to on site quality issues, requires a system to publicly tender.
What were the results of the CCTV survey?
Drainpipe connected to the RWP immediately outside affected area was cracked causing a leak, recommended relining area of drainpipe.
Was there no option to carry out internal and external decorations together?
No, both internal and external decorations took place at numerous stations and the client wanted separate contracts for both so that the projects were manageable. It was a client decision.
You state that although the leaking rainwater pipe was the cause it did not explain the water ingress. How would you determine what was causing the water to migrate and affect the internal wall? Why was further investigations not undertaken?
- The drainpipe appeared to be the cause of the water ingress. However, water may have been able to migrate across due to concrete infill or cavity dropping within the cavity.
- Investigative works could have taken place where bricks are removed to determine the reason for migration. However, if the water ingress is rectified and / or the client decided to proceed with the tanking system then it would not matter if there were mortar droppings or otherwise to this area.
- If it is found there is a bridge of the cavity then it potentially would involve rebuilding an area of the wall to ensure the cavity is satisfactorily cleared, where a tanking system could just be installed to ensure no further ingress.
How would you mitigate against exceeding client costs?
- Well developed contract documents
- Cost estimates and cost plans taking place
- Risk register developed
- Good communication with contractor and project team
How were you able to evidence that the contractor was not proceeding in accordance with the contract? What documents were used to demonstrate this?
- Through photographs and the site reports undertaken detailing progress / operatives on site / weather / quality concerns / etc.
- Comparing works with BS8000-12:1989 and the preambles.
- Email correspondence and warnings provided to the contractor.
Upon issuing the first seven day notice, how long would the contractor have to wait until they can terminate?
Seven days and if still not complying can terminate within 10 days of expiry of the seven day notice.