Cases Paper 1 Flashcards
(106 cards)
1
Q
case to show an actus reus must be a voluntary act
A
R v Mitchell
2
Q
case to show contractual duty
A
R v Pitwood
3
Q
Case to show duty of relationship
A
R v Gibbins and Proctor
4
Q
Case to show duty undertaken voluntarily
A
R v Stone and Dobinson
5
Q
Case to show duty due to an official position
A
R v Dytham
6
Q
Case to show duty because D set in motion a chain of events
A
R v Miller
7
Q
What case defines intent?
A
R v Mohan
8
Q
What case shows direct intent?
A
R v Inglis
9
Q
What case shows oblique intention?
A
R v Woolin
10
Q
What is the case to show recklesness?
A
R v Cunningham
11
Q
What is the case to show transferred malice?
A
R v Latimer
12
Q
What case shows the coincidence of AR and MR?
A
Fagan
13
Q
What case shows the but for test?
A
R v White
14
Q
What is the case to show legal causation?
A
R v Hughes
15
Q
Case to show acts of a third party
A
R v Hughes
16
Q
Case to show the thin skull rule
A
R v Haywood
17
Q
Case to show someone refusing medical treatment
A
R v Blaue
18
Q
Case to show the victim’s acts breaking the chain of causation (doing something so silly)
A
R v Roberts
19
Q
What case defines ABH?
A
R v Miller
20
Q
What case shows psychiatric injury from ABH
A
R v Ireland
21
Q
What case shows the MR of ABH?
A
R v Roberts
22
Q
What case shows that consent is not a defence?
A
R v Donovan
23
Q
What case defines wounding (GBH S.20)
A
JCC v Eisenhower
24
Q
What case defines GBH?
A
DPP v Smith
25
What case defines the MR of S.20?
R v Parmenter
26
What case shows specific intent for S.18 GBH?
R v Belfon
27
What case shows that resisting arrest can be intent? GBH
R v Morrison
28
What case shows that murder has to cause death?
R v White
29
What reference shows a fetus in the womb is a person in being
A-G Ref no.3 of 1994
30
What case shows that brain dead means you aren't a reasonable person in being?
R v Malcherek
31
What case shows Express malice aforethought?
R v Moloney
32
What case shows Implied malice aforethought?
R v Cunningham
33
What case shows that drunk intent is still intent?
R v Sheehan and Moore
34
What case shows voluntary intoxication?
DPP v Majewski
35
What case shows involuntary intoxication?
R v Kingston
36
What case shows intoxication by mistake?
R v O'Grady
37
What case set out the rules of gross negligence?
R v Adomako
38
What case shows a duty of care for gross negligence?
R v Evans
39
What case shows gross negligence if there is a serious and obvious risk of death?
R v Misra and Sirvasava
40
What case defines what 'gross' is?
R v Cooke
41
What case shows that MR is irrelevant for gross negligence
AG ref No.2 of 1999
42
What case defines 'unlawful' in unlawful manslaughter?
R v Lamb
43
What case shows that unlawful act manslaughter must be an act not an omission
R v Lowe
44
What case shows the unlawful act must be dangerous and set the test?
R v Church
45
What case defines the MR of unlawful act manslaughter?
DPP v Newbury and Jones
46
What case shows that robbery requires theft?
R v Zerei
47
What case defines force for robbery?
R v Dawson and James
48
What case shows that fear of force is enough when it comes to robbery?
B and R v DPP
49
What case says that theft should be viewed in its entirety? Instead of jest before or at the time of
R v Hale
50
What case defines assault?
Fagan v MPC
51
What case shows that even silence can be assault?
R v Ireland
52
What case shows that words can negate assault?
Tuberville v Savage
53
What case defines force for battery?
Collins v Wilcock
54
What case shows that even touching clothes can be battery?
R v Thomas
55
What case shows indirect force can be battery?
R v Martin
56
What case shows that force can be used if there if honest belief it was necessary
R v Gladstone and Williams
57
What case says that reasonable force is an objective test?
R v Press and Thompson
58
What case shows that self defence can't be used if the danger has passed?
R v Clegg
59
What case shows that people might not be able to weight to a nicety (not expected to work out the exact proportionate force) Self Defence
R v Palmer
60
What case shows that a householder can use disproportionate force?
Denby Collins
61
What case defines insanity?
M'Naughten
62
What case shows a defect of reason?
R v Clarke
63
What case shows a disease of mind?
Bratty v A-G
64
What case shows that hypoglycemia is not a defence for insanity?
R v Quick
65
What case shows that hyperglycemia is a defence for insanity?
R v Hennessy
66
What case shows that insanity is not a defence if the defendant knew the nature of their act?
R v Oye
67
What case defines automatist?
R v Smallshire
68
What case shows that automatism must be an external cause?
Hill v Baxter
69
What case shows that hypoglycemia is available for automatism?
R v Quick
70
What case shows there has to be a total loss of voluntary control for automatism?
AG's Ref No.2of 1992
71
What case shows that automatism can't be self induced?
R v Hardie
72
What case defines what an 'abnormality' is for diminished responsibility?
R v Byrne
73
What case shows a recognised medical condition for diminished responsibility?
R v Ahluwalia
74
What case is an example of depression for diminished responsibility?
R v Gittens
75
What case shows D must be substantially impaired for diminished responsibility?
R v Golds
76
What case shows that voluntary intoxication is not an abnormality?
R v Di Duca
77
What case shows you have to disregard alcohol in a diminished responsibility case?
R v Dietschmann
78
What case shows that Alcohol Dependent Syndrome can be used in diminished responsibility?
R v Woods
79
What case defines loss of control?
R v Jewell
80
What case shows there has to be a fear of serious violence to use loss of control as a defence?
R v Dawes
81
What cases shows that behaviour has to be out of extremely grave character? (loss of control)
R v Zebedee
82
What case shows that sexual infidelity is not a valid trigger for loss of control?
R v Clinton
83
What case shows that loss of control can't be revenge?
R v Baillie
84
What case shows that a person of similar age, sex, tolerance etc. would have done the same (loss of control)
R v Rejmanski
85
What case shows that a criminal attempt must be more than merely prepatory
R v Campbell
86
What case is an example of more than mere preparation?
R v Knight
87
Case to show that a criminal attempt can only be intent, not recklessness
R v Mohan
88
Case example of attempted murder?
R v Whybrow
89
Case to show that you can still be charged for a crime even if it is an impossible crime
R v Shivupuri
90
Case to define appropriation?
Corcoran v Anderton
91
Case to show that you can appropriate property even with consent?
Lawrence v Commissioner for Metropolitan Police
92
Case to show that confidential information cannot be stolen
Oxford v Moss
93
Case to show that abandoned property can't be stolen?
R v Small
94
Case to show you can appropriate your own property (possession of control)
Turner
95
Case to show that if an obligation to use property in a certain way is broken, that is theft
Davidge v Burnett
96
What is the case for dishonesty (theft)
Barton & Booth
97
Case to show that sometimes there is a belief you have a right to deprive
R v Bernhard
98
Case to show that a person is not dishonest if they believe, reasonably or not, that they had a legal right to the property.
R v Holden
99
Case to show that disposing of property can still be theft
R v Lavander
100
Case to show that borrowing can be theft if the goodness or virtue of the item is lost
R v Lloyd
101
Case to show conditional intent (stealing something then returning because they didn't want it)
R v Easom
102
What is the pharmacy example of strict liability?
Storkwain
103
What is the case to show absolute liability?
R v Larsoneur
104
Case to show no fault in strict liability
Callow v Tillstone
105
Case example where the judge will presume means rea is needed if the Act of Parliament doesn't make it clear
Sweet v Parsley
106
