Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Law paper 1 > Paper 1 ELS > Flashcards

Paper 1 ELS Flashcards

(73 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

what courts do criminal law use

A

Supreme court
Court of appeal
Queen’s Bench Divisional court
Crown court
Magistrates’ court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How must criminal cases be proved

A

beyond all reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does ‘Stare decisis’ mean?

A

‘let what has been deciding stand’ the essence of the precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does ‘ratio decidendi’ mean?

A

‘the reason for deciding’ binding part of the judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does ‘obiter dicta’ mean?

A

‘sayings by the way’ extra things leading to s final decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the 3 types of precedent?

A

binding, persuasive, avoiding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is binding precedent?

A

must be followed if it is made by a court higher than you
appeal courts generally bind themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is persuasive precedent?

A

principles could be considered but don’t have to be
anyone can follow anyone
can be from courts in other countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is avoiding precedent?

A

a higher court overrules a decision made by a lower court
court decides that an earlier case is wrong / not fitting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when did the supreme court precedent (practice statement) change?

A

1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the practice statement 1966?

A
  • supreme court changed their rules of precedent changing from ‘never’ to ‘when it appears right to do so’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

court of appeal precedent rules

A

1 - court can chose between 2 of their previous cases if they are similar
2 - must follow supreme court’s decision if any have been made
3 - where the decision was made per incuriam - by mistake or carelessly, it can be changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

judicial precedent advantages

A

1 - certainty
2 - consistency and fairness
3 - precision
4 - flexibility
5 - time saving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

judicial precedent disvantages

A

1 - rigidity
2 - complexity
3 - illogical distinctions
4 - slowness of growth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is a statute?

A

Acts of parliament passed into law
written document which will become legislation (law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is statutory interpretation?

A

when a judge defines words on page within an act of parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the literal rule (SI)

A

judges reading a statute as a plain, ordinary, literal meaning
traditional approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is the golden rule? (SI)

A

used when the literal rule creates absurd results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is the mischief rule? (SI)

A

judges filling in the gaps and looking at context to decide whether a law should be changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

rules to consider with mischief rule

A

1 - what was the common law before?
2 - what was the mischief that the law didn’t provide for?
3 - what was the remedy parliament enacted?
4 - judges should then interpret the act to ensure mischief is solved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

examples of internal aid

A
  • long/short title
  • preamble (little paragraph introduction to the statute) helps understand parliaments initial intentions
  • marginal notes - explaining different sections but don’t always give intentions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is internal aid?

A

things to help judges understand what parliament meant when they wrote statues
things from inside the statute written down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is external aid?

A

help that can be found outside of a statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

examples of external aid

A
  • previous acts of parliament on the same topic
  • historical setting
  • earlier case law
  • dictionaries of the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
things to consider when giving a caution
Victim’s view. Any attempt by the offender to offer compensation. Seriousness of offence. Have they ever been cautioned before.
26
some reasons people may not be granted bail
- they would fail to surrender - would commit another offence - must be kept in custody for their own or another's safety
27
rules applied to bail
- live at particular address - don't contact certain people - hand in passport - report to police station weekly
28
what is remand?
if a person is cared with a serious crime, instead of bail, they are put in prison until first hearing
29
what is CPS and why was it needed?
Crown Prosecution Service - takes over criminal prosecution on behalf of the police why? - officers may be too attached to case - too much variation between police forces - police officers are not well versed in law
30
2 criteria to decide if CPS will take a case
1 - if there is sufficient admissible evidence 2 - would prosecution be in public interests? e.g. crime happened too long ago
31
what are the 3 classification offences?
1 - summary offence 2 - triable-either-way 3 - indictable
32
explain features of summary offences
- least serious offences e.g. shoplifting under £200 - mostly driving offences - held in magistrates' court - punishments are max 6 months
33
explain features of triable-either-way offences
- held in magistrates' court or crown court - theft, assault causing ABH - punishments - imprisonment up to 12 month's or fine
34
explain features of indictable offences
-most serious e.gg. murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery - held in crown court - punishment can be any jail time depending on crime
35
what is burden of proof?
have to prove that defendant is guilty
36
where are jury's used?
crown court - criminal
37
who cant be a jury?
- people who have been in prison for more that 5 years - people on bail - anyone who's been in jail within the last 10 years - mental disorders - lack of capacity e.g. don't have good English - deaf people - need a translator and cant interpret tone of voice
38
how to be excused of jury duty?
- too ill - disability - a mother with a young baby - exams - pre booked holiday - business appointment
39
what is vetting?
checking jury are allowed to be on panel e.g. police and background checks
40
what are the two examples of challenging the juror?
1 - challenge for array - asking the jury as a whole 2 - challenge for cause - challenging individuals
41
jury secrecy exceptions
1 - there has been a complete repudiation of their oath (using different methods to reach their decision) 2 - when extraneous material has been introduced to the jury room e.g. calls or news info
42
jury trials PROS
1 - PUBLIC CONFIDENCE - very old fashioned and people support the use of a jury 'lamp that shows that freedom lives' 2 - IMPARTIALITY - no one has connection to the case and no one individual is responsible for the decision 3 - JURY EQUIDY - not bound to follow any previous precedent and don't need to give reasoning for decisions. based on fairness not laws 4 - OPEN JUSTICE - justice is carried out as members of the public are involved in a key role of the case 5 - SECRECY OF THE JURY ROOM - free from pressure as jurors are protected from outside influences. not going to be in danger for their individual decision
43
jury trials CONS
1 - PERVERSE DECISION - jury can ignore laws they consider unjust - can be seen as unjust 2 - SECRECY - no reasons for decision have to be given so no way of knowing the jury fully understood the case 3 - MEDIA INFLUENCES - high profile cases with lots of coverage could persuade the jury's decision 4 - FRAUD - fraud cases are sometimes hard to understand and are very ling so unjust decisions may be made to cut things short 5 - LACK OF UNDERSTANDING - one case was tried across the country and in total only 31% understood it fully 6 - RACIAL BIAS - may be prejudice 7 - JURY TAMPERING - jury can be bribed or threatened to persuade others on the jury 8 - HIGH AQUITTAL RATES - 60% of people who plead non-guilty are sentenced 9 - COMPULSORY NATURE - some people may be against the whole system and don't care about the case so reach a rushed decision 10 - STRAIN - lots of cases could be traumatising with graphic evidence
44
what must judges have regards to when sentencing?
1 - the punishment of offenders 2 - reduction of crime 3 - protection to public 4 - reform and rehabilitate 5 - making of reparation to person affected by crime
45
what is retribution?
punishment, criminal law taking revenge on offender, punishment must be proportionate to crime
46
what is a tarriff?
level of sentencing
47
what is deterrence?
punishment to put off future crime from the same person or others 55% of people reoffend withing 2 years of being released from prison
48
what is general detterence?
giving an individual a harsher punishment than usual to prevent others from offending
49
what is reformation?
bringing people back to society favoured for young people society would be better of physically and financially
50
what is reparation?
making up for what they have done e.g. community service, road works
51
what is denunciation?
court expressing strong disapproval for criminal activity public condemnation
52
examples of aggravating factors
- how serious, of its type, was the offence? - previous convictions for similar offences - if they were on bail when it happened - discriminatory aspects - hostility to disabled or sexual orientation
53
mitigating factors
- cooperate with police - mental illness - physical illness - clean background - evidence of genuine remorse - fines - financial situation
54
what are the different stages of a guilty plea?
at first opportunity - 1/3 deducted after first opportunity, before trial - 1/4 deducted trial has started - 1/10 deducted
55
What are the 3 types of custodial sentences?
1 - mandatory (murder sentence) 2 - discretionary (anything other than murder) 3 - fixed term sentence (set number of months, only behind bars for half) 4 - suspended prison sentence (punishment not enforces unless a further crime is committed)
56
give 4 examples of community orders
1 - unpaid work requirement 2 - prohibited activity requirement 3 - curfew requirement 4 - supervision requirement
57
what are the 2 types of discharge?
1 - absolute discharge 2 - conditional discharge
58
Where are criminal cases held?
Magistrates court or crown court
59
How must criminal cases be proved?
beyond all reasonable doubt
60
where are civil cases held?
high court county court
61
how must civil cases be proved?
on balance of probabilities
62
what is custom law?
a rule of behaviour which develops a community without being deliberately invented - historically important
63
what is common law?
unwritten laws based on legal precedent established by the courts e.g. murder - created by judges - still important today
64
what is statute law?
creating new major laws, made by parliament helpful for new laws like technology
65
what is rule of law?
a durable system of laws, institutions, norms, and community commitment
66
why is the rule of law important?
safeguards democracy and keeps democracy accountable nobody can exert power in an unchecked way
67
Dicey's view on the rule of law
1 - equality becomes before the law 2 - wealth gives better access to the justice system 3 - absence of arbitrary power is evidence of rule of law 4 - supremacy of law 5 - conflicts with parliament supremacy
68
Von Hayek views on rule of law
1 - agrees arbitrary power should be absent 2 - rule of law had become weaker 3 - state involved in regulating economy
69
Joseph Raz views on the rule of law?
1 - believed the rule of law controlled discretion rather than preventing it 2 - law must be capable of guiding individual behaviour
70
where do we see the rule of law today?
law making legal system substantive law (protects people)
71
what is judicial precedent?
following the decisions of previous cases
72
3 things for law to work successfully
1 - a settled court structure 2 - a ratio decendi 3 - accurate record of the decisions made by superior courts
73
what is ratio decendi?
reason for deciding

Law paper 1 (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions