caste and untouchability Flashcards
(36 cards)
varna system
• Brahmins-Priests • Kshatriyas-Warriers • Vaishyas-Traders • Sudras-Service castes • Untouchables/Dalit’s (Terms for untouchables) Depressed Class, Untouchables, Harijan (People of God), Dalit (the oppressed)
Jati and Varna difference
Thousands of tiny communities who were bound by kinship ties, marriage ties, marry within community. These communities criss crossed india and didn’t really fit into the varna system.
H.H.Risley and the satsudras
Satsudra, Brahmin one who takes the water, Brahmins who would not take water and asprishya Sudras (‘those whose touch is so impure as to pollute even the Ganges water’)
hh risley - asprishya sudras
untouchables - (‘those whose touch is so impure as to pollute even the Ganges water’)
untouchables
used in different ways by different actors
british - depressed class
gandhi - untouchable
now - dalit
British and caste system
. BRITISH CATEGORISING CASTE SYSTEM, THEY ARE ALSO CATEGOPRISING YTH HINDU SYSTEM. THE CASTE SYSTEM IS PART OF BEING A HINDU.
What does this classification do?
THIS LEADS THE UNTOUCHABLES TO ASK, ARE WE REALLY HINDU?
HISTORIOGRAPHY - the untouchable writer - Kanchan Illiah. What did he state?
CLOSEST TO MUSLIMS WHO ATE MEAT AND THE CHRISTIANS – NOT ALLOWED TO APPROACH THE BRAHMINS OR UPPER CASTE OF THE VILLAGE. NOW FUNDAMENTALISM TRYING TO EMBRACE THE UNTOUCHABLES TO THE HINDU CHEST – THEY ARE SAYING NOT HINDU
ANTHROPOMETRY
USED B/y BRISLEY- USED TO MEASURE SKULLS ETC TO CLASIFY AND CATEGORISE AND LABEL PEOPLE. USED TO SEE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BRAHMINS AND UNTOUCHABLES. (HUXLEY’S TIME I SUPPOSE?) THE OTHER WAYS THE BRITISH DID THIS WAS THROUGH PHOTOGRAPHY AND POLITICAL REPRESENTATION. THIS FIXING OF IDENTITY AND COMMUNITIES IS TYPICALLY BRITISH. GAVE POLITICAL REPRESENTATION THROUGH SEPARATE ELCTORATES AND GIVING A LEG UP TO THE DEPRESSED CLASSES AND GIVING MORE POWER TO MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS.
Castes Patronised by the British
Through Photography
Through anthropometry
Through Political representation
When was the term Depressed classes first used?
1870’s. There is a petition who are depressed classes in reading. 1933. how do we see them> what do we do with them? do we give them voting?
1906
1906 depressed classes mission society formed in Bombay and depressed class mission society in madras in 1909. Muslim league founded 1906. Indian national congress founded 1885. Conscientising of other groups. Politics is coming to the forefront.
Gandhi and untouchables
Politics is coming to the forefront.
Gandhi when arrives in India in 1915. Sees untouchability at the heart of the problems India is facing. He faced racism in south Africa and realises the position of the untouchables was not something to be proud of.
terms for untouchables
Terms for untouchables Depressed Class Untouchables Harijan (People of God) Dalit (the oppressed)
Why is Gandhi so upset about what is happening to the untouchables?
Work divided between upper caste and lower caste. Lower cast perform all menial duties, and the main duty which enshrined their works is manual savaging. Manual scavenging is cleaning shit with your bare hands. All toilets of upper caste are cleaned by lower caste particularly untouchables. Some [people die of the pollution it causes. Banned in India but still surviving in several districts still practice manual scavenging. Actively practices in great number of places in India.
Gandhi and cleaning your own toilets
Gandhi makes cleaning your own toilets as symbol of revolutionary message. This is to stop the untouchables being made to do it. He sees it as wrong. Gandhi makes everyone who is with him clean their own toilets. Many untouchables found Gandhi patronising. More apparent when he calls the Harijan (people of God). Why upset them? because patronising.
So who is going to lead the untouchables? Is it themselves or is it the congress made up of upper caste Brahmin shatrya men.
Out of this emerges B.R. Ambedkar
B.R. Ambedkar
Who is he?
• 1891-1956
• Untouchable Mahar caste
• Key to rise was education and British did allow this even though it was mediocre. Educated – British allowed them to have a basic education as they had a village school and untouchables could not be banned from it. Less than 1 per cent of his caste were literate yet he achieved a ba in Bombay and a PhD in Colombia a DsC London and passed bar at greys inn in London – a lawyer.
Father worked in army and helped with upward mobility
• Leading indian scholar and trained in law.
Starts the Organisation of the Depressed classes
• Delegate at Round Table conference 1931
• Debate on separate electorates - untouchables vote for untouchables - ambedkar
reservations - untouchable seats and everyone votes for them - gandhi
• Communal Awards and Gandhi’s Fast
separate electorates
British looking for untouchable leaders to give them some form of recognition. They invite Ambedkar to give evidence in the southborough committee when the govt India act of 1919 being debated. 1909 morley-minto reforms, 1917 Montague reforms, 1935 govt India act. Ambedkar talks about creating separate electorates. Where untouchables vote for untouchables seems to be the way to get ahead. Can’t do that through reservations where everybody votes.
separate electorates.
In the case of separate electorates, the voting population of a country or region is divided into different electorates, based on certain factors such as religion, caste, gender, and occupation. Here, members of each electorate votes only to elect representatives for their electorate. Separate electorates are usually demanded by minorities who feel it would otherwise be difficult for them to get fair representation in government. separate electorate for Muslims means that Muslims will choose their separate leader by separate elections for Muslims
Reservations
India’s constitution, adopted in 1950, inaugurated the world’s oldest and farthest-reaching affirmative action programme, guaranteeing scheduled castes and tribes - the most disadvantaged groups in Hinduism’s hierarchy - not only equality of opportunity but guaranteed outcomes, with reserved places in educational institutions, government jobs and even seats in parliament and the state assemblies.
These “reservations” or quotas were granted to groups on the basis of their (presumably immutable) caste identities. The logic of reservations in India was simple: they were justified as a means of making up for millennia of discrimination based on birth.
1909 morley minto act
The Indian Councils Act 1909 (9 Edw. 7 c. 4), commonly known as the Morley-Minto Reforms [or as the Minto-Morley Reforms], was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that brought about a limited increase in the involvement of Indians in the governance of British India.
Montagu–Chelmsford Reforms
The Montagu–Chelmsford Reforms or more briefly known as Mont-Ford Reforms were reforms introduced by the British Government in India to introduce self-governing institutions gradually to India. The reforms take their name from Edwin Samuel Montagu, the Secretary of State for India during the latter parts of World War I and Lord Chelmsford, Viceroy of India between 1916 and 1921. The reforms were outlined in the Montagu-Chelmsford Report prepared in 1918 and formed the basis of the Government of India Act 1919. Indian nationalists considered that the reforms did not go far enough while British conservatives were critical of them.
govt india act 1935
The most significant aspects of the Act were:
the grant of a large measure of autonomy to the provinces of British India (ending the system of dyarchy introduced by the Government of India Act 1919)
provision for the establishment of a “Federation of India”, to be made up of both British India and some or all of the “princely states”
the introduction of direct elections, thus increasing the franchise from seven million to thirty-five million people
a partial reorganisation of the provinces:
Sindh was separated from Bombay
Bihar and Orissa was split into separate provinces of Bihar and Orissa
Burma was completely separated from India
Aden was also detached from India, and established as a separate Crown colony
membership of the provincial assemblies was altered so as to include more elected Indian representatives, who were now able to form majorities and be appointed to form governments
the establishment of a Federal Court
However, the degree of autonomy introduced at the provincial level was subject to important limitations: the provincial Governors retained important reserve powers, and the British authorities also retained a right to suspend responsible government.
The parts of the Act intended to establish the Federation of India never came into operation, due to opposition from rulers of the princely states. The remaining parts of the Act came into force in 1937, when the first elections under the act were also held.
In this act The federal type of Government was selected but when the Act was given then the Indian National Congress opposed it because they wanted the unitary Government.